News 
Market Data 
Discover
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
microby
49m
a look into weekend befor DDR4 damages trial
i have the impression that patent '912 is seen as "the holy cow", mhhh. well, of course 912 describes the way to increase capacity and efficiency, several modules together. '912 describes how the memory controller has to work to run these multi module configurations used in HPC systems. with claim construction order focuses on a single, stand-alone module. Right? Yes, '912 describes much more.
But is that a problem? No!
The single stand-alone module must have the properties to be able to work according to the N- logic. That is the reason why it is not a problem how the claim constructions were ruled around the topic "rank"
'417 is with its predecessors ('215, '314 and older) a little bit older than '912 and was released in August 2021. a really big one! look in doc228,
it continues from doc228
"...’417 Patent add sections on “Load Isolation,” “Back-to-Back Adjacent Read Commands,” “Serial-Presence Detect Device,” “Tied Data Strobe Signal Pins,” and “Memory Density Multiplication,” in addition to the ’912 Patent’s subject matter on “Command Signal Translation......”
and that's why I think the '417 is very significant in recovering the lost profits through damages with microns's LRDIMM.
in the end '417 has run through the following ipr's, all predecessor papers, but look with your own eyes into the '417
several ipr to the '907, several ipr to the '150, several ipr to the '185, to the '536 and '364
well known for more than 10 years!!!
and the last ipr of the predecessor '314 IPR2022-00744/745 with fwd - all challanged claims patentable - aha.
No wonder Micron already submitted the FWD to the cafc as an appeal in December 2023
I think the mole in the courtroom will be able to report something pleasant, I salute YOU
go to the last page and read the language of the '912 in the claims!!!
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f7/17/a9/dd8dddd73e2d17/US11093417.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570224372.png
99 Apr 19, 2024 Main Document Redacted Document
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc-pursuant-to-court-order/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
hey i nailed the bottom just want cash incase lol
you read too many msg boards !!! even the pink clown could of told you 50 cents would never happen. get the dog ready to run. i smell one of these days coming into the spring/summer !!!!
now now, you had your chance!!! lol !!!
thx u
Still, you did well!
robcobb
7:04 AM
$NLST Almost all of the IPRs against Nlst patents are almost completed now except for a couple I can think of.We now know how we stand with the ptab on the patents winning some and losing more.(That scenario and negativity is almost behind us).It is now Judge Gilstraps turn at getting to the bottom of the validity of the remaining patents although claim constructions and trial against Samsung by Judge Gilstrap would lead us to believe most of the patents are valid!Now April 29 is big in that we know after yesterday’s filing with Judge Gilstrap doing some house cleaning with Dr,Lyndes testimony that he is full speed ahead on the upcoming trial even after the ptab ruling on claim 16! I am not a suit person,but I am going to enjoy wearing a suit in ten days from now and reporting what happens against Micron.Micron has drug their feet all the way to this trial,I am anxious to see what Micron does now since they can no longer stall! I am pretty sure Prime Larry will be there with me again!
4 new docket entries in the Micron 294 case dropped late.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
NLST Case 0294 Netlist v, Micron.
The Honorable Judge R. Gilstrap preparing to preside over the patent infringement jury trial set to begin April 29, for the unlicensed use of several Netlist patents.
Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Order on Sealed Motion
96 - Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Order on Sealed Motion
97 - Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Memorandum & Opinion AND ~Util - Terminate Motions
98 - Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.97.0.pdf
NLST they didn't discover anything, it's obvious... right Kathy?
https://www.techradar.com/pro/scientists-inch-closer-to-holy-grail-of-memory-breakthrough-producing-tech-that-combines-nand-and-ram-features-could-be-much-cheaper-to-produce-and-consume-far-less-power
SilviaJ Apr 16, 2024 2:26 AM https://stocktwits.com/SilviaJ/message/569690757
scheduling conference 2 days before our 4-25-24 cc pertaining to the 628 case with patentable claims !!!! according to chart !!!
TY for putting that up that quick!!!
New litigation chart courtesy of Stokd
NLST to Vidal, Jurgovan, Galligan, and the rest of the corrupt scum from PTAB - a big F You... just remember, karma is a bitch and that goes for Google, Scamscum, and Micrime... your day will come... NLSTLONG&STRONGER! and our sunscreen painted clown with the kim jong hair doo !!!
https://media0.giphy.com/media/P5OPJ9u1xTZegDEVz6/giphy.gif?cid=9191ed4cizysoltot5ogbfxbwj7bb3tijsfxppmm73wpl35g&ep=v1_gifs_gifId&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
BolliverShagnasty
1:35 PM
$NLST IMO everyone should shift focus to the 314, 608, and 523 patents which are alrteady validated and the 6 patent case (423) in Texas with the Jury award of 300 million. The validated patents ensnare Google, Samsung, and Micron and the 6 patent case was decided by a district court and Jury. Judge Gilstrap can disregard the PTAB. Anyone ever think Jason might be playing rope a dope with the older patents? He always has a strategy.
NLST take a look at the PTAB conclusion phrasing vs the Claim Construction from Gilstrap on the definition of rank and its meaning pertaining to the actual patents in question as they are intended to be used specifically.
PTAB says “a rank may include only one memory device” which in their mind makes the claim 16 of 912 invalid because although claim 16 refers to multiple devices working together controlled by a common subsystem, the semantic ordinary meaning of the word rank could also refer to only one chip (out of context and standing alone).
It’s like how the word “moose” is the same singular and plural. Netlists patents refer to the plurality for the specific patents to work as intended, but yes the most common iteration of the word out of context could mean singular.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570026104.png
thread..... https://stocktwits.com/mrbiggumsworth/message/570026104
4-18-24 litigation chart if you feel like replacing the stickied one........... Stokd
12:19 PM
$NLST Looking ahead to the future!!!
***Current litigation status***
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570039439.png
ok i'm back and had dinner, held up real well considering what the 3 stooges had to say under vidals direction. they should bury her under samscums ice skating rink........
got filled at 1.07 earlier and its not looking to shabby!
my opinion on todays action so far and then i'm taking a nap.... ironically and about time it shows what the market actually thinks about ptab lol........if they held any real clout this would of opened under a buck and still been there now. in 11 days we get back to what we consider normal around here !!!
this may come all the way back
Indeed. Netlist baby!
just what we need, that should help the share price....
8-A12G/A Amended Securities Registration (section 12(g)) Apr 18, 2024
https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/3210/us-sec-filing.html?format=html&secFilingId=09893079-3f99-4d73-a282-d6ac49b0dd70&shortDesc=Amended%20Securities%20Registration%20%28section%2012%28g%29%29
$NLST got me 1500 cheapies!
Nasty morning or giant head fake and buyer op?
microby
12m
You should know what the content of the Micron complaint is.
Yes, the entire '912 patent with 91 individual patent claims.
But additionally the complete '417 patent, where the language of the '912 is interwoven.
The predecessor of '417 is '314.
fwd '314 - all challenged claims found patentable 😉
Trial starts in a few days
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570000669.png
Looks like the open will be around $1.15.
Stokd
3:29 AM
$NLST If the fear/dip is not bought up by tomorrow's close, it is only IMO because folks are concerned that Gilstrap may stay the 912 case pending appeal. But remember that the 417 patent is also part of the case, and that IPR decision is not due till Aug.
Gilstrap was aware of the possible circumstances when he denied Micron's stay, so I highly doubt he would stay the case because of the 912 PTAB decision. Of course anything is possible, he did reverse his denied stay in 203 case to wait for the 060 & 160 IPR decisions, but especially after that you would think he would be more aware of his intent going forward.
I get it, we've seen enough to warrant caution, but I'll be buying tomorrow while some contemplate and wait for positive signals. I'm in for the long game, and we're going to have many CAFC appeals as big catalysts in our future. After cases come trials, then post trial, then appeals—of judgments/verdicts/trials/IPRs/patents—we're on a long wild ride full of adventure.
NETLIST SCHEDULES FIRST QUARTER 2024 FINANCIAL RESULTS AND CONFERENCE CALL
IRVINE, CA / ACCESSWIRE / April 18, 2024 / Netlist, Inc. (OTCQB:NLST) announced today that it will report its financial results for the first quarter ended March 30, 2024, before 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 25, 2024.
Netlist will host a conference call at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 25, 2024. Netlist encourages participants to pre-register for the conference call. Callers who pre-register will be given a unique PIN to gain immediate access to the call and bypass the live operator. To pre-register, click here.
For those who would like to join the call but have not pre-registered, they can do so by dialing +1 (412) 317-5443 and requesting the "Netlist Conference Call."
A live webcast and archived replay of the call can be accessed in the Investor's section of Netlist's website at www.netlist.com.
About Netlist
Netlist is a leading innovator in memory and storage solutions, pushing the boundaries of technology to deliver unparalleled performance and reliability. With a rich portfolio of patented technologies, Netlist has consistently driven innovation in the field of cutting-edge enterprise memory and storage, empowering businesses and industries to thrive in the digital age. To learn more about Netlist, please visit www.netlist.com.
For more information, please contact:
Mike Smargiassi
The Plunkett Group
NLST@theplunkettgroup.com
(212) 739-6729
SOURCE: Netlist, Inc.
View the original press release on accesswire.com
https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/2100/press-releases.html
Stokd
9m
$NLST The timing and irony of it all... we have entered the twilight zone!
The firm Kathy Vidal left to become Director of USPTO/PTAB—Winston Strawn—is the same firm who represents Micron on all our current infringement cases, as well as at that time Vidal was actually Micron's counsel on our WD-TX case.
Micron's acting lead from Winston Strawn on our current cases is Reuckheim. He along with the firm are defendants in a suit against them alleging copyright infringement of legal briefs by another firm. If you recall, I have followed and reported on that case in the past.
Today, Reuckheim & Winston Strawn settled their copyright case. Of course they did not want to get to discovery or trial where the theft and infringement of the firm and acting lead would be exposed, in the face of representing other infringers in numerous litigation with Netlist.
Also today, PTAB with Vidal's support—after ruling NO RPI—invalidates claim16 which is in our Micron case.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/winston-strawn-settles-copyright-suit-claiming-it-copied-brief
sounds like hes saying the same thing i just did except with a lot more detail.............
Stokd
9:56 PM
$NLST Appreciate the great contributions by many valuable voices on this great board... we've come a long way.
On the topic, something to keep in mind about the process involved for a patent claim to be cancelled—we're far from it.
From article explaining the following:
"A typical IPR where the petitioner prevails includes the following three-step sequence:
1)Unpatentable Decision: PTAB issues a final written decision concluding that the challenged claim has been proven unpatentable with a preponderance of the evidence.
2)Affirmed on Appeal: On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirms that judgment.
3)Certificate of Cancellation: Once the appeal is complete, the USPTO Director then issues a certificate canceling the claim."
Points on:
-"at what point are the claims no longer enforceable?
-"what about infringement that occurred (and lawsuits pending) prior to the cancellation?"
-"arguing that the use of IPRs to prevent infringement lawsuits violate due process."
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2023/02/cancelling-patent-claim.html
i look at that with a common sense point of view. not that it means anything anymore in this corrupt world. but if a patent was initially granted to a company through their system of bullshit it would have to be upheld until it was legally deemed unpatentable right ?
VERY INTERESTING IF TRUE!
BolliverShagnasty
45m
$NLST I almost forgot one other thing, the court in Delaware is on record in a few cases setting aside rulings at the P tab. It's not just Texas. Remember Samsung lost the breach of contract case and went running to Delaware thinking they had chosen their ideal venue but they only ended up dragging Google with them into 34 claims of patent infringement that have been validated compared to one claim in California.
|
Followers
|
307
|
Posters
|
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
1
|
Posts (Total)
|
25980
|
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
| Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs | |||
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote: 
https://netlist.com/
brings over two decades of high-tech management experience to Netlist. He most recently served as President of Infinilink, a DSL equipment manufacturer, and as executive vice president of Viking Components, Inc. Prior to that, he spent 15 years with LG where he held various senior management positions in the U.S and Korea. Mr. Hong holds an MS in technology management from Pepperdine University and a BS in economics from Virginia Commonwealth University.
AI
