News 
Market Data 
Discover
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
thx u
Still, you did well!
robcobb
7:04 AM
$NLST Almost all of the IPRs against Nlst patents are almost completed now except for a couple I can think of.We now know how we stand with the ptab on the patents winning some and losing more.(That scenario and negativity is almost behind us).It is now Judge Gilstraps turn at getting to the bottom of the validity of the remaining patents although claim constructions and trial against Samsung by Judge Gilstrap would lead us to believe most of the patents are valid!Now April 29 is big in that we know after yesterday’s filing with Judge Gilstrap doing some house cleaning with Dr,Lyndes testimony that he is full speed ahead on the upcoming trial even after the ptab ruling on claim 16! I am not a suit person,but I am going to enjoy wearing a suit in ten days from now and reporting what happens against Micron.Micron has drug their feet all the way to this trial,I am anxious to see what Micron does now since they can no longer stall! I am pretty sure Prime Larry will be there with me again!
4 new docket entries in the Micron 294 case dropped late.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
NLST Case 0294 Netlist v, Micron.
The Honorable Judge R. Gilstrap preparing to preside over the patent infringement jury trial set to begin April 29, for the unlicensed use of several Netlist patents.
Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Order on Sealed Motion
96 - Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Order on Sealed Motion
97 - Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Memorandum & Opinion AND ~Util - Terminate Motions
98 - Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.97.0.pdf
NLST they didn't discover anything, it's obvious... right Kathy?
https://www.techradar.com/pro/scientists-inch-closer-to-holy-grail-of-memory-breakthrough-producing-tech-that-combines-nand-and-ram-features-could-be-much-cheaper-to-produce-and-consume-far-less-power
SilviaJ Apr 16, 2024 2:26 AM https://stocktwits.com/SilviaJ/message/569690757
scheduling conference 2 days before our 4-25-24 cc pertaining to the 628 case with patentable claims !!!! according to chart !!!
TY for putting that up that quick!!!
New litigation chart courtesy of Stokd
NLST to Vidal, Jurgovan, Galligan, and the rest of the corrupt scum from PTAB - a big F You... just remember, karma is a bitch and that goes for Google, Scamscum, and Micrime... your day will come... NLSTLONG&STRONGER! and our sunscreen painted clown with the kim jong hair doo !!!
https://media0.giphy.com/media/P5OPJ9u1xTZegDEVz6/giphy.gif?cid=9191ed4cizysoltot5ogbfxbwj7bb3tijsfxppmm73wpl35g&ep=v1_gifs_gifId&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
BolliverShagnasty
1:35 PM
$NLST IMO everyone should shift focus to the 314, 608, and 523 patents which are alrteady validated and the 6 patent case (423) in Texas with the Jury award of 300 million. The validated patents ensnare Google, Samsung, and Micron and the 6 patent case was decided by a district court and Jury. Judge Gilstrap can disregard the PTAB. Anyone ever think Jason might be playing rope a dope with the older patents? He always has a strategy.
NLST take a look at the PTAB conclusion phrasing vs the Claim Construction from Gilstrap on the definition of rank and its meaning pertaining to the actual patents in question as they are intended to be used specifically.
PTAB says “a rank may include only one memory device” which in their mind makes the claim 16 of 912 invalid because although claim 16 refers to multiple devices working together controlled by a common subsystem, the semantic ordinary meaning of the word rank could also refer to only one chip (out of context and standing alone).
It’s like how the word “moose” is the same singular and plural. Netlists patents refer to the plurality for the specific patents to work as intended, but yes the most common iteration of the word out of context could mean singular.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570026104.png
thread..... https://stocktwits.com/mrbiggumsworth/message/570026104
4-18-24 litigation chart if you feel like replacing the stickied one........... Stokd
12:19 PM
$NLST Looking ahead to the future!!!
***Current litigation status***
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570039439.png
ok i'm back and had dinner, held up real well considering what the 3 stooges had to say under vidals direction. they should bury her under samscums ice skating rink........
got filled at 1.07 earlier and its not looking to shabby!
my opinion on todays action so far and then i'm taking a nap.... ironically and about time it shows what the market actually thinks about ptab lol........if they held any real clout this would of opened under a buck and still been there now. in 11 days we get back to what we consider normal around here !!!
this may come all the way back
Indeed. Netlist baby!
just what we need, that should help the share price....
8-A12G/A Amended Securities Registration (section 12(g)) Apr 18, 2024
https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/3210/us-sec-filing.html?format=html&secFilingId=09893079-3f99-4d73-a282-d6ac49b0dd70&shortDesc=Amended%20Securities%20Registration%20%28section%2012%28g%29%29
$NLST got me 1500 cheapies!
Nasty morning or giant head fake and buyer op?
microby
12m
You should know what the content of the Micron complaint is.
Yes, the entire '912 patent with 91 individual patent claims.
But additionally the complete '417 patent, where the language of the '912 is interwoven.
The predecessor of '417 is '314.
fwd '314 - all challenged claims found patentable 😉
Trial starts in a few days
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570000669.png
Looks like the open will be around $1.15.
Stokd
3:29 AM
$NLST If the fear/dip is not bought up by tomorrow's close, it is only IMO because folks are concerned that Gilstrap may stay the 912 case pending appeal. But remember that the 417 patent is also part of the case, and that IPR decision is not due till Aug.
Gilstrap was aware of the possible circumstances when he denied Micron's stay, so I highly doubt he would stay the case because of the 912 PTAB decision. Of course anything is possible, he did reverse his denied stay in 203 case to wait for the 060 & 160 IPR decisions, but especially after that you would think he would be more aware of his intent going forward.
I get it, we've seen enough to warrant caution, but I'll be buying tomorrow while some contemplate and wait for positive signals. I'm in for the long game, and we're going to have many CAFC appeals as big catalysts in our future. After cases come trials, then post trial, then appeals—of judgments/verdicts/trials/IPRs/patents—we're on a long wild ride full of adventure.
NETLIST SCHEDULES FIRST QUARTER 2024 FINANCIAL RESULTS AND CONFERENCE CALL
IRVINE, CA / ACCESSWIRE / April 18, 2024 / Netlist, Inc. (OTCQB:NLST) announced today that it will report its financial results for the first quarter ended March 30, 2024, before 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, April 25, 2024.
Netlist will host a conference call at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 25, 2024. Netlist encourages participants to pre-register for the conference call. Callers who pre-register will be given a unique PIN to gain immediate access to the call and bypass the live operator. To pre-register, click here.
For those who would like to join the call but have not pre-registered, they can do so by dialing +1 (412) 317-5443 and requesting the "Netlist Conference Call."
A live webcast and archived replay of the call can be accessed in the Investor's section of Netlist's website at www.netlist.com.
About Netlist
Netlist is a leading innovator in memory and storage solutions, pushing the boundaries of technology to deliver unparalleled performance and reliability. With a rich portfolio of patented technologies, Netlist has consistently driven innovation in the field of cutting-edge enterprise memory and storage, empowering businesses and industries to thrive in the digital age. To learn more about Netlist, please visit www.netlist.com.
For more information, please contact:
Mike Smargiassi
The Plunkett Group
NLST@theplunkettgroup.com
(212) 739-6729
SOURCE: Netlist, Inc.
View the original press release on accesswire.com
https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/2100/press-releases.html
Stokd
9m
$NLST The timing and irony of it all... we have entered the twilight zone!
The firm Kathy Vidal left to become Director of USPTO/PTAB—Winston Strawn—is the same firm who represents Micron on all our current infringement cases, as well as at that time Vidal was actually Micron's counsel on our WD-TX case.
Micron's acting lead from Winston Strawn on our current cases is Reuckheim. He along with the firm are defendants in a suit against them alleging copyright infringement of legal briefs by another firm. If you recall, I have followed and reported on that case in the past.
Today, Reuckheim & Winston Strawn settled their copyright case. Of course they did not want to get to discovery or trial where the theft and infringement of the firm and acting lead would be exposed, in the face of representing other infringers in numerous litigation with Netlist.
Also today, PTAB with Vidal's support—after ruling NO RPI—invalidates claim16 which is in our Micron case.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/winston-strawn-settles-copyright-suit-claiming-it-copied-brief
sounds like hes saying the same thing i just did except with a lot more detail.............
Stokd
9:56 PM
$NLST Appreciate the great contributions by many valuable voices on this great board... we've come a long way.
On the topic, something to keep in mind about the process involved for a patent claim to be cancelled—we're far from it.
From article explaining the following:
"A typical IPR where the petitioner prevails includes the following three-step sequence:
1)Unpatentable Decision: PTAB issues a final written decision concluding that the challenged claim has been proven unpatentable with a preponderance of the evidence.
2)Affirmed on Appeal: On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirms that judgment.
3)Certificate of Cancellation: Once the appeal is complete, the USPTO Director then issues a certificate canceling the claim."
Points on:
-"at what point are the claims no longer enforceable?
-"what about infringement that occurred (and lawsuits pending) prior to the cancellation?"
-"arguing that the use of IPRs to prevent infringement lawsuits violate due process."
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2023/02/cancelling-patent-claim.html
i look at that with a common sense point of view. not that it means anything anymore in this corrupt world. but if a patent was initially granted to a company through their system of bullshit it would have to be upheld until it was legally deemed unpatentable right ?
VERY INTERESTING IF TRUE!
BolliverShagnasty
45m
$NLST I almost forgot one other thing, the court in Delaware is on record in a few cases setting aside rulings at the P tab. It's not just Texas. Remember Samsung lost the breach of contract case and went running to Delaware thinking they had chosen their ideal venue but they only ended up dragging Google with them into 34 claims of patent infringement that have been validated compared to one claim in California.
BolliverShagnasty
49m
$NLST the next important thing to watch for with the 912 patent in my opinion is to see how Google responds. I'm sure there will be a filing in the Google I'm sure there will be a filing in the Google case in California and they will give notice to the court. It's going to be real interesting how that comes to pass because remember they're not supposed to be a real party in interest RPI with Samsung according to the arguments made by Samsung to the P tab. LOL it's going to be real funny how they try to walk that tightrope!
In the meantime, pay attention to what Rob and stoked were telling you today. Also remember that nothing that has been happening in Texas so far had much at all to do with the 912 patent. As Rob stated earlier let's see what judge Gilstrap does! The P tab is Judge Gilstraps piss boy. He's going to fill the chamber pot and make them empty it!
Stokd
8:42 PM
$NLST At least our lead attorney on all our cases (Jason Sheasby) won a huge verdict on a retrial against Samsung today in Gilstrap's court.
"A Texas federal jury on Wednesday said Samsung owes G+ Communications LLC $142 million for infringing two 5G wireless network patents, a huge win on retrial for G+, which was originally awarded less than half of that."
Be careful what you wish for Samsung—who wanted a retrial on the initial 67 million verdict—which now has increased to 142 million. 😂
Next up is our man Sheasby in Gilstrap's court against Micron on Apr 29th... followed by a trial—date to be set—on same patents in the same court against Samsung.
https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1826231/texas-jury-hits-samsung-with-142m-loss-in-ip-retrial#
Durango24k
8:39 PM
$NLST The second one 
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569963821.png
Durango24k
8:38 PM
$NLST Two more quick posts, then Im done for the evening. These are meant to be nothing more than thought provoking for the deep divers here, so don't bust my balls! Blame ChatGPT Just going through my desktop and found a few things that made me go hmmm.... A 2nd post to follow.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569963777.png
Durango24k
8:27 PM
$NLST If I remember correctly the image on the left if from Microns own website and the image on the left is from a previous PTAB ruling. It appears they both new what 'RANK' was back then. It's funny how things change, isn't it?
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569963007.png
Durango24k
8:12 PM
$NLST Let's not forget what Netlist' lawyer Jason Sheasby said previously about this PTAB rulling (IPR2022-00615) that came out today.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569961924.png
Stokd
7:29 PM
$NLST This is far from over and the CAFC will reconcile.
Something to add is that in every one of our infringement cases against Micron & Samsung, they argue in defense through their Answer to the Complaint—1st brief of the case—that Netlist failed to comply with its RAND obligation... meaning to license the patents at RAND rates. Though that obligation is based on the patents being standard essential—which later Netlist prevailed through Summary Judgment that they're not standard essential, therefore removing obligation to license at Fair Reasonable And Non Discriminatory terms—which don't apply to infringers, especially the willful.
But the point is that Samsung and Micron pushed and argued for Netlist to license what are now "invalid" patents, at the time Netlist filed the lawsuits. Then when Netlist disagreed that they deserve or are obliged to RAND, the same infringers that wanted to pay for the patents decided all of a sudden to challenge that they are obvious and worthless.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569958377.png
|
Followers
|
307
|
Posters
|
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
14
|
Posts (Total)
|
25993
|
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
| Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs | |||
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote: 
https://netlist.com/
brings over two decades of high-tech management experience to Netlist. He most recently served as President of Infinilink, a DSL equipment manufacturer, and as executive vice president of Viking Components, Inc. Prior to that, he spent 15 years with LG where he held various senior management positions in the U.S and Korea. Mr. Hong holds an MS in technology management from Pepperdine University and a BS in economics from Virginia Commonwealth University.
AI
