Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I hate lobbyists!
I'm not suggesting it. I've said they always have performed with integrity as far as I can tell. My big concern is they are our last line of defense. We have the big infringers with great influence affecting things. The PTAB has invalidated numerous of our patents and still look at other ones that have passed the test many times. We have few friends, or support. Our Lawyers who are great, and these judges are all we have left. And the truth. I just think there's outside influences, even on our judges. We need them to stand strong despite all that's going against us. And the ongoing delays continue to kill us. I'd love to finalize a Royalty rate on the Samsung case we won. I understand the reason to wait, but it's been a long time coming. As many other long term posters/holders, my patience is being tried and I start to worry about everything. I assume I'm not alone, but maybe most of you are still very confident. I'm past that phase.
If you're insinuating that either Gilstrap and Scarsi "has a price"??
There's not been ONE IOTA of evidence that suggests that and I think the suggestion of it is bullshit.
I think you're totally wrong and I take exception to that statement.
$6.4 billion investment in Texas by Samsung. Meanwhile it feels like all we have going for us is a couple Texas judges, and the truth (which unfortunately, and bizarrely, might not matter). That kind of money invested by Samsung in Texas is not coincidental. They'll be looking for some quid pro quo. I've trusted the integrity of Gilstrap and Scarsi. But unfortunately everyone has a price and someone they answer to.
I don't know.
That is a lots of money being thrown around for Samsung in Texas.
All that money sloshing through people pockets can persuade them to look the other way.
What hell now they are going to be in our back yard! https://www.npr.org/2024/04/15/1244716743/biden-samsung-texas-semiconductor-chips
And all this does not mean that judges who are compromised step aside….even if there is a law on the books they don’t obey the laws… and who is going to make them obey the law?
There is definitely a conflict of interest the facts are there for all to see . The obvious problem is the people who allowed this process are very powerful and corruption is in their bag of tools . I never realized how corrupt the United States Patent review process is . Being involved with NLST has opened many people’s eyes to how doing something illegal is OK if you have unlimited access to large amounts of money . NLST getting in bed with SK Hynix was the only way for NLST not to go bankrupt. I thought that would end all this and NLST would be in the clear . I never realized that PTAB was so corrupt that any and all of NLST patents could be overturned because the system is so corrupt.
Stokd $NLST JOINT NOTICE REGARDING THE CURRENT STAY filed in the Micron 203 case which is under a limited stay and ready for trial.
Netlist position — "... Thus, the stay needs to be lifted and Netlist needs to bring its claims before a jury. Lifting the stay would not prejudice Micron, as the parties have already fully prepared for trial. Moreover, Micron’s latest retaliatory filing in Idaho on two of the patents-in-suit is proof that Micron is prepared to incur the significant expense of litigating Netlist’s infringement claims. The more efficient path is to reactivate this case which is ready for trial."
Micron position — "The stay should remain in place pending appeals ..."
Link to full doc— https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.215248/gov.uscourts.txed.215248.500.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569451530.png
Because KATHY VIDAL IS COMPROMISED and should recuse herself as outlined by senate committee
They are just being difficult. that is the problem with our legal system. guilt has been proven so why cant sentence be handed down ? the only thing they can do is attempt to delay twist and convolute the case, and as long as the courts give in to their bs it will continue. other than that as long as the court date that is set is adhered to i'll take joy in that.......
Several things come to mind about this.
There are WEEKS before Saski's vacation is planned to start. If her testimony is so important to Samsung? Why don't they just get some lawyers from each camp, the judge, and a video recording artist in a room and record whatever Samsung wishes to ask her? Wouldn't take more than an hour or two I would imagine.
Then it can be replayed for the jury if the court and all parties agree it needs to be seen.
But I don't think it is a matter or real importance to Samsung. They are just being difficult.
Stokd $NLST Just want to make sure the accurate interpretation is conveyed regarding today's order in the BOC case.
What Scarsi denied was Netlist's — "Plaintiff applies ex parte for an order shortening time on its reply deadline and committing the Court to resolve the motion without a hearing." — not Netlist's actual Motion To Quash Trial Subpoena for Gail... which is yet to be decided.
"The Court will consider Ms. Sasaki's travel situation in determining how and when to adjudicate the motion to quash. But the application is denied."
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569393791.png
Don't get me wrong I'm still long, but it really sucks being a Netlist shareholder right now!
Stokd $NLST Netlist just initiated their CAFC appeal of the PTAB's IPR decision on the 339 patent.
PATENT OWNER NETLIST NOTICE OF APPEAL
—"Patent Owner Netlist appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Final Written Decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, the Order denying rehearing on the Final Written Decision, and from all underlying findings, determinations, rulings, opinions, orders, and decisions regarding the inter partes review"
—"...including whether the Final Written Decision and the Decision on Rehearing Request are arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, not in accordance with law, or in excess of the Board’s jurisdiction, and any procedural irregularities associated with the review proceeding; as well as all other issues decided adversely to Netlist in any orders, decisions, rulings, and opinions."
https://ptacts.uspto.gov/ptacts/public-informations/petitions/1549229/download-documents?artifactId=IsWB4MdRbyJgmAv1xiDyPRNCzUWbPaPZBNr8Z6_U5ekuVncX35lN-j4
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569300748.png
Stokd
5:47 PM
$NLST I like this move by our legal team yesterday in IPRs of the 215 & 417 patents which are part of the 912 Samsung & Micron cases.
Same 2 of 3 judges on the PTAB panels on most of our IPRs (Jurgovan & Galligan) seem to—from what we witnessed during Orals—have it out for Sheasby & Anita, beyond Netlist as their target in general... unless suddenly both with winning records lost their craft simultaneously—something hard to believe, especially knowing what we know about the patents and efficient/willful infringement.
As backup counsel, Netlist brought on a Texas IP firm and their partner (Michael Heim of Heim,Payne&Chorush) who "has a degree in electrical engineering, and early in his career, SERVED THREE YEARS AS A PATENT EXAMINER AT THE U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE where he specialized in examining patent applications involving electrical communications and computer software and hardware."
Being proactive👍🏼... hopefully he provides insight and guidance, with a bit of influence.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569279581.png
to me the only good news is so far we got a court date on 4-29-24. lets hope it doesnt get delayed.
that whole room has vested interests and 7 plus figure bank accounts, go figure......
Its been soooo long since we've had any good news..
Kennedy is the same Senator that did not want the CAT system implemented for more transparency in the market basically supporting Citadel and Virtu.
Guy speaks out of both sides of his mouth. Whatever he has a vested interest in. JMO
robcobb
6:01 AM
$NLST With Samsungs renewed motion (597)to stay the 463 case , I think we are about to find out which side of the fence Judge Gilstrap is on when it comes to the PTAB.With words like (well reasoned ,thorough opinions of the PTAB)and (while the Federal Circuit addresses the challenges to the PTABs fine work) made by Samsung in the motion.I wonder what Judge Gilstrap thinks of the wording in this motion? What decision will he make regarding this motion? I know what I think it will be!
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569169084.png
According to Stokd's chart, the ruling on the 912 patent (Caim 16) is due by the 19th of this month. That's for Samsung court case #00293.
when is the ruling on the 912?
anyone invested in NLST should boycott Samsung products..
Samsung STILL trying to get Gilstrap to stay the #0463 case!
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.211544/gov.uscourts.txed.211544.597.0.pdf
SAMSUNG’S RENEWED MOTION TO STAY
In well-reasoned, thorough opinions, the PTAB has now found unpatentable all of the
claims that the jury found infringed in this case. Although Netlist presumably will appeal these
adverse decisions (it has filed a notice of appeal for one of the patents), it would be highly
inefficient for the Court and the parties to continue to litigate the post-trial motions in this case
while the Federal Circuit addresses Netlist’s challenges to the PTAB’s fine work. Accordingly,
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) renew their past motions to stay the case pending
final resolution of the IPRs involving the asserted patents.
??? I thought you live in NY Robio is Florida
or are you who had enough of the let policies and moved?
yes it has been review and approved twice as you say, who knows .
I just emailed my senator Marco Rubio
What really doesn't make sense to me is the PTAB further reviewing the 912 Patent.
It's my understanding that the 912 patent (claim 16) has already been reviewed and approved TWICE by the PTAB and further, was additionally blessed by the CAFC as being valid.
Yet it looks like the PTAB is FURTHER reviewing the same patent/claim?
I do NOT understand how they can once again decide to review it, never MIND legitimately come to a different judgement now, then they did the first TWO times.
Me neither. It’s bullshit!
sure, but our federal judges dont give a rats ass about vidal or anything the inferior judges at ptab rule. the only negative is delay. once put to an end we get paid. is what it is...... just be glad she or them dont have the final say.
I think the evidence of what is actually happening is clear.
They are SAYING they are looking at the evidence. They are holding hearings and talking about it. But they are NOT actually taking the evidence gathered into consideration, and using it to take any actions.
Ms. Vidal was appointed as head of the PTAB despite the reservations of 8 senators who declined to vote yes.
Mr. Kennedy said two YEARS ago (in that video) that big tech was running rampant over the little guy for the FIVE YEARS he's been on that committee, and NOTHING had been done about it to date. That's 7 years of "same old, same old" (since that video was taken), and still - nothing has been done about it.
Plainly, the senate is making it LOOK like they are on top of things, but they are still doing nothing about it.
microby
16m
let’s go!!!
🍀
unfortunately a prediction makes no sense, I myself have been wrong too often
so I'd better keep my mouth shut!🤐
In the oral defense, Netlist's team picked up on some important points, usc 311, the thing about using real publications/patents 🫣
And another thing, read it, it should be possible to recognize/describe the chances of success.
Also the explanations from 2016 and subsequent examinations that claim 16 and 17 could not have been derived/combined from amidi or jedec after all.
I would hereby like to point out another piece of absurd contestation.
I think ptab bought samsmuc's delaying tactics. But I couldn't believe it if they kill the multiple decisions of previous years and cafc to create an even bigger delay.
Sorry to be such an unabashed optimist.
🍀🙏
What would Senior Bahkta have to go through!!!
R.I.P.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569086351.png
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569086910.png
the date only shows how slow our bs system moves. the point is our federal judges are curently moving in the direction kenedy is implying. ''one of these days''
yes it is, but it shows they are aware coupled with how our texas judges feel about ptab being irrellevent in how they try there cases. not too mention how cafc will side with federal judges over bs ptab rulings that dont practice the higher standards of law. theres a big difference in looking at the evidence vs. not even taking it into consideration.
I didn't even look at the date, you are right.
Isn't that video from over two years ago?
If true, then it looks as though they have not done anything since then.
what they need to do is show the money trail to the votes who favored. its that simple. you just dont vote the wrong way unless your getting something out of it.
wow awesome and it sounds like they maybe going to do something.
robcobb
8:16 AM
$NLST I still think Judge Gilstrap will right the wrongs of the PTAB and Kathi Vidal seeing that Kathi was a senior litigator and partner at Winston and Strawn ,same law office that represents Micron against Nlst! I think she should have been recused in the Micron cases!(IMO)We know Judge Gilstrap has to be aware of what is going on at the PTAB and their unfair practices.Judge Gilstrap said at one point in a hearing I was at ( that he did not have his head in the sand when it came to the PTAB). I think that works both ways good and bad.Claim Constructions were done on the patents by Judge Gilstrap and Judge Payne where they found mostly in favor of Nlst on the http://claims.now/ the PTAB says most if not all the patents are unpatentable. If I were the East Texas judges I would be insulted!No one can predict the future but I think Judge Gilstrap is going to right the ship before all is said and done!(IMO) We need Gilstrap justice against the Tech Giants! Just my two cents.
WOW....... the vast majority of that room is corrupt as well. if i heard it correctly at the end the vote was 17-8 in her favor. very disturbing i might add.......
vidal, they know.............. 78,467 views Jan 13, 2022
At today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) criticized Katherine Vidal, nominee to be Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
when stuff like that happens in a play like where we're currently involved you know some thing is being orchestrated.
thaxs want lower but time is running out I fear
can you believe a trade for 75000 @ 1.20 shares hits and the price doesn't react? maybe its the mm's that are short
just getting on and i see you got your 120, congrats, keep the dog ready !!!
added 500 @1.20 79555 share buy at $1.20 think matybe theres alittle short covering????
ya know the funny thing is the mm's have to be in on it some how as it didn't effect the share price at all.
So close to going under 1.2 if it does I add 1k
Followers
|
304
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
25113
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators gdog 100lbStriper Daylas Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs |
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote:
https://netlist.com/
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |