Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
According to Stokd's chart, the ruling on the 912 patent (Caim 16) is due by the 19th of this month. That's for Samsung court case #00293.
when is the ruling on the 912?
anyone invested in NLST should boycott Samsung products..
Samsung STILL trying to get Gilstrap to stay the #0463 case!
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.211544/gov.uscourts.txed.211544.597.0.pdf
SAMSUNG’S RENEWED MOTION TO STAY
In well-reasoned, thorough opinions, the PTAB has now found unpatentable all of the
claims that the jury found infringed in this case. Although Netlist presumably will appeal these
adverse decisions (it has filed a notice of appeal for one of the patents), it would be highly
inefficient for the Court and the parties to continue to litigate the post-trial motions in this case
while the Federal Circuit addresses Netlist’s challenges to the PTAB’s fine work. Accordingly,
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) renew their past motions to stay the case pending
final resolution of the IPRs involving the asserted patents.
??? I thought you live in NY Robio is Florida
or are you who had enough of the let policies and moved?
yes it has been review and approved twice as you say, who knows .
I just emailed my senator Marco Rubio
What really doesn't make sense to me is the PTAB further reviewing the 912 Patent.
It's my understanding that the 912 patent (claim 16) has already been reviewed and approved TWICE by the PTAB and further, was additionally blessed by the CAFC as being valid.
Yet it looks like the PTAB is FURTHER reviewing the same patent/claim?
I do NOT understand how they can once again decide to review it, never MIND legitimately come to a different judgement now, then they did the first TWO times.
Me neither. It’s bullshit!
sure, but our federal judges dont give a rats ass about vidal or anything the inferior judges at ptab rule. the only negative is delay. once put to an end we get paid. is what it is...... just be glad she or them dont have the final say.
I think the evidence of what is actually happening is clear.
They are SAYING they are looking at the evidence. They are holding hearings and talking about it. But they are NOT actually taking the evidence gathered into consideration, and using it to take any actions.
Ms. Vidal was appointed as head of the PTAB despite the reservations of 8 senators who declined to vote yes.
Mr. Kennedy said two YEARS ago (in that video) that big tech was running rampant over the little guy for the FIVE YEARS he's been on that committee, and NOTHING had been done about it to date. That's 7 years of "same old, same old" (since that video was taken), and still - nothing has been done about it.
Plainly, the senate is making it LOOK like they are on top of things, but they are still doing nothing about it.
microby
16m
let’s go!!!
🍀
unfortunately a prediction makes no sense, I myself have been wrong too often
so I'd better keep my mouth shut!🤐
In the oral defense, Netlist's team picked up on some important points, usc 311, the thing about using real publications/patents 🫣
And another thing, read it, it should be possible to recognize/describe the chances of success.
Also the explanations from 2016 and subsequent examinations that claim 16 and 17 could not have been derived/combined from amidi or jedec after all.
I would hereby like to point out another piece of absurd contestation.
I think ptab bought samsmuc's delaying tactics. But I couldn't believe it if they kill the multiple decisions of previous years and cafc to create an even bigger delay.
Sorry to be such an unabashed optimist.
🍀🙏
What would Senior Bahkta have to go through!!!
R.I.P.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569086351.png
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_569086910.png
the date only shows how slow our bs system moves. the point is our federal judges are curently moving in the direction kenedy is implying. ''one of these days''
yes it is, but it shows they are aware coupled with how our texas judges feel about ptab being irrellevent in how they try there cases. not too mention how cafc will side with federal judges over bs ptab rulings that dont practice the higher standards of law. theres a big difference in looking at the evidence vs. not even taking it into consideration.
I didn't even look at the date, you are right.
Isn't that video from over two years ago?
If true, then it looks as though they have not done anything since then.
what they need to do is show the money trail to the votes who favored. its that simple. you just dont vote the wrong way unless your getting something out of it.
wow awesome and it sounds like they maybe going to do something.
robcobb
8:16 AM
$NLST I still think Judge Gilstrap will right the wrongs of the PTAB and Kathi Vidal seeing that Kathi was a senior litigator and partner at Winston and Strawn ,same law office that represents Micron against Nlst! I think she should have been recused in the Micron cases!(IMO)We know Judge Gilstrap has to be aware of what is going on at the PTAB and their unfair practices.Judge Gilstrap said at one point in a hearing I was at ( that he did not have his head in the sand when it came to the PTAB). I think that works both ways good and bad.Claim Constructions were done on the patents by Judge Gilstrap and Judge Payne where they found mostly in favor of Nlst on the http://claims.now/ the PTAB says most if not all the patents are unpatentable. If I were the East Texas judges I would be insulted!No one can predict the future but I think Judge Gilstrap is going to right the ship before all is said and done!(IMO) We need Gilstrap justice against the Tech Giants! Just my two cents.
WOW....... the vast majority of that room is corrupt as well. if i heard it correctly at the end the vote was 17-8 in her favor. very disturbing i might add.......
vidal, they know.............. 78,467 views Jan 13, 2022
At today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) criticized Katherine Vidal, nominee to be Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
when stuff like that happens in a play like where we're currently involved you know some thing is being orchestrated.
thaxs want lower but time is running out I fear
can you believe a trade for 75000 @ 1.20 shares hits and the price doesn't react? maybe its the mm's that are short
just getting on and i see you got your 120, congrats, keep the dog ready !!!
added 500 @1.20 79555 share buy at $1.20 think matybe theres alittle short covering????
ya know the funny thing is the mm's have to be in on it some how as it didn't effect the share price at all.
So close to going under 1.2 if it does I add 1k
Ortex and FINRA data are useless~! Better off getting a dart board and guessing.
$NLST baby~!
New short interest report out today - NLST shorts down slightly.
But still over 9.2M shares short.
This will move up smartly with good court news.
lol !!! were not suppose to talk about those !
The scalded dog will run your right I had a moment there
its gotta be right, you said it yourself ! ''one of these days''
microby
1:47 PM
35 U. S. C. 311b
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568957727.png
https://stocktwits.com/microby/message/568957727
NLST With no signs of the issuance of a stay for either Scarsi in the Samsung BOC Cal. case and the Micron Texas case, both judges will ignore the PTAB political hacks and will allow the 2 juries to rule in Netlists favor consistant with patent law.
The federal judges know the PTAB judges are big tech shills and will override their nonsense that passes for legal reasoning.
The federal court judges use a higher legal standard of proof of clear on convincing evidence while the PTAB uses the lower standard of preponderance of evidence and they throw the cases.
The American Invents Act should be renamed The Big Tech IP Theft Prevention Act.
https://stocktwits.com/insider1/message/568956742
our day will come, afterall there selling our $$$$ !!!
None of this makes sense to me.
me niether
Would be nice to be up top with the big fish. They are so worried that were going to reach in their pockets when they are already reaching into ours.
we got the NLST logo under contributors...........
https://computeexpresslink.org/our-members/
doesnt look like thats happening today !
And the fact that NLST was granted by the USPTO, then licensed to a customer, and now the customer wants to say the patent is no good. By initially agreeing to a licensing contract, isnt the customer implicitly agreeing the patent is good? None of this makes sense to me.
I agree there should be a law against it. I mean Samsung is working without a license does it get any stupider than that? tell them they can't sell without a license and this is settled in three months
Court is so boring and drawn out. Ugh
anything under 1.2 today I ad another 1k
TOMKiLA
7:18 AM
$NLST It is no coincidence that 2 American semiconductor companies are among the best performing companies of the last 10 years. Soon it will also be netlist's turn, which is why tens/hundreds of millions of dollars are being invested in legal costs.
We need results!
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568892676.png
Stokd 2:09 AM $NLST BOC case — NETLIST MOTION TO QUASH TRIAL SUBPOENA ON GAIL SASAKI — "Samsung had previously subpoenaed Ms. Sasaki to appear on the original trial date of March 26, 2024, which Ms. Sasaki had prepared to do. Samsung sought to move the trial date to its current date even though Netlist had expressly informed Samsung that Ms. Sasaki was not available for that date. Specifically, Ms. Sasaki is not available from May 8 to May 22, 2024."
"The trial, however, was rescheduled at Samsung’s request. Netlist informed Samsung of Ms. Sasaki’s conflicts when the parties’ discussed potential new trial dates, and offered to move the trial to April 1 when both Netlist’s counsel and Ms. Sasaki would be available to appear. Samsung did not accept this proposal. Samsung also claimed that it could not be prepared for trial during the second week in April (even though it had previously asked Netlist for just a one or two week extension), when Ms. Sasaki was also available."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.486.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568884961.png
NLST Case 0993 Netlist v. Samsung.
486
April 8, 2024
Main document
Annulment of court summons https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
$NLST Gilstrap now reversed the change and set trial back to the original date — "Set/Reset Hearings: Jury Selection and Trial Day 1 previously set for 4/26/2024 has been RESET to its original date of 4/29/2024 at 09:00 AM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap."
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568852577.png
Followers
|
305
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
9
|
Posts (Total)
|
25067
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators gdog 100lbStriper Daylas Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs |
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote:
https://netlist.com/
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |