News 
Market Data 
Discover
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
lets call it a ''how we proceed'' get together today. laymans legalese ......
NLST sounds like someone with a license is leading the pack.. https://www.trendforce.com/news/2024/03/14/news-salvaging-hbm-yield-samsung-follows-competitors-by-adopting-sk-hynixs-techniques/
status conference re conitinuation of trial today https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566237534.png
8:20-cv-00993 boc Final Pretrial Conference: March 18, 2014, 2:00 pm
STATEMENT Samsung's Request for Trial Continuance Due to Medical Emergency filed by Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. / Joint Statement to Continue Trial Date re: Order on Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal, 468 . (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Marc Feinstein, # 2 Declaration of Michael Yoder)(Feinstein, Marc) (Entered: 03/14/2024)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.469.0.pdf
TOMKiLA
6:21 AM
$NLST Netlist's cash management has been very positive in the last 4 quarterly reports, honestly we know that Samsung, Micron and Google want to waste as much time as possible to make Netlist fail but this game isn't working entirely. By now the cases are all close together and netlist has more than 50 million in cash, the financial market is increasing its revenues. the only expense that really stands out and affects the net losses for the quarter is precisely that of legal expenses. Hong said that investments under this heading are at their peak so it is expected that these expenses may reach an end soon and begin to collapse in 2/3 quarters.
It is essential to go to jury trial and win as well as have a final victory from the BOC of the Samsung case. If there are these concrete victories, the price will not stop and will probably reach $5 in a few weeks.
SAMSUNG damages is increasing exponentially, this is not a game
yes, great stuff, posted yesterday morning......... https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174044015
no apology necessary !!!
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.469.0.pdf
I do apologize if this has already been posted. But I just read through the entire thing and there is some really good information in this document!
FrankFromYahoo
4:29 AM
$NLST We don’t know the motivation for Yoder departing from Samsung, but certainly there are some serious concerns at Samsung and/or Yoder regarding the BOC trial and its consequences. Take it for granted that they know that they have close to zero chance. People should read the joint file (with diverging views on when to hold the trial.) NLST indicated acceptance of only 1 week later (first week of April) and although I am a biased shareholder, the arguments provided by NLST are compelling. As NLST highlights: it is only about a contract written under NY law, a clause (6.2) and few files and witnesses regarding extrinsic evidence. And: Yoder was not alone. And: Scarsi certainly remembers the sudden severe Covid and sudden gone Covid of Yoder. Point is: IF Samsung and Yoder were confident about the BOC and its consequences, they would have zero objections against the trial held on 26 March. Scarsi will make a quick decision - maybe already right at the conference on Monday.
nice buy !!!
Stokd
6m
$NLST Fair point, but the check is next to a date, not patent, and you'll notice other green checks indicate something is done. But I agree it's best to remove them.
For inquiring minds, the issue with results being on the chart from German hearings—Samsung/Sept & EP735/Mar—is they should reflect a filing/doc to officially back it up, otherwise I'm hesitant putting up anything coming from what someone saw/heard, I need official word from court or at least our attorney & CEO before I'm comfortable—especially as context and specifics matter.
For now, CEO & 10Q keep us informed on German cases. Regarding hearings, Samsung infringement proceeding was paused after Sept hearing, awaiting validity proceeding decision... and the EP-735 validity hearing in March, we got word from a shareholder of invalidity, but the extent, substance, and next steps & options like appeal, are still unknown. Awaiting written decision in weeks/month and word from Netlist before reflecting on the chart.
many countries from around the world have been buying large quantities of metals over the last 20 years because its real money. what they know is despite what anyone says, its the best hedge against fiat, next to other tangible assetts.
NLST *Current Netlist Litigation*
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566062801.png
there beautiful coins, i havnt bought any since around $9-$10 so its been a while.. last gold one i bought was $400 maybe in the 10 plus year ago range..........
nlst baby !!!
get some !!!
she needs more shoes man!!! we'll be ok down the line. just keep smilin about everything like that pink clown does. everythings cool...
Responding to Obviousness Rejections in Light of the USPTO’s New Guidance
https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/03/14/responding-obviousness-rejections-light-usptos-new-guidance/id=174329/
Stokd
32m
$NLST The other odd thing as far as timing, is the medical emergency was brought up shortly after Scarsi intervened regarding the framework of the BOC trial and pointed out that even if the jury adopts Samsung's interpretation, that does not mean Samsung did not breach the JDLA, and Netlist would be allowed to argue/prove breach no matter the jury's interpretation. It is clear to me that Scarsi made it apparent to Samsung that it's not going to be easy for them to escape Netlist's breach claims, and Samsung will not be allowed to frame the issues how they prefer or rely on their narrative. Then all of a sudden a medical emergency... kind of suspect. Below is Yoders attempt to delay the first BOC trial due to a medical emergency/covid, which was denied by Scarsi, and Yoder showed up in court healed with no worries about spreading covid to others.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566007615.png
thred........... https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/566007615
ahh makes sense for the dip today! this clown is getting out of hand. do we have any options?
144 Report of proposed sale of securities Mar 15, 2024
https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/3200/us-sec-filings.html
Micron’s Partnership With NVIDIA For H200 AI GPUs Shocks SK Hynix & Others In The HBM Race.
we'll get our royalties and a license from these bastards..........
https://wccftech.com/microns-partnership-with-nvidia-for-h200-ai-gpus-shocks-sk-hynix-others-in-the-hbm-race/
i understand what your saying. though my interpretation of everything i read this morning is the judge wants no more delays and will denie them. although giving a minimum of 1-2 weeks for the new lead to be brought up to speed and then asign a calender date for continuance. this case is going our way soon regardless of what they try. once boc gets settled scum gets a real hammering. the way i see it, gilstrap has given scum everything they need to defend themselves. so when they appeal to cafc they will absolutely have nothing to introduce to overturn marshall texas. the only thing all of us will agree on is this. dam!!! this is taking forever !!! lol !!! we'll be ok...........
Wow. Well, it could be a few things. If Yoder is being taken off the case? Yes, it could be because of a real medical condition, or it could be that Samsung simply wants him removed - that they don't like the corner Yoder has painted them in and they want to BOOT him. They couldn't ask for a delay if they simply want to boot him - the court wouldn't stand for it. So, they might have invented this medical issue to both get Yoder out and have a bit of time allowed to spool up another lead attorney.
Or. Yoder really is in dire straights medically and the issue is real. So, they need as much time as the judge will give them to prepare another lead.
At any rate - Samsung is doing this, knowing the court will give only a limited time for another attorney to be spooled up. Possibly they will use this to appeal any loss that might result in the case, citing the dire condition of its attorney and the lack of sufficient time given by the judge for the replacement of its lead attorney.
We already know that Samsung wants nothing more than more delay. Delay, delay, and delay! That is has been at least part of their game plan all along.
yw, like minds see the same thing while clowns on every post have a mental issue. nlst will prevail.
robcobb
7:25 AM
$NLST A lot is happening in all the cases!(For those who read the rulings from the recent Pre-Trial. )As I reported before Nlst won many motions and subparts and Micron won their share also.What the ruling documents don’t show is the arguments leading to the rulings by Judge Gilstrap.Many interesting aspects of the case were argued in front of Judge Gilstrap and will show up in the transcripts for everyone to see when they drop. As everyone knows I witnessed the Samsung 463 Pre-Trial and I want to say there are many similarities to the two conferences ,mostly same experts ,witnesses ,lawyers for Nlst,almost same rulings on what can be presented at trial,and many other similarities !We all know how that turned out! I have thought for a long time that Judge Gilstrap was waiting on the BOC verdict before setting a royalty rate for Samsung.Last nights document drop proved that . I look for Judge Gilstrap to throw Samsung a curve ball,if the BOC trial is delayed very long!Good Luck Longs!
Stokd NLST Look a Sheasby fighting for investors and defending the stock. It's nice to see and know they're aware of the impact litigation has on shareholders. Seems this has become personal not only for us, but especially for CEO/Chuck, and now our lead attorney on all Netlist litigation Sheasby... they have our back!
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565947757.png
Stokd
2:54 AM
$NLST We are close and Samsung is %&$#@!
Bullish
https://media3.giphy.com/media/r5eafWP6dcbxX8cLeN/giphy.gif?cid=9191ed4crn3ozbffql25o21xx9hrw2n9tczdj38t76161zap&ep=v1_gifs_gifId&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/565947367
Stokd NLST Whoa... look at this line in the BOC Statement filed sealed from 2 days ago, posted earlier today — Netlist Statement..."Judge Gilstrap is holding the decision of post-trial motions while awaiting the impending verdict in this case." — we finally get clarity on what Gilstrap is waiting for before ruling on Ongoing Royalty in the Samsung 463 case.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565946884.png
Stokd NLST And as a result of the Statement in BOC case from my previous post, for trial continuance/medical emergency, Scarsi Ordered—“In the interest of judicial economy, the Court has considered the joint statement filed provisionally under seal. The Court finds good cause under Rule 16(b)(4) to continue trial. The Court converts the pretrial conference set for March 18, 2024, to a status conference at which the parties should be prepared to: (1) provide a complete menu of dates the parties are mutually available for a pretrial conference and trial (even if those dates are not mutually agreeable) through June 2024, and (2) discuss the concerns and framework the Court set forth in its order requiring revision of pretrial documents.”
Trial sometime Apr through June. Keep in mind, Netlist sought to stay this case till SamsungTX trial resolves certain license issues, so if BOC is after SamsungTX—whose trial date is TBD soon—then Netlist gets their sequence of events.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.468.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565946442.png
Stokd NLST WOW🔥what a turn... Mr Yoder gone for good it seems. This is the—JOINT STATEMENT RE: SAMSUNG'S REQUEST FOR TRIAL CONTINUANCE DUE TO MEDICAL EMERGENCY—filed 2 days ago when I posted the notice to seal.
"Samsung requested a 1-2 week continuance for new lead trial counsel to get up to speed. Netlist agreed to a week's continuance but because two of the three members of its trial team have trials scheduled on April 15, April 29, and May 6, a longer continuance was not feasible."
"Samsung notified Netlist's counsel o f Mr. Y oder ' s condition and the need for substitute lead counsel to get up to speed, and asked whether Netlist would be willing to agree to a continuance of the trial date. Netlist's counsel asked what Samsung had in mind, and counsel explained it was not yet clear but at minimum one or two weeks."
"NETLIST STATEMENT—Samsung reported on Mr Yoder's health emergency, stated that he will not be able to continue on the case at all"
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.469.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565946034.png
Stokd
Yesterday 9:38 PM
$NLST I hope it's clear that I did not describe/state each motion's ruling, nor did I state which parties motion it was, I only referenced the names of the motions—which could be Netlist's or Micron's—and who won on the motion. Kind of confusing, but I was limited by Stocktwits character limit, and chose to format that way.
For example—and it would be obvious upon reading the doc—Consolidate & Pre-Suit Damages went for Micron, meaning no Pre-Suit Damages for Netlist and no Consolidation for Netlist... even though as written in my post it seems that I said Pre-Suit damages were expected, I meant the result... same as to Consolidate, which is in the Micron win column, not that Netlist can Consolidate.
Another example is Netlist win on Noninfringement of 912 & 417 patents... which is Micron's motion, hence listed in Netlist win column by name which can seem there was no infringement.
Anyways... I think you get the gist.
the post referred to....... https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/565922351
Stokd
2m
$NLST Here is the link to the doc (screenshot) from my previous post— https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.73.0.pdf
Also dropped in 294 & 293 is an Order to compensate the Special Master.
294— https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.74.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565924591.png
Stokd
20m
$NLST Tried to take a day break and this drops lol
ORDER ON PRETRIAL MOTIONS, MOTIONS IN LIMINE, AND EXHIBITS
From Micron294 pretrial conf Mar6. Rob/Prime/Bolliver reported results on them, we're getting specifics here, especially on "In-Part" rulings.
In my opinion a very favorable overall outcome for Netlist—Consolidation was long shot & Pre-Suit Damages with our scenario as to marking & notice are somewhat expected like Samsung463/same ptnts. MILs also good considering what Micron cannot raise in court.
Read doc for specifics/context.
Motions Netlist won:
Asserted Patents Not Standard Essential
Dismiss Micron Defense of Breach of RAND
Obligation
Noninfringement of 912&417
Lack of Written Description of 417
Supplement Expert Reports
Compel Deposition Transcript from Samsung294
Motions Micron won:
Strike Opinions of Halbert
Pre-Suit Damages
Consolidate
Supplement Expert Reports
In Part:
All 5 Strike Export Report motions
Micron’s Affirmative Defenses
yes they did. now we need to go to court lol !!
yes, to simplify your assumption. we did very well.
WOW. I'd have to say that the overwhelming majority of those motions went Netlist's way!
NLST 294 Pretrial Motion Rulings. Read up!
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.73.0.pdf
without a doubt.
Yup. Agree. We'll just keep ignoring him.
$NLST case 0293
691 Mar 14, 2024,,,Main Document,,,,Order https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861664/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
$NLST case 0294
Order 73 and 74 ,,,,Mar 14, 2024 Main Document https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
|
Followers
|
307
|
Posters
|
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
1
|
Posts (Total)
|
25994
|
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
| Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs | |||
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote: 
https://netlist.com/
brings over two decades of high-tech management experience to Netlist. He most recently served as President of Infinilink, a DSL equipment manufacturer, and as executive vice president of Viking Components, Inc. Prior to that, he spent 15 years with LG where he held various senior management positions in the U.S and Korea. Mr. Hong holds an MS in technology management from Pepperdine University and a BS in economics from Virginia Commonwealth University.
AI
