Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
its gotta be right, you said it yourself ! ''one of these days''
microby
1:47 PM
35 U. S. C. 311b
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568957727.png
https://stocktwits.com/microby/message/568957727
NLST With no signs of the issuance of a stay for either Scarsi in the Samsung BOC Cal. case and the Micron Texas case, both judges will ignore the PTAB political hacks and will allow the 2 juries to rule in Netlists favor consistant with patent law.
The federal judges know the PTAB judges are big tech shills and will override their nonsense that passes for legal reasoning.
The federal court judges use a higher legal standard of proof of clear on convincing evidence while the PTAB uses the lower standard of preponderance of evidence and they throw the cases.
The American Invents Act should be renamed The Big Tech IP Theft Prevention Act.
https://stocktwits.com/insider1/message/568956742
our day will come, afterall there selling our $$$$ !!!
None of this makes sense to me.
me niether
Would be nice to be up top with the big fish. They are so worried that were going to reach in their pockets when they are already reaching into ours.
we got the NLST logo under contributors...........
https://computeexpresslink.org/our-members/
doesnt look like thats happening today !
And the fact that NLST was granted by the USPTO, then licensed to a customer, and now the customer wants to say the patent is no good. By initially agreeing to a licensing contract, isnt the customer implicitly agreeing the patent is good? None of this makes sense to me.
I agree there should be a law against it. I mean Samsung is working without a license does it get any stupider than that? tell them they can't sell without a license and this is settled in three months
Court is so boring and drawn out. Ugh
anything under 1.2 today I ad another 1k
TOMKiLA
7:18 AM
$NLST It is no coincidence that 2 American semiconductor companies are among the best performing companies of the last 10 years. Soon it will also be netlist's turn, which is why tens/hundreds of millions of dollars are being invested in legal costs.
We need results!
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568892676.png
Stokd 2:09 AM $NLST BOC case — NETLIST MOTION TO QUASH TRIAL SUBPOENA ON GAIL SASAKI — "Samsung had previously subpoenaed Ms. Sasaki to appear on the original trial date of March 26, 2024, which Ms. Sasaki had prepared to do. Samsung sought to move the trial date to its current date even though Netlist had expressly informed Samsung that Ms. Sasaki was not available for that date. Specifically, Ms. Sasaki is not available from May 8 to May 22, 2024."
"The trial, however, was rescheduled at Samsung’s request. Netlist informed Samsung of Ms. Sasaki’s conflicts when the parties’ discussed potential new trial dates, and offered to move the trial to April 1 when both Netlist’s counsel and Ms. Sasaki would be available to appear. Samsung did not accept this proposal. Samsung also claimed that it could not be prepared for trial during the second week in April (even though it had previously asked Netlist for just a one or two week extension), when Ms. Sasaki was also available."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.486.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568884961.png
NLST Case 0993 Netlist v. Samsung.
486
April 8, 2024
Main document
Annulment of court summons https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
$NLST Gilstrap now reversed the change and set trial back to the original date — "Set/Reset Hearings: Jury Selection and Trial Day 1 previously set for 4/26/2024 has been RESET to its original date of 4/29/2024 at 09:00 AM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap."
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568852577.png
i've looked at the eclipse before, no glass's, checked it out for 30 seconds or so. i still see fine for my age except for reading glass's. havnt even bothered with the current one lol !!! yeah i better put on some sun block 40 then i can look like our clown!!!
Yeah, I can understand that it's a special event that happens rarely.
What gets me is all the hype, with people saying it's the beginning of the "end of days" and that coupled with the recent Earth Quakes, it is all some sort of predictions of doom.
I mean really, eclipses are astronomical events that have been known about, studied and predicted in advance for hundreds of years.
I thought most of mankind had grown past this type of wonderment.
Meanwhile, the NLST court cases march on!
All I go to say, is that luckily I bought some Bitcoin last week @67500 instead of more NLST @1.42.
For now, I have some green to show.
this solar eclipes thing is cracking me up don't look at the eclipes unless you where special sun glasses, does anyone ever look at the Sun with or wothout Sun glasses? I even saw a guy on the news ask if they should wear sunscreen lol I mean really???? if its 80 and the suns out of course. good grief.
emmm maybe the sun is brighter during an eclipes rotflol
robcobb
42m
$NLST Just a reminder to everyone it was right after jury selection in the Samsung case that we found out the damage numbers .Nlst could argue for 404 mil and Samsung could only argue down to 8 mil! The jury was picked by 12pm.The trial was to start proceedings at 1pm after everyone had a lunch break. (I arrived at 1pm.)It was almost 2pm before Judge Gilstrap ,Jason,and Cordell entered the courtroom. They had been in Judge Gilstraps chambers arguing over the amount of damages that could be asked for at trial!Judge Gilstrap took his seat and said (I am not going for this!) ,holding up two pieces of paper and directing his comment towards Jason.On the papers that Judge Gilstrap held Jason was asking for 1.8 billion to 2.3 billion! Judge Gilstrap was very adamant about what damages Jason could ask for.So maybe April 26 after jury selection in the Micron trial we will find out what damages Nlst is seeking,and what Judge Gilstrap allows.I will be there as usual to report what I hear!
NLST Correction... Micron 294 case!
Stokd
37m
$NLST Heads up in Micron 203 case — "NOTICE of Hearing: Jury Selection originally set for Monday, April 29, 2024 has been RESET for FRIDAY 4/26/2024 at 09:00 AM followed by Trial Day 1 in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (aeb) (Entered: 04/08/2024)"
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568815003.png
NLST Heads up in Micron 203 case — "NOTICE of Hearing: Jury Selection originally set for Monday, April 29, 2024 has been RESET for FRIDAY 4/26/2024 at 09:00 AM followed by Trial Day 1 in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (aeb) (Entered: 04/08/2024)"
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568815003.png
I’m sure it is not by mistake
WHO APPEALS (AND WINS) PATENT INFRINGEMENT CASES?
https://houstonlawreview.org/article/66211-who-appeals-and-wins-patent-infringement-cases
Some revealing quotes
"The PTAB is a primary reason that Big Tech was able to monopolize, and China now leads the U.S. in 37 of 44 technologies critical to our economic growth and national security.'
"Each PTAB tribunal consists of three APJs. You might assume it is imperative that all three would, at the very least, have a degree in the patented technology. This is not the case in 91.8% of PTAB petitions."
"PTAB management most often assigns APJs to cases where the technology in question is not even remotely close to the APJ’s undergrad degree. "
Which explains the questions like what is DRAM and Address Bus...
But they are qualified enough to determine "Obvious"
Hopelessly Inexperienced PTAB Judges Are Destroying U.S. Innovation
https://innovationgadfly.com/hopelessly-inexperienced-ptab-judges-are-destroying-u-s-innovation/
lol !!! i already have 911 on speed dial for the day it happens !!!
So contrary to some here beliefs Hong is making progress. And believe me when 9 million shares have to get cover the price will sky rocket.
Stokd
2:09 PM
$NLST Something else to keep in mind… the team from Irell&Manella handling all of Netlist's cases DO NOT want to lose and WILL NOT go down easy, which provides some confidence and serenity. They and our lead Sheasby are at the top of their game... and a bet on Netlist is essentially also a bet on Sheasby, the firm's reputation, and other members getting involved to bring the win ultimately. Infringers can't stretch Sheasby too thin anymore—which we've seen is the intent.
There is a big team working along side Sheasby, including Phillip Warrick who’s an Irell/DC big gun who is now on a few cases, including new ones like the Micron 628 Declaratory Judgment filed by Netlist. In that case—which recently held a Scheduling/Mgmt Conference setting trial and other dates—another member of Irell was added, taking the discovery load off Sheasby... so it looks like we'll have some action soon in a new case also with Gilstrap.
Part of Thomas Werner's bio is pictured below with the docket entry.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568612739.png
NLST FYI DD & Historical Reference:
“An International Guide to
Patent Case Management for Judges”
https://www.wipo.int/patent-judicial-guide/en/full-guide/united-states
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568607506.png
A lot in here: https://www.wipo.int/patent-judicial-guide/en/full-guide/united-states
The Indirect infringement (below 10.5.2) is likely why various companies are asking for indemnity.
Interesting please read up in this area…
“10.5.2 Infringement
U.S. patent law provides for liability for both direct and indirect infringement.”
Also interesting:
“10.5.3.1 Patent invalidity
Section 282(a) of the Patent Act provides that patents “shall be presumed valid.” Therefore, the patent owner does not need to prove validity in an infringement action. The challenger bears the burden to prove invalidity by “clear and convincing evidence.”118”
https://www.wipo.int/patent-judicial-guide/en/full-guide/united-states
robcobb
7:25 AM
$NLST At many hearings that I have witnessed over the last year and a half to two years,Judge Gilstrap has been very adamant about not wanting to hear about any rulings from other courts and doesn’t want them to be mentioned in his court that (he will make his own rulings!)There was only one hearing that I heard Judge Gilstrap say that (he did not have his head in the sand when it came to the PTAB). He added the word (but )at the end of that statement !I think Judge Gilstrap will look at the PTAB rulings and rule in a way where his logic and knowledge of the case and cases leads him! I am pretty sure we will find out pretty soon what he is thinking.Looking forward to Stokd posting the document or documents that give us some direction!
thread...... https://stocktwits.com/robcobb/message/568535150
TOMKiLA
7:24 AM
$NLST NETLIST is hiring vice president marketing for CXL hybridimm project!!!
The launch is soon?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Netlist_/comments/1bwfjms/so_cxl_hybridimm_is_ready_to_launch_soon/?share_id=zt6DXDsq1M6CGF2605zcc&utm_content=2&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1
thread https://stocktwits.com/TOMKiLA/message/568535022
Netlist, Inc. v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY TEXAS, LLC (2:22-cv-00294)
District Court, E.D. Texas
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?order_by=desc
This is whats coming for NLST soon, not the news but the price imho.
08:52 AM EDT, 04/05/2024 (MT Newswires) -- GCT Semiconductor Holding (GCTS) said Friday that it has signed a memorandum of understanding with Aramco to further develop Saudi Arabia's 4G/5G ecosystem for mission-critical and public safety networks.
Financial details were not disclosed.
GCT said the collaboration aims to design and co-develop chipsets and modules tailored for Saudi Arabia's LTE, 5G, and NTN networks in support of wireless end-user devices and Internet of Things manufacturing.
Shares of GCT were up nearly 90% in recent Friday premarket activity.
Price: 10.77, Change: +5.04, Percent Change: +87.96
Holdddd Holddddd Holddddddd our day is coming people. sooner than later now I believe...
What an absolutely horrible precedent to set.
could ya send that to the sellers ??? lol
Stokd
4m
$NLST Take a look at my litigation chart below, notice how much else is in play aside the Micron 203 case. The only things impacted by the PTAB at this point are the Micron 203 and Samsung 463 cases... and with the 463 trial unanimous win with patents deemed valid and willfully infringed, we don't need the 203 trial win for the CAFC to reconcile the decisions of District Court and PTAB, because the Samsung 463 case will get to the CAFC first, and results will impact the Micron 203 case.
Active and in play aside the Micron 203 case—with no impact from PTAB:
- Micron 294 trial
- Samsung 293 trial
- Samsung BOC trial
- Samsung 463 case post trial motions
- Delaware Samsung/Google case—valid patent
- Micron WD-TX case—valid patents
- German cases
- 2 Declaratory Judgment cases
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568123765.png
Two things drive price. Fear and Greed. When they are at a balance the price is stable, when one dominates sentiment the price runs.
What’s another 6 months kicking the can down the road!!
These prices are the result of doubt. Doubt is being introduced in the form of news regarding the PTAB rulings. If I believed that the PTAB rulings were just and accurate, then I would be selling and writing this investment off as a loss. I'm not. But (like everyone else), I'm anxious.
The PTAB rulings and eventual outcomes of the majority of them are clear. The CAFC invalidates and reverses a majority of them. It is obvious (to me at least) that the PTAB is ill-formed. The majority of the "judges" that sit in on PTAB hearings are not qualified to do so. Most do not have the background and training to accurately assess the validity of the patents they are reviewing. THAT is why the CAFC reverses so many of them.
Unfortunately, my opinion is that NLST may see even lower prices, before the CAFC reviews the PTAB decisions in the NLST patents. Let's not forget that Gilstrap is waiting for the BOC trial to finalize, before he gives final ruling on the #0463 bench trial and the royalties judgement. Once he does, I think that Samsung will once again appeal. The stock price may suffer again, once that is announced. If it does? I will buy more. Yes, at some point I will consider the risk is enough for me, and I will cease to add shares. I'm not there yet.
Good luck to all of us.
Followers
|
307
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
1
|
Posts (Total)
|
25994
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs |
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote:
https://netlist.com/
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |