NetList Inc (NLST)

[Perillo1964]

Fire sale!

[gdog]

I agree would like another 6k shares but only willing to pay a certian amount for the total lot...

[eyeownu]

neeed more netlist shares........ ;D

[Redoocs]

Or praise the man that brought us all the way down to an anemic 1.30 PPS.

[thelimeyone]

NLST

If that's the case let us all sit around the fireplace and sing kumbaya together.

tlo.

[Redoocs]

Sorry, not crying, but stating a fact. 1.33 pps is an insult. Buy the dip, buy the dip, buy the dip....buying the dip when you have a shitload already makes no sense.
Time for hong to shit or get off the pot and pass it along to a possible board that might have a different perspective on how to proceed to make not only Hong some cash, but his SHers also.
And, again, not crying, but stating a fact.

[Redoocs]

And, it's not all about Hong. Being shareholders with a lot invested also, we deserve him to run the company with our best interests involved also. 1.33 waiting for corrupt court cases is not in our best interests at this point. Without us, he doesn't have a company.

That's not crying, it's stating a fact.
Sometimes the dip when you got a shitload already is chasing bad money already.

[gdog]

Everyone has different threshold for pain, i have no problem with people expressing their feelings. Non of us know how much each has invested or how much they have to invest. 5k to some may feel like 40k to others. I hope we can refrain from name calling as we are all in this together.

[thelimeyone]

NLST

Well said 100% factual.
Everyone pay no mind to all the cry babies on this board, in fact do the opposite and
use the opportunity to buy the dip.

tlo.

[eyeownu]

ouchh! spent all my extra cash chasing the damn solar eclipse next week! LMAO otherwise i'd buy!!!

[Redoocs]

Says the person that continues to bash others for their opinions on a different sub penny site because they think it will go up and make them some well deserved cash.
All of his posts are negative there.
Constantly bashes the CEO there for supposedly not doing anything, but praises Hong for also not doing anything but waiting while NLSTs pps continues to drop. Imo, you are not to be believed, here or there.

[gdog]

Just filled another 500 at $1.28

[gdog]

I feel the same way on most all you said, but not here to make others upset for the way they feel.
I trade at least 5-10 stocks a wk and I have to trade my way out of some plays, yesterday was brutal, ( https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bottom-swing-plays-29717)
I guess my point there is I feel that the price now is a gift, the company itself is worth the price right now. mho

[Jetmek_03052]

I agree with you. Yes, there's always the chance to lose all. But I think NLST will win in the end.

Logically speaking, either the PTO or the PTAB has to be screwed up. I've never tried to get a patent before, but I know people who have, and it is an incredibly long and drawn-out process. The PTO does not just issue patents "willy nilly". Usually when the PTO issues a patent, it has been researched beyond belief.

The PTAB on the other hand? Reportedly, it is made up of individuals who have little experience in the issues they are passing judgement on. This is precisely why the CAFC overturns a GIANT percentage of their rulings. The PTAB gets it wrong on something like 75%-85% of their rulings (as far as the CAFC is concerned)! This is documented! I'm not overly concerned about the PTAB rulings, specifically because of this. The unfortunate thing is that waiting for the CAFC to overturn stupid PTAB rulings will take additional time.

The price is being manipulated - at least I believe it is. And 9M shorts has weighted it down. It's the bad news of the PTAB rulings, and the constant delays of trials that are also having an effect. These things would have affected the stock price no matter the exchange NLST resided on. To think that the Nasdaq would have mattered is folly. In fact, the greater exposure the Nasdaq brings might have even affected the stock price to a greater degree. Yes, upwards AND downwards. But it is impossible to know that for sure.

Hong is the biggest shareholder here. We all know the reasons why he is holding off on a Nasdaq listing. I continue to believe that a Nasdaq listing will be made at some point. My opinion is that those who want one now are in the wrong. At any rate, it does little good to complain about it. Hong will list NLST on the Nasdaq at the time of HIS choosing.

Hang in there.

[gdog]

Why do you suppose SK made the deal with NLST that they did????????? anyone?

[gdog]

time will tell, i have a buy in for another 500 at 1.28( see l2) and want 7k more if it gets anywhere near 1.00 again. I believe in the way things are going.
Naz won't change samsung micron or googles mind at all.

[Redoocs]

It ran to 10 because of the SKH deal and the prospect of joining Nasdaq. Once hong said no to Nasdaq and no new deals were made, here we are years later in the low ones. There is a reason for all of the shorts, they see nothing to indicate any upside to this debacle yet. Hong needs to step up and stop with the canned questions from Suji (?) during the CCs and answer some of our concerns.
I just hope you are right.

[gdog]

I believe 9 m short is whats holding us down, we were on the otc when nlst ran to $10.00 of course like you this is mho.
At any rate I think with in a couple months we'll know for sure. I happen to belive we'll be $10.00 or above by fall.

[Redoocs]

Morning gdog. Imo the only one keeping the PPS down is Hong. There was a huge path to raising the PPS, he passed on it and eventually we ended up in the low ones. Without knowing all the details, he could have possibly taken less and made another deal like he did with SKH, which so far turned out to be a good deal afterall. Hong has to take responsibility for this debacle. You can't just keep hoping on a corrupt court system.
I'm not going anywhere, but enthused about out prospects anymore.

[gdog]

I hate to say it, but I'm starting to chalk it up as a loser.
this type of thinking is excaly what they are trying to accomplish (imho) by keeping the price low and going lower, the way I see it we are closer than ever for our payday.

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
9:19 PM

$NLST I thought her answer in the below image was pretty clear... they did barrage her as usual, but this time Chandler got it as well.

The issue of expression and language barrier—with respect to judges—can't be enough of a factor if Sheasby/Chuck have confidence in her. These are oral arguments after everything has already been argued back and forth through briefs with demonstratives/exhibits.

Not to diminish the importance of orals and good performance, but based on the line of questioning and substance, it seems the judges wanted to explore any holes they can find searching for something to invalidate with. Question is, can Anita/Netlist present enough where PTAB/judges can't find a way to justify a decision of unpatentability.

Anyways, I'll leave that alone and just say it's anyones guess, we're all prepared for the worst while already looking past the PTAB.
I can relate to DuffelChad's moments of frustration, but it was while watching Anita, not reading the transcript.😂

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568194088.png

[100lbStriper]

GoodTidings
8:13 PM

$NLST By the way this is very interesting!!!

"Reposting my response to another poster who wrote to his Senator…. Senator Dick Durbin

Good for you…sent below to Senator Padilla…..fyi Vidal was sworn in April 2022.

Dear Senator Padilla

Attached is court document showing that even after Kathi Vidal was appointed Director of the USPTO in April 2022, she was still with William and Strawn, counsel for Micron in a patent infringement trial Unification Technologies vs Micron in which trial was set to begin June 2022. Sounds like conflict of interest to my ears.

https://www.cadwalader.com/uploads/media/WDTX-6-20-cv-00500-97.pdf

Please write your Senator in the Judiciary Committee and send the attached documents as proof that even after Vidal was appointed she was still listed in the attached documents as counsel for Micron."

[100lbStriper]

robcobb
6:07 PM

$NLST We know that Judge Gilstrap is aware of the PTAB ruling on the 060 and 160 by now.I am anxious to see what his reaction will be since those patents were ruled valid and willfully infringed by a jury in his court against Samsung , and upheld by Judge Gilstrap after a bench trial last year.There were expert witnesses knowledgeable of how the patents work that testified to the validity of the patents ,which is higher standard of evidence than what the PTAB uses. I think if I was Judge Gilstrap knowing the PTAB judges already knew of his prior rulings , I would be very insulted! Let’s see what he does in the coming days.Should be very interesting times in the upcoming days!
thread.... https://stocktwits.com/robcobb/message/568178606

[100lbStriper]

Geo_D
5:33 PM

$NLST posted yesterday from USPTO.
A mockery-and-contradiction. Government institution not an example of “In God We Trust”. And previously where CAFC “schooling” PTAB.
Chuck and Jason like the Patrick Henry “give me liberty, or give me death”

SHE NEEDS TO GO TO PRISON..........

https://www.inventorsdigest.com/articles/your-uspto-directors-blog-leap-forward-with-ptabs-help/

[100lbStriper]

CRR4270
4:41 PM

$NLST folks……here is the simple reality :

1) no sitting superior court judge is obliged nor obligated to adhere to any ruling of the executive branch of government. Period. Full stop.

2)if 1) above WAS EVER FALSE? A sitting president could invalidate any ruling of any court at any time. Simply put? THEY CANNOT.

3) Judge Gilstrap WILL consider the conclusions of the PTAB, and give it the proper weight it deserves. It is basically nothing more than ill conceived biased opinion and has nearly no weight as such in the judges court, and he has ample authority and discretion to set it aside.

4) Gilstrap is not going to allow PTABs verdict to undermine his own. On that basis he will uphold his own ruling.

5) Samsung will appeal to the CFAC. Unless the judge abused his discretion? An overturn of Gilstrap on appeal is highly unlikely.

End of story

[100lbStriper]

whatever happens happens is all i can say. but i will say this, whatever decision ptab comes to is not the end and the reaction to the pps is temporary. we can cry all we want in the mean time as i dont care anymore, but i will stay in this till the end.

[TheTermonator]

This is depressing to look at!! 912 gets invalidated and we’re done!

[Redoocs]

Key words...barring anymore delays.
I hate to say it, but I'm starting to chalk it up as a loser. We had our chance after SKH and blew it.

[gdog]

Oh but within two months we'll be glad he did barring anymore delays.

[Redoocs]

I sure am glad that chucky stood firm and didn't go on the Nasdaq after the SKH deal or bite the big one and somehow took less to broker a settlement with at least one of the big three scumbags. Much better to languish in the low ones and fight through the corrupt court systems.

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
12:09 PM

$NLST Current state of things.

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568123765.png

[gdog]

NP its true your the only one that puts anything on here thats positive.. its appreciated.

[100lbStriper]

lol!!, thx

[gdog]

naaahhh your our main man all the post and reposts are greatly appreciated.

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
6m

$NLST The transcript of the 912/claim 16 IPR Oral Argument was just released, and in anticipation of the FWD (Final Written Decision) to come any day, figure it's worth a post if anyone is interested. This is the one where the judges actually interrupted and challenged Samsung attorney Chandler quite a bit—which in prior Orals was strictly reserved for Netlist.
Who knows, maybe the PTAB can't avoid looking biased and incompetent if they were to invalidate claim 16, and after the 060 & 160 negative results, perhaps they let 912/claim 16 stand. I'm not expecting it, but am I nuts to think we have a chance... optimism mixed with realism. Regardless of PTAB decision, I definitely believe the CFAC will reconcile and get this one right... at the least.
https://ptacts.uspto.gov/ptacts/public-informations/petitions/1549198/download-documents?artifactId=mINOqZM5IJRhAMuR0j2m_kIiffJy5zkj123Z0VfjRWnZVdQOSdy8wkY

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_568120538.png

[100lbStriper]

our main man is still stamping a clown on every post.

[Jetmek_03052]

Case 2:22-cv-00203-JRG-RSP Document 499 Filed 04/01/24

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.215248/gov.uscourts.txed.215248.499.0.pdf

DEFENDANTS’ THIRD NOTICE OF DETERMINATIONS
INVALIDATING PATENTS-IN-SUIT

[gdog]

What happened to our Main man???

[gdog]

I certianly know how you feel but we all know its being minipulated and that sometime in the future it will move north again. I know everyday watching it
sink drives me carzy also. We just have to keep the faith.

[Jetmek_03052]

Yup. It has always been a risky gamble. Not for the faint hearted.

People in Netlist have a decision on whether or not to stay in it.

For me? It's not hard. I believe they will prevail. I'm still buying.

Good luck.

[papaphilip]

Shorting this when Netlist had their win over Samsung was the smart play here. Of course that's when I averaged up and have been bleeding ever since. Feels like I'm always on the wrong side. Company has been fighting the good fight on the legal side, but has done nothing to support small investors like myself. Thought we wouldn't get below $1 again. But once again, I'm not so sure.
Infringers, PTAB, shorters, market makers, officers selling, trillion dollar companies against us, paid off government officials/judicial system, etc, etc. We are David fighting multiple Goliaths. Truth should prevail, but in our case, I'm not so sure anymore.

[Jetmek_03052]

I have another buy order in for 1K shares @ $1.30. Don't know if it will hit but it's good for 60 days. I hope it does but then again, I hope it doesn't.

[gdog]

I agree and our country seems to be getting worse, both parties.

[Perillo1964]

Washington DC is where criminals go to become millionaires!

[nygirl]

I friggin agree! It pisses me off!

[choo choo trader]

The patent killing PTAB is a complete joke, corrupt, and incompetent. It must be abolished, or American inventors will cease to invent. Big business bought out our glorious, elected officials in Washington DC in order to get the America Invents Act passed so they could steal everyone's patents. What a corrupt bunch of people we have running this country. They are morally bankrupt!

[gdog]

Yes I don't believe it will have any effect on the coming court cases.

[Ramazing]

The district court also cited to a recent Federal Circuit decision holding that the PTAB is not binding precedent on a district court, namely, Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corp., 846 F.3d 1190, 1202 n.7 (Fed. Cir. 2017). In Tinnus, the Federal Circuit upheld a preliminary injunction even though the PTAB had, in the interim, issued a Final Written Decision invalidating the patent-in-suit. The Federal Circuit acknowledged the intervening PTAB decision, but concluded that “[t]he PTAB’s decision is not binding on this court . . . .”

[gdog]

Netlist Loses Two IPR Patent Trials Related To '060 And '160 Patents Filed By Samsung And Micron As All Netlist Patent Claims Have Been Determined To Be Unpatentable.

[Jetmek_03052]

Just bought another 1K at $1.45. Down goes my average - a little.