News 
Market Data 
Discover
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
gm, for one the 912, and everything you see in this chart that they are appealing....... https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2024/5/6/mloatstokd_05062024.png
just so you know kathy vidal was micraps lead lawyer before she became head of ptab. cafc will overturn her puppet circus.
NLST Here's the verdict from today. https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573440845.jpg
NLST docs dropping galore... 993...... https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
NLST Keep in mind that Judge Gilstrap will be preciding over the Micron case that's starting on Monday. Micron has never had a license. They can't be happy after todays ruling.
He also precided over the Samsung $303 million dollar win last year. Well, he's been waiting on the Samsung verdict that came out today in Los Angeles. He's also been waiting on ruling about the future royalties on that same case since December 1, 2023 when all the objections, replies and sur replies were finally in his hands. Remember that the Judge Gilstrap decided to limit the time frame to roughly less than two years on the $303 million dollar judgement. Today we find out Samsung breached the contract materially. It was a 5 year contract that ended before the two years of damages that were awarded. Just saying'. Im including the ruling from LAST YEARS RULING against Samsung for you new people and a ew other goodies. These docs ARE NOT FROM TODAYS RULING.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573436561.jpeg
whole thread........... https://stocktwits.com/Durango24k/message/573436561
doc 552 in the 993 May 17, 2024 Main Document Receipt for Release of Exhibits to Counsel upon Verdict/Judgment at Trial (G-38)
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
Netlist Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (8:20-cv-00993)
District Court, C.D. California
551 May 17, 2024 Main Document Jury Trial - Completed
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
Stokd $NLST FYI—writer of article is unaware or hasn't factored Netlist 303mil win over Samsung in 463 case... Samsung is unlicensed!
'Netlist Triumphs Over Samsung in Breach of Contract Case'
"In a decisive verdict announced on Friday, a Los Angeles-based federal jury has sided with chipmaker Netlist, identifying a material breach of contract by tech giant Samsung. This breach involved Samsung halting the supply of essential memory products that were under contract with Netlist."
"The case adds a new chapter in the ongoing multi-jurisdictional patent dispute involving the two companies."
"By establishing that a material breach occurred, Netlist reinforces its position within the larger patent conflict with Samsung."
"A legal victory of this nature, even without immediate financial compensation, can offer several potential advantages to Netlist. It supports Netlist’s reputational standing as a company capable of defending its legal rights against a larger industry player."
https://smartphonemagazine.nl/en/2024/05/17/netlist-triumphs-over-samsung-in-breach-of-contract-case/
NLST 🔥NEWS JUST OUT!!!🔥 'BREAKING: Calif. Jury Finds Samsung Breached Contract With Netlist'
"A Los Angeles federal jury found on Friday that Samsung materially breached its contract with chipmaker Netlist by cutting off its supply of crucial memory products, delivering a significant win for Netlist in its multi-jurisdictional patent fight with Samsung even though no monetary damages were at stake."
https://www.law360.com/articles/1838582
sorry i dont have access
very nice !!! waiting for details!!!
today should be the final day, stay hopeful !!
nice!!
Back
Stokd
5m
$NLST Jury worked through lunch and have a verdict…
WE WON!!! 🔥🔥🔥
Jury agreed with Netlist interpretation of Sec 6.2 and breach was meterial.
Bullish
10
1
67
Back
Stokd
5m
$NLST Jury worked through lunch and have a verdict…
WE WON!!! 🔥🔥🔥
Jury agreed with Netlist interpretation of Sec 6.2 and breach was meterial.
Bullish
10
1
67
have a great wkend everyone monday is going to be awsome
you aint seen nothing yet. 
i wanna see 9mm shares trade
NLST Here is today's schedule. Court starts in less than 30 minutes...
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573347150.jpg
TOMKiLA
2m
$NLST POSSIBLE MICRON DAMAGES!!
Kennedy damages discussion for micron 1 $23.42 per unit for micron 2 $46.70 incremental royalty rate of $70.12 the proposed royalty rate was $89.24 but it looks like Kennedy settled on the $70.12. I think all those numbers will make everyone very happy because if you remember we ended up with about three quarters of Kennedy's estimate during the Samsung case
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573335113.png
Ex parte applications are solely for extraordinary relief and are rarely granted.
https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-mark-c-scarsi
EX PARTE APPLICATIONS:
Ex parte applications are solely for extraordinary relief and are rarely granted. See Mission Power Eng’g Co. v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 488 (C.D. Cal. 1995). All ex parte applications must be sent in PDF version to mcs_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov(link sends e-mail) along with a Word version of the proposed order. Both the e-mail to the Court and the application should advise whether opposing counsel will be filing an opposition. Ex parte applications that fail to conform to Local Rule 7-19, including a statement of opposing counsel’s position, will not be considered, except on a specific showing of good cause.
Counsel for the applicant must provide advance notice of the application by telephone and email to all other parties. In addition to the information required by Local Rule 7-19.1, the notice must advise the other parties of the anticipated deadline to oppose the application. The applicant must serve the application by facsimile, email, or personal service, even if electronic service is effected under Local Rule 5-3.2.1.
Oppositions to ex parte applications must be filed within 24 hours of the filing of the application, subject to Rule 6(a)(2). If an opposing party does not intend to oppose the ex parte application, counsel must inform the Courtroom Deputy Clerk by telephone or email as soon as possible.
as far as i know today is the final day.
i hear ya on that. hopefully by the end of the day. somethings got to renew my sense of balance !!!
all quiet this morning, didnt see anything on yesterdays court action.
vidal is so fos.... Vidal Addresses ‘Patent Examiner’ Reddit Issue with USPTO Personnel
https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/05/16/vidal-officially-responds-patent-examiner-reddit-issue/id=176569/
yup, their well done now, but we wanna get them crispy lol !!!
i have no idea how there going to proceed, but i'm dam sure gilstrap isnt going to let them use a vidal ptab defense or even reference ptab in any testimony or arguments.
|
Followers
|
306
|
Posters
|
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
5
|
Posts (Total)
|
25965
|
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
| Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs | |||
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote: 
https://netlist.com/
brings over two decades of high-tech management experience to Netlist. He most recently served as President of Infinilink, a DSL equipment manufacturer, and as executive vice president of Viking Components, Inc. Prior to that, he spent 15 years with LG where he held various senior management positions in the U.S and Korea. Mr. Hong holds an MS in technology management from Pepperdine University and a BS in economics from Virginia Commonwealth University.
AI
