News 
Market Data 
Discover
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
robcobb
42m
$NLST The Ptab has put a temporary funk on everything right now.When we win the boc 00993 and Micron 294 trials,(IMO)things will look very different!To all the seniors on the board we have all been through times in our lives when things seem to be going against us,to have something unexpected turn it all around.Thats what I am expecting when we win both trials in May (IMO),and Judge Gilstrap sets the royalty rate for the 463 case.We have already accrued another years damage and interest when Judge Gilstrap sets that rate since the 463 trial!Samsungs liabilities will increase significantly over another year if they appeal.We don’t know what the future holds but I will be like Chuck and not give up! I have faith in Jason and Judge Gilstrap getting justice for Nlst ! I will be there to witness it when it happens!For those that don’t understand how strong Chucks resolve is haven’t been here for the last ten years!Good luck to the true longs!
thats just it, seeing it through. common sense will tell you after all this time they have to be legit or they would of been shot down years ago. lol !!! its having to entertain all the deceit and corruption of a justice system that allows it that just kills me ! but i will see this through to the end, or when i think the pps is high enough for my own personal gain.
Stokd
15m
$NLST Apparently some think that we're going to stay at the current price till all CAFC appeals are concluded. With many catalysts to come as verdicts/rulings/trials—even though we need to wait for the CAFC till we can collect—there is no way we don't run quite a bit as we gradually get these wins under our belt.
I would add that as things progress in Netlist's favor, the possibility of deals/settlements remains and could tip the balance in negotiations prior to CAFC conclusions.
Remember, that the negative aspects of our litigation situation is the PTAB, and with mostly all key patent IPRs being concluded, most of the bad news is in the rear view mirror.
Another thought is that there is no way that any investor would stay if they thought the only upside is in 2 years—it is just venting frustration or trying to affect sentiment to capitalize IMO—because they know like the rest of us that there are plenty of opportunity here prior to conclusion of appeals.
lol
sounds like a plan but in the world of otc there is no way they would let us hold a 4.5 pps!!! in theory your plan is the move. but the reality is if we think we're crying now, we'd be stroking out one by one and there wouldnt be enough ambulances to get to all of us in time !!!
they lost to begin with for starters. no jdla, no license. how much they get racked for is another story. my 2 cents!
all depends on whether the entity is long term or short. long we're winners.
I think we WILL see another offering. It'll be interesting to see how quickly it is scooped up. Or not!
Let's not forget - at the time of the last offering, many of these IPR's were still up in the air. Now that the PTAB has screwed us, the only hope left is for the CAFC to overrule the PTAB. If NLST does make a stock offering and it is scooped up quickly? It will be telling as to the general sentiment of the bigger investors.
To date, the entity that scooped up that last offering is under water on it. That might dissuade other entities from taking a risk on further offerings.
business as usual after the call and getting better, time for the pps to rebound again lol !!!
Stokd $NLST I hope folks understand, that with Gilstrap's order and reasoning yesterday to not stay or sever the 912 from the Micron 294 case, and to proceed with trial regardless of the PTAB IPR decision... it essentially clears any uncertainty regarding the Samsung 293 trial—which is on same patents—also not being stayed or severed, and I assume will be scheduled for the next available date once the BOC trial is over.
I also wonder if/how his reasoning may impact his decision whether to proceed with the stayed and ready for trial Micron 203 case involving the 918/054/060/160 patents.
Short interest data means NOTHING whether from ORTEX or FINTEL. "They" have many ways around this data.
IT MEANS ZERO~!
So, take it for what it's worth........ it doesn't even give an accurate idea of how shorted a ticker is.
Overstock lawsuit tells all the ways they get around showing their cards. This was exposed by a defendant who posed as
a market maker and had to spill the beans under testimony. All the tricks "they" (the real market makers) use to hide transactions.
Why is it Ken Griffen is so upset with the proposed auction of stocks saying it will disrupt order flow~? Without order flow
Citadel and Virtu make no money, THAT'S WHY. The auction is also more transparent. Ken and Dougie Fresh of Virtu don't like transparency.
They are both still fighting the CAT system.
Think NetList isn't shorted/naked shorted massively~? Better think again. These guys are not backing NetList's patented IP that is stolen by the corporate Clown Cartel of Google, Samsung, and Micron. They are counting on the deep pocket Clown
Cartel to win and steal NetList patents outright without paying a dime in licensing or any damages.
My guess is that NetList has been shorted/naked shorted to the hilt, in hopes that Hong would capitulate and go bankrupt
so the Clown Cartel could steal all of NetList patents/IP.
If going by "short data" provided by the powers that be for ANY ticker, good luck making sound choices.
Data is manipulated like everything in this CORRUPT market.
Good that NetList has a Kangal lawyer in Jason Sheasby keeping these Clown Cartel wolves at bay. Eh~? So far the Kangal lawyer's bite force was enough to win some money from ScamScum in just one jury trial, but his bite will be even more pronounced in upcoming trials,
Also good that Judge Gilstrap and Judge Payne are presiding over these cases. I do not think these Judges can be bought off like we have seen in the case of PTAB which should be totally abolished. PTAB is not being used for what it was originally intended, and now deep pockets seem to control what patents PTAB decides are valid and not valid. Also gives PTAB control of how to interpret the claims in the patent protections. This is ABUSIVE, and political theater for large Companys to buy patent decisions. PTAB should be dissolved and/or reformulated to do what it was originally intended to do.
$NLST baby~!
NLST Plaintiff (Netlist) Oppostion to Samsung's Renewed Motion to Stay the #463 Case. Filed Yesterday. Only Available, so far, on Pacer. I'll post the pertinent pages in the comments.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809121.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809193.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809642.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809788.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809915.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570810056.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570810552.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570810725.jpg
NLST Indefinitely delaying the enforcement of the jury's findings in favor of the PTAB proceedings
at this point would be unjust and inefficient. Once the remaining two motions in this case are resolved,
Samsung can appeal the jury's verdict to the Federal Circuit just as Netlist plans to appeal the PTAB's
findings of invalidity. At that point, the Federal Circuit will be able to decide the outstanding issues in
each case with the benefit of the full record from both actions should it so choose. This is plainly the
most just and efficient course of action. Samsung's proposed stay, on the other hand, would deprive
the Federal Circuit of the opportunity to decide when and how to review these judgments and further,
would conceal the jury's findings of infringement, validity, and willfulness from the record, along with
any contradictory representations Samsung made in this Court and before the PTAB. This is not the
purpose of a stay and this Court should not delay its final decision
not exactly my interpretation as these are Jason Sheasby’s words in arguement for why a delay makes no sense.
low vol bs......means nothing.....
just went back up !!! oh and yeah, one of these days !!!
OTC Short Interest report for Netlist shows a decrease of 229K shares (229,319 to be exact).
Total short interest went down to 8,988,618 from 9,219,937. Next report due out May 9th.
lol!!! gotta call an audible, we'll be ok.......
Very good news regarding revenue. But that Working Capital figure of $9M is worrisome. It is the lowest working capital they've had in two years of financials.
They are going to have to get more cash soon. I remember saying last year when they had that offering - if they didn't get paid from a court win - that they would need more money sometime in the spring/summer time period.
Wouldn't surprise me to see the announcement of taking some money from that credit agreement that is still available, or even another offering.
8-K Current report filing Apr 25, 2024 https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/3200/us-sec-filings.html
NETLIST REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2024 RESULTS https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/2120/us-press-release.html?airportNewsID=26328209-40ec-4873-8a47-bdf2b29269ff
good luck on the earning report and cc today. be back later, hope for the best, forget the rest.
NLST Ooh people, the first 3 weeks of May is going to be extremely Busy but most importantly promising for Netlist:
1st week : SS BOC Pre Trial
2nd week: SS BOC Trial
3rd week : Micron Trial (912)
—————
Also awaiting Gilstrap :
continuing Micron trial (339,506,918)
SS Royalties - post BOC Trial
SS (912) Trial - post BOC Trial
SK Hynix Logs Fastest Sales Growth Since 2010
NLST SK Hynix to invest $3.86 bln in DRAM chip production in South Korea
https://www.reuters.com/technology/sk-hynix-invest-386-bln-dram-chip-production-base-south-korea-2024-04-24/
NLST Samsung Starts Mass Production of 9th Generation V-NAND: 1Tb 3D TLC NAND
https://www.anandtech.com/show/21365/samsung-starts-mass-production-of-9th-generation-vnand-1tb-3d-tlc-nand
NLST PC memory gets faster, safer with new DDR5 standard
https://www.pcworld.com/article/2312798/pc-memory-gets-faster-safer-with-new-ddr5-standard.html
Stokd $NLST Netlist filed their opposition to Samsung's renewed stay motion in the 463 case—whose $303mil win is now in post trial awaiting a ruling on Samsung's JMOL and Netlist's Ongoing Royalty.
Unfortunately, after updating (careful⚠️) Recap few weeks ago—which allows me to make any doc I pay for publicly accessible—it has not worked once. When I first downloaded it took a month to work, so perhaps it takes some time, but for now I can't make it accessible and link for others.
Some have posted parts already, I'll post the Introduction, maybe others can fill in the rest of the pages...Doc 598. 🙏🏼🍻🙏🏼
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570748555.png
NLST Reading the latest court doc (opposed motion to stay from JS) and love this part......
"Indefinitely delaying the enforcement of the jury’s findings in favor of the PTAB proceedings at this point would be unjust and inefficient. Once the remaining two motions in this case are resolved, Samsung can appeal the jury’s verdict to the Federal Circuit just as Netlist plans to appeal the PTAB’s
findings of invalidity. At that point, the Federal Circuit will be able to decide the outstanding issues in each case with the benefit of the full record from both actions should it so choose..."
robcobb
26m
$NLST I have been going to all the hearings ,pre trials,Samsung trial and soon to be Micron trial for around two years now.Everything I have witnessed with Judge Gilstrap is that he tries to maneuver all the litigation in a way (fairly to both sides)where the jury after (hearing all the experts and evidence)has to make the decision on whether the patents have been infringed or not,and does not like to stay a case. His time is to precious with all the cases on his calendar!I have said in the past I think Judge Gilstrap is an honorable man and I stand by that! I think not severing the 912 (after the ptab ruling)from the 294 case proves that along with many other rulings he has made over the course of the Nlst cases! I am getting very anxious about attending the Micron trial on May 20 and will report to the best of my ability,along with Bolliver ,and maybe Prime 311.I think we will give a good picture of what happens! Hopefully some enlightenment from Chuck tomorrow.
NLST For DD: The word Daubert has been mentioned as one of the reason why the stay is denied.
The “Daubert Standard” provides a systematic framework for a trial court judge to assess the reliability and relevance of expert witness testimony before it is presented to a jury. Established in the 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), this standard transformed the landscape of expert testimony by placing the responsibility on trial judges to act as "gatekeepers" of scientific evidence.
Stokd
33m
$NLST 🔥🔥🔥 Gilstrap DENIED Micron's motion to Stay or Sever the 912 in the 294 case and firmly SET trial for May 20!!!
Micron... your train has arrived!!!
Link to full doc below---4 pages worth a read. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.112.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570733270.png
"Micron is to secure a replacement expert with sufficient qualifications who will wholly adopt each of Dr. Stone’s reports and opinions who will testify in person during the May 20, 2024 trial setting by “stepping into the shoes” of Dr. Stone. The Court made it clear during the telephonic hearing on April 23, 2024, that in no event would the Court allow the retention by Micron of a new technical expert who would not wholly adopt and be limited to Dr. Stone’s opinions and reports. Said another way, the Court made it clear that Micron would not be allowed to conduct new technical testing and analysis via a replacement expert for Dr. Stone"
1. Motion for Continuance (Dkt. No. 101) -> " In sum, Micron will proceed with Dr. Stone as a live witness, or it will replace Dr. Stone with another expert who will wholly adopt—and be limited to—Dr. Stone’s opinions and reports; and it must do one or the other in time to go forward with trial on May 20, 2024"
2. Motion to Stay or, Alternatively, Sever and Stay the Asserted ’912 Patent, in View of Final Written Decision of Invalidity (Dkt. No. 93) -> Consequently, the Motion to Stay or, Alternatively, Sever and Stay the Asserted ’912 Patent (Dkt. No. 93) is DENIED.
yes you are correct i got them mixed up being in the same column and stuff, yes its that 136 that has the ptab validated stuff. which now makes me think those idiots at micron get pslab to re review it by then and make them unpatentable. not being negative either. i can already see the delays coming, just wondering how far they go this time ? i dont even want to watch this trainwreck anymore lol !!!
YAY!!!
It looks as if Gilstrap is the Judge to me. Not to you? On the 00628 docket, he's been assigned the case.....
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68114488/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-inc/
It's the 00134/00136 merged cases that have not been assigned a Judge yet. It is on Stokd's chart, but just ABOVE the 00628 case....
Case 2:22-cv-00294-JRG Document 112 Filed 04/24/24
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.112.0.pdf
Further, in light of Dr. Stone’s family emergency (as addressed in the declarations filed under seal herein), the Court directed Micron to either arrange for Dr. Stone to be present and testify in person during the May 20, 2024 trial setting or, if he elects to withdraw from Micron’s trial team, Micron is to secure a replacement expert with sufficient qualifications who will wholly adopt each of Dr. Stone’s reports and opinions who will testify in person during the May 20, 2024 trial setting by “stepping into the shoes” of Dr. Stone.
The Court made it clear during the telephonic hearing on April 23, 2024, that in no event would the Court allow the retention by Micron of a new technical expert who would not wholly adopt and be limited to Dr. Stone’s opinions and reports. Said another way, the Court made it clear that Micron would not be allowed to conduct new technical testing and analysis via a replacement expert for Dr. Stone. The costs, delays, and related negative ramifications of such will not be accepted by the Court. In sum, Micron will proceed with Dr. Stone as a live witness, or it will replace Dr. Stone with another expert who will wholly adopt—and be limited to—Dr. Stone’s opinions and reports; and it must do one or the other in time to go forward with trial on May 20, 2024.
Father would jump at the sound of loud thunder. Reminders of those German 88s falling nearby.
Am very confident too. Licensing is the big issue, but also what was gained had the infringers not had the IP to begin with.
Good time to pad the position if one can. Does not get any better than this.
$NLST baby~!
correction, 628 case. the one with all the ptab VALIDATED claims and no judge, sorry for the confusion...
|
Followers
|
306
|
Posters
|
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
25960
|
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
| Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs | |||
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote: 
https://netlist.com/
brings over two decades of high-tech management experience to Netlist. He most recently served as President of Infinilink, a DSL equipment manufacturer, and as executive vice president of Viking Components, Inc. Prior to that, he spent 15 years with LG where he held various senior management positions in the U.S and Korea. Mr. Hong holds an MS in technology management from Pepperdine University and a BS in economics from Virginia Commonwealth University.
AI
