Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
News: $NRG NRG Energy Acquires Direct Energy for $3.625 Billion in Cash
Energy provider NRG Energy (NYSE: NRG) has announced it is acquiring Direct Energy, a North American subsidiary of U.K.-based Centrica PLC (OTC: CPYYF) . The all-cash deal is for $3.625 billion, and is expected to close by the end of 2020. Continue reading
In case you are interested NRG - NRG Energy Acquires Direct Energy for $3.625 Billion in Cash
$NRG $VST NRG Energy (NRG +4.6%) is initiated with a Buy rating and a $33 price target at UBS, which believes the stock will climb as announced asset sales close and plans for return of capital are revealed at the company's March 27 analyst day.
NRG has indicated it will seek projects averaging 13.75% unlevered pre-tax returns or return capital to shareholders, and UBS thinks the market would prefer share buybacks and is the message NRG likely will deliver, given the high bar set for investment returns.
UBS says incremental deleveraging likely is unnecessary, with pro forma net debt-to-EBITDA at 2.8x at year-end 2018 and an ongoing free cash flow yield of 13%; the firm also expects an update on progress toward cost-cuts and margin enhancements goals at the analyst day meeting.
UBS also initiates Vistra Energy (VST +1.7%) but with a Neutral rating and $21 target, seeing shares as fairly valued even with closing of the Dynegy deal, as the company is more exposed longer term to volatility in the power markets.
16.30 PRINT LOL
THEN A 21.19
HAHA
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc. to Announce the Conclusion of its Business Review and the Launch of its Transformation Plan on July 12, 2017
NRG Energy upgraded to Buy at UBS as GenOn settlement, PJM add clarity
NRG Energy (NRG +3.2%) pops more than 3% after UBS upgrades shares to Buy from Neutral and raises its price target to $20 from $19, saying the GenOn settlement and latest PJM auction add clarity while the cost cutting thesis remains intact and the major near-term catalyst for the stock.
While the deadline for the cost review is set for Aug. 14, UBS expects more details to come out sooner and could well see management update 2017 guidance in the coming weeks given the added clarity provided by the GenOn settlement.
The firm continues to assume $140M of cost cuts in its base case valuation and sees further savings potential within the retail and renewable segments.
Oil and gas stocks slammed as U.S. crude slumps below $50/bbl
Energy stocks look to extend yesterday's losses as WTI crude oil breaks below $50/bbl for the first time this year, now -2.3% at $49.11 after tumbling below $49 earlier.
U.S. oil stockpiles have gained ~50M barrels since the start of the year, raising doubts about the effectiveness of OPEC production cuts.
NRG Energy (NRG -0.6%) says it is seeking U.S. regulatory approval for the sale of its gas-fired power plant in Neoga, Ill., to P-E fund Rockland Power Partners II.
It seems like that would be the shrewd move to make and focus on investing into cash generation, laying down debt etc.
OK, so given all of that how come they keep raising the dividend. I mean if they are looking for ways to decrease their debt, wouldnt cutting the dividend be the way to conserve cash?
Im looking for a company with promise and who pays dividends and saw a nice write up on Motley Crew about this company.
They are obligated to pay dividends. So until they release a statement regarding the retraction of dividends they will continue paying it. If you look at the 3 month chart you will clearly see that after every big drop there is a rebound, approximately to the fibs 50% mark. Rebounds, similar to retracements when a stock goes up a ton, happen all of the time. There needs to be some ground breaking news in order to turn this stock around. It very well could bounce back up a bit, but until it breaks the $20 range it can not be considered a reversal. I fully expect this to keep falling
Why are they still paying dividends then? Today midway, it started going back up... is that a sign of bottoming out?
I think you may be right. Analyst are likely covering their original calls leading me to believe there may be flat to downside risk for some time.
Nrg is in debt and needs money badly to get out of the debt. I do not see this going back up until some sort of partnership is reached and they get out of the red
NRG Energy (NYSE:NRG) sank to a 52-week low in today’s trade, but Credit Suisse sees a buying opportunity, rating shares at Outperform with a $30 price target an implying an 83% rise from today's close.
The firm says it has been surprised by the sharply negative investor reaction to NRG's "well-reasoned plan" to cut costs and reduce debt, and that the move felt like capitulation on competitive power broadly and the better known NRG specifically from a market looking to duck commodity exposure in a risk-off backdrop.
As you were saying...
Today's monster drop, imo, solidifies the continued downtrend towards $15.36, and potentially to the $10 range. I really hope they are working on something to turn this around. Should bounce tomorrow for a nice 5% gain, but will ultimately continue falling through supports
Wow haven't looked at this in awhile, almost as bad as CHK.
NRG Energy (NRG -3.6%) unveils several moves to reduce debt, buy back shares and raise cash through an asset sale, as it faces pressure over its expensive clean energy businesses.
In an investor presentation, NRG says it plans to spend $1.3B on reducing debt and buying back shares through 2016, including $250M in share repurchases this year, and plans to cut $150M in costs starting next year.
Technical bounce Monday with possible $19 hod, depending how market reacts of course. May have a few day rally, but will ultimately continue on its downtrend. I know you have a stake in this stock, keep buying, bottom is almost in. $15 will hopefully be the bottom, may fall below a tad. With football season in full swing and NFL support, NRG will make an epic reversal. I will be loading the truck at the bottom. This all depends on the DJI index, seems we main have entered a bear market, only time will tell.
http://newswatchinternational.com/news/large-inflow-of-money-witnessed-in-nrg-energy-inc-3.html
Large Inflow of Money Witnessed in NRG Energy, Inc.
By Francesca Conomos - Aug 6, 2015
NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NRG) witnessed a selling pressure and the shares last traded with a loss of -0.01 points or -0.05% at $20.03. Investors jumped in to buy the shares on weakness. The net money flow till latest update was calculated at $5.93 million with an inflow of $23.76 million in upticks and an outflow of $17.82 million in downticks. Using the data, the up/down ratio is found to be 1.33. The share price has recorded -10.78% on a weekly basis.A block trade of $6.81 million in uptick and $2.18 million in downtick was also observed, resulting in an up/down ratio of 3.12. The net money flow of the block trade stood at a $4.63, signaling heavy buying.
The company shares have dropped -33.44% from its 1 Year high price. On Nov 10, 2014, the shares registered one year high at $33.92 and the one year low was seen on Aug 4, 2015. The 50-Day Moving Average price is $22.75 and the 200 Day Moving Average price is recorded at $24.44.
On a different note, The Company has disclosed insider buying and selling activities to the Securities Exchange, The Securities and Exchange Commission has divulged in a Form 4 filing that the CEO of Nrg Energy, Inc., Crane David W had purchased shares worth of $116,950 in a transaction dated on March 2, 2015. A total of 5,000 shares were purchased at a price of $23.39 per share. The information is based on open market trades at the market prices.Option exercises are not covered. Currently the company Insiders own 0.7% of NRG Energy, Inc. Company shares. In the past six months, there is a change of 0.21% in the total insider ownership. Institutional Investors own 98.6% of Company shares. During last 3 month period, -2.26% of total institutional ownership has changed in the company shares.
NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NRG): The mean short term price target for NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NRG) has been established at $32.57 per share. The higher price target estimate is at $37 and the lower price target estimate is expected at $28 according to 7 Analyst. The stock price is expected to vary based on the estimate which is suggested by the standard deviation value of $2.99
Shares of NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NRG) ended Wednesday session in red amid volatile trading. The shares closed down 0.01 points or 0.05% at $20.03 with 7,235,465 shares getting traded. Post opening the session at $20.06, the shares hit an intraday low of $19.95 and an intraday high of $20.96 and the price vacillated in this range throughout the day. The company has a market cap of $6,680 million and the number of outstanding shares have been calculated to be 333,495,000 shares. The 52-week high of NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NRG) is $33.92 and the 52-week low is $19.905.
NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) is an integrated wholesale power generation and retail electricity company in the United States. NRG is a wholesale power generator engaged in the ownership and operation of power generation facilities; the trading of energy, capacity and related products; and the transacting in and trading of fuel and transportation services. NRG is a retail energy company engaged in the supply of energy, services, and sustainable products to retail customers in competitive markets through multiple channels and brands like Reliant Energy, Green Mountain Energy, and Energy Plus (collectively, the Retail Business). In September 2014, the Company acquired Goal Zero, bringing growing consumer products company and its suite of personal solar devices into NRG family.
http://www.greenbiz.com/article/3-economic-technology-forces-will-shape-future-NRG-IDEO-energy
NRG, IDEO on 3 mega-forces that will shape the future of energy
Lauren Hepler
Monday, April 27, 2015 - 2:30am
Shutterstock
Evolving utility business models and renewed focus on energy-related "hard technologies" are two factors driving change in how people and businesses procure electricity.
David Crane is banking on a fragile balancing act to see his company, power giant NRG Energy, through what he predicts will be an upheaval in the way electricity is generated, stored and purchased.
The key is balancing the "slow death" of utilities' core business — the centralized electrical grid, which may be poised to become "the backup system it should be" — with agressive expansion into renewable energy, distributed generation and related technologies, Crane explained at a recent event in San Francisco hosted by The Atlantic.
The chief executive of NRG recalled telecom giants forced to adapt to regulatory breakups during the 1980s and subsequently to the advent of the Internet, as an analogy for the turmoil that utilities soon could face.
David Crane, chief executive of NRG Energy.
"Almost every company out there faces some sort of existential threat," Crane said, invoking talk about disruption by tech icons such as Google's Eric Schmidt to help sell NRG's reinvention plan.
While the vast majority of NRG's portfolio still comprises coal, oil and natural gas, the company has stated a goal of cutting carbon dioxide emissions 90 percent by 2050. That's 10 percentage points deeper than the 80 percent power emissions reduction ordered by the United Nations during the same period to avoid catastrophic impacts of climate change.
Add to the urgency of climate issues other macro trends such as tech-enabled efficiency gains that could slash utility profit margins, or the potential for broader shifts in consumer demand, and today's dominant model of power companies "who have been granted, by various states, a monopoly" becomes much murkier, Crane said.
Although the oil price slump has kept things interesting while renewable energy costs continue to fall, a combination of market fragmentation and agressive new upstarts in the business of power — some backed by deep-pocketed institutions or investors — are starting to reveal what a new type of energy industry might look like.
Here are key trends identified by Crane and others jockeying for position in the evolving power sector:
1. The rise of purpose-driven consumption
The energy industry is already rife with opportunities to realize significant sustainability gains by cracking down on wasted power, thanks to inventions such as smart meters and other automated monitoring systems — features that are good for reducing the footprint of the power industry, but which also cut into the bottom line of electricity companies.
Where efficiency and power use could get much more interesting (or much scarier, if you're an incumbent provider) is behavior change that further reduces per capita energy consumption.
Crane posits a future where millennial consumers in particular gravitate toward "purpose-driven energy consumption."
Just as incumbents in sectors such as fast food and apparel are attempting supply chain improvements or revamping marketing campaigns in response to consumer demands for transparency and ethical production of goods, Crane sees climate change as a force that could mobilize new buying patterns in energy.
"The best hope we have for climate change is for millennials to basically vote with their purse or their wallet,” Crane said. "The fundamental issue we have is an issue of caring."
Kate Lydon, public sector portfolio director at design firm IDEO, said at the Atlantic event that energy conservation and climate advocates are increasingly focused on behavioral research and overhauling yesterday's turn-off-the-lights campaigns to capitalize on the sentiment that "where things come from matters to people.”
The key challenge for her: “How can we create meaningful connections between people and energy? For most people, it’s abstract. You don’t see it. It’s cheap."
One example of how to combat that sense of apathy is making evolving smart building technology more transparent. IDEO has worked with the U.S. Green Building Council, for example, to reinvent familiar LEED plaques as more dynamic digital screens that provide information about the building's footprint and the impact of its occupants' behavior.
Crane also sees energy as a matter of political framing. While positive messaging about environmental sustainability may not resonate all that widely, other incentives such as cost savings or long-term predictability could help.
"The battle that we have to win, that no one has figured out, is the 70 percent in the middle — the pragmatic environmentalist," he said, setting up a comparison to another well-known social movement: "I grew up during the Vietnam War. It was called the silent majority."
2. A return to 'hard technology'
As in other lucrative markets, such as the automotive sector, incumbent energy providers historically have retained their foothold through a combination of favorable regulatory policies and high barriers to entry for would-be competitors.
Underlying those dynamics is that investors haven't been inherently interested in shelling out money to change the current bloated power delivery system.
"To suddenly think that fund managers themselves will get fossil fuel companies to act on their own is never going to happen," Crane said.
While regulators in Europe and activist shareholders in the U.S. continue to debate other potential financial mechanisms — accounting for the potential of "stranded assets," putting a price on carbon — a slew of new entrants also is looking to jump into the mix.
The federally funded Lawrence Berkeley National Labratory in Berkeley, Calif., for instance, is making its facilities (supported by an $820 million annual budget) available to startups through multiple programs related to energy.
Energy storage is a hotspot in the field of power technology.
CalCharge, a public-private partnership focused on energy storage, fosters startups working in the field and also has enlisted companies such as Volkswagen and Duracell to help accelerate development and commercialization of new battery technologies.
Meanwhile, the lab also supports "industrial energy" incubator Cyclotron Road, formed in response to declining early stage investment in capital-intensive energy startups.
Cyclotron Road Director Ilan Gur said that his program's focus is on "hard technologies" rooted in scientific fields such as physics, electrochemistry or materials engineering.
“You do need some phenomenal resources," Gur said. “Going to a venture capitalist, it’s not clear you can get the amount of capital and time that you need."
Still, there are also examples of individual energy startups working to raise capital and get their programs to market through private investors.
LightSail Energy, a startup backed by $42 million from investors including Bill Gates and Silicon Valley venture capitalist Vinod Khosla, is working on commercializing a compressed air energy storage technology.
Danielle Fong, a 27-year-old thermodynamicist* who dropped out of both middle school and a Ph.D program before co-founding LightSail, said that climate change raises the stakes for finding grid-scale energy storage solutions to help grow renewable energy.
"We have to solve this problem within our generation,” she said.
On the other end of the energy delivery spectrum are companies such as uBeam, which closed a $10 million funding round in late 2014 to help manufacture and scale a wireless power technology that could erase the need for snarls of different types of power cords.
Whether the energy provider at hand is a venture-backed startup, a university spin off or a utility looking to diversify, Gur said one enduring question is if current economic forces will help or hinder efforts to make the generation and consumption of power more sustainable.
"Is capitalism the strong agent for change?" he asked at the event. "I think that’s going to come to a head around energy."
3. Defining grid 2.0
Sure, pockets of promising startup activity and one incumbent energy executive talking frankly about climate change are interesting, but how might all of these disparate efforts come together to change the power industry as a whole?
Grid integration of new electricity sources and a need for better energy management long have been considered imperatives for increasing adoption of renewable energy and increasing power efficiency.
"People will tell their grid provider to get lost," Crane said. "But it all has to be managed."
While startups such as LightSail and uBeam are hard at work on new hardware solutions, the energy management software field is also booming thanks to both upstarts and enterprise players such as Siemens and Intel. But the offerings are still nascent, and it would take much deeper market penetration to realize sustainability improvements that could make a dent on issues such as the power emissions contributing to climate change.
One possibility to catalyze larger-scale shifts in energy: pair efforts to improve power efficiency with complementary sustainability goals.
Crane, for instance, preaches four pillars of sustainability: clean energy; clean transportation; zero waste; and fresh water. Without delving too far into detail, he hinted at a potential market opening for a more interdisciplinary approach to these silos.
“The really cool microgrid," Crane said, "is not just going to be about energy."
*Correction: this article previously misidentified the professional background of Danielle Fong. She is a thermodynamicist.
The way I interpreted your message was that my analysis/ opinion was outlandish. Many times when I post something that people don't necessarily want to hear i get aggressive responses back.
So maybe I overreacted, in that case I apologize for my reaction. You are right it is currently trading at previous levels. If you go back into the chart history a few years, more like a decade or so, you will see that 15.30 or so was a level the chart bounced off of many times. 21 has been a support in the past, so I do see this trading above that for a period of time. I think there will be a serious fight between the Bears and Bulls as the months move on and the election grows closer. If 20 does not hold the next level of support is 15, which should be the absolute bottom, news pending. I like when I have someone opposing my opinion, it forces me to back check my analysis and strengthens my DD. I'm not here to argue, I am here to have a conversation regarding my knowledge of analysis and your knowledge of the company. It will be interesting to see what catalysts get this thing moving in the right direction. In no way am I hoping this stock/company falls any lower, but my analysis suggests there is weakness in the chart and strength in the trend
Fired up? I'm not fired up or on your case at all. I'm replying with my opinion on NRG as I thought you were doing. Where did that come from?? You mentioned NRG would return to previous levels and I pointed out a fact that NRG prices ARE at previous levels now. I'm sorry your ego was bruised. Please find someone else to argue with, I'm done!
I'm playing the chart. There is a clear down trend yes? Right, ok, well based on that and the major levels of support this has blasted through, my better judgment leads me to believe this may continue downward. The next major, super mega major, level of support is around 15. The fact that it fell through 21 indicates that it very well may not have found a bottom. I believe it will bounce off of 20 and find some resistance around 25. In which it may trade in the 20-25 range in search of news. This is a pivotal point in the chart. If news hits, and it has to be good, then the trend may reverse. If no news hits then expect a continuation. I'm not sure why you are so fired up. I am not guaranteeing anything, this is all speculation. But, hey chart structure and technical analysis go a long way. If you truly believe in this company and know for fact that it will bounce back, then what I say holds no weight. Keep averaging down and maybe one day you will be rewarded. Personally I like to see some support in a trend before putting my hard earned money on the block. I like this company I see major potential, but I will not act until I am certain there is money to be made in the short and long term. Take what I say however you like. I'm not forcing my opinion on you I am simply voicing my thoughts on how I think this will play out. If this magically shoots back above $30, then you can say something. Until then get off my case