Methes Energies Inc (MEIL)

[buccaneer1961]

to what date?

[samsamsamiam]

Another extension granted:


Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed Extra Text
1. 2540 - Notice of Entry of Ord 05/17/2021 Extra Text: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CUSTODIAN PURSUANT TO NRS 78.347AND FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND MANDATORY INJUNCTIVE - Transaction 8448918 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 05-17-2021:15:56:48
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/17/2021 Extra Text: Transaction 8448922 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 05-17-2021:15:57:39
3. 3980 - Stip and Order... 05/14/2021 Extra Text: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CUSTODIAN PURSUANT TO NRS 78.347, AND FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND MANDATORY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. - Transaction 8446567 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 05-14-2021:16:27:55
4. $1566 - $Def 1st App - Business Court 05/14/2021 Extra Text: METHES ENERGIES INTERNATIONAL - Transaction 8445353 - Approved By: CSULEZIC : 05-14-2021:11:38:43
5. 2520 - Notice of Appearance 05/14/2021 Extra Text: JAMES BOYLE ESQ OBO METHES ENERGIES INTL - Transaction 8445353 - Approved By: CSULEZIC : 05-14-2021:11:38:43

[Milo1]

Thanks, got you back.

[NOBO]

The credibility of George Sharp demonstrated here :

Forwardly's CEO, George Sharp, was quoted in yesterday's Financial Times $FORW

Forwardly's CEO, George Sharp, was quoted in yesterday's Financial Times $FORWhttps://t.co/rFTkDV3WdR

— Forwardly, Inc. (@ForwardlyInc) May 18, 2021

[eliot]

Aladdin Sane: thank you for the information. i gave you a member mark, and i think it is VERY important that you realize that i did NOT say i marked your member

Play Sharp - Trust Self

Fun Fact
Just because the body is small, does not mean the spirit is.

[eliot]

Milo: ya got the self another mark for deductive reasoning and level headedness, and for having a brain bigger than mine

play Sharp - trust self

Fun Fact
What is the only word in the English language that is always pronounced incorrectly?...............................................Incorrectly!


Fun Trick
Take a mug, or glass that you cannot see through and fill it with water. Place a piece of paper over the top of the mug. Turn the mug over and quickly place it upside down on a flat surface. Remove the paper by sliding it out from under the upside down mug. Clean up the small amount of water, and walk away with a secret silent smile, realizing, that you are the only one who knows what horror hides within the mug.

[DlarsMN]

Can’t DM, I’m still around. Have to use my alternate account now. Main got suspended indefinitely for calling some guys wife a midget I guess lol.

[buccaneer1961]

So at the hearing they will also give date. Of the big date. Hearing. Where decision can come?

[Aladdin Sane]

Correct. Judge might not entertain any shenanigans. No worries re: the link.

[Milo1]

He could also deny the extension. I don’t have a link at the moment.

[Aladdin Sane]

Thanks for the update. Can you send that link? The judge can still award custodianship in the interim of the extension, if there is cause.

[Milo1]

MEIL lawyers asked for extension. It will probably be given at the hearing.

[Aladdin Sane]

Judge said he would award Sharp custodianship unless otherwise persuaded. MEIL lawyer better be one persuading MF. Sharp may get custodianship no matter what. I believe Wednesday will be the 8th business day from 05/07.

[buccaneer1961]

LOOKS LIKE george getting his other ticker 'red tape' squared away https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_nv/E0269092018-6

[buccaneer1961]

True

[buccaneer1961]

Enough out if you

[Milo1]

Sharp will give them ample time to prepare a defense, that has been his MO, but he will not give them anything ridiculous. It doesn’t look as though anything is going to happen in the coming weeks. Events, at the very latest, should occur before the Sept. deadline, as that has been a line drawn in the sand with OTC custodianships, but I expect the hearing much earlier to allow Sharp to get the shell current before that same deadline.

I would bet we have as good a chance at seeing those current filings as we have at Trump voluntarily releasing his tax returns.

[Millenium323]

The market cap here is only $9 million dollars. Hardly what I would call a pump. It just goes to show how poorly the company was performing previously

[buccaneer1961]

Wish we had a hearing date

[Milo1]

I don’t know what argument they current owners could use to justify keeping the shell at this point. Barring them becoming current on the day before the hearing, I see it going Sharp’s way. I am very interested to see how this plays out.

I was just told that defense lawyers have been added now, and it will officially be contested. This was expected.

[buccaneer1961]

They are stupid baboons running this..justice demands. Gs be givin a shot I'd be stupid to defend current management

[WHIP THE HORSE]

Agree. They didnt file anything. Since the previous attempt to rest control from the owners of this shell, they havnt submitted any filing. Nobody knows what they did with the 5 million of the sale of the assets, no SEC filings, no FINRA filings. We dont know how they got away by no presenting any filing, or submitting any plans.

The PR person posting here talks about they have a plan. None exists, it is just BS.

They are derelict towards the SEC and irresponsible towards the shareholders.

[buccaneer1961]

No..they weren't filing anything beforehand....all lies!!!

[Dina]

A company that goes to court to fight for MEIL had either way the plan to file. Maybe with other companies there are other reasons like convertible debt, but here it was always planned to file someday. George only created bagholder with frontloading the stock and additional is responsible for unnecessary fees for lawyers. No one needs him here.

[Millenium323]

George probably saved the stock from eventual suspension due to non filing. Regardless of how this turns out, best of luck to all. I will sit back and watch the court process play itself out

[Millenium323]

It's going to be interesting hearing them try to defend years of inactivity on this stock. Especially after they were semi-contested last year and appear to have done nothing since. On a side note, it looks as if a lot of shorts were caught off guard on this stock.

[Dina]

lol, well said!

[samsamsamiam]

Good god! The judge isn’t going to give a shit what is said on some messageboard by anonymous posters!

George is already prepping his followers for the failure to be awarded custodianship!
He said it was a risk buying it and it is.


Hasn’t George already tweeted “who cares” about these tattle tales?

[Dina]

...and this strategy worked when Cutler tried to petition for custodianship. But funny enough the owners of the shell never followed through with getting the shell current after Cutler walked away.

The company thought it´s enough to keep NVSOS active.

Cutler filed custodianship after it was 2 years in default and days before NVSOS would be revoked. As soon he has seen it´s active he has withdrawn the petition. I strongly believe this is the reason.

Company thought after filing form 15 they have all the time they need to bring MEIL current and the plan was to do it when they have a plan for MEIL.
Because of the new SEC rules company would file either way next months with or without Sharp, so he does nothing else as wasting company´s money for attorneys and did not help one bit here.

Company never wanted to lose MEIL and no one could expect someone will file for custodianship in a moment the license was active.
It doesn´t happen often. Most custodianplayers do it when there is a revoked license or after it´s a long time in default.

[samsamsamiam]

You really are onto something, highly possible.

More like “on something”.


Pretty wild speculations by shareholders that never owned stock before the frontload.

[buccaneer1961]

Let's see why this was a failure

[buccaneer1961]

Open the books yes!! Let's see where everything went

[Milo1]

Wow defending those shell owners to the point of threatening litigation against you for arguing a hypothetical possibility.

Wow. No one should have any doubt who that person works for now.

A very interesting, and may I say entertaining, Saturday morning discourse. Do you want to forward this conversation on to Sharp, or should I.

A few toes got stepped on... hehe.

[buccaneer1961]

they text you to shut it off?

[buccaneer1961]

true discovery phase will bring out ;)

[buccaneer1961]

no...lets go foward....

[buccaneer1961]

you did 10 min. ago ;)

[Milo1]

At this point in the conversation, I would say that is extremely doubtful. You've outed yourself.

[buccaneer1961]

go george sharp!

[buccaneer1961]

friend...where did you go? george is the one who can help us out

[Dina]

Please, to be honest i really give a shit about the stupid conversation here. ;)

[Milo1]

Are you threatening him?!! Wow!

[buccaneer1961]

yes like this management had to be involved with shady things or just utter failing of the shareholders

[Milo1]

Good for you for exposing criminals! There sure are enough of them out there.

[buccaneer1961]

the shareholders have to unless they press him to do so

[Dina]

You were interviewed. Who interviewed you? It doesn´t matter but i believe this wasn´t a good experience in your life and you don´t need it again. Maybe you don´t care. But i would be careful after it.

[Milo1]

If Sharp gains custodianship of the shell I wonder if he has a right to sue for the funds on behalf of the shell's former company?

[buccaneer1961]

intresting

[Dina]

I don´t want to comment about your video. But you know accusing a company of these things can bring you in deep trouble, you should be careful.

There is no hint or no sign the company did something wrong. This is really only wild speculation because you don´t know what happened after the sale of assets with the money and you hope George has seen something which makes the custodianship possible.

There are many other companies which deregistered and sold assets and not many would do anything illegal, especially not previous nasdaq companies who know exactly what´s right and wrong.

Let´s wait for filings, i think it will be all explained.

[Milo1]

Lol, I thought she was talking to me.