Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Kunstler:
CLUSTERFUCK NATION – BLOGMay 3, 2024
Nostalgia for the Mud
“Resentful childless harpies unconsciously longing for domination. Why else worship at the altar of Hamas? Why else would it be so overwhelmingly female?” — Dr. Jordan Peterson
Wasn’t it cute how the youngsters who “occupied” Columbia U’s Hamilton Hall — and were busy smashing things up inside — demanded restaurant-grade meals sent in to avert “starvation and dehydration” amongst their dauntless ranks? You could imagine a colossal mommy breast with three hundred nipples descending from the sky over upper Manhattan to nourish them back to action. “Feed me. . . !”
It turns out, actually, that at least half the troops inside were not students at all, but rather semi-pro activists paid up to $7,000 each by George Soros’s Open Society Institute and other overtly insurrection-themed orgs, so you’d think that the troops could afford to load-up their ever-ready backpacks with Clif bars and bottles of Smart Water. The order-in food and beverage gambit suggests we should understand that this is not so much politics as the acting out of a game — which is exactly what you might expect of people who spend more time on video screens than in the real world — in which something like a half-time intermission for refreshments is de rigueur.
Alas, they were not obliged with DoorDash servings of Alitcha (“Ensemble of potatoes, carrots, collard greens, and cabbage baked in turmeric,” $22.30) from the nearby Massawa Ethiopian bistro, or Firecracker Chicken from Junzi Kitchen over on Broadway and 113th Street. And then, when the cops came to roust them out into the big buses now used as paddy-wagons for such events, the occupiers were heard to whine, “I have finals and I need to go home!” You’ve got to wonder how they’ll make out when “Joe Biden” drafts their ass to go fight the Russians out on the Ukrainian buzzard flats, about which the White House is just now sending out early signals.
It has been observed that a clear majority of the pro-Hamas activists are young women — which makes sense considering that they are the largest demographic evincing mental illness on America’s social landscape these days. Thus, they are marching in support of a sect that specializes in the rape, mutilation, and murder of young women like themselves, or at least treats them as chattels, hidden under black bag-like garments. The group psychology on display has more occult angles than any movie by the Wachowski sisters.
Among the marching Columbia students who are not paid outside activists, a few are apparently Jewish, such as spokesperson Johannah King-Slutzky (actual name, hat-tip Alex Berenson, who ID’d her), the winsome creature who complained about the lack of order-in meals at Hamilton Hall. Another observer on “X” who styles himself @J9_ATX identified the syndrome in play as “oppression envy,” among women seeking compensatory validation for occupying such a privileged niche on Planet Earth as a cushy Ivy League college — featuring international cuisine stations in the dining halls — while their third world sisters trudge through the burning sands of Al-Kufra carrying water-jugs on their heads as they dodge the odious “wind scorpions” of the region.
Higher Ed in the USA was already chugging down the suicide track before this spring’s eruption of pro-Hamas fury. The college loan racket (government-backed) had the perverse effect of pumping up tuition costs beyond what even many pretty well-off families could afford, while loading up young people with life-wrecking obligations (debt which “Joe Biden” is now shifting onto the creditors, US tax-payers). Decades of DEI have filled the faculties with incompetents and assorted malcontents teaching fantasy curricula with no real-life value, and burdened the schools with cadres of overpaid diversity busybodies and thought-police. Diversity college presidents are very publicly failing to cope. The whole rotten train is going off the rails.
I’m not at all sanguine that the society we are becoming will need this vast infrastructure for babysitting young adults who could otherwise make themselves useful and productive on-the-ground in lines of work that actually keep civilized life going. This is too self-evident now to belabor, though there is an awful lot of confusion about what kind of society we might become.
I doubt that it is to be the utopia of robots, A-I, and non-stop sexual titillation that the techno-narcissists dream of. Rather, it will be a society struggling to keep too much complex stuff running with insufficient energy resources and capital — that is, a society falling apart, losing knowledge, technical know-how, comfort, and convenience while having a hard time feeding itself.
The campus Hamas zealots ironically (and tragically) represent exactly the sort of rough medievalism that the citizens of Western Civ countries would be chary of sliding into. You’d have to sadly conclude that many young people really can’t take much more Modernity, and are now pretty avid to opt out of it, even as they gaze into the magic, glowing pixels of their iPhone screens.
https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/nostalgia-for-the-mud/
" Today's the Day " >
" for the Mudders "
Danger, danger:
Congress Warns If We Don’t Keep Sending Billions To Ukraine, The War Might End
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congress issued a dire warning to the American people Friday, sternly reminding voters that if they do not keep sending billions of tax dollars to Ukraine, the war might end.
"This is America. We can't let this happen," said Senator Chuck Schumer in a press conference. "Our donors at Lockheed Martin, General Dynamic, Teledyne, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Burisma are running out of patience. If we don't inject their weapon supply chains with fresh cash immediately, Ukraine and Russia might be forced to broker a peace deal."
"I shudder at the thought."
Foreign policy experts concurred that essential defense contractors and Ukrainian shell companies will run out of money to launder within a few weeks, which might force the hands of Russian and Ukrainian leaders to sign a peace treaty and stop slaughtering each other.
"I don't want to imagine a world where people on the other side of the globe aren't killing each other with American weapons," said Secretary of State Blinken. "I urge Congress to put aside their differences and support this endless war. For America."
At publishing time, Republicans had shown willingness to send more funding to Ukraine in exchange for a promise of future conversations to plan potential negotiations to secure the southern border maybe someday.
https://babylonbee.com/news/congress-warns-if-we-dont-keep-sending-billions-to-ukraine-the-war-might-end
The US government is a freak show. I don't know if it can be fixed at this point.
LMAO, I was reading about that earlier, think they have been Bud Lighted, LOL
Hims CEO Offers Jobs to Anti-Israel Campus Protesters, Angering Investors
OLIVIA RONDEAU 3 May 2024 5:14
US taxpayers shouldn’t be subsidizing idiotic college extremism
By David Harsanyi Published May 3, 2024, 5:55 p.m. ET
That was hysterical. Cock-a-doodle-doo.
Yep. Wake up, Commies.
Howdy Mr. G. Hope you enjoyed this week's taste of summer.
I'm looking forward to the cooler weekend.
Something for everyone in the great northeast.
Take care.
lol... Excellent. Let's hear it for the working man.
Enjoy your weekend, cap.
Hope to see you again next Friday.
Thanks, cap. No legitimate complaints on this end.
Compared to others I know... I'm in great shape for the shape I'm in.
Almost forgot this, been saving it for a few days!
Yes, he was a very wise man.
Ronald Regan was a very wise man:
Hope all is well young lady. It's a good thing I can't post a lot here on certain days. I'd be in trouble with the new world order.
It's unreal what colleges have become Larry. It's such a shame and I feel so bad for the vets who fought for our Country. I can only imagine how they feel about what's going on in this country.
Happy Hour is here again! Howdy, cap.
Always a good day when you stop by.
Keep your powder dry and watch your back.
I learned from a very wise man... If anyone ever comes to you and says we're from the Government and we're here to help.
Run like Hell!
"Do not comply" Don't Worry!
Dumb, Dumber, and Dum-dee-dee-dum
Irina Slav
May 03, 2024
Denial, disinformation, and doublespeak. That’s how a group of Democrat legislators in the U.S. Congress dubbed a Senate budget committee hearing that took place this week.
Here’s the full name: Denial, Disinformation, and Doublespeak: Big Oil’s Evolving Efforts to Avoid Accountability for Climate Change. Passionate, right? Righteous. Highly impressive. And the result of an “investigation” into Big Oil that started three years ago.
The conclusion of that investigation? Big Oil is bad because it knew about climate change and didn’t tell the whole kindergarten, and also Big Oil doesn’t love the climate and wants the planet to burn. You might think I’m oversimplifying to mock and deride the investigators but here’s a quote.
Among the assertions made by one of the legislators partaking in the hearing party were the following: “Big Oil continues to conceal the facts about their business model and obscure the actual dangers of fossil fuels, including natural gas, in order to block the climate action we need.” Same thing, only said in pompous language.
The legislator, by the name of Jamie Raskin, seems really passionate about the climate. “Despite knowing about the devastating effects of their oil and gas products on the planet for decades, the industry has always prioritized its bottom line and chosen low-road PR tactics over a high-road commitment to addressing the crisis.” Yep. That’s real passion right there. Too bad passion rarely keeps company with reason.
Big Oil’s reaction to the latest round of blame-flinging and name-calling was one of exasperation, with the exception of Shell, which had this to say about the documents waved around as evidence of knowing about climate change and hiding it for profit. These documents, a spokesman said, “are evidence of Shell’s efforts to set realistic targets, hi-grade its portfolio and meaningfully participate in the energy transition.”
Speaking of Shell, the company had an eventful week that also happened to be highly amusing for me. First, there was the report that a group of 27 institutional shareholders had called on Shell’s other shareholders to vote for a resolution demanding more of what everyone calls “climate action” as if that phrase means something.
The group, which together has 2.5% in Shell, said in its letter to their fellow Shell-holders that the company had to do more about cutting emissions because Paris Agreement strategy alignment was “essential to preserve the health of the global economy”.
You’d no doubt be shocked to learn that the originator of the letter-writing effort was none other than Follow This, the activist shareholding scheme that has been filing resolutions against Big Oil for a decade and has recently started to experience some pushback as Big Oil started making Even Bigger Money. This has not made Follow This a happy scheme.
Just a day after the news about the shareholder letter broke, Shell reported a net profit of $7.7 billion for the first quarter of the year, beating analyst forecasts by over $1 billion. It also said it would buy back $3.5 billion worth of shares over the next quarter. Now, who are those shareholders going to listen to — Follow This or the company that pays them for their generosity in buying shares in it?
Regrettably, the answer to this question may not be as straightforward as it seems, based on that letter that features among its signatories entities such as Amundi and AXA. Apparently, the idea that reason rules in the financial world is a huge illusion.
While asset managers with Shell holdings fret about the health of the global economy, which apparently depends on Shell’s production plans, a California court — I repeat, a California court — just killed a kids’ climate lawsuit. I guess even evil climate deniers need a bit of good news once in a while.
Anyway, that court, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, dismissed the case, brought in by a group of 21 children on the grounds that, per Reuters, “courts could not mandate broad policy changes that are better left to Congress and the executive branch.”
The kids, gently guided in their righteous battle by Our Children’s Trust, which you’ve probably heard about because having children sue various governments is all it does, initially wanted the court to make the U.S. federal government say Mea culpa, self-flagellate, change its energy policies and phase out “subsidies” for oil and gas production. That was back in 2020 and the 9th Circuit Court promptly dismissed the case.
But Our Children’s Trust doesn’t give up that easily. After that first dismissal, they changed the tune, now only wanting a declaration that these policies were wrong. An Oregon district judge obliged and gave the lawsuit a second chance of life. Well, that ended this week, for good this time.
You’d think Our Children’s Trust would give up and go home but you’d be wrong. There’s this to be said about fungal infections and climate litigators: they are stubborn little things. So now the case is going in front of an extended panel at the 9th Circuit Court in hopes 11 judges would rule differently from three. Because they so did back in 2020, when OCT did the same after the initial court ruling, as in, they didn’t.
"This is a tragic and unjust ruling, but it is not over," one OCT attorney said in comments following the ruling. Ominous words, I’m sure. Maybe it would make her feel better if she knew that other climate crusaders had much bigger, much more serious problems than her. Because tragic and unjust as that ruling may have been it pales in comparison to the tragedy and unjustness that the Basel III banking framework is about to unleash on the energy transition. Allow me to take a moment to compose myself.
Okay, so. Remember the 2008 financial crisis, right? Remember how no one went to prison for it but regulators rushed, nay, scrambled, to make new rules to prevent that kind of thing from happening again, right? Well, the result is the Basel III framework, which in very crude terms will require large banks to hold more capital as buffer against potential crises. Guess what that means.
Why, it means banks won’t be able to be as generous with wind and solar projects as they have been so far. As illustration, CNBC related this week the tragic and unjust story of one solar developer who said that “the proposed rule “potentially makes projects unfinanceable with the implied costs” and that he’s already heard from bankers who have said they won’t be able to continue funding renewable energy projects.”
If you just laughed, may Jamie Raskin come down upon you like a sack of organic fertiliser. Shame on you. Unfortunately, there’s more shameful laughter-inducing news. It’s not just raining bad news for the transition this week, it’s pouring.
Denmark’s Orsted this week warned that costs for wind projects will remain elevated until central banks start cutting rates. “The longer interest rates stay high, the longer prices in [renewable energy] auctions will stay high,” CEO Mads Nipper told the FT and if you’re laughing now, that’s just heartless.
So, wind and solar are going to remain costly because of interest rates (and nothing else at all) and banks will become less generous because they’d be obliged to keep more money at home. Can the future get any bleaker?
Of course it can. The UK’s Prime Minister just played a cruel joke on all the righteous defenders of Mother Earth in the country. You know what this man has done? He’s gone and allowed drilling for oil and gas at offshore wind sites. The Guardian is in understandable pieces about it.
I would like to share with you the comments that a former climate official with the Sunak government, Chris Skidmark — I mean Skidmore — had for the Guardian: “Instead of wind powering new oil, the investment should instead be in more wind and renewables. More fossil fuels will only create stranded assets and stranded jobs at a time when demand for oil and gas is falling.” Who wants to tell Chris about Basel III? And oil demand, too.
Thickening the gloom, Wood Mackenzie this week issued its own warning, saying that a five-year delay in the energy transition “could see the global average temperature rise to 3-degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels.” May the original Wood Mackenzie and its valuable analysis rest in peace. Someone would have to tell the new, crusader-friendly, Wood Mac about Basel III, too. And maybe about the reliability of a concept as abstract as a global average temperature.
To end on a positive note, the G7 shook hands on a 2035 phaseout of coal power and I can’t wait to see this implemented. I also can’t wait for the new coal consumption data from Asia once the G7 begins the phaseout in earnest. The other thing I can’t wait for is the inevitable news that AI data centre operators are moving their operations to Asia where the electricity supply is reliable. Imagine that.
https://irinaslav.substack.com/p/dumb-dumber-and-dum-dee-dee-dum?publication_id=376351&post_id=144198693&isFreemail=false&r=rd9j8&triedRedirect=true
Friday's Energy Absurdity: Billy Blazejowski the Climate Alarm Idea Man Strikes Again!
He's got a million of 'em!
David Blackmon
May 03, 2024
All you younger readers are just going to have to get used to this old reference, because Billy Blazejowski, the “idea man” played by Michael Keaton in the hilarious ‘80s comedy “Night Shift,” has truly been reincarnated and is working hard to kill the climate alarm boogeyman.
Back on April 3, I wrote about how the 21st century Billy Blaze brought us the grand idea of blocking the sun by floating thousands of huge helium-filled balloons into the stratosphere to fight the climate boogeyman. Sure, after all, nothing could possibly go wrong with such a plan. It’s even better than Billy’s early idea to sell cans of tuna with the mayonnaise already inside. Who can even argue with this stuff?
This week gives us a group of Billy Blazejowskis at LanzaTech with another fantastic idea to cure the climate-demic. And don’t worry: No big balloons are involved in this one. Indeed, these idea men aren’t planning to put anything into the atmosphere at all, which should give us all a huge sigh of relief!
Until, that is, you read what they are planning on doing.
I’ll let this excerpt from a story at OilPrice.com fill you in:
U.S.-based biotechnology firm is using carbon-eating bacteria to turn emissions from steel mills, refineries, and other heavily polluting industrial processes into ethanol and chemicals, helping reduce carbon emissions and make recycled, sustainable products.
LanzaTech, which has been operating at a commercial scale since 2018, not only captures the carbon gases at industrial sites but it also transforms them – using bacteria in bioreactors – into fuels and chemicals. These recycled products are directly replacing virgin fossil carbon in consumer goods and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), the company says.
"LanzaTech's carbon recycling technology is like retrofitting a brewery onto an emission source like a steel mill or a landfill site, but instead of using sugars and yeast to make beer, pollution is converted by bacteria to fuels and chemicals," the biotechnology firm says.
"You can find carbon dioxide from almost every steel mill and refinery. You can even make it from trash," LanzaTech's chief executive officer Jennifer Holmgren told The Wall Street Journal.
[End]
Ok, so, we’re going to eat the carbon with bacteria. Let’s all remember that carbon dioxide is not any sort of pollutant whatsoever, no matter what any 5 idiots (I’m looking at you, Anthony Kennedy) on any US Supreme Court have ruled. Carbon dioxide is, in truth, the very foundation for all life on planet Earth.
But now the Billy Blazejowskis at LanzaTech, driven by climate alarm hysteria, are spreading bacteria to eat it.
Hey, we’re all carbon-based beings, aren’t we? Remember the meme below that sits atop my landing page?
hmmmmmmmm…Billy Blaze might be more of a threat than we all thought.
That is all.https://blackmon.substack.com/p/fridays-energy-absurdity-billy-blazejowski?publication_id=712558&post_id=144268697&isFreemail=false&r=rd9j8&triedRedirect=true
Democratic Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar expected to be indicted >
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-texas-rep-henry-cuellar-expected-indicted-doj-sources
Socialists, non-students, activists emerge as leaders >
https://americasvoice.news/justthenews/socialists-non-students-emerge-leaders-anti-israel-protests-campuses/
((Put link in Browser ~ UnMute & Hit Play )) >
pic.twitter.com/Npf4l2Ox0B
Morning, Sir,. keep that AC near by going to hit the 80's so they say, been doing a lot of gardening. enjoy the day
Welcome back, fellow Joisey guy!
I'm beyond sick of these idiot scuzbuckets and their "protests". They haven't a clue and just let the agitators lead them by their nose rings.
lol It's about time. Enjoy.
More great TV today as UCLA gets cleansed.
Still hope for our young kids and it starts at Chapel Hill .... (scroll down to see videos) ..https://americanmilitarynews.com/2024/05/videos-pics-american-flag-defended-by-heroic-college-students/
TURBO CANCER – Nurses are developing advanced (usually Stage 4) turbo cancers after being forced into taking COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. I present 30 nurses & their tragic stories!
https://vigilantnews.com/post/turbo-cancer-nurses-are-developing-advanced-usually-stage-4-turbo-cancers-after-being-forced-into-taking-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-i-present-30-nurses-their-tragic-stories/
Watch for future protests and lawsuits against law enforcement for police brutality!!!
" Lol .. !!! . Marjorie Taylor Green's new nickname >
((( Moscow Marjorie ))) .. !!! . They will regret that move " .. !!
Per this, there were a lot of outsiders mixed in with the arrested students on campuses throughout the U.S.
US colleges where students have been arrested over anti-Israel protests
By Ronny Reyes Published April 30, 2024, 8:36 p.m. ET
https://nypost.com/2024/04/30/us-news/us-colleges-where-students-have-been-arrested-over-anti-israel-protests/
Back in my day, Mumsy often said the anti-war protestors were being used.
I scoffed then. I'm paying attention now.
In retrospect, I believe Mother was right... again.
These pro-terrorist, collegiate nitwits are being used... by outside agitators.
Too bad stupidity isn't a terminal illness.
omg Tear gas. LOVE it.
I assume you're talking about the Columbia Tent-In.
Still don't have it in me to read the news.
Getting excited in a major POed way is bad for my health.
Great TV today.... Love the smell of tear gas in the morning!
The Left-Wing Media Frets Over Presidential Debates
Beyond the ratings windfall, some could be dreading Trump-Biden TV showdown.
by Graham J Noble | Apr 30, 2024
Will American voters get to see presidential debates in 2024? Currently, nobody really knows the answer to that question even though the Commission on Presidential Debates has created a schedule. The first face-off between the two presumptive nominees – incumbent Joe Biden and challenger Donald Trump – is slated for Monday, Sept. 16. While the television networks appear anxious for the debates to go ahead, there seems to be something of an emerging campaign by left-leaning print and digital media outlets to shield Biden from having to take the stage for direct verbal confrontations with his predecessor and would-be successor.
On April 14, 11 prominent news organizations issued a joint statement urging presidential candidates to publicly commit to a series of televised debates. CBS, CNN, ABC News, Fox News Media, and several other organizations argue that the stakes in this election are “exceptionally high” and that “there is simply no substitute for the candidates debating with each other, and before the American people, their visions for the future of our nation.”
One hardly needs a master’s degree in communications to figure out why these news companies want the debates to go ahead: Televised Trump-Biden grudge-matches are sure to be ratings gold. It is beginning to look, however, as though a lot of Biden supporters in the world of digital and print journalism are less enthusiastic about the idea. A quick internet search for “presidential debates 2024” throws out a list of articles that attempt to rationalize, in various ways, the argument against presidential debates. Unsurprisingly, each one of these articles focuses on Trump, and why he is supposedly unworthy to share a stage with the current occupant of the White House. Examples include:
Why Biden Should Not Debate Trump – The Atlantic, April 16
Have presidential debates outlived their usefulness? – The Boston Globe, April 15
TV networks want Biden and Trump to debate. What’s the point? – Poynter., April 10
In The Atlantic article, David Frum argued that Trump should not be given “equal status on a TV stage” to Biden because to do so “would be a dire normalization of [Trump’s] attempted coup.” The opinion piece from Poynter. is at least a more honest and less hysterical argument – agree with it or not. Presidential debates have become a tradition, the author posited, and they are very important – just perhaps not this time around because, “In the end, there is a risk that Trump won’t play by the rules and any debate will skid off the rails.”
Presidential Debates Perilous for Biden?
That was a common thread running through many of these media articles: that Trump “won’t play by the rules” of presidential debates. The unavoidable suspicion, of course, is that the authors of these articles know full well that Biden has a potentially career-ending problem. His undeniable cognitive decline in recent years renders him incapable of holding his own against Trump in anything but the most rigidly controlled and staged-managed event. The rules by which Trump might refuse to play are perhaps those these journalists hope would be put in place to make the debates as accommodating as possible to Biden. They would leave little or no room for mistakes on his part – or for any appearance that he is not up to the task.
It’s a theory supported by former Biden White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain’s recent appearance on MSNBC. Speaking with Jen Psaki – a former White House press secretary under Biden who now hosts her own show on the network — Klain said:
“I think what we have to see is something different than we saw in 2016 and 2020, where the debate commission lost control of the debates. Trump didn’t follow the rules at all. He talked over his opponents. There wasn’t a fair division of time. It was more a spectacle than a debate. That’s always going to be true with Donald Trump on the stage.”
Klain went on to describe his vision of the Trump-Biden presidential debates. He spoke about the candidates getting equal time and “where there is an orderly way of proceeding.” The president’s critics could be forgiven for interpreting that as a way of shaping the debate format so that Biden can recite prepared comments without interruption and without having to respond to Trump spontaneously.
It is fair to say that in past presidential debates – even up to as recently as the 2020 Democratic Party primaries – Biden usually came off as calm, cool, collected, and rational, even if one does not agree with his politics. Since that time, however, he has demonstrated a tendency to lose his temper, to raise his voice at times to a level one might even describe as hysterical, and to call people names. Additionally, Biden is now known for his frequent gaffes and a habit of recounting fictional episodes from his personal and political history. In a nutshell, he has on several occasions conducted himself in a manner often ascribed to Trump – and frequently used against the 45th president.
Those on the political left wary of presidential debates between Biden and Trump are, in all likelihood, concerned about these very issues. Thus, they would prefer to see either no debates or only events that are very strictly regulated. They are almost certainly hoping to eliminate the possibility of Biden embarrassing himself or simply being unable to go toe to toe with his notoriously boisterous opponent.
Trump has made it clear that he wants to debate Biden – who has, in turn, now claimed he is happy to engage in presidential debates with Trump. However, neither campaign has officially accepted the debate commission’s schedule – and so it still remains to be seen whether there will be any presidential debates in 2024. If there are none, then Biden’s handlers might well breathe a sigh of relief. Trump, on the other hand – along with his supporters – will probably feel cheated.
https://www.libertynation.com/the-left-wing-media-frets-over-presidential-debates/
Right there with ya Bull:
Wow! The creepy judge let him go. (I'll check later.)
Good thing. This trial is sheer persecution of a political opponent. (JMO)
From the (still) pictures I've seen, it looks like it's wearing on Trump.
I'm amazed at his stamina. Hope tonight's rallies are a huge success.
Thanks Larry. Plus, there will be great TV leading up to the rallies as they drag protestors off the campuses.
" I could be wrong, but I think >
He's off today to be at Barron's Graduation " .. !!
Half day at court for The Donald???
I can't bear to read the news just yet.
Morning, Larry.
#2 ~ *Live* ~ President Donald J. Trump, 45th President >
of the United States of America,
will deliver remarks at a Rally in Freeland, Michigan on
Wednesday, May 1, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. ET.
Watch LIVE on RSBN starting at approximately 3:30 p.m. ET.
https://www.rsbnetwork.com/video/live-president-trump-holds-a-rally-in-freeland-michigan-5-1-24/
Followers
|
379
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
21
|
Posts (Total)
|
397978
|
Created
|
04/05/03
|
Type
|
Premium
|
Moderator pos_stock_hoarder | |||
Assistants ONEBGG ksquared Gmenfan |
<> THIS BOARD IS NOT FOR THE LIBERAL OR DEMOCRATICALLY SENSITIVE!!! <>
<> We on NOLIB are not suggesting that being a liberal or a democrat is somehow wrong, We just don't care for the liberal or democratic point of view. <>
* Rules Of The Board *
1- Be courteous and respectful of other posters.
2- We Require that ALL copy and pastes of articles have the full link included.
3- Conservative bashing WILL NOT be tolerated here, all posting of this nature will be deleted without mercy.
4. Do not block Moderators. Most board issues can be resolved via pm and keeps the board from being disrupted.
~ Thank You!
<> Anti-Liberal Links <> One Opinion Of Today's Liberal <>
Do not use this board to attack specific posters, especially liberals. They cannot post to retaliate. This is not fair.
If you want to go after a particular person, do it in another forum. Not here. Thanks.
In Fact - No discussion of other boards are allowed here , this includes links to other boards,
all posts doing so will be deleted. ~ The Mods
In Memorium
This board is dedicated to it's founder and my good friend ONEBGG
who was a Patriot and was a Good Friend to Many.
These words fit him best:
Good friends are like gold: Rare, Reliable, Beautiful and Valuable.
signed....T
Posts Today
|
21
|
Posts (Total)
|
397978
|
Posters
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Assistants
|
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |