Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
and you are expecting ? i mean your reason to still be in it?
RE: are you in favor of recovery for ct's or not?
—-//——-//—-
If you’re still expecting money from the distributions, then you’re really confused. My answer is still the same.. YOU WILL NOT GET EVEN A PENNY.
I’ve been saying it in fifteen years.
$.0014 , the trading fee is higher. this confirms that they must be trading each month to be listed and some large holder is keeping them alive?
"LBHI IS COMING BACK AS A GOING CONCERN" i am confused. are you in favor of recovery for ct's or not? i get this feeling that you think ct's wont get a dime as creditors need to get paid in full. what is your stance?.
they did this before....
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
12
0
January 6, 2022, Southern District of New York – Varde Investment Partners, L.P. transfers its claims in the face amount of $8,395,690.46 (Claim No. 27940) to Seaport Loan Products LLC and Seaport Loan further sells claim in the face amount of $2,795,562.88 (Claim No. 27940) to Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P. in the bankruptcy case of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Amount of Claim: $122,834,000.00
SOLD TO;
STONEHILL INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS LP
320 PARK AVENUE, 26TH FLOOR
NEW YORK NY 10022
NEW YORK NY
Hedge Fund
Stonehill Institutional Partners is based out of New York. Whalewisdom has at least 18 13G filings, and 4 Form 4 filings The firm last filed a Form D notice of exempt offering of securities on 2023-10-17. The filing was for a pooled investment fund: hedge fund The notice included securities offered of Equity,Pooled Investment Fund Interests
—-//———///———-//—-
THEY ARE NOT STUPID TO BUY A UNPAID CLAIM AGAINST A BANKRUPTED COMPANY IF THEY DONT KNOW THAT LBHI IS COMING BACK AS A GOING CONCERN.
$122,824,000.00.. WONDER HOW MUCH THEY PAY FOR IT?
1,440 NQ’s. Traded at $.000001. Total value of the trade $.0014. You just can’t make this up. On to Moab via Mesa Verde NP. Cheers
The Lehman Groups' Waterfall:
LBIE
LBHI2 and WW
LBH PLC
LBHI's sub debt note in LBH PLC $1 Billion
LBHI
Senior Creditors
Subordinated Creditors' CTs Holders' interest
Song by Harold Melvin & the Blue Notes
If you don't know me by now
You will never never never know me (oh)
All the things that we've been through
You should understand me like I understand you
Now baby I know the difference between right and wrong
I ain't gonna do nothing to upset our happy home
Oh don't get so excited when I come home a little late at night
'Cause we only act like children when we argue fuss and fight
If you don't know me by now (if you don't know me)
You will never never never know me (you'll never, never know me)
If you don't know me by now(if you don't, if you don't know me baby)
You will never never never know me(No you won't)
We've all got our own funny moods
I've got mine, woman you've got yours too
Just trust in me like I trust in you
As long as we've been together it should be so easy to do
Just get yourself together or we might as well say goodbye
What good is a love affair when you can't see eye to eye, oh
If you don't know me by now (if you don't, if you don't know me baby)
You will never never never know me (hey hey, hey hey, hey hey)
If you don't know me by now (you will never never never know me)
You will never never never know me (oh)
Source: LyricFind
Songwriters: Kenneth Gamble / Leon Huff
If You Don't Know Me by Now lyrics © BMG Rights Management, Kobalt Music Publishing Ltd., ONErpm, Royalty Network, Songtrust Ave, Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC, TuneCore Inc., Universal Music Publishing Group, Warner Chappell Music, Inc
and the relevance?
Continue with page 5:
5
demonstrates the universal applicability of the principle. In any event, whether a
rule of law applicable in myriad circumstances applies to the parties’ New York law-
governed contract is a quintessential question of law👉️ warranting review by the Court
of Appeals to clarify the now uncertain and confused state of the law.
Similarly legal in nature were Supreme Court’s (and this Court’s)
misinterpretation and misapplication of other cases construing the same contract at
issue here. For example, AGFP repeats Supreme Court’s erroneous interpretation
of the Devonshire case when it contends (AGFP Opp. n.8) that Devonshire, as the
non-defaulting party, “did not attempt to calculate a theoretical market price for the
terminated transactions.”👉️ That is because the parties had amended their ISDA
Master Agreement to provide for an alternative calculation in the event Devonshire
was the non-defaulting party. LBIE Reply Br. (NYSCEF No. 29) at 7 n.1. AGFP
could have sought a similar amendment to the parties’ Agreement here, 🇱🇷but it did
not, and Supreme Court’s misapplication of Devonshire to the standard, un-amended
ISDA Master Agreement constituted legal error.
These legal errors are subject to review by the Court of Appeals not only
because they are wrong but because they raise issues of significant public
importance. 👉️New York, as the world’s financial capital, has a unique interest in
ensuring the predictable and fair interpretation of the ISDA Master Agreement
consistent with the principles of New York law by which it is governed. Supreme
1700 KQ’s; 1285 MQ’s
Sent from Monument Valley, watching the sun set was cool. I’ll be having my coffee at sunrise. Have to keep living while we wait. Cheers
Pretty big Claim transfer...
1 Dockets
Sort by:Filed Date
Docket # 61661
Filed May 07 2024
Transfer Agreement FRBP. Transfer Agreement 3001 (e) 2 Transferors: Varde Investment Partners, L.P. (Claim No. 25450, Amount $122,834,000.00) To Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P. filed by Edward J. Leen on behalf of Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P.. (Leen, Edward)
Case Number 08-13555 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
https://dm.epiq11.com/case/lbh/dockets/61661?debtorId=1906
Continue with next page:
6
Court’s departure from well-settled New York law governing the calculation of loss-
of-bargain damages, and its departure from the well-settled rules of construction
governing the ISDA Master Agreement, raise legal issues of state-wide and indeed
global public importance, necessitating Court of Appeals review.
LBIE has therefore identified legal errors that this Court appears to have
overlooked or misapprehended, warranting reargument, and that present issues of
significant public importance and conflicting caselaw that ought to be reviewed and
resolved by the Court of Appeals.
what implications does this have on capital trusts?
Continue from my previous post:
4
is axiomatic that “[t]he interpretation and construction of such documents as
contracts … are matters properly treated as questions of law and are reviewable by
this Court.” Gitelson v. Du Pont, 17 N.Y.2d 46, 48 (1966). 👉️In this case—where the
contract at issue governs hundreds of trillions of dollars of financial derivatives
between parties entirely remote from the parties in suit, see JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. v. Godfrey Ltd. P’ship, No. 602920/2008, 2012 WL 10007863, at *9 (Sup. Ct.
N.Y. County July 16, 2012), there is a clear and significant public interest in ensuring
certainty and consistency in its interpretation and construction.👈️
Supreme Court’s ruling that market prices were “irrelevant” also raises a
series of additional legal errors of broad legal consequence to businesses governed
by New York law. AGFP claims to have calculated Loss based on “loss of bargain”
pursuant to the parties’ contract. A7147, 9416. But New York law—which governs
the parties’ contract—requires that loss of bargain be calculated by reference to
market price, White v. Farrell, 20 N.Y.3d 487, 499 (2013), even if market prices are
not directly observable, Credit Suisse First Bos. v. Utrecht-Am. Fin. Co., 84 A.D.3d
579, 580 (1st Dep’t 2011). By affirming Supreme Court’s contrary ruling, the
Decision stands in direct conflict with these Court of Appeals and First Department
decisions applying fundamental damages principles.
AGFP contends that these cases (and many others cited by LBIE for the same
proposition) did not involve precisely the same facts as this dispute—but that only
MEMORANDUM OF LAW (Motion #1919)
Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Motion for Leave to Reargue, or in the Alternative, Le ... show more Rossman, A.
Filed: 05/03/2024
Received: 05/03/2024
LBIE vs AGFP Case Link:
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/DocumentList?docketId=nBhmPgrlziYnQ3JvgTtW2A==&display=all
See May 3, 2024 letter...
Its up to the BOD, judge would just sign off on it
>>It is not the court decision unless if management requested it.
And whose decision is it to allow or deny it? Lol
🏝️🏝️🏝️Keep Working on your Bucket list and never stop:
We all can use some down time. If I get paid here, my plan is to approach the speed of light...
Possible party location?
In retirement you have more idle time to look back.
Jim Hall hired me fresh out of College, in Houston, Texas; to work for General Electric and sent me to Schenectady, New York and Charlottesville, Virginia for several years. We bid on Federal and State and Private contracts too.
https://www.tributearchive.com/obituaries/26401927/james-albert-hall
http://www.hickoryknolranch.com/hkr
4800 MQ’s. First trade in a few sessions. Happy Friday boys and girls.
IMHO
a big waste of time
IMHO
a big waste of time
do the same , write, tell sec the story and watch where the chips fall.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174354721
😎😎😎 Welcome to the new America, no more Law Enforcement and Government, only Professional Gang Members!
Where is Ivy? Damn Shame 🌡️🌡️🔥
There is no monetary value you can place on time. Once time passes it can never return.
Time is more valuable than anything in this world.
I just want this to end. And for all.of us to move on.
The grim reaper awaits.
Imho
The Window to make a 43 persent has returned. And has up to 1 year or more.. has been opened ... Its happening No risk... for at least 40 percent returns is an outrages rate. Another great reason to add another year ...Maybe. IMO
dec 2025 and may get extended. unbelievable. they want everyone to go away.
——————————————————-
The banks/elites have been paid 100% + & more + (Full recovery) via this amended POR that should have ended back in 2012. The rest of the creditors are just casualties of war like us retailers IMO and it was stated by our council of the plan trust a few years back that “we can will our investment to our kids” (not those exact words of course), but same effect. Here we are awaiting measly millions from our own sister subs lmao… Well I’m still alive and yes I plan to still be here too see the Lehman bk end game:)
dec 2025 and may get extended. unbelievable. they want everyone to go away.
For what its worth.. If your in banking And in the Know. Then you know with 20 Billion you can make 8 Billion in the fiscal year to April 2025. So how many Atty's on the board are bankers. I can !... Coulld you??
The Key words. CMB's Treasury. Yes... You can as well... esp to our in-house intern schizoid. IMO
SOOO Says SENIOR Emoji 🤣😂😂😂😂 .
🚦🚦🚦 Waiting on Declaration Notifications:
https://highways.dot.gov/highway-history/general-highway-history/safer-stop-and-go-garrett-morgans-traffic-signal-legacy
⌛️
https://www.pwc.co.uk/services/business-restructuring/administrations/non-lbie-companies/lbh-plc-in-administration/dividends-to-creditors.html
https://www.pwc.co.uk/services/business-restructuring/administrations/non-lbie-companies/lbhi2-limited-in-administration/dividends-to-creditors.html
Re: When ..
Usually October
When is the 29th Distribution expected? August 2024?
RE: deem it necessary…
It is not the court decision unless if management requested it.
The court will just look if there is no violations to the bankruptcy law.
>>POR TO CLOSE ON 2025 OR AFTER THE 29th DISTRO
December 2025 most likely lol
It may even get extended if the courts deem it necessary
Why yall always give toogood the shit and clown emojis? 🤣😂😂😂😂
MARCH TO APRIL 4..
..MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT
SOURCE OF CASH 252.4M
FINAL CASHFLOW ESTIMATE FROM DECEMBER 31 QUARTERLY REPORT IS 320M
———————————————————-
DIFFERENCE 67.6M
67.6M MORE TO BE RECEIVED FROM VARIOUS AFFILIATES IN ASIA AND EUROPE.
POR TO CLOSE ON 2025 OR AFTER THE 29th DISTRO
RE: his resurfacing…
—-//——-//—-
Resurfacing just the alias. He’s always present using different identity.
A KIND OF PERSON CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
his resurfacing over here bodes well. he probably has many alias and this one reserved for the pot of gold. we shall see.
RE: Is there an echo here?
—-//////-/—-
Just to emphasize the guy is “very smart”
He learned the meaning of “Cash flow”
Is there an echo here?
“VERY SMART”
“VERY SMART”
“VERY SMART”
"Cash flows" denotes that money is moving in and out of Company/ Business.
See also
SEC.
Cash flow refers to money that goes in and out. Companies with a positive cash flow have
more money coming in, while a negative cash flow indicates higher spending.
Net cash flow equals the total cash inflows minus the total cash outflows.
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Hey Maaa! Look what just come Home...it's "little joe"
Must be Pay Day. Yah.hhh. ... You know it....just give'm
Can of Tuna, Milk.. Maybe some water. Just leave the door
open so he can come back when he's hungry
Again.... Poor little cat. Come back soooooon
Lilttle Joe Stocks. We'll be waiting.
Nice to hear you Meow!!!
RE: Good investing to all!
WOW!! JOE STOCKS STILL HERE!!!
ALSO HOPING!!!
JUST LIKE US!!!
BUT PRETENDING!!!
ELSE, HE SHOULD NOT BE STILL HERE..
LMFAO :🤣
>>Why can't we simply stop the BS against each others and admit that we were all wrong<<
It has been months since I checked in to this site. Good to see a little reality set in. You certainly have a stubborn group here that don't understand the facts and reality of this situation with the Lehman BK. Move on guys. Turn off the lights and shut the door on this play. It will do you good.
And I see IHUB has changed their website.
Good investing to all!
1200 NQ’s. That completes a cycle through of all four CT’s. BTW, $.36 changed hands as a result of the trade.
Followers
|
314
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
111126
|
Created
|
01/28/09
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators stoxjock cottonisking real777mellon |
IPO - 1/7/2005 - 8.00 Million Shares @ $25.00/share.
Previous Ticker Symbol: LEH-N Changed: 9/17/08
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |