Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Jdsu has about 1.5 billion shares outstanding. Right now revenues are around 145-165 million/q, but with a recovery this could suddenly ramp to 500 million and keep rising for awhile, IF a recovery in long haul ever starts. If break even, at 170 million soon, rises to around 250/million as rev's surge to 500 million in the initial phase, Jdsu will have a .16 quarterly profit. This is all speculation, but if the day comes that they are suddenly on track for a .65 to .80/year run rate, the stock is going to be at 20-25 and rising. Rapidly.
Metro is going to surge but jdsu won't be the main beneficiary someone like ciena probably will be(different specialty I know), the question is: does any sensible person think long haul can surge within a couple years? I don't know the answer. It's a broad pick up in long haul that matters.
Yes. Bookham is considered the #2 world player followed closely by the newly formed Avanex. Jds is a giant when compared to their competitors. It will be interesting to see what happens when Bookham's guaranteed Nortel contract comes to an end (June 2004). As Jds is lowering their breakeven from 200 million to 170 million by June 2004 I don't think they are making any assumptions they will get the business. I think they are following the stategy "Hope for the best, plan for the worst". As Martha Stewart would say "That is a good thing".
river, good read
Is Bookham really the second FO player? If that is the case, there is a big span between JDSU and them. JDSU may pick up Nortel as June 2004 end the year for JDSU. That would be a big boost. It could be possible, seeing that JDSU is shooting for 2nd quarter 2004 break even.
Bookham's (#2 FO palyer next to jdsu) quartely results :
"Cash and cash equivalents as of June 29 were GBP70.8 million ($117.5 million) compared with GBP87.7 million as at March 30. Cash burn for the second quarter was GBP16.9 million ($28.1 million), down 5% on the first quarter (GBP17.7 million), reflecting significantly improved operating cash flow offset by higher spending relating to restructuring activities."
Comment:
Bookham's war chest of $117 million is no match of for jdsu's 1.2 billion. In addition, 62% of Bookham's revenues came from a guaranteed Nortel supply agreement which will end June 30, 2004 (6 quarters from the start of this year). 82% of sales were made to 3 customers. Unlike jdsu Bookham is poorly diversified. In my opinion, if Nortel does not renew next year Bookham will be in serious problems. It should be noted that a few weeks ago Nortel dumped 50% of their holdings in Bookham.
Regards
To Cards16:
Where does jdsu fit into this Department of Defense project. Regardless of who wins will jdsu be supplying the components/modules ? My understanding is that jdsu supplies components to Lucent, Nortel, Ciena, etc.
Regards
Corvis Solo in Bake-Off Boast
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Defense Information Systems Agency has turned another corner in its closely watched Global Information Grid Bandwidth Expansion (GIG BE) project [ed. note: we're watching it, it's watching you], and the lone bidder boasting of progress is Corvis Corp. (Nasdaq: CORV - message board).
The GIG BE request for proposal (RFP) includes tenders for optical transport gear, optical crossconnects, MSPPs (multiservice provisioning platforms), and IP routers -- all aimed at rebuilding networks for the Department of Defense. The project's expected to draw $800 million to $900 million over two years (see DISA Deal D-Day Approaches ).
Corvis says it's been invited by Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC), which is coordinating the RFP for the government, to participate in the live testing phase of optical transport gear (see Corvis Gets in GIG-BE Bake-Off ). The "bake-off" is set to precede a test at AT&T Research Labs prior to the final selections this fall.
This is the second time Corvis has made public its RFP status (see Corvis Spikes on DISA Talk ), and it indicates the government may be leaving such matters to the discretion of the individual vendors. At press time, Corvis shares were trading at $1.56, up $0.14 (9.86%).
Where’s everyone else? SAIC wasn't talking at press time, and a DISA spokeswoman said the agency could not confirm any selections, but educated guesses abound. In a note to clients Wednesday, analyst Simon Leopold of Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. gives the following list of who the firm thinks the shortlisters may be in each equipment category.
Optical transport and switching:
Ciena Corp. (Nasdaq: CIEN - message board), Corvis, and Lucent Technologies Inc. (NYSE: LU - message board)
Optical digital crossconnect:
Ciena, Lucent, and possibly Sycamore Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: SCMR - message board)
Multiservice provisioning platform:
Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO - message board) and Lucent, with the third possibly Fujitsu Network Communications Inc. (FNC) or Nortel Networks Corp. (NYSE/Toronto: NT - message board)
IP router:
Cisco and Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR - message board)
For the most part, Leopold's list matches handicapping by analysts Steven Levy and Tim Luke of Lehman Brothers early in July (see Lehman Spots Gov't RFP Surprises ). Missing from Leopold's list, though, are a few vendors Levy and Luke favored, including Alcatel SA (NYSE: ALA - message board; Paris: CGEP:PA), Innovance Networks, and Tellabs Inc. (Nasdaq: TLAB - message board; Frankfurt: BTLA).
It's tough to tell whether these vendors are really out of the running. None of the suppliers listed above is willing to follow Corvis into the limelight by making its RFP status known. Apparently, most want to stay secretive to avoid a face full of egg if things don't work out.
But Corvis seems to think the risk is worth it, though we were unable to ask: Requests for more information on the vendor's press announcement went unanswered.
"I would not be surprised if Corvis got a piece of the contract," says Mark Lutkowitz of consultancy Telecom Pragmatics Inc. He says Corvis's dedication to optical transport may help it against competitors. "This is one time when a bleeding-edge approach may pay off," he notes.
— Mary Jander, Senior Editor, Light Reading
It appears to me
Barring a total meltdown in the economy, it would be hard to lose with JDSU. If they break even in June 2004, we win. If the FO sector takes much longer, JDSU could pick up some of its competion cheeply.
With this amount of cash, I feel comfortable waiting and watching.
I would say there will be major movement in JDSU (good or bad ) within one year based on the following:
1) The market thinks ahead 6 months. This time next year the market will be predicting Jan 2005. We should know if the Fibre optical components industry will survive by then.
2) Hopefully jdsu will have reduced their breakeven to 170 million a quarter (end of their 2004 fisal year - June 2004). All jdsu needs is a slight improvement in demand to show a small profit. With their leadership role I think they will command a minimum of $6 a share.
3) If, this time next year, the Fibre optics industry is still in a severe depression as it is today, jdsu will be the major benificairy (this is my gut feel) of picking up sales from their bankrupt competitors. Neither Avanex or Bookham (jdsu's 2 major world competitors) have the cash to survive 2 years. Both have cash reserves for a maximum of 6 quarters (I think their creditors will pull the plug on them way before they reach that point). Bookham has about 130 million dollars in free cash as so does Avanex (if you take away all the free cash that Avanex will use in consolidating their newly acquird businesses). Quite honestly if jdsu did not have 1.3 billion in cash and no debt I would not give this stock a second look.
With Vitesse closing the doors on their optical unit last week, along with the sale of Ditech's opical unit to jdsu for a pittance 1.5 million the week before... there are interesting times ahead of us. At the beginning of this year the general consensus was that the Fibre optic components players from positons 1 to 3 would do well. Right now I can see either Avanex or Bookham landing up in chapter 11.
Verizon's Gutsy Bet
Will its massive rollout of fiber-optic cable -- right to customers' homes and offices -- keep it ahead of the pack?
Ivan G. Seidenberg hardly looks like Old Man Telecom. The chief executive of Verizon Communications (VZ ) Inc. is only 56 and has the build and intensity of someone much younger. But sitting in his sun-filled, 39th-floor office in Midtown Manhattan, Seidenberg points out that he joined the company as a cable splicer's assistant in the Bronx when he was 19. He even keeps his cable splicer's shears, knife, and sheaf tucked away in his desk. "It's hard to believe, but I've been here for 37 years, more than one-third of this company's history," he says. "I feel an obligation to make sure this company is well positioned for the next 100 years."
Now Seidenberg is launching a series of sweeping initiatives to make good on his vow. From hardball pricing tactics that have knocked rivals back on their heels to a capital-spending war chest that's the largest in telecom, he's determined to transform what was once just another sleepy phone company into the pacesetter for the industry. "When you're the market leader," says Seidenberg, "part of your responsibility is to reinvent the market."
At the heart of this reinvention is the most ambitious deployment of new telecom technology in years. Verizon plans to roll out fiber-optic connections to every home and business in its 29-state territory over the next 10 to 15 years, a project that might reasonably be compared with the construction of the Roman aqueducts. It will cost $20 billion to $40 billion, depending on how fast equipment prices fall, and allow the lightning-fast transmission of everything from regular old phone service to high-definition TV. No competitor yet dares follow suit, fearing it could be their financial Waterloo. "We'll watch them closely and go to school on them if they have found something economic," says Ross Ireland, chief technology officer at SBC Communications (SBC ) Inc., the second-largest phone company after Verizon.
Seidenberg is being no less aggressive when it comes to the wireless technology that has consumers and companies equally abuzz -- Wi-Fi. In an unprecedented move, Verizon is blanketing Manhattan with more than 1,000 Wi-Fi hotspots that will let any broadband subscriber near a Verizon telephone booth use a laptop to wirelessly tap the Net for the latest news, sports scores, or weather report. If the rollout goes well, Verizon will duplicate this wireless grid in other major cities. Next up: third-generation wireless service, known as 3G, which lets customers make speedy Net connections from their mobile phones. Verizon will begin to deploy 3G in September, at least three months before any of its major competitors. "The other guys will say they want to be the best follower. The guy on the frontier takes a lot of arrows, so they say, 'Let someone else roll out 3G and fiber-to-the-home.' Well, that someone else is Verizon," says Alex Peters, lead manager of the $200 million Franklin Global Communications Fund, which bought an undisclosed number of the company's shares last year.
Verizon is leading the way with its pricing strategies, too. In March, the company became the first Bell to slice its broadband Internet service by 30%, to $35 a month. That's typically 10% to 20% cheaper than cable players such as AOL Time Warner (AOL ) Inc. and Comcast (CMCSK ) Corp., which have grabbed an early lead in broadband service. Even the musty long-distance business is getting a jolt of innovation: Earlier this year, Verizon became the first Bell to offer unlimited long-distance and local calls for one flat rate, typically $55 a month. Customers loved the idea, and Verizon quickly zoomed past Sprint (FON ) Corp. to become the third-largest consumer long-distance player in the country. Now, every other Bell has introduced its own flat-rate service.
What's behind Seidenberg's sudden series of audacious moves? Two major reasons: competition from cable companies and the CEO's vision of his industry's future. The cable assault is most pressing because Comcast and its brethren are cutting into Verizon's cash-cow local-phone business and swiping most of the customers in broadband, the fastest-growing segment of telecom. To compete, Verizon plans to use its fiber-optic lines to offer Net access that's 20 times as fast as today's broadband -- and bundle that with local phone service.
Just as important is Seidenberg's conviction that telecom as we know it is history. In its place will emerge what he calls a "broadband industry" that will use the new, superfast Net links and high-capacity networks to deliver video and voice communications services with all the extras, like software for security. If he's right, other companies will follow Verizon's lead and the communications industry will be remade. Seidenberg thinks ubiquitous broadband will transform broad swaths of the economy. High school students, for instance, could download the video of a biology lecture they missed. Doctors could use crystal-clear videoconferencing to examine patients in hard-to-reach rural areas. "The cable industry focuses on entertainment and games. The broadband industry will focus on education, health care, financial services, and essential government services," he says. "I think over the next five to 10 years, you will see five, six, seven [segments of the economy] reordering the way they think about providing services."
Over the long term, the strategy will put Verizon into completely new businesses. Though video may not be its primary focus, the company says that within five years it expects to distribute video services, which could include TV programming and movies on demand, so it can compete directly with cable companies. "I think it's terrific....It could definitely work," says Sumner M. Redstone, chairman and CEO of Viacom (VIA ) Inc., whose holdings include MTV Networks (VIA ) and Paramount Pictures (VIA ), and where Seidenberg is a director.
There are plenty of people, however, who think all that time spent up on the 39th floor has left Seidenberg a bit light-headed. Can any company afford to do what Verizon is attempting? The company says it will pump $12.5 billion to $13.5 billion into capital expenditures this year, the third-largest capital budget in the world after DaimlerChrysler (DCX ) and General Electric (GE ) Co. That's on top of the $3 billion a year it's paying in yearly interest because of its $54 billion debt load. How can Verizon pay for all this? Its business is one of the great cash machines of Corporate America. The largest local-phone operator and the largest wireless company, Verizon generates about $22 billion a year in cash from operations. That's 50% more than SBC, twice as much as BellSouth (BLS ) and nearly three times as much as AT&T (T ). More than any company in the industry, Verizon can make enormous bets and pay for them out of its own pocket. Seidenberg expects to cover the fiber-optic initiative without raising the capital budget above the current level, while he continues to reduce the company's debt. "Funding is not an issue," he says.
Still, plenty of critics question whether Seidenberg is leading the industry in the right direction. SBC and Qwest Communications (Q ) International ventured onto a different path when they announced partnerships with satellite-TV service EchoStar (DISH ) Communications on July 21. The deal will allow them to combine voice, video, and data on a single bill -- sooner than Verizon and at a fraction of the cost. And rather than a massive fiber rollout to offer broadband Net service, SBC is focused on DSL, where it has a big lead on Verizon. Other industry experts think Verizon's plan may not make financial sense. "Frankly, I'm skeptical," says former Federal Communications Commission Chairman William E. Kennard, managing director of investment company Carlyle Group.
The skepticism stems in part from history. Verizon was formed from the merger of Nynex and Bell Atlantic in 1997 and the melding of the combined companies and GTE in 2000. The predecessor companies tried, and failed, several times in the 1990s to capitalize on the convergence of television and communications. Bell Atlantic and Nynex helped launch Tele-TV in 1994 to develop interactive-TV programming, but the project folded after several years. Bell Atlantic also announced a merger with cable-TV powerhouse Tele-Communications Inc. in 1994, only to see the deal fall apart a few months later.
Now Verizon faces cable companies that are spoiling for a fight. The cable industry has spent more than $75 billion since 1995 to upgrade their networks for high-definition TV, fast Internet access, and telephone service. The phone companies "have to make sizable investments to catch up," says David N. Watson, executive vice-president for marketing at Comcast, the nation's largest cable operator. "And we won't be standing still." In fact, Comcast and the other cable companies are hell-bent on torpedoing Seidenberg's plans by destroying Verizon's profits before it can use them to get into the video business. Cable players are expected to nab 3.7 million phone lines nationwide by 2005, up from 2.2 million last year, according to market researcher Kagan World Media. That, along with competition from AT&T Corp. and wireless companies, caused Verizon to lose 3.7% of its local-phone lines in 2002.
The competitive threat is compounded by Verizon's labor situation. The company is locked in intense negotiations with its two main unions over a new contract for 75,000 of its 228,000 employees. Far apart over issues of health-care costs, work-rule flexibility, and organizing in the wireless unit, the two sides may very well be headed for a strike when the current contract expires on Aug. 2. Verizon has trained tens of thousands of managers to assume union duties should the talks fail. "There is no clear break. Sometimes you can see it in advance. This time, we can't," says George Kohl, director of research for the Communications Workers of America.
Verizon's labor issues won't disappear even if a strike is averted. More than half of its workers belong to a union, while rival cable companies are typically nonunion shops. Verizon has what it says are the highest costs in telecom, with union workers in New York earning an average salary of $62,000, plus overtime and benefits. More important, Verizon has less flexibility than competitors when it comes to laying people off or reassigning them to high-growth units. On July 11, a labor mediator in New York ordered Verizon to rehire 2,300 workers the company had thought it had the right to lay off. It quickly announced it would rehire an additional 1,100 workers who were making similar claims in mediation.
Asked about all the skepticism, the understated Seidenberg responds with a wry smile. "People that watch our industry tend to be skeptical when there's hard work involved, but we've shown the resolve to get up every morning and do what it takes," he says.
Seidenberg and other execs insist much has changed at Verizon since the miscues of the '90s. In February, the FCC changed the regulations so that Verizon and other Bells won't have to share their new networks with rivals at government-controlled prices. Although final details have yet to be released, the decision strengthens the business case for building the networks. At the same time, the price of rolling out fiber to homes and offices has dropped by 50% over the past five years, and it will likely decline another 50% over the next few. "This is not a trial. It's a deployment," says Bruce S. Gordon, president of Verizon's consumer division. "The decision has been made, and it will happen. There's no going back."
If Seidenberg is right, he's positioning Verizon to thrive in the coming decades. Short-term, the deterioration in the core local-phone business probably will cancel out growth in new services. Analyst Simon Flannery of Morgan Stanley (MWD ) expects revenues to stay flat at $67 billion this year while net income declines 10%, to $7.5 billion, not including a $3 billion noncash charge for an accounting change and a write-down from international operations. Profits could even shrink again in 2004, to $7.2 billion. After that, Verizon's prospects look better. As broadband services are rolled out to more of its customers, Flannery estimates that the company's revenues will hit $70 billion in 2005 and net income will recover to $7.6 billion. "They are definitely the industry's future," says Brian Adamik, chief executive of market researcher Yankee Group (RTRSY ).
Leave it to Seidenberg to do what others think impossible. The son of an air-conditioning repairman, he grew up in the working-class Gun Hill section of the Bronx. If he had potential for greatness, it was well hidden. Without the money for college, he started working for New York Telephone splicing cables in 1966. He was quickly drafted into the U.S. Army and wounded in Vietnam. After he returned to his old employer in 1968, his raw determination emerged. With his company helping to foot the bill, he earned a BA in mathematics from Lehman College, of the City University of New York, and an MBA at Pace University. He married his high school sweetheart, Phyllis, and they now have two children. During this time, he spent 12 straight years going to night school.
He worked hard on the job, too. As the youngest person on a work team laying cables at Co-op City in the Bronx, Ike, as he was called at the time, would remeasure the cable lines of other workers to see if they were the right length. Perhaps most surprising, he did it without getting throttled by more-senior workers. How? He never tried to take credit for the extra work from supervisors. He simply told the other workers so they could correct any errors as a team. Plus, he was a likable guy who played in the regular lunchtime football games. Seidenberg worked in operations and engineering before moving to Washington to handle regulatory affairs. In 1995, he became chairman and CEO of Nynex Corp.
It could have been a brief, shining moment of glory. When the local-telephone industry was deregulated in 1996, Nynex looked like takeover bait: too small to determine its own fate. Still, Seidenberg figured out a way to get the necessary scale by cutting savvy deals and sharing the spotlight. First, after the Bell Atlantic merger, he let Bell Atlantic Corp. CEO Raymond W. Smith run the combined companies for a couple of years before taking over. Then he waited his turn while GTE Corp. CEO Charles R. Lee ran the show, taking full control only after Lee stepped down as co-CEO last year, at the age of 62. "He's a master boardroom player," says Kennard.
Even now, Seidenberg is eager to let his lieutenants take the limelight. He often has Vice-Chairman Lawrence T. Babbio Jr., who runs the traditional phone business, and Verizon Wireless Services CEO Dennis F. Strigl represent the company in public forums. "All of these people could be CEOs in their own right. They are warriors, and they are on a mission," says Seidenberg. Yet they profess fierce loyalty to him and Verizon, which has been an island of stability in a churning sea.
The commander will need all the warriors he can get. Within two years, the cable-TV companies are expected to be in the phone business big time. They already have 15% of the market in a handful of Verizon neighborhoods where they offer phone service. Cable companies like Comcast, Cablevision Systems, and Cox Communications are planning to expand their phone operations in 2004 using Internet technology that's cheaper and packed with features like inexpensive second and third phone lines. At the current pace, the cable companies will probably have 30% of the phone market over the next decade, says telecom analyst John Hodulik of UBS.
The fiber strategy will help Verizon defend itself. By offering TV, superfast Web access, and feature-rich Internet-based phone services, Verizon could reduce potential customer churn by 50%, Hodulik estimates. Assuming fiber is deployed, he thinks the company will have 2007 net income of $7.9 billion on revenues of $79.7 billion. Those numbers are 2.5% and 5.7% higher than his forecasts before the fiber strategy was outlined.
Although these are the early days, high-speed fiber connections are proving popular with consumers. Verizon already is installing fiber in Brambleton, a planned community in Loudoun County, Va. Only 200 homes have been built so far, but that will grow to 6,000. Liz and Steve Levy are among the early adopters. The high-speed Net connection helps them stay in touch with neighbors over the community Web site, and Liz Levy uses it to maintain a Web site for her stationery business. They get pitched by satellite-TV companies all the time, but they won't switch. "It works really well, and I like getting all the services from a single company," she says.
Still, there's no guarantee that Seidenberg's broadband vision will become a reality. No company has attempted what he is doing on such a massive scale, and even smaller initiatives have shown mixed results. Construction of a fiber network in Eugene, Ore., was cut back because the economics of the effort didn't pan out. The city had originally planned to extend its optical links into homes and businesses, but it canceled the plan in March, 2002, as the economy soured. "We just couldn't make the numbers work," says Lance Robertson, communications coordinator for the Eugene Water & Electric Board.
Whether the numbers work for Verizon will depend on its costs for the new network. Installing a fiber-optic line in a home or business has dropped to about $2,000 today from more than $4,000 five years ago, according to market researcher Render, Vanderslice & Associates. The firm expects that will fall another 50%, to $1,000, in the next five years, although that will depend on how quickly Verizon and the Bells buy equipment. Doreen Toben, Verizon's chief financial officer, says costs have just now come down enough for the initiative to make financial sense. It should be profitable if the company's expense per line comes in between $1,200 and $1,800.
Verizon has a card up its sleeve. About 45% of its customers are wired via telephone poles and other above-ground connections, according to Verizon Chief Technology Officer Mark Wegleitner. That's compared to 32% for BellSouth, 28% for SBC, and 13% for Qwest. Why is that key? It's as much as 30% cheaper to upgrade a line on a phone pole than it is to upgrade one buried beneath a sidewalk or someone's lawn.
Despite the challenges, Seidenberg has a track record of patient investing that pays off in the end. Consider the wireless business, 45%-owned by Vodafone Group (VOD ) PLC. In recent years, it invested more than its rivals and has reaped the reward. Today, with 33 million subscribers, it's far larger than No. 2 Cingular, a joint venture of BellSouth Corp. and SBC. And it's ahead on many financial metrics, from revenue and earnings growth to profitability. "We're trying to replicate wireless' successful model in other parts of the company, but it takes patience," says Babbio.
Verizon's wireless data plans should keep that growth engine humming. Beginning this September, it will introduce wireless systems in Washington and San Diego that let customers download data at peak speeds of 2.4 megabits a second. That's about five times faster than a DSL connection. While rivals are expected to deploy comparable technology, Verizon is ahead of the curve. Competitors won't roll out the technology until 2004 or 2005. By getting to market first, Verizon expects to maintain its above-average growth.
Rivals are skeptical. "The real question is, is the market ready for it," says William E. Clift, Cingular's chief technical officer. Seidenberg thinks all of these investments will create something of lasting importance and have a positive impact on the overall economy. "As broadband becomes more pervasive over the next three or four years, all the 'excess capacity' in long distance will get absorbed," Seidenberg says. "Microsoft or IBM would never say there's overcapacity. They envision a world in which you always need more capacity to handle all the things they can make. The problem is, we don't have that capacity where it needs to be...in the home and office."
It will require near-perfect execution. But Seidenberg performs well under pressure. One afternoon in 1969, the young cable splicer and his buddies took a break for a game of touch football at Ferry Point Park in the Bronx. Pat LaScala, a cable splicer's assistant who had played high school football, told Seidenberg to go out for a pass as far as he could. "He ran right into a tree and got some big welt on his eye," LaScala recalled. "But he caught the ball." Today, he needs that poise more than ever. This time, it's no game.
By Steve Rosenbush
With Tom Lowry in New York, Roger O. Crockett in Chicago, and Irene M. Kunii in Tokyo
I may be wrong but I am not looking for much movement with JDSU for at least a year. Anyone have any different thoughts on the subject. I think it will take two years, if we can stand it, to get the ecomony back and the market moving again.
All comments greatly appreciated, especially if they are positive. LOL
Max
Alone and in groups, vendors line up for FTTP award
25 July 2003 Nashua, NH Lightwave -- Details of who responded -- and with whom -- to the RFP issued by BellSouth, SBC, and Verizon for fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP) hardware are beginning to emerge. The deadline for responses passed July 21.
Advanced Fibre Communications, Alcatel, Alloptic, Fujitsu, Lucent, Paceon, Terawave, and Wave 7 Optics confirmed their participation. In addition, Lightwave believes Vinci Systems is aiding as many as two respondents by supplying optical network terminal (ONT) expertise.
Alloptic, which partnered with Ericsson in its response, has been the most forthcoming regarding its plans. According to Alloptic's Kirsti Spiva, chief corporate officer, and Mike Serrano, market manager, the teaming merges Alloptic's Ethernet-based GigaForce passive optical network (PON) product line with Ericsson's services expertise. While the requirements contained in the RFP are known to heavily reflect the ATM-based ITU G.983 recommendations, Spiva and Serrano say that the fact that the company received an invitation to bid, coupled with input received at the bidder's conference July 8, lead them to believe that the three carriers are open to Ethernet infrastructure.
Other companies, while acknowledging that they have formed teams, were coy about their partners. Lucent spokesmen, for example, acknowledged that their submission combines Lucent and partner resources, but declined to provide further details. Similarly, Terawave has joined at least one team, but sources there declined to name names. At Paceon, sales and marketing head Bill Shank responded to a question regarding potential partners by saying, "We are open to doing whatever it takes to find a suitable solution for the RBOCs."
Alcatel is widely believed to be working with Scientific Atlanta. However, Alcatel sources would not comment on the specifics of their response, other than to confirm that the company had submitted one.
Meanwhile, Tom Tighe, president and CEO at Wave 7 Optics, says, "We are pursuing this opportunity on two fronts -- the first with our own product coupled with the financial backing of a $60 billion plus annual revenue company, and the second with a leader in the FSAN-compliant PON system area where we will be helping them get to a triple-play product." He declined to disclose either company.
For its part, Fujitsu is "working closely with certain startups in this field," according to John Stewart, senior director, corporate and marketing communications, at Fujitsu Network Communications. Stewart also would not reveal those companies.
Several potential bidders -- including FlexLight Networks, Nortel Networks, Optical Solutions, Quantum Bridge (which is working with Motorola), and Zhone Technologies -- refused to comment on their status, with several citing the non-disclosure agreement that accompanied the RFP. However, all are likely players. Other potential bidders -- including Adtran, General Bandwidth, iamba Networks, Marconi, Salira Optical Network Systems, and Siemens -- have yet to signal their intentions. The three carriers invited more than 20 companies to respond to the RFP.
I listened to the CC. I'm concerned that those two quarters could turn into four, then six, then eight.
I think most people heard only two things:
1. Declining revenue
2. "Few signs of a robust recovery in near term"
But the long term sounds better. Some things I heard:
o RFPs by RBOCs for fiber to home (but no meaningful revenue till 2005, but the revenue is a matter of "when" not "if.")
o Design win points for addtional $24 million additional business over next two years
o Trend for system providers to outsource hardware development, which represents new market for JDSU to make card-level and rack-mounted products. Recently secured several card-level opportunities with system providers.
Hawk et al I hope it works for all of us. I am going to post the latest opinion I have.
Max
JDSU - JDS UNIPHASE (NASDAQ)
Date Open High Low Last Change Volume % Change
07/25/03 2.79 2.87 2.60 2.85 -0.30 108431313 -9.52 %
Composite Indicator
Trend Spotter (TM) Sell
Short Term Indicators
7 Day Average Directional Indicator Sell
10 - 8 Day Moving Average Hilo Channel Sell
20 Day Moving Average vs Price Sell
20 - 50 Day MACD Oscillator Sell
20 Day Bollinger Bands Sell
Short Term Indicators Average: 100% - Sell
20-Day Average Volume - 30403566
Medium Term Indicators
40 Day Commodity Channel Index Sell
50 Day Moving Average vs Price Sell
20 - 100 Day MACD Oscillator Buy
50 Day Parabolic Time/Price Sell
Medium Term Indicators Average: 50% - Sell
50-Day Average Volume - 30226314
Long Term Indicators
60 Day Commodity Channel Index Sell
100 Day Moving Average vs Price Sell
50 - 100 Day MACD Oscillator Buy
Long Term Indicators Average: 33% - Sell
100-Day Average Volume - 28992328
Overall Average: 72% - Sell
Price Support Pivot Point Resistance
2.85 2.50 2.77 3.04
Click on the indicator for a graphical interpretation of the result
or visit the Learning Center for more information on the studies
Max: Turned today at sup.
at 2.60 area,got in for trade.
See what happens at 20 EMA soon.
I'm also LT w/ JDSU.
GL&HT
Hawk
River,
Thanks for your response. It is very logical and well based. I think no comfort in what any analysts say anymore. I am a long simply because I think the company is solid. Not because the company is coming out and trying to reassure everything will be fine, as Enron did. As you know, Enron was encouraging its innermost circle that things were great and the stock was cheap and it was a great time to buy.
I guess sometimes you have to go with your gut feeling. That is the only reason I am still a long. "Boiler Room" techniques no longer work for me.
I think we have a good company here. I only hope we are no biting off more than we can chew with the shrinking economy and Greenspan at the controls. JMO
Max
To Max, Jimmy, Learning and all
Just curious if any of you were listening to JDSU conference call. The reason given for the drop in 2004 1st quarter guidance was the anticipation of a reduction in thin film product sales (special emphasis on display). JDS management indicated that they were revamping and it would take 2 quarters to gain traction. This appears to be a temporary problem and, if so, could the market be over reacting?
Also, did you recall the qustion from the Morgan Stanley Analyst about Vitesse exiting from the fiber optical module/subsytem. He was asking if jds was one of the potential buyers of the buiness. It will be intersting to see if JDS buys them for a pittance or Vitesses will just close their doors. It just shows how many companies are exiting the fiber optical business. IBM, Lucent, Agere, Alcatel, Nortel, Corning, Marconi, Diteck, Vitesse ... just to name a few of the big names. For large projects such as the network design phase in Japan, jds is now involved in the fibre optical end of it. My gut feel is that from here on end any large fibre optic network upgrades will involve jds. JDS competitors are too small and do not have finacial resources, depth of products or epertise to pull off the large projects. Interesting times ahead?
My suggestion to all longs is not to get sucked in by the next 3 to 4 maybe even 5 quarters. JDSU is a "heart attack" stock. It will return but we are definitely looking at a longer recovery than initially thought.
My strategy is "don't watch the market right now unless you want a heart attack or ulcers". Time will reverse our positions. Don't be a panic seller and catch the contagious "reverse Midas touch".
Remember "patience is a virtue" and the market is not virtuous so we will "survive". I believe I've heard it said that good always wins over evil".
BTW Jimmy don't you think 3 posts a day are enough right now? What have we got to discuss? LOL
Max
The breakeven point at <12 months is encouraging. As the cashless competitors waste away, JDSU should pick up their clients. The world will always need FO and networking. The big downside is there is no real "discernable light" at the end of the tunnel. Frankly, running record deficits and spending a billion a week or so in Iraq is a killer. No sky there either...
Well, time to turn the computer away and hold the nose, huh longs?
I suppose a shakeout ultimately could be good for JDSU. They've got plenty of cash, so they should be able to hang on or change.
But it feels like that business will never turn around.
The only positive thing I can find is the fact that they're reducing expenses and lowering their breakeven point.
But they say they'll need $200 million in second quarter (fiscal 2004) to break even. That will require about a 30% increase quarterly from their projected first quarter revenues of $145 million.
Their projected breakeven of $170 million in fourth quarter is much better, but even that requires increased revenue. Looks to me like this company won't break even till this time next year.
Which I'm guessing means the stock is dead for 2-4 quarters.
I can deal with that, but what's going to turn revenue around?
Disheartening and disappointing are words that first come to mind. You ask if anyone sees anything encourageing. Well, its encouraging that they are lowering thier breakeven to 170 million, its encouraging that they are moving up the food change into subsystems/modules (recent acquistion of Ditech optical business), its encouraging that they are increasing efforts towards penetrating growth markets (Asia/Europe), its encouring they are winning design awards that will help them in the future. However, what we wanted to hear was that the demand for jds products was stabilizing. Instead we heard demand was not stable and sales were going down. Not good. The only real consolation in this mess is that JDS Uniphase's major competitors, Bookham and Avnex, will be in serious financial problems within the next 9 months if someting doesn't drastically improve. JDS may well be the last man standing in Fibre Optics business. It's that bad.
Getting clobbered in after hours.
Anyone have comments on the recent earnings?
Numbers looked okay, but guidance was disheartening.
Anyone see anything encouraging for JDSU?
CISCO SEE IT INCREASE
I copied this from another stock board:
8:46AM Cisco Systems expects IT recovery within months -- Reuters (CSCO) 18.73: Reuters reports that Cisco CEO John Chambers expects the IT market to recover within months. "In the next two to four months, companies' spending on IT products will recover. In two to six quarters, that will translate into a recovery in investments by Internet and telecom providers," Dutch daily Het Financieele Dagblad quoted Cisco Chief Executive John Chambers as telling reporters in San Jose, California.
Some very good reads! Just watch and wait...
Thanks for all the informative reads! If I could do it, I would stop watching the market for a year or two. My investments are diversified. I gained over 30% on Real Estate holdings last year, even considering Cap Gains. I wonder what I am doing here sometime...? I have to write off something, right?
JDSU will payoff but it may not be for some time...IMHO
FYI.....
As JDS Uniphase Corp. (Nasdaq: JDSU - message board; Toronto: JDU) prepares for the announcement of its fiscal 2003 financial figures on Thursday (July 24), analysts give the company good reviews for its restructuring efforts. But the continued lack of profitability may soon become a sticking point for investors.
With JDSU shares now trading at a premium valuation relative to its peers, investors may soon start to question whether it deserves such a price while it's still losing money. Analyst don't see it returning to profitability until 2004 or even 2005.
In many ways, the ball's in JDSU's court. It's still the dominant player in the optical components space, with competitors such as Bookham Technology plc (Nasdaq: BKHM - message board; London: BHM) and Avanex Corp. (Nasdaq: AVNX - message board) vying for second place (see Bookham Buys Nortel's Components Biz and Avanex Deal Reshapes Sector ).
As investors have sensed the prospect of a telecom recovery, they've bid up JDSU's shares, which have risen 28% since the beginning of the year. But analysts said that merely being the biggest player in the optical components market isn't worth the nearly $5 billion market capitalization JDS is maintaining.
Investors may be looking toward a 2004 recovery in optical components, and analysts say that's not likely to happen. "They're going to get back to stability slower than people are expecting," says Max Schuetz, analyst with Credit Suisse First Boston Corp..
JDSU isn't likely to hit profitability until calendar 2005, says Stephen Savas, the Goldman Sachs & Co. analyst who initiated coverage of JDS with an Underperform rating last week, citing overinflated share prices.
His logic goes like this: JDSU's price-to-sales and price-to-book-value ratios seem out of whack with the rest of the industry. Given Friday's closing stock price of $3.29, its market cap sits around $4.7 billion, putting its price-to-sales ratio at 6.4.
Savas's report points out that the median price-to-sales ratios for other optical component companies sits closer to 5.4. Median price-to-sales for less specialized component companies such as TriQuint Semiconductor Inc. (Nasdaq: TQNT - message board) and Agilent Technologies Inc. (NYSE: A - message board) sits even lower, at 2.3.
Meanwhile, as JDSU continues to shed employees, its revenues are likewise dipping. Revenues for fiscal 2003, ending June 30, are likely to clock in around $678 million, Savas writes. That compares with $1.1 billion in fiscal 2002 and $3.2 billion in fiscal 2001 (see JDSU Posts Loss, Plans Cuts and JDSU Closes Fiscal Year ).
Among the difficulties JDSU faces is that, like everyone else, it's turning its focus to the metro and access markets, rather than the once-glamorous long-haul arena. And that means an adjustment to lower margins than the company had banked on.
"There'll be some signs of life in those [metro/access] businesses going into next year, but the problem is, those are lower-performance markets," Credit Suisse's Schuetz says. "They're going against guys like Agilent that are used to commodity markets."
What's been boosting JDSU's financials for the past year is its non-telecom business, which has accounted for half the company's revenues. Most of this business is based on the company's thin-film technology, and it includes quirky applications such as the color-changing ink used on new U.S. currency.
Schuetz suspects that the thin-film business might lose a bit of strength, however. JDSU's largest customer has become Texas Instruments Inc. (NYSE: TXN - message board), which uses thin-film components in its Digital Light Processor (DLP) devices for video projectors. TI comprised 13 percent of revenues in the March quarter.
But Schuetz thinks TI is slowing production of those devices as the sales channel fills up. Moreover, he says TI has improved the yield on its DLPs, which means fewer defective parts and, consequently, slightly lower volumes needed from JDS Uniphase.
— Craig Matsumoto, Senior Editor, Light Reading
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
oops error in calculation .. current annual telecom FO sales should be about $800 not $200 million. Forgot to mutliply the quarterly sales by 4 to get the annual sales.
"I question their acquisition at this time,in an economy as unstable as this, with the outstanding debt they have. "
As prevoulsy mentioned jds has $1.27 billion in cash, no debt. They got Altamar for a fire sale price of $1.6 million. As long as the purcahse enhances their market share and customer base, this is exactly what they should be doing. Most probably JDS got it for so little because no one else in the indusry has the cash or the ability to turn it around.
The increase in broker sell recommendations is based on the current valuation of jdsu and the lack of demand for Telecom Fibre Optics. The recent aquisition of Altamar, in itself, is very small and will have minimal effect on jdsu bottom line. What is worrysome is the number of companies exiting the FO business and how little Altamar was sold for ($1.6 million and some future paymnents if jds can make a go of it). My rough calcualtions is that FO business has dropped from a high of $8 to 9 billion in Telecom annual sales (2000) to current annual sales of 200 million. jds made $70 million in telecom sales last quarter (90 million in thin film sales). Jdsu has anywhere between 40 to 50% of world sales in Telecom Fibe Optics. Massive consolidation has taken place. Triquent bought Agere FO. Bookham bought Marconi and Nortel FO. Avnx bought Corning and Alcatel FO. Jds bought IBM FO and now Altamar FO. The list goes on and this is just recent history.
Until there is sustained turnaround in telecom spending I see the sell recommendations remaining
Here are some positives for JDSU:
- 1.27 billion in cash, no debt (strong financials - second to none in FO industry)
- Currently 60% of sales are out side the telecom industry (good diversification which will help them out in this downturn).
- Successfuly moved established operations to china (cheap labor)
- Successful global realignment program without loosing market share (29,000 employees to 6400, 40 sites to less than 10)
- Best of breed and broadest scope of Telecom FO products(long haul, metro, edge and enterprise. Closest in the industry to "one stop shopping".
- Massive consolidation in FO industry leaving few companies to enjoy the turnaround. Whenever that maybe :(.
-Increase of 100% in bandwith each year (reducing the glut)
-Favorable FCC rulings to encourage Carries to build out fibre otic networks. Baby bells recently issued RFP's.
-Competition has problems (Triquent screwed up the Agere purchase, Nortel dumped 50% of their shares in Bookham and only few quaters left on thier guaranteed supply agreemnent with Nortel, Avnx has major integration problems facing them -lots of their cash will be burned up on restructuring costs).
Sorry correct ticker should be ADTK for Adept. I am showing N/A on everything on RB regarding this company. I don't even know if it is still existing. I am showing the following on Barchart.
Here's some company info but I cannot relocate the insider holdings.
TIA
Max
Adept Technology Incorporated. The Group's designs, manufactures and markets factory automation components and systems. The Group operates through three segments: Assembly and material handling operations (AMH) segment, SILMA Software operations segment and Semiconductor operations segment. The AMH operation segment provides intelligent automation software and hardware products for assembly, material handling and packaging applications. The SILMA Software (SILMA) operations segment provides 3-D graphical simulation tools for assembly process design, simulation and analysis. The Semiconductor operations segment provides semiconductor contamination control products. The customers include food, communications, automotive, appliance, semiconductor, photonics, and life sciences industries. On 13-Sep-2002, the Group acquired Meta Control Technologies, Inc. Assembly and Material Handling operations accounted for 86% of fiscal 2002 revenues; SILMA Software operations, 8% and Semiconductor operations, 6%.
I am just trying to connect the dots between the 2 companies.
ADTK - ADEPT TECHNOLOGY (OTCBB)
Date Open High Low Last Change Volume % Change
07/18/03 0.96 1.00 0.74 0.74 -0.26 87200 -26.00 %
Composite Indicator
Trend Spotter (TM) Hold
Short Term Indicators
7 Day Average Directional Indicator Sell
10 - 8 Day Moving Average Hilo Channel Sell
20 Day Moving Average vs Price Buy
20 - 50 Day MACD Oscillator Buy
20 Day Bollinger Bands Hold
Short Term Indicators Average: - Hold
20-Day Average Volume - 53360
Medium Term Indicators
40 Day Commodity Channel Index Hold
50 Day Moving Average vs Price Buy
20 - 100 Day MACD Oscillator Buy
50 Day Parabolic Time/Price Sell
Medium Term Indicators Average: 25% - Buy
50-Day Average Volume - 42226
Long Term Indicators
60 Day Commodity Channel Index Buy
100 Day Moving Average vs Price Buy
50 - 100 Day MACD Oscillator Buy
Long Term Indicators Average: 100% - Buy
100-Day Average Volume - 36213
Overall Average: 32% - Buy
Is anyone here familiar with JDSU's insider holding on ADPT (Adept)? Any information on that would be appreciated. This would probably give a little insight to their new acquisition as well. I am showing the stock at 0.004.
TIA
Max
Jimmy
I have had so many problems with RB in the past couple of months that I think I will post most of my JDSU comments here.
I have heard that the numbers are not going to be strong when released. This is hearsay, of course, but I was also told not to be discouraged by next few quarters. I don't think the numbers, whether good or bad, with a company matters right now with the economy as it is. The market is just spinning. JMO
I think I might be best not to watch the market but who can help it.
I feel so strongly about JDSU, I am seriously considering adding significantly to my holdings. This is against all opinions, my broker, and the analysts. I plan on holding very long term on JDSU as well as a few others I own, so I guess the next 18 months really don't matter anyway.
Max
The acquisition may be a positive sign. If their confident enought to go shopping for other companies, maybe they've turned the corner and are back on the offensive, building for the future.
Their cash position is strong. That's very reassurring, but they will have to have the products when people start buying again. Their research dollars are down. Maybe the acquisition helps get them ready for the rebound.
MAX, I am holding because I am still slightly in the green
but if the price dipped below my purchase price, I would consider doubling up...
Earnings this week, right? If we meet or beat estimates, what will the share price do?
(I tried posting this question on RB and the server booted me)
I can understand why a broker will try to downgrade or promote certain stocks. They get a bigger commission on the stocks that their brokerage are affiliated with. I am not certain if this is the same with analysts but I would not be surprised if they did not get some sort of compensation for pumping.
I am definitely holding long, probably very long, but I am curious if there has been any change in the business plan or management since 2000. I question their acquisition at this time,in an economy as unstable as this, with the outstanding debt they have.
BTW are any of you buying more at this time or just holding?
TIA
Max
I tend to agree with that
The people who get paid for pedicting that Market are more apt to allow the Market to lead them. I have no issues with JDSU. It is a good company and will be standing at the end.
I do, however, have a real concern about the economy. The deficit, the highest unemployment in years, and an administration that is unwilling to say it was "wrong" in some of its pre-war rhetoric have me concerned. Remember, the tax cuts are still there? The states will struggle again next year while we are waiting for the "trickle down" stimulant.
Sorry guys. I am trying to be civil about this but Americans are dying every day in a war that no one in the world, other than Britian and the US, supported...
The motives of brokers may have nothing to do with reality or honesty.
And trying to be somewhat fair, don't brokers pay more attention to the movement and expectations of stock prices than company fundamentals?
If JDSU were to rocket upward, I'm guessing all those "sells" would become "strong buys."
I track Institutional Buyers and the best site
I have found is this one. It is updated daily. I Screen Print the page, date it, and come back on occasion to check progress. It is a good indicator on a stock's direction...
http://ownership.thomsonfn.com/ownership/Ownership.aspx?partner=Mzg4UTI5dGNIVlRaWEoyUCRZ&templat...
THIS IS NOT SPAM!
JDSU is a very good company
from everything I have read. Can I explain the present slump? No, but I can hold and be certain that eventually JDSU will climb dramatically.
As hard as it is to do, I have got to stop watching the market moment to moment. It is debilitating. I truely do not think it is time to panic. Patience and a hobby will help...
It seems that the "Sell" is being increase by most brokers to even include long term. How can they figure that this is a $2.84 stock? I just don't get it. Has something drastically changed within management or has the fact of the acquisition caused a more increased downgrade? Any opinions will be gratefully appreciated.
Max
JDSU - JDS UNIPHASE (NASDAQ)
Date Open High Low Last Change Volume % Change
07/18/03 3.37 3.39 3.00 3.31 +0.01 32979910 +0.30 %
Composite Indicator
Trend Spotter (TM) Sell
Short Term Indicators
7 Day Average Directional Indicator Sell
10 - 8 Day Moving Average Hilo Channel Sell
20 Day Moving Average vs Price Sell
20 - 50 Day MACD Oscillator Sell
20 Day Bollinger Bands Hold
Short Term Indicators Average: 80% - Sell
20-Day Average Volume - 26185750
Medium Term Indicators
40 Day Commodity Channel Index Sell
50 Day Moving Average vs Price Sell
20 - 100 Day MACD Oscillator Buy
50 Day Parabolic Time/Price Sell
Medium Term Indicators Average: 50% - Sell
50-Day Average Volume - 28548814
Long Term Indicators
60 Day Commodity Channel Index Hold
100 Day Moving Average vs Price Sell
50 - 100 Day MACD Oscillator Buy
Long Term Indicators Average: - Hold
100-Day Average Volume - 27772234
Overall Average: 56% - Sell
Price Support Pivot Point Resistance
3.31 2.84 3.23 3.62
BB
Can anyone explain to me why JDSU has holdings in a company Adept(ADPT)? From all acounts it looks like it has gone under.
I agree with you I am in for the long haul. Analysts are just what their label says Anal meaning of, relating to, or situated near the anus <anal fin>
In other words, it is a person that hangs around the anus hoping to make sense of any movement.
I guess you can tell I have no respect for analysts or brokers.
I believe they are one of the major problems of the market today.
Later, Max
Max,
Probably one of the most informative posts on JDSU in a long time. Thanks for DD.
I'm still crawling when it comes to analyzing data about companies, and who the d--kheads are that determine the value of the stock, but I know that one day my patience will pay off. It was there before, it will be there again.
How many companies have 1.27 billion dollars in cash reserves?
How can they say a fair value of a share of JDSU is $3.05?
Profile - JDS Uniphase Corporation (NasdaqNM:JDSU)
As of 16-July-2003
More Info: Quote / Chart / News / Profile / Reports / Research / SEC / Msgs / Insider / Financials / Analyst Ratings
Recent Events
June 6 Price hit new 52-week high ($4.71)
July 10 New Analyst Opinion
Upcoming Events
July 24 Earnings Announcement
July 24 Live call at 4:30 pm ET: JDS Uniphase Corporation Earnings (Q4 2003)
Location
1768 Automation Parkway
San Jose, CA 95131
Phone: (408) 546-5000
Fax: (408) 433-3838
Email: investor.relations@us.jdsuniphase.com
Employees (last reported count): 9,222
Financial Links
·Institutional Ownership
·Upgrade/Downgrade History
·Historical Price Data
·SEC Filings from Edgar Online
Competitors:
·Sector: Technology
·Industry: Communications Equipment
Company Website
·Home Page
·Search Yahoo! for related links...
Index Membership
·S&P 500
·Nasdaq 100
Ownership
· Insider and 5%+ Owners: 5%
· Over the last 6 months:
· one insider sell; 9,000 shares
· Institutional: 37% (39% of float)
(1,074 institutions)
· Net Inst. Buying: 45.9M shares (+7.98%)
(prior quarter to latest quarter)
More From Multex
·Highlights
·Performance
·Ratio Comparisons
Business Summary [Email this to a friend]
ADVERTISEMENT
JDS Uniphase Corporation designs and manufactures products for fiber-optic communications, as well as for markets where its core optics technologies provide solutions for industrial, commercial and consumer applications. The Company's fiber-optic components and modules are deployed by system manufacturers for the telecommunications, data communications and cable television industries. JDS also offers products for display, security, medical/environmental instrumentation, decorative, aerospace and defense applications. The Company operates in two principal segments: Transmission and Network Components segment, which accounted for approximately 70% of its net sales in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 (fiscal 2002), and Thin Film Products and Instrumentation segment, which accounted for approximately 29% of its net sales in fiscal 2002.
More from Multex: Expanded Business Description
Financial Summary
JDS Uniphase is a technology company that designs, develops, manufactures and distributes a range of products for the fiber-optic communications market, deployed by systems manufacturers worldwide to develop optical networks. For the nine months ended 3/31/03, net sales fell 41% to $515.3M. Net loss fell 89% to $872.2 million. Results reflect weak conditions in the telecommunications industry, offset by reduced impairment and other non-cash costs.
More from Multex: Significant Developments
Officers [Insider Trade Data]
FY2002 Compensation
Pay Exer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jozef Straus, Ph.D., 56
Co-Chairman, CEO $510K --
Martin Kaplan, 64
Co-Chairman -- --
Donald Scifres, Ph.D., 55
Co-Chairman and CSO 302K $2.6M
Syrus Madavi, 53
Pres, COO, Director -- --
Ronald Foster
CFO -- --
Dollar amounts are as of 30-June-2002 and compensation values are for the fiscal year ending on that date; "Pay" is salary, bonuses, etc.; "Exer" is the value of options excercised during the fiscal year.
More from Multex on Officers & Directors:
Expanded List, Bios, Compensation, Options
Recent Research Reports
Thu Jul 17 Company Profile Report. JDS Uniphase Corporation - Revere
Thu Jul 17 Competitors by Product Report. JDS Uniphase Corporation - Revere
Wed Jul 16 ValuEngine Quantitative Valuation Report for JDSU: Forecasts, market valuations, comparables, quantitative summary and financials. Based on proprietary Academic Valuation models. - ValuEngine, Inc.
Wed Jul 16 Independent research on JDSU; daily ENTERPRISE VALUE and trade recommendation based on proprietary quantitative industry-relative model. - Greenwich Research Analytics
Wed Jul 16 ValuEngine Quantitative Industry Report for ELECTRONIC SYST/DEVICES - ValuEngine, Inc.
All Research Reports for JDS Uniphase Corporation
Statistics at a Glance -- NasdaqNM:JDSU As of 16-July-2003
Price and Volume
52-Week Low
on 9-Oct-2002 $1.58
Recent Price $3.64
52-Week High
on 6-June-2003 $4.71
Beta 2.89
Daily Volume (3-month avg) 27.1M
Daily Volume (10-day avg) 25.8M
Stock Performance
big chart [1d / 5d / 3m / 6m / 1y / 2y / 5y / max]
52-Week Change -1.6%
52-Week Change
relative to S&P500 -10.3%
Share-Related Items
Market Capitalization $5.21B
Shares Outstanding 1.43B
Float 1.35B
Dividends & Splits
Annual Dividend none
Last Split: factor 2 on 13-Mar-2000
Per-Share Data
Book Value (mrq) $1.19
Earnings (ttm) -$1.38
Earnings (mrq) -$0.10
Sales (ttm) $0.53
Cash (mrq) $0.89
Valuation Ratios
Price/Book (mrq) 3.05
Price/Earnings N/A
Price/Sales (ttm) 6.93
Income Statements
Sales (ttm) $737.0M
EBITDA (ttm) -$1.98B
Income available to common (ttm) -$1.91B
Profitability
Profit Margin N/A
Operating Margin N/A
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year Ends June 30
Most recent quarter 31-Mar-2003
Management Effectiveness
Return on Assets (ttm) -68.24%
Return on Equity (ttm) -84.85%
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (mrq) 3.45
Debt/Equity (mrq) 0
Total Cash (mrq) $1.27B
Short Interest
As of 9-June-2003
Shares Short 22.3M
Percent of Float 1.6%
Shares Short
(Prior Month) 17.9M
Short Ratio 0.67
Daily Volume 33.6M
See Profile Help for a description of each item above; M = millions; B = billions; mrq = most-recent quarter; ttm = trailing twelve months; (as of 31-Mar-2003)
Multex offers more in-depth Company Research, Stock Screening, and Hottest Stocks and Industries on over 10,000 U.S. Equities.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2003 Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
Company information © 2003 Multex.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). Some event data provided by CCBN. Data and information is provided for
I don't trust brokerages or analysts but I am going to submit some of the institutional holdings and tell me what you think.
Top Institutional Holders Shares %Out* Value** Reported
Oppenheimerfunds, Inc. 54,263,820 4.01 $197,520,304 31-Mar-03
Barclays Bank Plc 48,343,962 3.58 $175,972,021 31-Mar-03
State Street Corporation 34,901,163 2.58 $127,040,233 31-Mar-03
Vanguard Group, Inc. (The) 24,789,036 1.83 $90,232,091 31-Mar-03
Allianz Dresdner Asset Management of America, Inc. 20,381,521 1.51 $74,188,736 31-Mar-03
Mellon Bank, N.A. 15,429,128 1.14 $56,162,025 31-Mar-03
FMR Corporation (Fidelity Management & Research Corp) 14,650,328 1.08 $53,327,193 31-Mar-03
Kopp Investment Advisors. Inc. 13,280,255 0.98 $48,340,128 31-Mar-03
Capital Guardian Trust Company 13,148,951 0.97 $47,862,181 31-Mar-03
Morgan Stanley 12,065,154 0.89 $43,917,160 31-Mar-03
Top Mutual Fund Holders Shares %Out* Value** Reported
Oppenheimer Global Fund 14,035,100 1.04 $51,087,764 30-Sep-02
Vanguard 500 Index Fund 11,798,020 0.87 $42,944,792 31-Dec-02
Fidelity Destiny Portfolios - II 7,177,400 0.53 $26,125,736 31-Mar-03
College Retirement Equities Fund-Stock Account 6,537,771 0.48 $23,797,486 31-Dec-02
Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund 6,000,000 0.44 $21,840,000 30-Sep-02
Van Kampen Comstock Fund 5,559,635 0.41 $20,237,071 31-Dec-02
Price (T.Rowe) Science & Technology Fund 5,500,000 0.41 $20,020,000 31-Dec-02
SPDR Trust Series 1 5,493,454 0.41 $19,996,172 30-Sep-02
Oppenheimer Total Return Fund, Inc. 5,152,200 0.38 $18,754,008 31-Dec-02
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund-Institutional Index Fd 5,086,575 0.38 $18,515,133 31-Dec-02
*Institutional holdings as a percentage of the current shares outstanding.
**Hypothetical value based on price of $3.64 as of 16-Jul-03. Position may have increased or decreased since the report date.
ADVERTISEMENT
I don't trust or value brokerage ratings, but I know people will follow them.
I'm just hoping JDSU doesn't do something fatal. This acquisition concerns me, because didn't they over do it before on acquisitions?
Hardway
After researching approximately 15 top brokerages the consensus is a definite "sell". I cannot afford to do that at this time. Basically ever street I went down was grim and I am a long.
Move over, I understand misery loves company, so here I am.
Max
Man, this is when I need community. Any honest commentary about the outlook appreciated.
My main concern is that additional debt may weaken rather than strengthen our position. It seems that JDSU may be following the economic precedence of the people that allow plastic to rule. I can understand extending yourself financially to a point but it seems that this is a bit drastic IMO. I hope that it pays off for them. I certainly have a lot riding on it.
BTW are you still accumulating after the acquisition or just holding?
TIA
Max
max, JDSU is being agressive. It could pay off
or it could come back and haunt them. If JDSU ends up selling this company in 2004 or beyond due to a sluggish sector, it will hurt.
It seems JDSU is betting on a sector recovery soon. The jury is still out on that. However, JDSU is well postioned to do some serious moving when it does come back.
Personally, I am very concerned obout the huge deficit the US has created. It is going to hurt, if not us, then our children.
A couple weeks ago we were heading to $5.00 and no one really knew why. We are now heading to $3.00 and I am not sure I know why. It is a mad, mad , mad, mad world...
GOOD FORTUNE TO ALL!
Followers
|
37
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
299
|
Created
|
03/09/01
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |