Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wrong attitude there dude. If you want to sell your junk you have to put a positive spin on it. The storm is about to hit but do you voice that concern no. What you want to do is promote all the work that will be created by the storm. Yes some will be debilitating and some rebilitating work.
Wish I could just get rid of this junk. Tired of seeing "99% loss" and .000001 PPS
So let's assume that it was true that special trailers were commissioned by the goverment to be built to haul helium.
A contract would of been put out by the goverment to jump start the program.
The goverment then becomes the leasor to the leasie of the trailers. The company it self.
The asset value of the trailer is based on the lease pricing. The retained earnings is the value of the lease going back to the stake holders oh the trailers. Now don't forget there are two stake holders. One being the equity holders the other being the goverment through the banking sindicate commissioned by the goverment to handle the goverment affairs in the matter of the building and leading the trailers.
There is of course a administration charge for this process.
So let's assume the asset value is based on the lease price minus the retained earnings. So what is the liability in the arrangement. The liability is the depreciated value based on a linear line of 10% a year write down subtracted by the earnings " appreciation " minus administration and sale charges.
So let's assume the trailers are not earning anything as far as revenue. They do start to earn appreciation value minus the depreciation value and storage costs plus the administration of the storage cost as the operating contract closes in.
This is tricky business where accounts must come up with a value for this wait time. I can tell you it's based on one the cost of goods and services going up over that time period as well the costs associated with other contracts of similar nature going up.
In other words a derivative is purchased based on the stated value of the lease. A derivative can be a commodity or a service offered. Now commodity is a strait forward contract easy to understand but a service derivative is much more complex. I'm not going to embellish this right now but to say that there are many factors that play into the outcome of the lease value regardless that it could be ten years down the road that the trailers will be utilized.
A good example is fiber obtic when it was deployed some twenty years ago. Another is the wireless spectrum auctions that took place. I can go on and on but never the less there is a time lag and the risk that needs may change due to the market demands of a service or commodity.
Helium is exciting. If they can take helium 4 on earth and convert it too helium 3 and using a process of fusion and create hydrogen with any harmful waist by product it will revolutionize energy as we see it. The countries who will lead this technology will control the planet.
One such country right now is North Korea. We have seen the threat they have emposed with the hydrogen bomb they plan on deploying. Let me assure you it's not the explosive kind of bomb but a financial bomb to the world economy as we see it. Russia for one has a huge stake in the energy project that threatens the world balance in energy provisions.
This technology has up to recent news announcement some time back were North Korea stated they had a new energy source that now they feel is threatened by the stiffening of science in this area by Western democratic powers.
Helium supplies to North Korea are being sanctioned as I speak but the true wild card in this is the amount of helium reserve Russia has.
The Russia enquiry will reveal this or there is hopes that it will.
Knowledge is power. Do your own DD as to what I'm saying has an ounce of truth in it. It could be all self promotion to sell my equity position or to acquire a larger interest then I already have.
Hey day explanation. There is a huge helium play that is going to take place in Medicine Hat Alberta Canada. The specifics are still being worked out. The thing that has caught my attention is after the manufacturing of the helium for shipping by truck and only truck.
This has two huge implications for IFCR. The first being the contract that will be rewarded in twenty years time to the trucking out fit that sets them selfs up first will be astronomical. This will require special manufactured trailers to carry the helium. The second is the close proximity to the Transcanada hiway to empliment a new driverless truck that can transport the product to major centers across North America.
The TransCanada hiway lends well to this due to it being straight and mostly divided with minimal traffic cutting down the algorithm numbers given to the liability risk of such an adventure.
Hang in there guys, this could be a block buster in twenty years time. Medicine Hat is being put on the map as a major distribution center for Helium for many applications mostly health care.
Not recommended for investors over twenty as there is great abundance of helium already stored in the central states, Africa that are further ahead in the developing process.
Never the less for IFCR's interest you want to be ahead of the curve and not behind. The special trucking trailers built could be writen down to a zero asset value before ever hitting the road. This is a hidden locked in value to upset the balance of equality in the industry. The risk of course is technology advancements in trailer technology where there is talk of a trailer being manufactured that can compress the helium at the well site removing as well the impurities in the helium. To day the process is bulky and cumbersome due to technical issues that are being worked on.
The time line is estimated to be twenty five years giving to days trailer technology a five year window of operation in the industry after helium production takes place.
Do not invest in the plant operation as those assets will be used to greatly off set tax's and those off set taxs will then be used for collateral to develop further the new trailers with manufacturing capabilities incorporated on the units them selfs.
Good luck, do you own DD on Helium development happening in Medicine Hat Alberta.
http://www.nasdaq.com/investing/glossary/o/outstanding-dividends
Tax's must be paid on dividends received. Tax's are withheld until dividends are paid. It is the responsibility of the equity holder to pay the tax's on dividends received. If you sell your position before the dividends are issued you are still intitlled to the dividends kept on the books from the date of issue too the date of transfer.
If you sell your position you can take the loss and apply it too the issued dividends. This is often done for you by the company itself.
Let's say you have a dividend coming of a $100 dollars and you have a loss of $200 that puts you in a negative tax position after the issuing of the dividends. So you will get the full amount of the dividends allotted.
Now if you sold the issued shares for more then you paid it would be the $100 dollars plus the net profits from your equity minus 50% for tax's. So you would only recieve $ 25.
Now imagine a fellow who has traded to where he had a gain of a $150. Well as you can see he now will owe $25.
Now let's put the companies trading into the picture. From the numbers and our explanation of the entent of the meaning of those numbers you can see how the treasury stock bill got so high along with the outstanding share count.
Good luck stay tuned for more. Please do all DD checks on any information given here or elsewhere on the World Wide Web.
Thanks red. The way i read it by oct we should have some sort of idea what will happen here
I'm sure there will be some sort of deal struck; fine instead of jail. Which might make it end sooner.
Look what he did was not all together wrong. He took assets and sold them to the public using that money to obtain credit for the customer that in turn becomes a liability to the company.
Sure an asset is only worth what it generates in net revenue after every thing is paid. Because the assets is set up as a credit to the equity holders this allows the outstanding shares to stay under the corporate umbrella as well differing the tax's owed cause the goods where never transferred.
He used another entity to issue shares from too the equity holders holding the liability of the credit.
Was it wrong well you be your own judge. If they secured the credit by the goods or service offered then it isn't. But if they didn't it could be technically wrong.
Now if they secured the line of credit minus the tax's owed govern by the amount of treasury notes held then that maybe a concern to the government should the customer default.
We now know most of there work was performed in the Southern states. Now not to send off alarms here but we have all been watching the devastation happening and to tell you all it has my deepest concerns at this moment for this company.
Let's stay positive guys.
Does anyone know when the trial will be??
Myself, im waiting to see what happens till after trial. At the least i will hold till dec
Average collection period is 54 thousand hours not days. Now divide that by an eight hour day and forty hour work week for the administration staff and that is approximately eleven years. What's all the fuss about. The debt is sold every ten years this leaving only a dilution of one year that has to be carried forward.
So yes it's a negative but if it's a big multi year contract that they have and it finishes before the collection period writen the 54,000 hour period could drastically be reduced exspecially if the large contract is followed by much smaller ones.
This is of course all speculation as to why the collection period is so long at 54,000 hours.
I can see many more shares being sold where the public will buy the liability of the crazy credit and collection period that's on the books.
They could and most likely have been issued equity on a standing offer basses to secure the credit liability that they maybe have been offered by this particular customer whom ever they are if at all any of this is making sense.
Buy buy while the debt and credit liability drives the outstanding shares higher.
Are people holding there shares? Is there any hope? Should I just have my broker get rid of them
Yup G&L...
Hopefully Fuselier gets this speech:
"I believe in two things: discipline and the Bible. Here you'll receive both. Put your trust in the Lord; your ass belongs to me. Welcome to Shawshank."
T.
Lol. Hasnt been any pumping since they went grey and neither has there been any dumping. There wont be anything going on here till fuseliers trial is over and more than likely this is over also
Nope same pumping and dumping program as always. Making a little money but I do belive it has run its course. There is talk of selling it off and regrouping with new group of companies.
Before that there is talk of discussing administration and sales relative too retained earnings capital surplus and of course the tax implication your treasury interest or collateral stock that supports the treasury debt.
It doesn't matter what is the cost be it sales or administration. Now granted it is mentioned as a cost so where is the revenue. Well simply the paid in capital is the component of four interest.
Well outstanding shares is the interest of six of the mentioned components
ie: liability:
(Accounts payable)
( Accounts receivables)
( Bank debt and bonds)
Capital surplus
Retained earnings
Equity
Treasury stock
Collateral
You can see how all these components are intertwined. You can see now who holds the debt and credit.
Let me give an example. Accounts receivable the customer holds the debt plus the collateral. The equity holder holds both the debt to the company and the credit to the customer as well the depreciation to the company if the merchandise is returned or services are not paid.
In when a service is given to a customer a lean is established against the work performed. In the event of a product the unsold product is the collateral and the depreciation is the cost of sales and administration fees too the equity holder.
Those fees are depreciated against the taxs owed for the sale of the goods or services bought from the company by the equity holders.
This is an insurance to the company to sell off the goods and services they provided to there customers but because it is also a debt that is sold the debt must be collateralized by the company. In other words they can't sell of more retained earnings then there is collateral to support the given customer debt.
Remember thow that the collateral only has to support administration and sales costs not the revenue or taxs owed for the goods sold and purchased. The sold and purchased taxs now fall to the equity holders. There is also taxs to the company as well in the form of interest to set apart the two tax's.
The reason that the company can call it tax's is that the cost of capital can adjust the tax rate lower that one may even see a negative number should earnings be retained due too the customer defaulting on there payments forcing a high depreciation cost to the equity holders reducing the treasury stock owed to the government for taxs owed after boasting the earnings associated through the sale of equity repurchased on the open market by the company and redistributed back in sales to new or existing equity holders.
Taxs is a good debt but they come before any payout but after depreciation. If there is outstanding shares owed as collateral for debt that can erode an equity position then that is never a good thing.
Wow what BS. . If one looks at the treasury equity it's as you say tax's not paid for a purchase contract on goods sold. Under any contract that is underwritten from a lending institution the remaining contract is represented by the purchase taxs still owed on the purchase minus any capital costs still to be paid.
Money lent is also taxable. This taxable amount adds up too 50% of the cost of the goods or in this case equity sold. The seller can repurchase the equity and forward split the equity to support the tax's already paid by the investing public.
This is not rocket science stuff. The information is out there and everyone owes it to them selfs to source the truth out.
Keep in mind any gains from the repurchase and selling of the said equity goes back to the shareholders minus any equity repurchased and cancelled i.e. diluting the sellers interest and upping the charges per share too the purchaser often reflected in a reversal of the shares issued.
The retained earnings was not well explained. Like treasury stock that is tax's owed to the government that must be worked backwards to find the net revenue retained earnings must also be worked backwards to obtain the amount of equity investors have invested.
Your total of equity, retained earnings based on average of a fifty percent tax retention as well the treasury stock based on a fifty percent tax retention that has to be paid or cancelled through the allowable depreciation tax retention program.
So on average a retained earnings of a $1 will require a public investment of two dollars. Equity is both retained earnings and treasury stock minus bought back equity that is cancelled or if one likes outstanding shares owed minus your retained equity. This of cours is done by dividing your outstanding shares by two as a rough rule of thumb.
This would be the assumption that all equity and net revenue is taxed at fifty percent. This is were the goodwill of the government steps in that you always see in a stock offering. The higher the goodwill figure the lower the marginal tax rate is on the net revenue.
When looking at any public offering always consider the tax implication or good will. Higher the goodwill the lower the taxs that are paid on net revenue to bring it to the fifty percent tax bracket for accounting purposes.
Good luck and do read up on your tax implication rules based on domestic as well international rulings.
No kidding.
Fuselier needs to be thrown in the can and sharing a cell with a guy named Bubba.
T.
Looks like eddy is just trying to self promote other stocks. Its against the rules and his posts could be deleted. But, what the hell. We have nothing going here anyway. I have tried my darndest to get info on fuseliers trial but unable to find anything new
hahahahahahahaha!!
Good one.
Next time, please buy the correct color of red lipstick so your can dress this ugly pig up properly.
T.
Taxs is only owed on income once everything else is paid. If you take thirty percent of the income that is paid in taxs that your treasury stock should be thirty percent of the equity raised.
If the equity figure is less then that number that difference is the number of shares bought back and cancelled.
The gain is then reinvested allowing those taxs to be carried forward in the coming up depreciation of equipment, wages etc.
So in essence you can say the treasury stock is good will from equity being sold above the administration costs to sell the equity.
There are about seventy percent of all public and private companies that run a difficit in this manner.
The market is what ever the other person is willing to pay.
Private placements are much the same. This of course brings the public market to a huge disadvantage to the private sector except in the public market there is the advantage of shortselling a stock to cover an overpriced stock.
Take the equity and treasury stock out of the earnings and you will discover the product or service earnings of a company subtracting the administration cost of selling the public shares i.e. "Retained earnings to the corporation.
There are many that have argued that the two earnings should be seperate from each other. This what I have shared is the true division between the pros reading a balance sheet and the novice investor.
Consult always your investment advisor if you don't understand the above.
http://www.alientechnology.com/media/press-releases/alien-technology-corporation-names-peter-green-chief-executive-officer/
Possibly this will be the new name of the new company.
I'm not sure either. But my Schwab account just listed every value as N/A. Not a great cap to my week.
On the plus side, I have a new headphone amplifier and a nice bottle of wine, so I'm going to listen to some good music and not going to think about it until Monday. Nothing more to be done.
Not sure if this is over or not. Be easier to call after fuselier's court cases are settled. Any number of things can happen to ifcr after that.
If the lease to purchase obligations are not met then the seller often ends up with both companies. Today's share holders then become the lease seller. There is about ten years for three quarters of the process to take place and another to transfer the reverse agreement back. Depending were they are in the process it could be an advantage too sell the buyers equity and purchase the sellers i.e. Prefered shares.
I would like to point out that a purchase of prefered shares is often known as acquiring annuity position in the seller. Those positions are often what a mutual fund will purchase for there clients.
Can an annuity position default? Well they can if the obligations are not met by the purchaser. The positive is that after bank debt, asset depreciation obligations there is always something in the pot but never more then the original equity position stated on the balance sheet.
The tax obligation i.e. "Treasury stock collateral " is the obligation of the buyer.
So what is the bottom line? Assets minus treasury stock valuation minus (liability minus equity i.e. " sellers collateral " is the trading share holders value relative to the market cap of the company at the time.
Now you do have the professional market makers weighing in to ensure a balance trade. Today they use very fast computers that for all the years that I have spent crunching numbers have never bought a stock with more the a ten percent up side unless of course there is a huge private equity offer for all the sellers shares i.e. Collateral Position.
Due keep in mind that the collateral debt is often the responsibility of the seller not the buyer. The buyer is the intrinsic asset often behind a good portion of the collateral offered.
This intrinsic value paid to the seller often covers the depreciation of the leased to purchase position between the buyer and the seller.
It is to this that depreciation then becomes income to both the seller and the buyer purchasing the rival company.
Stay tune for the fall program coming up on deferred collateral tax obligations and how and why fifty percent of the treasury tax obligations will fall back to the seller unless the buyer is behind in its obligation of purchase to the seller.
Sigh....
Doors are closed. Somone or some entity might in the next few years might revive or purchase this if they see value.
Nothing else or any other substantiative evidence tells me otherwise.
Anything else stated is all fluff and buff nonsense.
Find another play Stock. This fat lady just got heavier.
T.
Okk so whats your point ? Can you explain better without making me read all that stuff ? :) something shorter ?
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/a-tale-of-toxicity-the-real-culprit-in-nortels-collapse/article7379114/%3fservice=amp
Nothing, but my point is when a company sells it self to the public it will finance the purchase for the aquiring company.
The collateral is supplied by the seller to the buyers bank. No different then you buying a house except the seller holds the collateral not the bank. This allows a much cheaper rate going back to the bank with portions going to the seller for holding the collateral.
Now the collateral interest is restricted from trade as those shares are lent to the purchaser for a price. The purchaser then sells them on the open market in hopes of recovering them. If he dosn't well his plan is doomed but the shares purchased and the holders still hold a debt too the seller.
This debt is gradually paid back by deferring taxs where now the credit is transferred from the seller to the government.
Best of luck my friend. Remember all public securities are and is public credit from represented interest of the public managed by the government.
The shares are short sold for the administration cost of raising the capital not the value of the collateral that is represented in the retained earnings.
What does it have to do with ifcr ??
An introduction too Septembers topic on taxable collateral.
Collateral obtained by reinvested earnings minus the banks capital costs are taxable regardless of expenditures.
After tax contributions i.e.: earnings that have been taxed can repurchase the taxable collateral deferring the taxs owed.
An example would be if a company payed taxs on a portion of there revenue and repurchased the treasury stock eliminating one the treasury stock owed as well a portion of the outstanding shares owed as collateral to the government for unpaid taxs. This can also be accomplished by the public purchasing shares as well but in that case shares would be transferred by a forward split of the stock back to the public at a par value " cost of administration ".
The administration cost is taxable revenue minus the wage cost to the company it self.
There is all so depreciation costs associated with the taxable collateral that is deductible of the taxable revenue collateral liability.
We don't want to forget that there is two parts too the collateral. One being the trinsic value minus depreciation the other being intrinsic value minus any taxs owed.
Because the taxs are deferred does not mean that they are forgiven. So they have to be kept on the books as a liability to the company but not nessesarly in the accounts payable if sold to the company with revenue that the taxs are paid or after taxable dollars provided by the public.
Another company can purchase stock of another but only after taxs are paid. They can't borrow money and buy another companies stock without first selling the taxable collateral or buying it back with funds that taxs are paid on.
This takes us too the term of laundering money were money has been obtained by scrupulous methods that has been never taxed and used to purchase equity where taxs are deferred.
Do your own DD on all topic matter that is brought up in discussion here.
September topic is going to be about taxable collateral that once sold the tax's are deferred to debt until reinvested along with depreciation to buy back the tax debt.
Stay tuned and invested. It will be going to the moon in 3,650 moons from the September dead line date of the discussion date set.
Already tried.
DOA.
Hope they pin their lower repoductive extremities to the wall.
Or better yet, they're sharing the same cell with some guy named "Haus" who's got a 24 incher that constanatly has the urge to do some "plugging."
lol...
T.
DF is busy with his court appearances. I don't think we have a hope here. Hard lesson learned.
What does this have to do with IFCR?
Hey guys change your key boards on your phone back too English or we will get nothing but question marks.
Have a great day
Sly
????? ?????? ??? ?????
????? ?????? ??? ?????
Why dont they put this company in BK already. What's the difference?? Between BK and this??
They is the sec and finra
Penny stocks are basically "Buyer beware". Shareholders could sue him I suppose.
Not sure who "they" is.... CEO is to blame.
Don't be having my name included in that.
Followers
|
186
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
30846
|
Created
|
08/11/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
http://integratedfreightinc.com/
Integrated Freight Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides truck load services in the United States.
We carry dry freight, refrigerated freight, hazardous waste materials and provide long-haul, regional, and local services.
Furthermore, we offer freight brokerage services. Integrated Freight Corporation is based in Bradenton, Florida.
Form Type | Received | Period Ending | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
DEF 14C | Monday, January 11, 2016 | Monday, January 11, 2016 | PDF RTF XLS |
PRE 14C | Tuesday, December 29, 2015 | Tuesday, December 29, 2015 | PDF RTF XLS |
10-K/A | Friday, August 7, 2015 | Monday, March 31, 2014 | PDF RTF XLS |
10-K/A | Friday, August 7, 2015 | Tuesday, March 31, 2015 | PDF RTF XLS XBRL |
10-Q/A | Friday, August 7, 2015 | Monday, June 30, 2014 | PDF RTF XLS |
10-Q/A | Friday, August 7, 2015 | Tuesday, September 30, 2014 | PDF RTF XLS |
10-Q/A | Friday, August 7, 2015 | Wednesday, December 31, 2014 | PDF RTF XLS XBRL |
8-K | Tuesday, July 14, 2015 | Friday, July 10, 2015 | PDF RTF XLS |
10-K | Tuesday, July 14, 2015 | Tuesday, March 31, 2015 | PDF RTF XLS |
NT 10-K | Tuesday, June 30, 2015 | Tuesday, March 31, 2015 | PDF RTF XLS |
Typically, we work directly with management to enable the company to fully utilize its resources.
Our investment strategy is focused on growth and value creation.
We look for companies that meet the following criteria:
The above criteria may be mutually exclusive to certain opportunistic situations that we believe are highly undervalued.
However, solid Company fundamentals must exist in order for us to consider any direct investment.
Click here to zoom in on daily chart
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |