Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Nice to see that the SL and crew attacks are having no affect on the share price. Like the boy who cried wolf, this will hurt the organized bash credibility that is so prevalent.
HSOA: Rodman/Renshaw Starts @ Mkt Outperform; Sets Tgt @ $9.5; Analyst Notes
Wednesday, August 01, 2007 09:20ET
Issuer: Home Solutions of America, Inc. (NasdaqNM: HSOA)
Analyst Firm: Rodman & Renshaw
Ratings Action: INITIATE
Current Rating: Mkt Outperform
Target Price Action: INITIATE
Target Price: $9.50
Analyst Comments: The firm notes HSOA's core business is evolving into a backlog driven, construction services company with catalysts that include, A/R collection, potential shareholder lawsuit resolution, and strategic partnership opportunities.
From their latest 10Q, yes, they really said this
"Each of the control deficiencies described above could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned accounts or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures at March 31, 2007 were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required."
From their latest 10Q, STILL from their previous 10K
"The following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting were reported in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2007:
• Management did not maintain effective controls over management review of user accounts at any location within the Company because of a lack of segregation of duties within each application.
• The Company did not maintain effective control environment because it lacked (1) the appropriate communication of the code of conduct, employee handbook and fraud policy (2) the appropriate documentation related to personnel responsibilities and performance, (3) appropriate human resource policies regarding personnel matters, and (4) an internal audit function.
• Management did not maintain effective controls over stock/options. A reconciliation of the Company’s outstanding shares against the stock transfer agent’s records historically is not performed. Also, journal entries to record compensation expense and option exercises were not reviewed and approved by the CFO. Finally, the Company’s registered public auditing firm noted during the financial statement audit for the year ended December 31, 2006 that Board of Director compensation expense was erroneously recorded as prepaid expenses ($254,000) in the second quarter of 2006.
• The Company did not maintain effective internal controls over income taxes because documentation of the review and approval of the income tax returns, quarterly tax estimates, and tax journal entries were not present.
• The Company did not maintain effective controls over the accounts payable and expenditures cycle because (1) vendor maintenance request forms were incomplete and were completed after all additions had already been entered into the system, (2) vendor maintenance requests were not approved, (3) no purchases journal was maintained by the accounts payable clerk and not all purchase orders matched the invoices (and there was support for variances), (4) managers were not signing all invoices when the product/service is received to ensure that the product/service is acceptable prior to payment, (5) not all invoices contained documentation of the approval and GL coding provided by the controller, (6) expense reports were not reviewed and approved prior to payment, (7) wire transfers were not approved and one person has the ability to initiate and perform a wire transfer, (8) goods and services received but not invoiced are not tracked to ensure timely recording of all expenditures, (9) the accounts payable system did not prevent entry of duplicate invoices, (10) there was no indication that review of check registers tested had occurred, (11) for invoices that did not match the amount paid per the check stub, there was no explanation provided on the invoice explaining or reconciling the variance, (12) lack of segregation of duties, (13) check registers were not reviewed and approved, (14) the Company’s registered public accounting firm noted several adjustments related to the accounts payable cycle and the fact that a vendor statement did not agree to the general ledger.
25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
• At three locations, management did not maintain effective controls over accounts receivables and sales because: (1) masterfile changes were not approved, and the masterfile was not reviewed for validity, accuracy, completeness and timely recording of changes, (2) individual contracts were not approved, (3) copies of lien waivers and copies of invoices were not provided as support for several sales, (4) there was no evidence of a reviewed and approval of invoices, (5) cash receipts were not reviewed and approved, (6) posted cash receipt entries were not reviewed, (7) the appropriate accounts receivable and sales were not reviewed and approved, (8) a lack of access and segregation of duties was noted, (9) management noted during the financial statement audit that some sales were recorded twice, (10) the appropriate approval of contracts were not documented, (11) invoices to accounts receivable subledger reconciliation was not independently reviewed, (12) account receivable subledger to general ledger reconciliation was not independently reviewed, (13) cash receipts record (log) was not reviewed and no one verified that cash receipts are posted to the correct account.
• At one location, management did not maintain effective controls over the inventory function because (1) an inventory tracking system (subledger) was not maintained; therefore, no reconciliation to the general ledger could be performed, (2) an inventory master list was not being maintained, (3) matching of the receipts with the purchase order and bill of lading was not performed and the quality inspection is not performed, (4) the entries to record the receipt of inventory in the general ledger were not reviewed/approved, (5) a review of the inventory records to ensure that all issuances were properly approved was not performed, (6) lack of segregation of duties and access authorization was noted, (7) quarter inventory adjustments were not reviewed, (8) lack of appropriate documentation for the inventory count was noted, (9) finally, during the financial statement audit the auditor made an adjustment to inventory.
• At three locations, the Company did not maintain effective internal controls over Financial Closing and Reporting because (1) not all journal entries have adequate support, nor are all journal entries approved, (2) all required elements were not included in the controller’s monthly binder(s), (e.g. bank reconciliations, bank statements, and the reconciliation for intercompany accounts), (3) no supporting inventory documentation was submitted as a part of the financial package, (4) no sales and expenses cutoff review were performed, (5) lack of access controls to the chart of accounts and the rights within the accounting software, (6) no approval for changes to the chart of accounts was noted, (7) no review and approval of the financial reporting packages to the supporting general ledgers was noted, (8) management did not use a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) disclosure checklist in preparing and reviewing draft financial statements to ensure accuracy, completeness and consistency of required disclosures, and (9) each financial-statement disclosure was not independently reviewed and validated for appropriate assumptions, methodology, and presentation of all relevant information in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
• At one location, management did not maintain effective controls over the fixed asset cycle because (1) a fixed asset policy existed but there was no evidence of review and approval and the fixed asset policy had not been distributed to the person who codes and records all purchases, including fixed asset purchases to the general ledger (accounts payable clerk), (2) capital expenditure forms were not completed for all fixed asset acquisitions. One asset was purchased using the expense reimbursement process and not recorded, (3) reconciliation of fixed assets and accumulated depreciation was not performed and reviewed, (4) management did not review the fixed asset ledger at least quarterly to ensure compliance, (5) fixed asset inventory review, documentation and approval are not performed, any required impairment adjustments are not recorded, (6) the monthly depreciation expense journal entry prepared is not reviewed as part of the monthly closing and journal entry review processes, (7) no documentation of the approval of the disposal of assets was noted, (8) management does not review the purchase journal and invoices to ensure that fixed assets are recorded in the proper period. The journal entry and support was not put into a monthly binder and reviewed quarterly by the corporate controller.
• At one location, management did not maintain effective controls over the payroll function because (1) no authorization for hiring employees was noted, (2) no review of the employee master file occurred, (3) no review and approval of timekeeping was noted, (4) no reconciliation was prepared and there was no documented review of the comparison of timesheets to paychecks, and (5) no control over the distribution of paychecks was noted.
Each of the control deficiencies described above could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned accounts or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected."
From their latest 10Q
"On January 10, 2007, the Court consolidated two of the class action cases and appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated case. On March 12, 2007, the lead plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 against the same defendants as in the original complaints as well as against several additional defendants, including a member of the Company’s board of directors and Sanders Morris Harris Group, Inc. The consolidated amended complaint asserts that the defendants made false and misleading statements regarding certain of the Company’s contracts and acquisitions and made false statements regarding the Company’s 2006 earnings guidance. The Company intends to vigorously defend the class actions."
Sounds good. Best of luck to you.
And in response to your find, here is a link to something I just found which may be of interest to you as well:
http://tinyurl.com/2o76f4
Dont be so quick to judge. I posted it because i found it. I thought it was something you should know about. I have no interest in this stock. So chill.
Learn about this company and you will learn that those "articles" are just so much negative bilge.
Did you post that link out of iognorance, or because you are part of the crew intending to try to short the company indefinitely?
FYI RE: HSOA - http://www.stocklemon.com/
I should just let you know that today was a really, really off the wall day over there. Give the crew a chance to get all of their noses back in place and try again later in the week.
Honest, it is not like YMB at all under most normal circumstances.
I knew that, I just didn't want to do it. LOL
But in the time between this and my last post I did create a board for one of my stocks and will probably get my hand slapped for copy right infringement as I just took the company description for the info box off of their own web page and stuck it on there. They wouldn't create one without it.
I'll see if that works and then maybe some one will come forth and tweek it a bit. Make it their own. Toss up a couple charts, etc.
Thanks and I apologize for heading off topic. Back to HSOA
J
No- but you can start a baord:
How do I set up a new board or club?
Setting up a new board or club is very simple. You simply need to click on 'Boards' and then click on the 'Start A New Board' button. Read the next question for more information on where to place your club.
Thanks. Interesting group of people over there. A little too yahoo for me. LOL
I do like how they have boards for ALL my stocks over there because Ihub doesn't. I know I can start a new board here but I don't really feel motivated to do so.
Does anyone know of a message board on IHUB that you can SUGGEST a stock and have someone else create the board for it?
I think that I-Hub gets peeved when you post a link to a competitor site. Just got to investorvillage.com and look for the board for HSOA. You'll find an interesting group of folks there. Sometimes more social, if there is little left to discuss, but when new news comes out, its all serious.
Can you send me a link to it?
I was thinking of adding around the 4.50 range if given the chance.
As for Stocklemon...yes, read it all
Thankis for the feedback. If you aren't already aware, there are some other HSOA boards out there which have a pretty astute group of longtime holders. Many of us out there have been in since the HOM days, and have seen just about anything there is to see, happen to this stock.
Try the one on I-V if you get the chance.
Hockmir,
In your sig...."Public Disclosure: If it sounds too good to be true, I probably have it in my portfolio."
LMAO! Thanks! I needed some humor tonight!
BTW, excellent post and interesting opinion...thanks for that as well.
J
My take on it is that the PPS has been pinned down to get through Options expiration tomorrow. The shorts need the PPS at 5 to keep from losing their butts on their $5 options plays. A little under 5 may also trigger some margin calls and free up shares to let them cover.
But they are in a very tight situation. They have shorted everything that can be shorted, except for air. August earnings report is coming, and as the company said in its last CC, they have been providing conservative guidance. That means one can almost certainly expect an upside surprise.
Other message boards have shown that they have been bidding numerous projects in New Orleans, and that they have been announcing major work for Fireline in the non-disaster side of the business in many other parts of the country.
Put all of this together, and maybe a hurricane in the Atlantic along about the same time, and there is substantial upside potential from here.
My own take, such as it is, is that I would personally be surprised not to see a ramp up to earnings starting next week. You may see attempts to get the price to the 4.70's to try to panic out whatever is left of weak holders, but by now, the holders that are there are the insiders, the 'tutes and the ultra long retails. Not many shares to shake out when real covering needs to be done.
All of this is my own opinion, of course. You should always do your own due dilligence before making any buy or sell decisions.
Thanks Flatsixer.
Guess maybe it is time to add a little bit more. I have been patiently waiting for I am still unsure a bottom has been reached but some where in the fours works for me.
HSOA mention on CEOCast today:
http://www.ceocast.com/(0eppkyrfi1g3mp55ztm1um45)/NewsLetters.aspx?id=404&mode=
After nine consecutive days of decline in the price of shares of Home Solutions of America, Inc. (NASDAQ: HSOA), a provider of restoration, construction and interior services to commercial and residential customers, the company's silence appears deafening.
Is the sell-off overdone? Shares were weak on Wednesday, amid speculation that a particular property in Gibsonton, Florida, which has yet to be permitted and could be owned by certain officers of the company's Fireline Restoration subsidiary, was the venue of a 600,000 plus square foot retail center and corporate office site located in Hillsborough County, Florida for which HSOA was awarded a contract valued at approximately $100 million. The company has not identified the site yet, but it seems unlikely that this property is the venue, as parties we have spoken with tell us that it could be difficult to build a project as large as this one on a property with those characteristics.
Previously, this same group incorrectly speculated that the contract was with developer Burton Katzman, which the company denied. More significantly, however, is that the weakness in the stock, likely due to the company declining to comment on either the New York or Florida projects, has caused shares to retreat to levels prior to the company's solid first quarter results, where it beat the lone analyst's estimate by 2 cents.
The decline is even more puzzling in a week where shares of larger competitors Shaw Group (NYSE: SGR) and Perini Corp. (NYSE: PCR) established multi-year highs. Recently, The American Institute of Architects forecast a 7.2% growth in nonresidential construction spending throughout all of this year, driven by hotel and office building business. That's on top of 6% growth last year.
The institute's closely watched Architecture Billings Index, a leading economic indicator of construction activity, revealed a spike in design activity in May. That follows three months of moderate growth. The company's transition to become more of a construction services company should allow it to benefit from these trends.
With HSOA's stock trading at a P/E multiple that is less than 1/3 the level of its larger peers, and acquisition activity heating up in the area (URS announced plans to buy Washington Group International for $2.6 billion in May, Jacobs inked a deal to buy Edwards and Kelcey, a privately held engineering, design, planning, and construction management firm in March and Perini bought Rudolph and Sletten, an established building contractor and construction management company last October), the company could become an acquisition candidate at its current valuation. HSOA's stock currently trades at less than 9 times '07 P/E estimates, at the bottom of historical levels. Shares ended the week at $5.31, down 52 cents.
Flatsixer
HSOA: Jumps +5.68%; Vol +274%; Last 90 Min of Trading
Friday , June 22, 2007 16:21ET
During the last 90 minutes of today's session, shares of Home Solutions of America, Inc. (NasdaqNM: HSOA) demonstrated a strong UPWARD close relative to its 13:30 ET statistics. "Strong Closers" are determined by proprietary Knobias calculations performed during the last segment of each trading day.
sym: HSOA...@13:30
PRICE.......$6.00
VOLUME......436,500
#TRADES.....871
sym: HSOA...@close
PRICE.......$6.34
VOLUME......1,634,300
#TRADES.....1,673
That's some heavy volume in the last ninety. I missed after hour action.
It was spooky to watch the L3 at the close. In the last second, there was the typical attempt to paint the close down a few cents, when BOOOOM! like 63K shares at $6.34 landed in time to make it the closing price. Un bleeping believable. And then the volume and price pressure continued into AH trading.
Something happened! I think you may be right. Massive volume there at the end and big gap up AH. Very interesting.
If anyone hasn't looked at the late in session and then AH price and volume for HSOA for today, then they don't have an inkling what will be coming their way on Monday.
Something that looks to me very much like a sneak attempt by one fund to cover ahead of the others went on today AH. Just look at the volume and AH price levels.
If Fradella were very clever, he would drop a PR bomb Monday morning before the open, and the gap up would be something that would bring tears to the eyes of longs who have held through the recent wave of manipulations.
JMHO
We will see what we will see. Still have a small amount of this just in case! GL
HSOA CC this morning at 10:00...link...
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070615/20070615005260.html?.v=1
Flatsixer
CEOCast blurb from yesterday...
http://www.ceocast.com/(lxblzsa4hmg5p0yyfhyxwb45)/NewsLetters.aspx?id=400&mode=
"Investors and traders may want to pay close attention to shares of Home Solutions of America, Inc. (NASDAQ: HSOA) Monday morning, as the company will webcast its Annual Stockholder's Meeting at 10 a.m. eastern, and then take questions from investors. There are certainly no shortage of topics the company could address, including providing additional details on the two contracts it recently announced, each worth approximately $100 million, the FIGA receivable and whether it will collect it during Q2 and repay a $21.5 million note issued in connection with the acquisition of its Fireline Restoration subsidiary and its outlook for the second quarter and balance of the year.
Shares have retraced all of their gains since May 17th, the day prior to when the company announced its first $100 million contract, suggesting that investors have discounted the value of both contracts. The stock currently trades for less than 13 times trailing 12-month earnings. Volatility and trading volume in the stock declined significantly last week from previous levels, but with approximately 33% of the float short as of the most recently published report, volatility could return quickly. Shares ended the week at $5.97, down 24 cents."
Flatsixer
Absolutely. Thanks for your opinion. I appreciate it!
No, I don't think TheStreet has played it both ways with HSOA. It's been a negative bias throughout. I'm not saying they couldn't change or won't change, but they haven't yet. My contention is that there's a lot better stocks to short than HSOA as we enter the hurricane season.
"They should leave the HSOA camp and move elsewhere with their short".
So you don't think that once they cover there short they will go long?
It's just all about shorting and not playing it both ways?
Actually, Eastunder, TheStreet has been anti-HSOA for quite some time. I think HSOA's good earnings report caught TheStreet off guard and now they are on the attack again. But, good earnings reports and hurricane momentum puts a lot of pressure on TheStreet. They should leave the HSOA camp and move elsewhere with their short.
Yeah, because God knows "thestreet" has no idea what they are doing. ;)
Makes you wonder if they really feel that way or if it is just a temporary feeling?
I would venture to bet that should HSOA drop down to a lower level they will then come out and say it's value is one to now look at. Of course, if that's the case you can darn well bet they are already long on the stock.
It's like Cramer liking a stock, then disliking it, then liking it again. Wonder what his positions are during all those back and forth opinions?
This is an epic battle between the negative stance of TheStreet versus a company (HSOA) with rising earnings/hurricane momentum. I think TheSteet would be wise to shift their position and short another stock during this particular period.
The huge HSOA short position provides volatility and makes this one juicy for trading.
Flatsixer
HSOA news out tonight at 6:38PM:
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070611/20070518005359.html?.v=2
Part of the above:
"Press Release Source: Home Solutions of America, Inc.
CORRECTING and REPLACING Home Solutions of America Subsidiary Awarded Contracts Valued at Over $100 Million
Monday June 11, 6:38 pm ET
Fireline Restoration Joint Venture To Provide Construction Services For Three Buildings in New York City Boroughs
DALLAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--In release dated May 18, 2007, fifth graph, header and first sentence should read: Blue Diamond Construction Corp. (sted Blue Diamond Construction Management, Inc.). Fifth graph, sixth sentence should read: Based in New York City, Blue Diamond is 100% owned by Rick Holowchak. (sted Based in New York City, Blue Diamond is a subsidiary of SD Contracting Group Inc., a privately held NYC Development and Contracting Company.)
The corrected release reads:
HOME SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA SUBSIDIARY AWARDED CONTRACTS VALUED AT OVER $100 MILLION
Home Solutions of America, Inc. (Nasdaq: HSOA, the "Company" or "Home Solutions"), a provider of restoration, construction and interior services to commercial and residential customers, announced today that its Fireline Restoration, Inc. subsidiary ("Fireline") has entered into a joint venture agreement with Blue Diamond Construction, Inc. ("Blue Diamond"), a New York-based construction management firm, to develop and construct 339 residential condominiums and 160,000 square feet of mixed use retail space located in the boroughs of Brooklyn, Manhattan and Queens, New York. The value of the contracts to Fireline exceeds $100 million. Construction is anticipated to begin during the third quarter and is expected to be completed by 2009. Fireline is expected to complete approximately $12 million in work under the contract this year, which was not included in the Company's previously announced backlog. The contracts are collectively the largest in the Company's history.
Flatsixer
Anyone (if there is anyone left),
Help me out, here. What is the significance of the announcement this afternoon??? Is it time to finally bail out???
Well, I don't disagree with you. However, I do pretty well at this. Was up about 50% on hsoa. Made about 20%. I have a another account with buy and hold stocks. I make money faster with my "trading" account. So actually I practice both disciplines. Actually have some hsoa in long term account.
You have highlighted the BIGGEST problem of today's equity markets...too many traders and not enough investors! People are in and out of a stock faster than those guys who service prostitutes!
And there is good reason. There is no committment in today's market. You stay too long in an unproven stock and you usually watch your profit gradually go away.
Daytrading mentality, (naked) short participation and pump and dump tactics have ruined it all for the private investor.
That being said, HSOA has alot of positives for the long run only if there weren't just so many pessimistic and opportunistic "traders" trying to make a fast buck on every rise and dip. Little do they care that if NO ONE sold, the PPS would have to go up based on supply and demand alone. But FEAR usually wins over logic when it comes to stocks.
Nothing new here...just ramblings of a former stock broker guru who now spends his days watching small time investors try and play this game when they should really go to a casino where they can get a better win-loss action with flashing lights, drinks, music and player card points!
Honestly, folks, if you are letting yourselves get jerked around by clowns like stocklemon, et al, you are holding too much of the stock or you have not done your dd. or both. Check out a company's fundamentals with a service like Vectorvest or some such and buy enough to make a decent profit but not enough to cause you to panic even if the stock totally tanks. Fortunes are generally made in increments, except for the lottery of course.
fwiw jmho
And by the way, I'm not an investor, I'm a trader and could buy/sell an any moment.
Agreed! I sold most of my position, made a profit. I think I'll put half the shares back on the table again. The fundamentals are solid. Still think it's an easy double from here. GL
What bothers me the most is that after bogus articles like the one Stocklemon wrote are known, "investors" sell! They are intimidated and become fearful. The fact is: True LT investors just hold on for the ride and check back in a week or so.
But the real damage is with institutional buyers...they hold thousands of shares and have stock loss measures in place. When the weak hands sell, the proce drops and when stop losses are met, tens of thousands of shares are dumped on the market. That is what has happened here. HSOA was over $8 when the "false" news hit the internet. Now, it is under $7. Of course, it will come back in time, but just think of those private investors who got margin calls because of the orchestrated drop in PPS?
Private stock investment is getting tougher here in the United States. It's almost better to own .002 percent of 1 millon shares than 1000 shares directly. In this cae, your risk is spread. And who cares if HSOA takes a temporary dump...the temporary losses are just averaged in and you hardly notice it.
IMO, HSOA SP is only down today because the market is generally down.
LOL. Looking at the daily chart. I think I see where stocklemon bought in.
Buying a stock is a pain in the butt sometimes!
What info can one trust nowadays? Do we have to become private detectives to find a stock? I always use who I feel I can trust. Investors business daily and Daily graphs online thru IBD.
I choose Daily Graphs because all the fundamentals are on the same page as the graph. One stop shop, if I may.
Investors business daily show's excellent ratings and fundamentals on HSOA.
According to IBD...they show
p/e 16
eps growth 138%
roe 15%
SMR rating A
acc/dis rating A
Composite rating 98
relative strength 83
EPS rating 87
mgmt ownership 17%
banks 7%
funds 5%
HSOA went from 18 funds owning in jun06 to 23 funds owning stock in mar 07
eps went from .10 in 2004 to .39 in 2006, with .61 est for 2007 and .79 est for 08
sales went from 14.2m in jun05 q to 39.9m in Mar07
EPS went from .08 in jun05q to .12 in Mar07
This appears to be a growing company and I think it is difficult to argue with fundamental facts.
Now according to Stocklemon...they suck.
Hummm. Hard choice in whom to believe. :)
Criminal activity if you ask me.
stock lemon or "Citron" research...(get it? LOL!) certainly has an interesting disclaimer on their webpage:
http://www.citronresearch.com/index.php/disclamer/
Legal Disclaimer
By using this website you agree to the terms of this disclaimer.
You agree that the use of Citron Research is at your own risk. In no event should Citron Research be liable for any direct or indirect trading losses caused by any information available on this site.
The materials on the site are not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security, nor shall any security be offered or sold to any person, in any jurisdiction in which such offer would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction.
Citron Research makes no representations, and specifically disclaims all warranties, express, implied, or statutory, regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any material contained in this site. You should seek the advice of a security professional regarding your stock transactions.
Citron Research does not guarantee in any way that it is providing all of the information that may be available. We recommend that you do your own due diligence before buying or selling any security.
The principals of Citron Research most always hold a position in any of the securities profiled on the site. Citron Research will not report when a position is initiated or covered. Each investor must make that decision based on his/her judgment of the market.
(NOW read that last paragraph again...MOST ALWAYS?)
Followers
|
10
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
380
|
Created
|
08/15/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |