Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"BUYINS.NET, www.buyins.net, announced today that these select companies have been removed from the NASDAQ, AMEX and NYSE naked short threshold list: "... " HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: HIET). " Is that good for a stock or bad? don't know anymore....
Bombs blasting all over the world unchecked. It's time for governments to look into technologies like that of HIET to make this world safer place. Instead of relaying on human instincts and conventional wisdom its about time to put some science to work. And it’s about the corner. Don't be swayed by couple of clueless inpatient idiots to affect your desire for safer world and BIG $$$$. It’s all coming together right here at HIET...
"TV show's promo sparked bomb scare"... Vigilant America deserves technology offered by HIET, and IT’s gonna get it! Invest in company that's gonna make YOUR world a safer place to live...
Something tells me BIG $$$$ around the corner. Nothing better than making $$$ and the world a safer place! TO DAA MOOON!!! we go...
"Receipt of this license by SEPTA is a significant milestone for the commercial distribution of HiEnergy's SIEGMA(tm) explosive detection systems and is an important confirmation to first responders, law enforcement, military personnel, and other security professionals as to the safety and practicality of our ground breaking technologies," stated Roger Spillmann, HiEnergy's president
I'm still amazed by those idiots selling on days like these. The party just getting started! Once gevernment recognizes HIET technology, which you can savely acknoledge they already did: sky's the limit for this stock! IMHO...
All the news of late has been excellent. Good times ahead, IMHO.
Best,
Geoff
I'm not sure what confused idiots are selling before BIG RUN, but don't mind them folks, load up for quick $$$$ and lots of it... IMHO
Entire news:
"HiEnergy Technologies Announces License to Operate Its SIEGMA Explosive Detection Systems Issued to Leading Transportation Agency Customer
IRVINE, Calif., Jan. 30, 2007 (PRIME NEWSWIRE) -- HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB:HIET), the homeland security industry leader in neutron-based diagnostic technology, today announced that Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) received a license from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to deploy, transport and operate SIEGMA(tm) 3E3 and 3M3 portable explosive detection systems acquired from HiEnergy Technologies. The license is valid for a period of ten years.
Pursuant to the license, SEPTA will be able to operate at will the SIEGMA(tm) devices independently within the State of Pennsylvania, and anywhere the NRC maintains jurisdiction within the 50 States, including areas of exclusive federal jurisdiction and all federal facilities. Prior to obtaining the license, SEPTA had operated the systems it purchased from HiEnergy on a restricted basis under HiEnergy 's NRC license.
"Receipt of this license by SEPTA is a significant milestone for the commercial distribution of HiEnergy's SIEGMA(tm) explosive detection systems and is an important confirmation to first responders, law enforcement, military personnel, and other security professionals as to the safety and practicality of our ground breaking technologies," stated Roger Spillmann, HiEnergy's president.
The license was secured under HiEnergy's Equipment Technical Assistance Program (ETAP), which provides radiation safety certification and licensing, as well as hands-on equipment training, local equipment support (including calibration, maintenance and servicing), and software support and upgrades. HiEnergy offers ETAP's integrated suite of services to all U.S. purchasers of its ground-breaking explosive detection products through best-of-class service providers.
In October 2006, the State of California - Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) certified HiEnergy's SIEGMA(tm) explosive detection systems as safe and acceptable for commercial distribution and sale to authorized users in the United States and territories. Regulatory authorities at both the national and state levels can rely on this certificate in their evaluation of license requests by other purchasers and operators. Safety evaluations included the review and approval of the SIEGMA(tm) systems' design and operating procedures, as well as HiEnergy's internal quality assurance and control program.
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) serves approximately 1 million people per day in the greater Philadelphia region, which includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, and select rail services in the neighboring states of New Jersey and Delaware. SEPTA maintains and operates a vast network of fixed-route services including bus, subway/elevated, trackless trolley, light rail, and commuter rail operations from over 280 stations within a service area of over 2,200 square miles. "
HIET alive and well with licensed to: "Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) received a license from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to deploy, transport and operate SIEGMA(tm) 3E3 and 3M3 portable explosive detection systems acquired from HiEnergy Technologies. The license is valid for a period of ten years." Looking good...
""Rocket fired at U.S. Embassy in Greece". Terrorism alive and "well". Innovating products like those offered by HIET should help to curb it. It's time governments take a serious look at them and start to implement them... IMHO
Today's mystery fumes in NYC could benefit this stock in a twisted way... IMHO
yeah, you right many poeple hurting here. Shouldn'be so upbeat but potentials are huge here. Once the word is out that their technology work, orders gonna come fast and furious... IMHO
Folks are starting to nibble this morning following that great news. In spite of the good news, I think that it's taking a while for people to build up the confidence to plunk their money down to buy, as hiet as been in a tailspin for some time now, even though it occasionally has released some encouraging PRs.
Buy more, everyone.....I see 10 x 11 cents at 10:11 this morn. Looking nice as build up for run.
Pennyking,
I've (unfortunately) held HIET since it was over $1.00 per share. I keep thinking it will fly...that one of these days...but so far nothing. Maybe today will be the beginning of real sales. The potential of this comapny is obviously huge.
Best regards to you,
Geoff
All right, someone showed up on what it seemed deserted board. Right in time for busy and expensive holliday season. LOL, no seriously company has great products and new orders solidify notion that it is for real... To Da MOOON HIET!!!
A sale (finally)
Best regards,
Geoff
http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/061214/110435.html
HiEnergy Technologies Receives Order for SIEGMA Explosive Detection System for Middle Eastern Government Agency
Thursday December 14, 8:30 am ET
IRVINE, Calif., Dec. 14, 2006 (PRIME NEWSWIRE) -- HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. (OTC BB:HIET.OB - News), the homeland security industry leader in neutron-based diagnostic technology, announced today receipt of an order in the amount of $325,000 for one SIEGMA(tm) 3M3 Atometer(tm) suitcase-borne explosives detection system.
ADVERTISEMENT
The purchase order made on behalf of a Middle Eastern government's security agency was received through Applied Tactical Technologies, Inc. of New York, working in conjunction with Taylor Jordan and Associates, an authorized sales agent for HiEnergy Technologies. The order provides for delivery within 60 days and includes operator and radiation safety training, one year of maintenance and service parts warranty, as well as software upgrades for a period of six months.
``The order is the result of our ongoing sales and marketing efforts, with the cooperation of outside sales agents and valued resellers, to penetrate regions such as the Middle East, where there is significant demand for advanced counter-terrorism technologies, and to increase awareness of the unique capabilities offered by neutron diagnostics,'' stated Sean C. Moore, HiEnergy's Vice President of Sales and Marketing. ``Based on the interest received at the ASIS Exhibition in Bahrain, and the anticipated use of our explosives detection system by a high level government agency in the Middle East, we expect to increase our visibility in the region and advance our sales efforts in the region.''
HiEnergy Technologies' most recent exhibition in the Middle East was at the ASIS International Middle East Security Conference in the Kingdom of Bahrain, which featured more than 130 companies presenting the latest developments in security equipment and state-of-the-art technologies to an estimated 10,000 attendees, including security professionals, law enforcement, government and military officials, and leading policy makers. The Conference focused on the urgent needs of the public and private sectors in the Middle East for security products and services to protect critical infrastructure, information systems, and physical and intellectual property.
The delivery of the product related to the purchase order, and other similar orders, is contingent upon the payment of all taxes and import duties by the purchaser, as well as conformance with all applicable restrictions on the exportation or importation of the SIEGMA(tm) system. HiEnergy's ability to fulfill the purchase order is dependent, in part, on the ability of the Company to raise the necessary funds to meet its manufacturing costs and operating expenses. There can be no assurance that such funds will be available on acceptable terms and conditions, or at all.
Tried to rally today.. Gotta wait for new year or some great news right for boxing day' extravaganza... Big rebound on the way... IMHO
Bought another 15k in .083 range. No idea what idiots dumping it this low and why but seems grossly oversold and primed for BIG, ANORMOUS rebound... IMHO... GLTA longs...
Bought a few more today. Accumulating, waiting for a BIG REBOUND... IMHO
Looks primed to shoot up... IMHO keep on accumulating for quick holiday $$$$$... IMHO
Everyone gave up on this? I know that's a tough sell but gave it a shot once again. The last time bought it around .4 and subsequently sold in .30s for loss. Second time lucky? Is anything to look up for this stock?
Latest Plot Points Up Need for More Sophisticated Airport Screening
BY CHUCK McCUTCHEON
Newhouse News Service, 8/11/06
WASHINGTON -- The disrupted plot to blow up airplanes between London and the United States highlights the urgent need for high-tech systems that can detect liquid and other forms of explosives, aviation security experts said Thursday.
Several said technologies have advanced to where they could be put in place at airports, even though systems are costly and passengers likely to be inconvenienced.
"It's not that we don't know how to do security -- it's that we don't want to spend for it," said Douglas Laird, a former Northwest Airlines security chief who is now a consultant in Reno, Nev.
Charles Slepian, head of the Foreseeable Risk Analysis Center in New York, said the British plotters' intention to mix chemical explosives aboard planes was a threat that should have been addressed long ago. He cited a failed 1995 al-Qaida plot in the Philippines in which terrorists planned to bring aboard nitroglycerin bombs in bottles used for contact lens solution.
"We need to put in place technologies that will give us a chemical analysis of things carried on board," said Slepian, a frequent critic of the Transportation Security Administration. "Visual inspection simply isn't good enough -- you can't tell whether something will go bang in the night."
Several different technologies can measure the chemical properties of vapors or particulate matter collected from passengers or carry-on luggage. The TSA and other agencies fund research in these areas, but some critics accuse them of not moving fast enough.
"I'm seriously troubled because the U.S. counterterrorism apparatus has been very slow to find and bring online technologies that can counter new threats," said Michael Greenberger, director of the University of Maryland's Center for Health and Homeland Security.
Others disagreed.
"Over-investing in screening technologies is not where you get the biggest bang for the buck," said James Carafano, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. "Everybody wants a system that is perfect and never makes mistakes; those things don't exist."
Slepian cited one company, HiEnergy Technologies of Irvine, Calif., that has developed a system to identify concealed explosives. In tests with the Navy, the company said it detected all explosives and provided accurate chemical identification of more than 80 percent.
"We actually perform chemistry in midair," said Roger Spillmann, the company's president and CEO. "Any substance can be examined, liquid or solid."
Earlier this year, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority began using two HiEnergy systems. The $300,000 devices are enclosed in suitcases and can detect explosive materials remotely. So far, they have been deployed in training exercises and on patrol, but have not been needed in an actual emergency, said Capt. John Wenke of the authority's Transit Police Department.
Laird, the consultant, said technology for detecting liquid explosives is only a "partial solution" because terrorists are likely to find ways to smuggle small quantities aboard planes without having them scanned.
In his view, the government also needs to widely deploy computer tomography systems that are more accurate than X-rays. "With an X-ray, your chance of finding anything other than a gun or knife is minimal at best," he said.
One company, American Science & Engineering Inc. of Billerica, Mass., has developed a system that creates a photo-like image as it scans parcels or containers for explosives or other materials. It is awaiting word from TSA on its usage, said company spokeswoman Dana Harris.
Stephen McHale, a former TSA deputy administrator, said the government "is moving as fast as the technology exists" on airport security screening.
McHale said it could be impractical to use technologies to search many different types of liquids for explosives, because "you end up having to look for so many materials, you've gone beyond what you can reasonably administer."
Alternatives, he said, might be to increase physical searches of passengers or further restrict carry-ons.
David Stempler, president of the Potomac, Md.-based Air Travelers Association, envisions tighter restrictions on carry-on luggage, pointing out that the TSA's increased security measures do not affect checked luggage.
Those averse to checking baggage might find the new limits hard.
"Not only does it add time at the front end, but you've got to wait at the back end," Stempler said. "And there's the fear that your bag is not going to be there."
But he predicted travelers would come to accept the adjustments.
"People just don't like the period when it's in transition, when the rules change. But once they know what the rules are, everyone seems to go along with it and fall in line."
http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/mccutcheon081106.html
Posted by: nanookknows
In reply to: ED20332 who wrote msg# 2853
Date:8/11/2006 11:09:21 AM
Post #of 2858
This technology cannot, in any way, shape or form, be used for carry-on baggage. The technology involves making the substances (hair gels, etc) radioactive for a short period of time and then analyzing the decay spectrum.
20 years ago, in an earlier part of my career, I visited Westinghouse in PA. They had a prototype of this technology (known as neutron activation analysis) and it was already in beta testing at 3 airports at that time. The upside is there for checked baggage and cargo, but it is complicated and it takes people a bit smarter than the average TSA screener.
It is in the orange county register. If the link does not open, go to www.orangecountyregister.com and look for "air safety made in o.c" on the front page
http://ocregister.com/ocregister/homepage/abox/article_1240664.php
Good article. Where did you find it?
riday, August 11, 2006
Air safety made in O.C.?
By JOHN GITTELSOHN
The Orange County Register
A small Irvine company may have the technology that would allow passengers to bring their hair gels and beverages aboard planes again without compromising safety.
HiEnergy Technologies developed a chemical detection system that some experts say could help foil plots to blow up planes such as the one exposed in Britain this week. For years, though, the company has struggled to sell the system to airport authorities.
“I think their technology is revolutionary and we need it,” said Charles Slepian, founder of the Foreseeable Risk Analysis Center in New York.
Current airport screening devices, such as X-ray machines, cannot see chemicals inside sealed packages. That's why airlines banned passengers from bringing liquids on planes.
“What happened today tells us we have to revisit baggage screening,” said Roger Spillmann, chief executive officer of the 20-employee company.
HiEnergy's devices can see into packages by shooting neutrons which bounce back as gamma rays that paint a distinct signature for each chemical, enabling screeners to spot nitroglycerine, plastic explosives, drugs such as cocaine or plain water.
“Each element has its own energy so we can pick up chemical formulas,” Spillmann said. “We also can tell you the components are there to mix explosives.”
Currently, only the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, a commuter rail operator, has contracted to use HiEnergy's “Atometer” explosive detection system. HiEnergy has also won research contracts with the U.S. military for products to search for landmines, unexploded ordnance and improvised explosive devices.
Spillmann said the Transportation Security Administration, which oversees airport security, is reluctant to deal with a company as small as HiEnergy.
Nico Melendez, a Los Angeles spokesman for the Transportation Security Administration, said he is unfamiliar with HiEnergy but his agency welcomes new ideas.
“Obviously, we constantly work with industry to improve and develop new technology,” Melendez said.
Another concern is that chemical screenings would slow the boarding process. Spillmann said the TSA wants to process 10 packages a minute but his company's machines can read only about two or three packages a minute. He said it would take $1 million and one year for HiEnergy to build a usable prototype.
Slepian, the risk analyst and a frequent critic of the TSA, conceded that HiEnergy's technology is too slow to screen all baggage but might work as a secondary process.
“The government is right when they say they're a little company.” Slepian said. “But the government's job is to make them bigger when they can save lives.”
C
All aboard>>October 17, 2002
News Release: Fast Neutron Technology Detects Concealed Liquid Explosives
Pricey anti-terror devices still on iceBy MARK McDONALD
mcdonam@phillynews.com 215-854-2646
More than five months after SEPTA unveiled its most sophisticated weapon against bomb-planting terrorists - two metal suitcases of high-tech equipment that can read the chemical composition of a suspicious package - the devices are not operational.
The suitcases, which cost $300,000 each, were supposed to allow SEPTA police to identify what's inside an errant backpack, for example, while standing at a safe distance.
But early last month, when SEPTA briefly shut down the Broad Street subway to check out an unattended package, the device wasn't used.
The problem? It hasn't been licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. That could come in the next couple of weeks.
SEPTA's purchase is the country's first civilian use of the neutron-scanner technology, according to HiEnergy Technologies Inc., the Irvine, Calif., company that developed the equipment.
There's also another issue. Tipping the scales at 117 pounds, the shiny metal suitcase with the unlikely moniker, Siegma 3E3, was just too cumbersome for SEPTA police to lug around.
According to a company spokeswoman, SEPTA has traded in the weighty units - at no additional cost - for a next-generation device that comes in two lighter units. The first one is expected here in a couple of weeks. Meanwhile, the president of the union that represents SEPTA police officers says that the new technology has been fraught with problems, including faulty readings.
"Here we are in mid-July and the bottom line is that SEPTA had this big event last February to unveil their new technology," said Salvatore Perpetua, president of the Fraternal Order of Transit Police. "The public would be confounded to know that it's not operating."
Perpetua concluded, "You don't need an advanced degree to tell you that we should go with another company that can deliver a product that works."
SEPTA Capt. Jack Wenke, who oversees the police unit that will use the equipment, said the technology works and will shortly be available for service in the two-part unit with a total weight of about 70 pounds.
Jared Sjoberg, a HiEnergy official who is helping train SEPTA police to use the equipment, said the only minor change the company has made is in the size of the target to be scanned by the equipment.
Initially, with a focus on the weight a terrorist might pack into a weapon, the suitcase was set up to scan packages of at least 2 kilograms, but SEPTA officials wanted the ability to look at smaller items.
In late May, SEPTA paid HiEnergy $200,000 for a four-year maintenance and service agreement covering training, local equipment support, calibration, radiation- safety certification and licensing.
Wenke said SEPTA also asked the company to modify its equipment to deal with thick lead linings that terrorists might use to mask the presence of a bomb.
Wenke's team has used the equipment in only one operational instance with a company representative present. In general, they have practiced with a variety of explosives, learning their signatures.
"You want the officers to be as comfortable with what they are looking at as possible, so we've spent as much time as we can letting our officers run the system so that they see what happens not only when there are explosives, but more importantly when there aren't," Wenke said.
SEPTA spokesman Richard Maloney says unattended packages are reported every day. About a year ago at Market East, an evacuation was called when a bomb-sniffing dog sensed something in a backpack. It turned out to be fuel residue on a nozzle to a Coleman stove, he said.
Wenke said SEPTA can't call the city police bomb squad for every package it finds.
"If we find a blatantly suspicious package, say with wires sticking out or its chained to something or it's in an area where passengers don't usually go, then we shut down and call the bomb squad," Henke said.
In short, the neutron-scanner technology will be used on what appears to be everyday packages and not the ones that SEPTA officers consider suspicious.
"We will deploy it where we have experienced the most unattended packages and where shutdowns hurt us the most," Wenke said.
The new technology will enable SEPTA police to learn in short order, usually no more than 10 minutes, whether they have explosives.
Wenke said the suitcase is part of an array of anti-terror tools, including bomb-sniffing dogs.
Pointing to the suitcase, Wenke said: "It's kind of like a mechanical dog except that it doesn't get sick or tired. These are tools that help us keep the system running without jeopardizing safety."
HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. and Ingersoll Rand to Bring Industry Leading Atometer Explosive Detectors to Government Market
Tuesday July 11, 9:30 am ET
IRVINE, Calif., July 11, 2006 (PRIMEZONE) -- HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. (OTC BB:HIET.OB - News), the homeland security industry leader in neutron-based diagnostic technology, announced today that HiEnergy Technologies and Ingersoll Rand Security Technologies, part of Ingersoll Rand Company Limited, have agreed to jointly market and sell HiEnergy's portable, suitcase-borne SIEGMA(tm) explosive detection and confirmation system.
ADVERTISEMENT
The SIEGMA(tm) system will be marketed to governmental agencies, the military and other customers in complement to Ingersoll Rand's own security offerings, which include physical, access control, and intrusion detection security devices, and through established sales channels. Procurement will be facilitated through a listing of the SIEGMA(tm) system on Ingersoll Rand's GSA Series 84 Integrated Security Schedule, making the SIEGMA(tm) system available on a pre-approved basis to federal and Department of Defense (DoD) customers. The GSA is a centralized federal procurement and property management agency created by the U.S. Congress to improve government efficiency and help federal agencies better serve the public.
Ingersoll Rand's security equipment is listed in the Department of State's security ``Blue Book'' and GSA Schedules, and is found within every DoD installation and federal agency, as well as within 98 of the nation's 103 nuclear power facilities and 75 airports worldwide. In addition to numerous manufacturing and assembly locations, Ingersoll Rand's security unit maintains 25 service and supply centers and 45 integration centers across the country to provide customer and account support.
``Ingersoll Rand is an ideal partner, having a long history of quality products and support, and their understanding of the security business environment will also offer us insight for new and innovative uses of our products and technology,'' stated Roger Spillmann, HiEnergy Technologies' President and CEO. ``Incorporating SIEGMA(tm) in Ingersoll Rand's GSA program will help us expand our federal sales channels in a cost-effective manner, as well as simplify the purchasing procedure for our SIEGMA(tm) system.''
``Ingersoll Rand and HiEnergy Technologies have been exploring a variety of potential teaming opportunities in the past year and the inclusion of HiEnergy's leading edge system to our GSA schedule will enable the Federal government and other GSA customers to bolster their arsenal of next-generation explosive detection products. We look forward to our collaboration,'' added Judd E. Squitier, Director of Ingersoll Rand's Government Sales.
With a history dating to 1871, Ingersoll Rand is an $11 billion diversified industrial company employing more than 40,000 personnel in over 30 countries. Ingersoll Rand has developed world-class technologies and competencies in each of its product and services divisions, which include Industrial Technologies, Construction Technologies, Compact Vehicle Technologies, Climate Control Technologies and Security Technologies.
Ingersoll Rand Security Technologies division takes a comprehensive approach to security with a portfolio of market-leading brands of mechanical door hardware, exit devices, door controls, and more sophisticated credentialing and electronic access control. Ingersoll Rand has pioneered patented key systems and stand-alone electronic access control devices, as well as become a global leader in networked access control, biometrics, and enterprise building management. Additionally, the division's integrated access control and remotely monitored facilities management solutions encompass intrusion detection, HVAC and building controls, and CCTV monitoring.
Col. William J. Lacey, Jr. (ret.), President of HiEnergy Defense Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of HiEnergy Technologies, located in Alexandria, Virginia, spearheaded negotiations and will help coordinate federal agency and military sales efforts under the program.
ABOUT THE SIEGMA(tm) SYSTEM
The SIEGMA(tm) is a mobile, suitcase-borne explosive detection and confirmation system, incorporating HiEnergy's proprietary ``Atometry'' technology, which is unique in its ability to detect and confirm whether an object or container carries a select group of dangerous or illicit substances, such as explosives, biological agents, or illicit drugs, with a probability of detection equal to approximately 97.75%, and ``false negative'' and ``false positive'' rates of nearly 2.25%. Combined with its mobility and stand-off design, the SIEGMA(tm) is particularly well-suited for the detection of terrorist-made bombs, or Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). Unlike military ordnance, IEDs are unconventional in their delivery, often inaccessible by vehicle-borne systems, and contain non-standard mixtures that require chemical formula identification not obtained by the common ``anomaly'' and chemically blind detectors currently in the marketplace.
ABOUT HIENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (http://www.hienergyinc.com)
HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. is the creator of the world's first ``stoichiometric'' diagnostic devices that can effectively decipher chemical composition of unknown substances through metal or other barriers, almost instantly and without human intervention. HiEnergy's Atometer(tm) devices incorporate a proprietary interrogation process which activates a selected target with neutrons causing the contents to emit back gamma rays that contain unique signatures from which the chemical formulas are derived. HiEnergy believes its Atometry(tm) technology compares with other detection technologies like color photography compares with black-and-white photography.
HiEnergy is focused on the commercialization and sale of its portable, suitcase-borne SIEGMA(tm) 3E3; the CarBomb Finder(tm) 3C4, a vehicle-borne system, for the detection and identification of car bombs; and the STARRAY(tm), its robot-borne detector of IEDs, landmines and unexploded ordnance. The Company is marketing its devices to governmental and private entities and is negotiating licenses for distribution of its devices with various industry partners. The Company also continues to focus on the research and development of additional applications of its technologies and their further exploitation, both internally and through collaboration with third parties.
Stockbrocker linked to frausdster fined, banned
By Jeannine Klein Menzies
June 30. 2006
Canadian stockbroker Robertson Roger Dow has been banned from the securities business and fined more than $600,000 after a Canadian securities regulator ruled that he had secretly conducted trading of HiEnergy Technologies stock on behalf of American fraudster Phil Gurian.
Trading of that over-the-counter bulletin board stock was previously the subject of an American subpoena for information served on Bermuda investment firm Lines Overseas Management and its co-founder Scott Lines.
In 2004, the US Securities and Exchange Commission served Mr. Lines with a subpoena seeking documents which would “assist in establishing whether Gurian or related persons or entities profited from Gurian’s fraudulent undisclosed control of HiEnergy by selling its stock through LOM, and whether any person or entity, including possibly Gurian or LOM, manipulated HiEnergy stock.”
LOM previously told this newspaper that it found no evidence of any improper trading through LOM accounts, and no evidence whatsoever that Mr. Gurian or his associates have any connection to any accounts at LOM.
The SEC has since withdrawn its application with a US District Court to enforce the HiEnergy subpoenas on the grounds that it no longer needed information from LOM “based on recent developments unrelated to this action.”
Other court action against LOM related to a separate securities investigation is continuing.
This newspaper has been unable to establish how closely the US and Canadian HiEnergy probes are linked however the Investment Dealers Association of Canada has said that it commenced its investigation after being alerted to an SEC probe of apparent fraudulent activities by American residents with the apparent assistance of registered IDA member firms.
This week, an IDA panel fined Dow $150,000 after ruling the he contravened its bylaws between 2002 to 2004 by engaging in conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest by accepting Mr. Gurian’s trading orders.
The National Association of Securities Dealers permanently barred Mr. Gurian from the securities business in the 1990’s. He later pleaded guilty to fraud charges. In 1999, a grand jury indictment alleged that Mr. Gurian and others including persons tied to organised crime orchestrated a series of “pump and dump” schemes.
The IDA said Mr. Dow knew or ought to have known that Mr. Gurian had a history of securities violations and or an association with organised crime.
According to the IDA’s evidence, Mr. Dow had said that he learned about Mr. Gurian’s background – and even read media articles which tied Mr. Gurian to Phil Abramo, a captain in the Decavalcante organised crime family – however he felt Mr. Gurian was “an honourable man” in relation to the transactions they did together.
The IDA also fined ow $75 000 for concealing information from his then employer Octagon Capital Corporation. The panel found he had circumvented trading rules preventing him from opening accounts or accepting trades from US resident by opening various accounts in the sole name of Jeanne Schnapik, who is Mr. Gurian’s mother and a resident of the Ontario and Florida.
The IDA fined Dow a further $75,000 for taking trading instruction on six accounts for Benil Finance Ltd. which he opened at Octagon on behalf of individuals who were neither named as trading authorities nor permitted to trade given their US citizenship.
In its own investigation, the SEC alleged that Benil Finance Ltd. was Mr. Gurian’s “alter ego” through which he secretly controlled and manipulated the stock of HiEnergy. Benil Finance shares a corporate address with a number of offshore firms connected to Mr. Gurian, according to the IDA’s evidence.
The IDA also also gave Mr. Dow a lifetime ban from registering as a stockbroker. In addition to the $300,000 total fine, he must disgorge $361,000 in commissions which he earned during the two years that he traded for the seven accounts.
Mr. Dow may appeal the IDA’s ruling to the IDA or to the Ontario Securities Commission. If his appeal is unsuccessful, he can turn to the courts.
The IDA has served Octagon Capital Corporation with a notice of hearing for allegedly failing to properly supervise Mr. Dow. A spokesperson would not disclose whether the IDA is investigating any other firms or persons in relation to its probe of HiEnergy trades.
http://www.theroyalgazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060630/BUSINESS/106300123
lol...nice day today though...GLTA
This one has to be the poster boy for great promise ruined by horrid management.
A close second is ARTX.
Homeland Security Expert and Former Security Chief of El Al Airlines, Isaac Yeffet, Joins HiEnergy Technologies' Business Advisory Board
IRVINE, Calif., June 16, 2006 (PRIMEZONE) -- HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB:HIET), the homeland security industry leader in neutron-based diagnostic technology, announced today that Isaac Yeffet, the former Director of Global Security at El Al Israel Airlines and a leading expert in aviation and homeland security, will serve as a member of its Business Advisory Board
The guy was there 3 years ago and nothing came of it.
As far as I can remember he was suing HIET for breach of contract or something like that.
This stock has more stories than the empire state building.
Volume dropping away. Perhaps it's time for another fluffy pump PR??
Otherwise, low .30's here we come.
What's worse? the chart or management?
Congress drops financing for increased port security
Opponents say $648 million proposal too expensive
By KRISTEN MILLARES BOLT
P-I REPORTER
Nearly $650 million to increase scrutiny of containers shipping into Seattle and every other U.S. port was stripped out of a national security funding package moving through Congress this week in a move critics say makes the country more vulnerable to terrorist attacks.
Opponents of the $648 million for port security said it was too expensive and needed to be cut to satisfy President Bush's request that the supplemental budget for things such as the Iraq war and Hurricane Katrina reconstruction be brought under control.
Though the action by Congress was not unexpected, port safety advocates such as Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Port of Seattle Chief Executive Mic Dinsmore were dismayed.
"We are not going to have the money we need for screening machines, customs inspectors, Coast Guard inspectors, radiation monitors, gates, fences and more," Murray said. "The administration keeps talking a good game, but words do not provide security."
The decision came on the heels of the House passage Tuesday of a separate Department of Homeland Security spending bill. Absent in that bill was a controversial provision requiring that all U.S.-bound containers be scanned at overseas ports, which Democrats had tried to push through after the national uproar over the Dubai Ports World deal this spring.
Currently, about 5 percent of U.S.-bound containers are inspected.
The $648 million in port security funding was supported by Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., the ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Homeland Security panel. It would have paid for inspectors to be added at 50 foreign ports, additional Coast Guard inspectors to oversee security abroad and domestically, and 60 cargo container imaging machines.
Byrd's amendment passed in the Senate but was not included in the House version. Though the final version of the funding package still needs to be voted on by the Senate and the House, the committee that eliminated the amendment early Wednesday took further measures to ensure that it could not be reinstated this year.
"Like many people who have been strong advocates of getting this national security issue right, I am disappointed," Port of Seattle chief Dinsmore said. "We have not determined what kind of negative impact it will have, but if it takes money away from projects we need, it is going to hurt Seattle, as well as Tacoma and Everett."
The American Association of Port Authorities said the move was especially inopportune, given the additional costs incurred by ports implementing the government mandate for standardized federal identification for port workers.
Those rules, announced last month, create a national standardized identification procedure for all who have unescorted access to ports: longshore workers, truck drivers, port staff and contractors, and vessel and rail operators. Making that happen could cost from $299 million to $325 million, according to the Department of Homeland Security figures cited by the port association. However, the Homeland Security bill passed by the House contains only $40 million specifically designated for that.
"It's a grave disappointment that's not putting money into real port security," said Herald Ugles, president of Local 19 International Longshore and Warehouse Union.
"They paid money to inspect American workers, but should be spending it more wisely on inspecting cargo."
Ugles said the government, as part of a nationwide effort, asked for and received a list of the names and birthdates of all Local 19 longshoremen. Their information, he said, will be checked against the terrorist watch list.
"We understand that it has to be done, but they need to be inspecting the containers," Ugles said.
The Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill passed by the House does include $4.2 billion for port, container and cargo security, but Murray said those funds are "not enough, that is why we asked for more."
Murray said that ports need the kind of hardened security now present at the airports, and that the cost of doing so far exceeds the bill's budget for it. The bill will go onto a committee that will resolve the differences between the Senate and the House versions, then pass through a final vote.
It includes $2.1 billion for the Coast Guard port security operations, $1.7 billion for Customs and Border Protection cargo inspection and trade operation, $139 million for a Container Security Initiative, $178 million for radiation portal monitors, $70.1 million for a Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism, and $200 million in port security grants.
"You're talking less then bare bones with those numbers," said Murray, calling the emergency security funding package "the smallest budget number we've seen in a long time." She is co-writing legislation that would "push the borders back" and have containers inspected in foreign ports, among other things.
The White House had urged Congress to keep to its limit, or risk veto of the emergency funding bill that will send much-needed cash to Iraq and areas damaged by Hurricane Katrina.
P-I Washington Correspondent Charles Pope contributed to this report. P-I reporter Kristen Millares Bolt can be reached at 206-448-8142 or kristenbolt@seattlepi.com.
That deal with National Geographic was the last straw.
$200,000 order - the reality is that a good corner pizza shop makes more money than this. Watch for more shares to be dumped.
Company has a history of being one of the worst in terms of treating its shareholders.
Be very careful.
All I can say is that there is something seriously wrong at HIET.
Too many problems for coincidence.
I don't own any shares and I don't see myself owning any unless I can see that things get straightened out.
Way too many broken NR's to suit me.
If anybody wants to take over this board.
Let me know and I'll ask Mat.
What's making it go up??
Can't seem to post on RB. There's a suspicious package scare at SF City Hall. They could use a 3E3!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060530/ts_nm/crime_sanfrancisco_cityhall_dc_1
not HIET's
Fliers Could Keep Their Shoes On
Industry News
Source: USA Today
19 May 2006
A government lab is testing a "very promising" new machine that would allow airline passengers to keep their shoes on while going through security checkpoints, the nation's aviation security chief said Thursday.
The machine, which detects explosive material on shoes when people stand on a platform, is getting a "highly expedited" review at the lab, said Kip Hawley, head of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).
"We are looking at this with great interest," Hawley said. "Anything that speeds up explosive detection through the checkpoint, we want to encourage."
He wouldn't give a timetable for deploying the machines. They must pass testing in an airport before they are used to screen passengers.
The ShoeScanner uses technology similar to a medical MRI to detect explosives in 5 to 8 seconds. It shoots radio waves at shoes to agitate molecules and analyze their structure.
Readings are sent to a computer that holds a library of explosives characteristics and makes a rapid comparison.
Removing shoes at checkpoints has been one of the biggest inconveniences for passengers in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Passengers have been urged to remove thick-soled shoes at checkpoints since Richard Reid tried to blow up a Paris-to-Miami plane in late 2001 using plastic explosive hidden in his sneakers.
"The question is: Can you operate and deploy (the machine) and have people walk on it without it breaking down?" Hawley said. "It's sensitive electronic equipment."
The TSA has been searching for technology that detects explosives better than the X-ray machines and metal detectors now used at checkpoints.
The ShoeScanner is being developed by GE Security, a General Electric subsidiary that makes the "puffer" portals deployed at dozens of U.S. airports that blow air jets at passengers to detect explosives residue.
The government's Transportation Security Lab in New Jersey also is testing GE's Itemiser, which detects explosives on passengers when they press a finger on an electronic reader.
The ShoeScanner and Itemiser would first be used only in checkpoint lanes reserved for travelers who pass a background check and pay an annual fee to get faster security under a Registered Traveler program starting in June. Airports and private companies will run the voluntary program. The TSA wants them to pay for new detection machines that may let participants keep their shoes or coats on through checkpoints.
Those machines could ultimately be used for ordinary travelers. "That could be the big payoff for the Registered Traveler program," Hawley said.
GE Security is a minority owner of Verified Identity Pass, a Manhattan company with contracts to run Registered Traveler in Orlando, Cincinnati, Indianapolis and San Jose airports.
"Registered Travelers would be far more secure than anybody going through the regular (security) lanes," Verified Identity CEO Steven Brill said. The ShoeScanner "is a better way to test shoes than putting them through an X-ray."
Looks like a 2 penny pump provided by that fluffernutter. This one has got to be one of the worst in terms of shareholder friendliness that I've ever seen.
...to be on National Geographic
HiEnergy Technologies' Leading Explosives Detection Technology to be Featured on National Geographic Channel's Acclaimed Explorer Series
IRVINE, Calif., May 16 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: HIET - News), the homeland security industry leader in neutron-based diagnostic technology, announced today that its ground-breaking Atometry(TM) explosives detection technology will be featured in an episode of National Geographic Explorer entitled "Outsmarting Terror", scheduled to air on the National Geographic Channel, on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 at 9:00 p.m. EDT.
National Geographic's internationally acclaimed Explorer Series is carried on all of the nation's major cable and satellite television providers, reaching over 56 million homes in the U.S., and is broadcast in 27 languages to an additional 230 million households in 162 countries abroad.
This special production examines select, cutting-edge technologies and devices employed by today's modern soldier and first responders and the vital role they play in the global fight against terrorism. Relevant segments detail the extraordinary capabilities of HiEnergy's Atometer(TM) detectors as well as demonstrate their use in the detection of car bombs and other improvised explosive devices.
"We are pleased that the National Geographic Channel, an award-winning broadcaster with a history of excellence, has produced a documentary that profiles HiEnergy among a select group of companies providing intelligent, novel tools in the fight against terrorism," commented Roger Spillmann, HiEnergy Technologies' President and CEO. "I could not think of a better medium than National Geographic, a respected advocate of the global sharing of knowledge, to create awareness for our products and educate an international audience of the immediate relevance of our technologies to the real and present global situation."
The episode will also be rebroadcast on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 at 9:00 p.m. EDT. For additional air dates and times, please check National Geographic Channel's website at http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/explorer.
Goes along with the history of the company. You can bet on one thing - that the shareholders will get screwed
again
Makes one wonder. They fired the founder of the company.
What a company. They need an implosion detection device.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 18, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HIENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 0-32093 91-2022980
-------- ------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (I.R.S.
of incorporation) Identification No.)
1601-B ALTON PARKWAY, UNIT B
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (949) 757-0855
Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
|_| Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|_| Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|_| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|_| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. ("we", "us" or the "Company") files this report on Form 8-K to report the following:
Item 1.02 Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement
Termination of Employment Agreement
Our Employment Agreement with Dr. Bogdan C. Maglich was terminated, effective April 18, 2006, removing him as our Chairman of the Board and Chief Scientific Officer.
We terminated Dr. Maglich in accordance with Section 10(a) of the Employment Agreement, which states that the Company may terminate his employment at any time upon gross negligence or willful malfeasance by Dr. Maglich in the material performance of his duties and responsibilities to the Company under the Employment Agreement (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.150 to this Current Report).
On April 8, 2006, and pursuant to a resolution of our Board of Directors, we served a Notice of Termination for Cause and Discharge Notice (the "Termination Notice") to Dr. Bogdan C. Maglich. In our Termination Notice to Dr, Maglich, we provided him with a ten-day period within which to cure the items identified in the Termination Notice as grounds for termination under Section 10(a). Although Dr. Maglich did respond to the Termination Notice through his attorney to contest the Board's determination and to offer assurances that Dr. Maglich would, prospectively, engage in conduct which adheres to the policies of and is approved by our Board of Directors, we determined that the response did not adequately cure the items which constituted grounds for his termination under
Section 10(a) and, accordingly, Dr. Maglich's termination became effective as of April 18, 2006.
As we previously reported, on February 17, 2006 our Board of Directors removed Dr. Maglich from his position as our Chief Executive Officer and suspended Dr. Maglich from his duties as Chairman of the Board and Chief Scientific Officer. Dr. Maglich continues to serve as a Director.
We have reviewed the individual items which were listed by the Termination Notice as grounds for the termination of Dr. Maglich, and as of the date this report we have not found anything during such review which we believe requires an amendment to any of our previously-filed reports under the Securities Exchange Act. However, there can be no assurance that a circumstance will not arise which could require us to amend any prior filing, or which otherwise could create a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operations.
Material Terms of Employment Agreement
In March 2002, Microdevices entered into the Employment Agreement with Dr. Maglich to employ him as its Chief Scientist and Chairman of the Board. In May 2002, we assumed the Employment Agreement, which was subsequently amended in December 2002 and July 2003. Major commitments included in the agreement, as amended, were as follows:
-- We were required to pay an annual bonus of not less than 20% of the total amount of bonuses paid to our officers. If the pretax profit in any fiscal year exceeded $0.20 per share, then we were required to pay a bonus to him for that year of not less than $50,000.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- We were required to grant Dr. Maglich annually, during the term of the employment agreement, stock options to exercise a number of shares of common stock equal to the greater of (i) 1% per annum of the our common stock issued and outstanding or (ii) 10% of the total number of options granted by us for services in that year. In either case, the exercise price on the stock options was equal to the average price of our traded shares for the preceding 30 days prior to the date of the grant.
-- We were required to provide Dr. Maglich with a car, family health insurance, life and disability insurance, and reimbursements for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, attorney's fees not to exceed $20,000 in any one year, and any personal tax liabilities arising for the issuance to Dr. Maglich of Company securities up to $75,000.
-- We were required pay Dr. Maglich a base salary in cash which ranged during the term of the Agreement from $125,000 in 2002 to $183,012 at the time of his termination (excluding $2,800 a month in supplemental salary he was entitled to for the duration he served as Chief Executive Officer).
-- If the Employment Agreement was terminated by us without cause, we were required to pay Dr. Maglich on the termination date an amount equal to two years of his minimum annual base salary.
-- The employment agreement between Dr.Maglich would have expired on December 31, 2006, had it not been terminated earlier by us as of April 18, 2006.
Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers.
The discussion under Item 1.02 as to the departure of Dr. Maglich as an officer of our Company is incorporated herein by reference.
8.01. Other Events.
In reviewing Dr. Maglich's Employment Agreement, we became aware that the version originally filed with the SEC as Exhibit 10.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 20, 2002 had small differences from the signed original document in our files. In the signed original, it is clearly stated that Dr. Maglich was entitled to severance pay only in the event of a termination by us "without cause." The version of the Employment Agreement previously filed did not contain the words, "without cause", among other things. Even though the document has been terminated, we are filing the correct version of the Employment Agreement as Exhibit 10.150 to this Current Report.
Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
Exhibit No. Description
10.150 Employment Agreement between HiEnergy Microdevices, Inc. and
Dr. Bogdan C. Maglich dated March 6, 2002*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Corrected version of the agreement filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 20, 2002 filed with the SEC on July 29, 2002.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
HIENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
April 24, 2006 /s/ Roger W.A. Spillmann
-------------- ------------------------
(Date) By: Roger W.A. Spillmann,
Its: President and CEO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 10.150
Employment Agreement
Agreement made this 6th day of March, 2002, between HiEnergy Microdevices, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"); and Bogdan C. Maglich, an individual ("Maglich").
WITNESSETH
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. EMPLOYMENT. The Company hereby agrees to employ Maglich, during the term specified in Paragraph 2, and Maglich agrees to accept such employment, all subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this Agreement.
2. TERM. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Maglich's employment by the Company shall be for a term commencing on the date hereof and ending on December 31, 2006, unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided.
3. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
(a) During the term, Maglich shall serve as Chief Scientific Officer and Chairman of the Company and shall devote the stated time and attention to the business of the Company. The business of the Company, for purposes of this Agreement, shall include (i) the detection of the substances of which objects are comprised and the development, production, sale and promotion of devices and technologies to effect such detection, and (ii) such other endeavors as to which Maglich and the Board shall mutually agree.
(b) Subject to the supervision of the Board of Directors, Maglich, as Chief Scientific Officer of the Company, will be responsible for the determination of the Company's research and development program; its research and development associations and consortiums; its patent policy; the selection, hiring, and/or firing of its scientific, engineering and technical personnel and of any Principal Investigator or Co-principal Investigator on research and development contracts of the Company and of their clerical assistants, as well as their respective remuneration and budgeting priorities.
(c) Subject to such requirements as shall be imposed by law or governmental regulation, Maglich, as Chief Scientific Officer, shall be responsible for determining what technical information may be publicly disclosed by any officer or employee of the Company.
(d) As Chairman, Maglich agrees to perform, and shall perform, the functions of the Chairman as set forth in the By-Laws of the Company; shall be one of two signatories on all checks and drafts of the Company in excess of $1000; and, subject to review by the Board of Directors, shall be the officer of the Company responsible for submitting budgetary recommendations to the Board.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) It is recognized by the Company that Maglich has heretofore been engaged, and in the future may be engaged, in other endeavors, including, without limitation, those relating to nuclear fusion energy, satellite-borne nuclear power, and anti-missile defense, as well as scientific education, including, without limitation, scientific publications and documentary films. It is recognized by the Company that such activities are indirectly beneficial to its reputation, standing and governmental and business relations. It is further recognized that, provided the company does not furnish its personnel, equipment, facilities or funding for such other endeavors and that the work conducted on such other endeavors does not interfere with the services and time on the job provided to the Company by Maglich, any patents or other intellectual property or other benefits derived from such other endeavors are the sole property of Maglich and that the Company shall neither have or claim any interest therein. A list of Maglich's other endeavors, as discussed above, shall be maintained mutually by the Company and Maglich. All other work conducted by Maglich during his employed time, or using the Company's personnel, facilities or funding, and which is not so listed, will be work for hire to the Company by Maglich.
(f) Maglich shall devote not less than 35 hours per week to the business of the Company, it being understood that he may give such time and attention to other endeavors as does not materially detract from his services for, and attention to, the business of the Company.
(g) It is contemplated that, for the continuance of this Agreement, Maglich will be employed as Chief Scientific Officer and Chairman of the Company. In the event Maglich is not so elected and not so continued in any or all of such posts, for any reason other than termination for cause (as defined below), such failure shall constitute a breach of this Agreement by the Company and Maglich shall have the right to terminate his employment hereunder forthwith by written notice of such intention to the Company and the Company will be obligated to make the severance payments set forth in Paragraph 11 of this Agreement and to satisfy all other obligations set forth in Paragraph 10.
4. COMPENSATION. In consideration of the services to be rendered by Maglich hereunder, the Company agrees to pay Maglich, and he agrees to accept, the following:
(a) Base Salary. For the period commencing January 1, 2002, and ending December 31, 2002, the Company shall pay Maglich at the annual rate of $125,000 annually, payable in cash monthly. For the period January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2006, the Company shall pay Maglich as follows:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) For the period January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, $137,500 annually, payable in cash monthly;
(ii) For the period January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2004, $151,250 annually, payable in cash monthly;
(iii) For the period January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2005, $166, 375 annually, payable in cash monthly; and
(iv) For the period January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2006, $183,012 annually, payable in cash monthly.
(v) In the event that Maglich, with the approval of the Company, shall work less than the time required of him under Paragraph 3(c), his base salary shall decrease proportionally.
(b) Signing Bonus. In consideration of Maglich executing and delivering this Agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Maglich a signing bonus by issuing to him its promissory note in the face amount of $100,000 in the form of Exhibit A hereto, payable (i) $50,000 upon receipt by the Company of One Million Dollars or more from any source, and
(ii) $50,000 upon receipt by the Company of in excess of $500,000 from its sales or operations (including grants not directed for equipment) or receipt by the Company of a further cash infusion of One Million Dollars or more.
(c) Annual Bonus.
(i)At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Board of Directors of the Company shall establish a bonus plan based upon Company performance goals. At the end of the fiscal year, officers of the Company, including Maglich, shall receive a bonus based upon performance against the established plan.
(ii) In no event shall Maglich's bonus be less than 20% of the total amount of bonuses paid to officers of the Company pursuant to the bonus plan referred to in "(i)" above.
(iii) In the event the Company's gross pretax profit in any fiscal year shall exceed $.20 per share, then Maglich's bonus in that year shall not be less than $50,000.
(d) Stock Options.
(i) The Company represents, warrants, and confirms to Maglich its agreement in 1998 to then issue to him options entitling him to purchase 111,040 shares of the Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $3 per share, such options to be exercisable at any time and from time to time within the period ending November 30, 2008. The Company represents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and warrants that it will take all corporate action necessary or desirable to effect the valid issuance of all such options to Maglich and the delivery of certificates therefor to Maglich no later than March 30, 2002; and (ii) The Company shall grant and issue to Maglich annually during the term hereof five-year stock options at a rate of not less than one (1%) per annum of the Company's stock issued and outstanding at the end of the year, such options to have an exercise price of the most recent arms length sale, or if publicly traded, the average price for the preceding thirty days. In no event shall Maglich receive, in the aggregate, in any one year less than 10% of the total number of options granted by the Company for services in that year.
5. PENSION AND FRINGE BENEFITS.
(a) Maglich shall be entitled to participate in any employee benefit plans generally available to senior officers and/or key employees of the Company, including medical, disability, pension, non-qualified deferred compensation plans, the programs for the allowance for or the reimbursement of automobile expenses, and any other plans of general application to senior officers and/or key employees of the Company on the date hereof and such plans and programs adopted hereafter for the benefit of senior officers and/or key employees of the Company.
(b) As Maglich is covered by Medicare, the Company shall pay his supplemental Blue Cross, TIAA Long-Term Care insurance, medical insurance for his children under eighteen (18) years of age, and dental insurance for himself and his children, and not less than $1000 per month into his TIAA annuity pension fund until August 31, 2003.
(c) The Company will provide Maglich with a Lincoln, Cadillac, or equivalent U.S. brand automobile of his choosing for his business and personal use and will pay for all related expenses thereof, including, without limitation, the costs of registration, fuel, repairs, and insurance. (d) Maglich shall be entitled to take time off for vacation or illness in accordance with the Company's policy for senior executives and/or key employees and to receive all other fringe benefits as from time to time made generally available to senior executives and/or key employees of the Company.
(d) The Company shall reimburse Maglich for reasonable and necessary personal attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with matters relating to the affairs of the Company, excluding any disputes with the Company itself. Such reimbursement shall not exceed $20,000 in any one year, except as may be necessary to protect the Company from actual or claimed liability to others or as shall be otherwise agreed by the Company or provided for in Paragraph 12 hereof. Nothing contained herein shall limit the Board of Directors from providing defense costs to all officers and directors of the Company, including Maglich.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. REIMBURSEMENT. The Company shall reimburse Maglich for all proper expenses, including, without limitation, travel and entertainment expenses, incurred by him in the performance of his duties hereunder in accordance with the Company's policies and procedures in effect from time to time.
7. OFFICE AND LOCATION. The Company shall provide Maglich, at the Company's sole expense, with an executive office at its headquarters commensurate with his positions as Chief Scientific Officer and Chairman within the facility then occupied by the Company.
8. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY. The Company shall provide Maglich, at the Company's sole expense, with the services on a full-time basis of an executive secretary of his choosing. Said executive secretary shall perform those services for Maglich that are regularly performed for the Chairman of the Board of a public company and shall also assist Maglich in his positions as Chief Scientific Officer of the Company. A salary customary in the area in which the Company's offices are located shall be paid by the Company to Dr. Maglich's executive secretary.
9. INSURANCE . The Company shall, at its sole expense, provide Maglich with the following insurance:
(a) Life Insurance. The Company shall provide Maglich with, and pay up to $1,000 in premium per month for two key man life insurance policies. The owner and beneficiary of one policy shall be the Company. The owner of the other ("Maglich Policy") shall be Maglich and/or the beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by him. Every time the Company increases its insurance on Maglich's life the Maglich Policy shall increase at the Company's expense by an identical amount.
(b) Disability Insurance. The Company shall pay the premium on the disability insurance policy presently maintained by Maglich and any renewals thereof provided the premium shall not exceed $500 per month.
10. TERMINATION.
(a) Termination for Cause. The Company may terminate Maglich's employment at any time upon Maglich's gross negligence or willful malfeasance in the material performance of his duties and responsibilities to the Company under Paragraph 3 of this Agreement. Such discharge shall be effected by notice (the
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Discharge Notice") to Maglich which shall specify the reasons for Maglich's discharge and effective date thereof. In each instance, such termination shall not be effective if the gross negligence or willful malfeasance specified in the Discharge Notice is cured by Maglich within ten (10) days following the date of receipt by Maglich of the Discharge Notice.
(b) Termination for Disability. In the event of disability of Maglich rendering him unable to perform his services hereunder for a period of one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days, the Company shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon giving not less than thirty (30) days' notice ("Termination Notice") of its intention to do so. If Maglich shall have resumed his duties hereunder within such a thirty (30) day period and shall have continuously performed his services for at least thirty (30) consecutive days thereafter, the Termination Notice shall be deemed of no force and effect and this Agreement shall thereupon continue in full force as though such notice of termination had not been given.
(c) Termination by Maglich. Maglich may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving not less than three (3) months' notice of his intention to terminate, in which case all Company benefits shall be terminated "in due course" as of the effective date of termination. Any notes and earned stock options of Maglich shall immediately vest and be paid as agreed.
11. SEVERANCE PAYMENTS. If this agreement is terminated by the Company
[without cause], the Company shall pay Maglich, on the termination date, an amount of money equal to the aggregate unpaid balance of the minimum annual base salaries provided for in Paragraph 4(a) hereof through a period of two (2) years after the termination date. Additionally, the Company shall continue to pay Maglich, for said one year period, all of the benefits provided for in Paragraph 5(a) and (b) above and, thereafter, all premiums associated with the continuation of Maglich's insurance under COBRA for the period that COBRA shall be available to Maglich. Upon termination [without cause], all of Maglich's options respecting shares of the capital stock of the Company shall forthwith vest in Maglich and become immediately exercisable.
12. COMPROMISE OF UNPAID CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS TO MAGLICH. Maglich and the Company have certain differences in their understanding of the existence and magnitude of the Company's obligations to Maglich under an Employment Agreement initially entered into between Maglich and Advanced Physics Corporation on the 31st day of December 1993 and understood by Maglich to have been adopted and approved by the Company on August 23, 1995. If Maglich is correct, the Company's current obligations to Maglich under the aforesaid Employment Agreement would exceed $4,000,000. Maglich and the Company have agreed that Maglich will cancel all obligations or alleged obligations of the Company to Maglich respecting the aforesaid Employment Agreement in exchange for indemnification of Maglich by the Company against any personal tax liabilities arising from the
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
issuance to Maglich of securities of the Company, up to a total possible indemnification payment of Seventy-five Thousand dollars ($75,000). Accordingly, upon the release by Maglich of the Company from his claims under the aforesaid Employment Agreement, the Company agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Maglich from and against any and all personal tax liability or liabilities or alleged tax liability or liabilities of any kind or description, and against all attorney's fees, costs and expenses of counsel of Maglich's selection with respect to such tax liabilities or alleged tax liabilities, to the fullest extent permitted by law and subject to the payment of no more than $75,000. It is understood by the Company that it is a material condition of Dr. Maglich's entering into this Employment Agreement with the Company that he have no tax liability whatsoever respecting the issuance by the Company of securities to him, and it is the intention of the Company that to the limit of $75,000, it bear any and all such liability in full. The parties will execute and deliver such other and further documents as shall be necessary or advisable to carry out the transactions contemplated by this Paragraph 12. If the ultimate determination of tax liability by Maglich is in excess of $75,000, the Company will advance to Maglich an additional amount equal to the excess, up to an additional $75,000, as an advance against salary, without the collection of interest thereon.
13. EXCHANGE BY MAGLICH OF SHARES OF CLASS B COMMON STOCK FOR SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK OF THE COMPANY. Maglich is the owner of record of 100% of the authorized and issued Class B shares of the Company. The Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders for it to exchange Class A shares of the Company for all of Maglich's Class B shares. Maglich agrees that he will accept 100,000 shares of the Class A common stock of the Company in exchange for all of his Class B shares, and the Company agrees that such an exchange is fair and reasonable and agrees to such exchange. The Company represents and warrants to Maglich that its Board of Directors has or will take all necessary or appropriate action to vest in Maglich full and unfettered title to such 100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, free and clear of any liens or encumbrances of any kind whatsoever, upon Maglich's delivery to the Company of his Class B Common Stock in exchange for said 100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock.
14. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY RESPECTING CERTAIN SECURITIES ISSUED TO MAGLICH AND ASSOCIATES AND RATIFICATION OF TRANSACTIONS RELATED THERETO.
(a) The Company hereby represents and warrants to Maglich that the securities set forth below have been duly and validly issued by the Company and registered by the Company in the names of the persons listed below and are outstanding, fully paid and non-assessable securities of the Company:
(i) Advanced Projects Group, Inc. 58,000 share of Class A (majority owned by Bogdan Maglich Common Stock and Maglich Family Holdings, Inc.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) Bogdan C. Maglich 76,000 shares of Class A Common
Stock and all shares of Class B
Common Stock (converted by
Maglich into 100,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock pursuant to
Paragraph 13 hereof)
(iii) Maglich Family
Holdings, Inc. 166,049 shares of Class A
Common Stock
(b) The Company hereby ratifies and reaffirms all transactions which resulted in the issuance of the securities listed in "(a)" above and represents and warrants that its Board of Directors has or will take all action necessary or appropriate to vest in the parties listed above full and unfettered title to all of said shares as stated above.
15. NON-DISCLOSURE AND COVENANT NOT TO COMPETEE
(a) Non-Disclosure. During the term of this Agreement and from and after the termination of this Agreement, Maglich shall not, except as required by law or to perform his duties under this Agreement, divulge, disclose or communicate to any person, firm, or corporation, any confidential information. The term "confidential information" includes, without limitation, information about the business of the Company (or any division, subsidiary or affiliate of the Company) including, but not limited to, methods of operation, pricing information and customer lists, but excluding such information that was in the public domain at the time it was acquired by Maglich or that comes into the public domain other than through disclosure by Maglich. If confidential information is contained in any document or writing or is fixed in any other tangible form, magnetically, electronically, or otherwise, and if such confidential information is in Maglich's possession or under his control, he shall return such information and all copies thereof to the Company upon his termination. Maglich shall not directly or indirectly, take, copy, or transfer, in any manner whatsoever, any of the business records of the Company (or any division, subsidiary or affiliate of the Company).
(b) Non-Compete. During the term of Maglich's employment hereunder, and for a period of five (5) years following the date of termination of Maglich's employment hereunder, Maglich shall not, directly or indirectly, engage (whether for compensation or without compensation) as an individual proprietor, partner, stockholder, officer, employee, director, consultant, joint venturer, lender, or in any other capacity whatsoever (otherwise than as a holder of no more than 1% of the total outstanding stock of a publicly held company) in any business activity or business activities that compete with the remote-non-intrusive detection business of the Company, it being understood and agreed by the Company that "other endeavors" of Maglich referred to and listed in Paragraph
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3(a) and 3(b) hereof are not and never shall be considered as competing activities to those of the Company. During the term of Maglich's employment hereunder, and for a period of the greater of one year or any time during which Maglich is receiving severance payments pursuant to Paragraph 11 hereof, Maglich shall not, directly, or indirectly: either for himself or for any other person, firm or corporation, divert or take away or attempt to divert or take away any person, firm or corporation who was or is a customer of the Company during the term of this Agreement, or (b) induce or influence any person who is engaged by the Company as an employee, agent or otherwise, to terminate his or her engagement or to engage or otherwise participate in a business activity directly or indirectly competitive with the Company. (c) Scope of Restrictions. The restrictions set forth in this Paragraph 15 are considered by the parties to be reasonable. However, if any such restriction is found to be unenforceable because it extends for too long a period of time or over too great a range of activities or in too broad a geographic area, it shall be interpreted to extend only over the maximum period of time, range of activities or geographic area as to what may be enforceable. (d) Remedies. In the event of a breach or a threatened breach of this Paragraph 15 that is not cured by Maglich after receipt of ten day's written notice from the Company, the Company shall be entitled to an injunction restraining Maglich from committing or continuing such breach, as well as to any and all other legal and equitable remedies permitted by law.
16. MISCELLANEOUS.
(a) Enforceability. The failure of any party at any time to require performance by another party of any provision hereunder shall in no way affect the right of that party thereafter to enforce the same, nor shall it affect any other party's right to enforce the same, or to enforce any of the other provisions of this Agreement; nor shall the waiver by any party of the breach of any provision hereof be taken or held to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of such provision or as a waiver of the provision itself.
(b) Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Company, its successors and assigns and Maglich, his heirs, and personal representatives. This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without the prior written consent of the other party being first obtained.
(c) Modifications. This Agreement may not be orally cancelled, changed, modified or amended, and no cancellation, change, codification or amendment shall be effective or binding, unless in writing and signed by the parties to this Agreement.
(d) Severability; Survival. In the event any provision or portion of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, in whole or in part, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless be binding upon the parties
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
with the same effect as through the invalid or unenforceable part had been severed and deleted. The respective rights and obligations of the parties thereunder shall survive the termination of the executive's employment to the extent provided elsewhere herein and to the extent necessary to the intended preservation of such rights and obligations.
(e) Notices. Any notice, request, instruction or other document to be given hereunder by any party to another party shall be in writing and shall be deemed effective (i) upon personal delivery, if delivered by hand against receipt, (ii) mailed postage prepaid, by United States certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, (iii) upon being sent by facsimile transmission (if receipt is electronically confirmed) and, in each case, addressed as follows:
If to the Company:
HiEnergy Microdevices, Inc.
10 Mauchly Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
With a copy to:
Blackwell Sanders Pepper Martin
2300 Main Street, Suite 1000
Kansas City, MO 62108
Attention: Steve Carman, Esq.
If to Maglich:
Bogdan C. Maglich
559 Vista Flora
Newport Beach, CA 92660
With a copy to:
James Monroe Marx, Esq.
590 Madison Avenue, 23rd Floor
New York, New York 10022
Any party may change the address to which notices are to be sent by giving notice of such change of address to the other party in the manner herein provided for giving notice.
(f) Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California, without application of conflict of law provisions applicable herein.
(g) Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the Company and Maglich with respect to the subject matter hereof, and all prior agreements, plans and arrangements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
relating to the employment of Maglich by the Company are nullified and superceded hereby.
(h) Headings. The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only, and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement
(i) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement, and each of which shall be deemed an original.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
HiEnergy Microdevices, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
By: /s/ Gregory Gilbert
------------------------------------
Gregory Gilbert
President and Duly Authorized Signatory
/s/ B. C. Maglich
------------------------------------
Bogdan C. Maglich, Individually
HiEnergy Technologies Appoints Dr. Alex Vaucher As Chief Scientist
08:45 EDT Wednesday, April 26, 2006
IRVINE, Calif., April 26 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: HIET), the homeland security industry leader in neutron-based diagnostic technology, announced today that it has appointed Dr. Alex Vaucher as Chief Scientist.
Dr. Vaucher joined HiEnergy Technologies in July 2004 as a Senior Research Scientist and was subsequently promoted to Vice President of Research and Development. Prior to joining HiEnergy, he held senior positions in research and product development, project management and technical supervision at leading companies including Northrop Grumman Corporation and Hughes Aircraft Company.
"Dr. Vaucher is an accomplished scientist and seasoned industry professional with more than 20 years of research and product development with leading defense companies and a rare understanding of how research and development fits within the broader context of corporate strategic planning and business development," stated Roger Pullman, HiEnergy Technologies' President & CEO. "Besides having a broad and deep market and technical knowledge of our industry, Dr. Vaucher also has a strong understanding of complex architectures, design concepts, and systems. I am confident that under his stewardship, our scientific and R&D teams will make tremendous contributions which will further set us apart from our competitors, and accelerate the adoption of our technology and products across the entire industry."
In his new leadership position, Dr. Vaucher will determine the direction and chart the course of all scientific and technical efforts of the company, with a focus on research and advanced engineering development activities, in particular the identification of new market opportunities for HiEnergy's groundbreaking Atometry(TM) technology. Dr. Vaucher will work in close collaboration with HiEnergy's engineering, manufacturing and marketing teams to translate these market opportunities into new products as well as differentiate current and future product offerings based on customer needs and market demands. As Chief Scientist, Dr. Vaucher also serves as custodian of all of the company's technology and intellectual property and will handle all matters related to patent application and prosecution.
"As one of the few companies in the U.S. where the expertise and methods of High Energy Physics are being used to solve some very difficult problems, HiEnergy Technologies is in a very unique position both scientifically and commercially," stated Dr. Alex Vaucher. "I am very excited to take on this position of leading an extraordinary team of talented and inventive physicists and engineers to advance our commercialization and production efforts of the world's first stoichiometric explosive detection systems."
"It is my objective to promote a team-oriented atmosphere, and implement a process in which a balance between individual creativity and team work is optimized to produce products efficiently from inception to prototype stage to commercial production," added Dr. Vaucher. "This culture of creativity and team work is of utmost importance in efficiently moving ideas from talented minds onto the marketplace. I also intend to introduce more rigorous practices to insure that we provide superior quality control, excellent workmanship and reliability in all our products. I look forward to a very promising future for employees and shareholders alike."
ABOUT DR. ALEX VAUCHER
Dr. Alex Vaucher brings with him more than two decades of experience in software and product development and engineering with a focus on new product development, project management, cost administration and technical supervision. From 1997 to 2004 he served as a Software Engineer and System Administrator with Northrop Grumman Corporation where he was responsible for the project management for a satellite telemetry-data acquisition system, which included continuous troubleshooting, hardware and software upgrades and installation, and system architecture modifications. From 1985 to 1997, Dr. Vaucher served as Software Engineer and a systems analyst with Hughes Aircraft Company where he developed analysis and algorithms for near field calibration of aperture array radar antennas, as well as theoretical models and simulations of ground clutter return in airborne radar systems, digital filters to simulate antenna commanding for various radar modes and coordinate transformations between aircraft and antenna platform for radar simulations. Other positions include Systems Engineer with Vitro Laboratories, where he developed a mathematical model for an electrostatic gyro used on the Trident Submarine navigation system and other projects, including digital time series analysis, and filtering. He also held a position as a physicist with the U.S. Bureau of Mines, conducting research on thin film deposition using high vacuum equipment.
Dr. Vaucher received a Ph.D. in Theoretical High Energy Physics and a Masters in Physics from University of California -- Riverside. He completed undergraduate studies in Physics at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Dr. Vaucher is a co-author on many publications, focusing on quark mass matrices that have been published in such journals as Physical Review, and Reviews of Modern Physics.
ABOUT HIENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (http://www.hienergyinc.com)
HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. is the creator of the world's first "stoichiometric" diagnostic devices that can effectively decipher chemical composition of unknown substances through metal or other barriers, almost instantly and without human intervention. HiEnergy's Atometer(TM) devices incorporate a proprietary interrogation process which activates a selected target with neutrons causing the contents to emit back gamma rays that contain unique signatures from which the chemical formulas are derived. HiEnergy believes its Atometry(TM) technology compares with other detection technologies like color photography compares with black-and-white photography.
HiEnergy is focused on the commercialization and sale of its portable, suitcase- borne SIEGMA(TM) 3E3; the CarBomb Finder(TM) 3C4, a vehicle-borne system, for the detection and identification of car bombs; and the STARRAY(TM), its robot-borne detector of IEDs, landmines and unexploded ordnance. The Company is marketing its devices to governmental and private entities and is negotiating licenses for distribution of its devices with various industry partners. The Company also continues to focus on the research and development of additional applications of its technologies and their further exploitation, both internally and through collaboration with third parties.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Any statements made in this press release which are not historical facts contain certain forward-looking statements; as such term is defined in the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995, concerning potential developments affecting the business, prospects, financial condition and other aspects of the Company to which this release pertains. The actual results of the specific items described in this release, and the Company's operations generally, may differ materially from what is projected in such forward-looking statements.
MEDIA CONTACT: INVESTOR RELATIONS:
Karen Gleason Paul Knopick
Going Global Communications E&E Communications
949-702-3409 949-707-5365
info@ggcpr.com pknopick@eandecommunications.com
SOURCE HiEnergy Technologies, Inc.
For further information: Media - Karen Gleason of Going Global Communications, +1-949-702-3409, info@ggcpr.com, Investor - Paul Knopick of E&E Communications, +1-949-707-5365, pknopick@eandecommunications.com / Web site: http://www.hienergyinc.com
I rarely "bash" but this company has one of the sorriest histories in terms of shareholder friendliness. I warned about management back about 6 months ago and I don't see any progress, just a steadily declining share price and a ski slope for a chart.
So many people have sufferred over the past couple of years of broken promise.
.30's
and now we see "new marketing initiative to penetrate growing private...."
could be an add for a porn movie.
Forget about the "we are thinking about trying to sell..." stuff and JUST SELL and keep the capital structure steady!!!!
CEO, CFO 101
Followers
|
16
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
418
|
Created
|
02/24/03
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |