Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Luckily if would be better if YOU keep your mouth shut!
Luckily, we have YOU watching this.
Impossible for this stock price to go up than 0.15$.
As long as there are heavy selling investors at a bargain basement price of 0.1310-0.1320$, it’s impossible for the stock price to go up than 0.15$.
Bid is not at all increasing and ask keeps going down-&-down.
No hopes for this stock price.
Yesterday CFGN was the broker on Bid side and CFGN was the broker on Ask side. The trade of almost 6K happened at bid price. After that when OTCN became broker on bid side all of a sudden no trade happened. The same pattern was observed so many times before in GTHP stock trading. This same pattern was notified to SEC & FINRA. Both these regulators are closely monitoring/watching activities of these 2 broker-dealers/MMs CFGN & GTSM.
A broker is on the bid side & the same broker is on the ask side. How’s that normal & legal?
A broker is on the bid side & the same broker is on the ask side & sell always happens on bid price. How come a seller always lowers price & sells stock at bid price? How’s that normal & legal?
I understand what you SAID but I don't understand what you MEAN.
You are describing normal legal MM activity in a thinly traded OTC stock.
You are not understanding what I said. I said on bid side & ask side it’s always the same broker. Whether it’s GTSM or CFGN etc. & all the time seller lowers price & the trade happens at bid price. That’s just plain manipulation of stock prices these brokers have been already reported at FINRA & SEC.
What in the world are you talking about?
There was a bid at 0.136$ & an ask at 0.16$ and a trade happened at 0.136$ -- what is your point? A seller dropped to .136 and that is illegal or unethical in your eyes?
Yes it was 7500 volume.
Today also CFGN had a bid at 0.136$ & CFGN had an ask at 0.16$. The trade of 25K happened at 0.136$.
CFGN’s all this “activity” is being reported to SEC.
Did you take a look at the volume of those trades?
Did you take a look at what price did it close today?! In spite of this news, people are still willing to sale at 0.1260$.
Although last trade is suspicious. CFGN had a bid at 0.1260$ & CFGN had ask at 0.16$ & the trade happened at 0.1260$
CFGN is already under SEC watch & today’s suspicious trade was also reported to SEC.
I don't think anyone believes the SMI hype because SMI has been promising the moon for many quarters, but wouldn't that be nice if SMI actually paid the $2.2 million they've been promising.
It wouldn't book until Q1 2024 but that would be a nice $$$ bump coming at a good time for Guided. And it's no skin off Guided's back if SMI never ponies up, as long as somebody actually files the trial results with the NMPA (fka the CFDA).
Come on, there is no heavy ANYTHING. No heavy selling and no heavy buying either.
There was heavy selling once, back in June, but that was short-lived. We've all been waiting for that seller to return but I think they liquidated and that was a once-in-a-lifetime buying opportunity.
Remember that? When you called everyone who said they were buying a liar?
Oh and about the news today -- if you can't find that PR then you're hopeless. It's a PR, man. It's on BusinessWire if that helps.
Can you please post the link of that great news?
If the news would have been great then bid would have gone up. Each & every uptick in bid is taken & then heavy selling resumes.
Great news out let’s see what next$$$
Absolutely no hope for this stock. Any uptick in bid is immediately taken & heavy selling resumes. Extremely bearish!
I think you meant "extremely boorish."
Whether it’s China or US, it doesn’t matter. There’s absolutely no interest from anyone in buying this stock. If (& it’s a very big if) they announce a substantial good news then only there will be any interest. It’s very hard & difficult for this stock’s bid to go up than 0.125$
Oh I thought China was and open book and always told the truth about everything?
Also look at the trading of GTHP stock in this entire year. You will find there are absolutely no buys for this stock because there’s no buying interest for this stock,
There are only sells & only sellers & all sellers want to sell at any salvage price they can get. As if sellers just want to get out of their long positions. Any slightest uptick in bid price is immediately taken/claimed and then heavy selling resumes. Unless bid goes up there’s no hope for this stock.
If you think this is way undervalued then where are your buys?!
When there are 2750 stock sell at a bargain basement price of 0.125$, obviously the seller knows something (bad) that you & I don’t know.
Chinese were supposed to complete trial by 1st, 2Q end ‘23, then they were supposed to complete it by 3Q end ‘23 & they are still not complete. You can get the picture!
everyone has their reason for selling...a 2 year delay getting a USFDA study off the ground might be a good place to start. Using your primiitive valuation metrics, i suppose because some people were selling Citi Group once upon a time at $1 that represented fair value?????
i won't do your homework for you but just go and have a look at other cancer screening device companies and see where they were trading at the inflection points of 1. Starting the study. 2. completing and submitting the study. 3. approval. They are 12% in on the USFDA study and are very much lagging those that you would find in that comp group
What you are missing is. There are investors who are selling at a salvage price of 0.125$.
This much extremely bearish sentiment is there for the stock.
So your statement of “this warrants much higher valuation” based on latest updates in latest 10Q, doesn’t hold the truth test,
to keep that guy in perspective...
FIRST he said the Officers and Directors didn't exist, and the company was fake. THEN he said Cartwright (the CEO at the time) stole all the money. THEN he said they'd never start US trials. And to say all that, he's used multiple usernames (myjo and myjog) to fake the illusion of a conversation.
So whatever he says now... consider that history.
smart money would share their opinion only when they have the position they are comfortable with. As for you, if you haven't spent your allowance money for the week maybe you should add 100 more shares
Really? Then how many you are buying?
Latest 10-Q.......
USFDA study... 12% of the total number of patients needed for the study have been enrolled and tested.
Chinese NMPA.... As of October 31st there are 12 patients left to complete the study
Pretty sure that warrants a market cap far greater than where we are at
Yes, long stockholders indeed need all the good luck in the entire universe for this stock’s bid to go up than 0.15$
Looking at today’s trading, feeling that something very bad is going on here.
People are selling at a bargain basement price of 0.14$ & still there are no buyers. There are only sellers even at a salvage price of 0.13$ as if long position holders just want to get out of their long position at any salvage price they can get. Very very bad!
So happy I added more can’t believe how cheap let’s hope I am doing the right thing good luck y’all $$$$
FIRST you said the Officers and Directors didn't exist. THEN you said Cartwright stole all the money. THEN you said they'd never start US trials. And to say all this, you've used multiple usernames (myjo and myjog) to fake the illusion of a conversation.
I don't "always make sarcastic fun of those who are bearish on the stock (or the company & it’s management)." I'm being unsarcastic and I'm not making fun of anyone when I say this: YOU are full of BS.
Who said I was "bullish on this stock?" I'm not bullish at this time. I think there will be plenty of opportunities to buy in the next six months -- no reason to buy it right now, IMO, unless someone dumps again the way they dumped in June. But the fact that I'm not bullish doesn't mean that I will read your BS without calling it BS.
If you're wondering about the new guy, toohot -- he followed me here because he's frustrated by my negative comments about a stock he's pumping. I think that would be a good stock for you, myjog -- follow toohot back to his pump-and-dump stock. It's easy to find.
OK that was a little sarcastic. 😄
You promised to put me on Ignore. Please fulfill your promise.
You always make sarcastic fun of those who are bearish on the stock (or the company & it’s management).
Why don’t you tell why you are bullish on this stock (or the company & it’s management)?
Yes, by all means, toohot, explain why this stock has "Sell" written all over it.
This is going to be good.
LOL, when you're right, you're right, yes sir.
Why do you think it has “SELL” written all over it? Are you selling/shorting this stock?
Added more trying to average down. Good luck y’all
Will the SEC investigate Fund Raising Activities and Conduct by President & CEO Mark Faupel and Director, Attorney Richard Paul Blumberg at and inside the GTI/GTHP level from its last $3 million dollar raise?
Perhaps such an investigation by the SEC will be initiated. The manager of GIUL, LLC a retired attorney, who is also a shareholder in GTI/GTHP is considering the same.
It doesn't bother you that this has "SELL" written all over it?
https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/GTHP/overview
Is this the reason why you are bearish on this stock?
Is there any other reason why you are bearish on this stock?
Myjog:
GIUL, LLC is suing individually Mark Faupel and Attorney, Richard P. Blumberg individual for unfair and deceptive trade practices in their fund raising activities against GIUL, LLC for funds GIUL, LLC provided to Shenghou which were almost immediately lent to GTI/ GTHP.
Legal Definition of Deceptive - Deceit
A fraudulent and cheating misrepresentation, artifice, or device, used by
one or more persons to deceive and trick another, who is ignorant of the true facts, to
the prejudice and damage of the party imposed upon. People v. Chadwick, 143 Cal.
110, 70 Pac. 884; Reynolds v. Palmer (C. C.) 21 Fed. 433; French v. Vining, 102 Mass.
132, 3 Am. Rep. 440; Swift v. Rounds, 19 R. I. 527, 35 Atl. 45. 33 L. R. A. 561, 61 Am.
St. Rep. 791 ; In re Post, 54 Ilun, 634, 7 N. Y. Supp. 438; Civ. Code Mont. 1895,
May I please know what are the reasons you are bearish on this GTHP stock?
&
If you have any opinions about RDGL & TPST.
Trump was not president when the FDA last rejected GTI.
Besides, Trump was hard on biotech. Under his direction, DARPA slashed biotech funding, and it sent my favorite biotech at the time, AOLS, into an early grave.
As I said before the stock price is extremely sad state of affairs. Those who hold the stock long, they just want to sell it at any salvage price they can get. They just want to get out of their long position. There are no buyers for this stock. Just don’t know what catalyst that might get this stock up! Is there any hope for this stock?! The incompetence literally killed the stock price. This company is having a great product & great technology.
Plaintiff Giul, LLC Wired Funds into Shenghou, LLC based on Faupel and Attorney Richard Paul Blumbergs fund raising conduct on behalf of Shenghou as outlined in GIUL, LLC' s amended complaint.
Given that Funds Were Wired Into an Account Director Blumberg Controlled,- I believe there might be POSSIBLE undertones of Federal Wire Fraud in this matter.
MyJog:
Faupel, President and CEO and one director, Attorney Richard Paul Blumberg are being sued Individual for engaging in unfair and deceptive trade practices in Massachusetts in relation to raising funds from Plaintiff, GIUL LLC, which were subsequently and immediately sent and lent to GTI/GTHP.
Did you miss that part of the Press Release?
WOW a trade of less than $300.00;
If they could not get approvals during relaxed Trump presidency - Who is confident now that they can?
Followers
|
107
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
15647
|
Created
|
11/06/16
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators GetSeriousOK |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |