Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hey Shep
Check out the recent board. Have new guy trying to get 50% of outstanding shares to get a place on the board.
Let us know if your in, have over 50% of shares needed.
Hey Ninja,
Are you holding some shares here? See what's going on ....
Very good news ... yes, seems appropriate following Independence Day
Thanks 87!
that takes us to 425m
Another friend,AJ, just called me with 8o m
so 525
Amazing half way there in less then a week. Please remnid old posters to comback and see what is going on. Nothing like a uprising starting July4
I have 50 million. Yes, anything to help this company grow. I am against RS and voted no last election
past funny! i needed a laugh this am.
anning. Rjafferson is working getting 50% of shareholders tp call for a meeting and taking over board. Which I fully support.
would you be iterested in jioning group? and if so how amny shares do you have?
current count committed id 375m , about a third of the way there.
Rolondo, with a post like that are you speaking of yourself?
Could be anytime, last time they applied for one after 6 months GAHC removed the request. The reason last time is the had John Fife who SEC designated as a "bad Actor"
It would not surprise me to see this one held up due the the toxic note issued at half the price of par value.
Lets keep working on getting our 1 Billion shares to get to take over control of board. We are past a 3rd of the way there.
So, since the comment can't mean the share price is up that high - must mean you have that many more shares ... you in?
we will add to list, every mill helps
i call after 5
please explain that
I have a few at 10 M approx
well lets see if we get close we are 35% there. If you know any members dont dont come back to board ask them to sto in and take a look..
To be honest not enough to make a dent. I REALLY trust you but maybe only 10 million more for 15 combined.
Currently this is a Ponzi scheme hiding in plain sight
To be honest not enough to make a dent. I REALLY trust you but maybe only 10 million more for 15 combined.
Currently this is a Ponzi scheme hiding in plain sight
Cane how many would you buy
with three commitments we have 203 committed.
we need another 800m lets see how the other roommates chime in.
The elections company is valued around 10M which makes sense with 1m in earnings a tenX is a low mutiple for a tech company
Lets hear from the rest,
that has us 315, 700 to go.
I have dwindled down to about 35M now.
http://www.investmentpitch.com/video/1_rie7t07t/Toxic-Debt-Lenders-lose-to-SEC-in-SEC-vs-John-M-Fife
This is long ,well worth the wacht.
A few take always from this.
Under 15C 780 the SEC is winning judgements for running non registered BD's.
Upon further research 15C-78cc nullifies the contracts and allows for harmed parties (us shareholders) to file suit against lenders. I appears that GAHC borrowed from three of the firms that have summery judgments against them. Under 29B we can recoup in state court. And I thought i was retired, GAHC is giving me a full time and lucrative new job.
Talk to your ounce, the actions are against the lenders.
Interesting,
Does anyone have corporate docks or know if share holders can call a special meeting.
My councel researched and Gahc is a registered in Delaware. Delaware only allows board members and CEO to call meetings. With that said he feels any board member would be remiss in not calling a meeting if over 51% of stock holders request. It appears we have close to 300m with just 4 shareholders, Still waiting on Bbees holdings and Manning said he would by back in.
Please contact any friends who are not active on board and if interested please post the amount of shares.
We are 30% of the way there.
Two areas of caution, keep conversations causal so that we cannot be considered a control group. The other is do not purchase over 4.9% of stock., you will have to register and state your intentions.
One last item, if we do get control my attorney has solid legal grounds that the .0005 note will never be able to convert. In addition if the note holder has invested in these type of notes prior and is not registered with SEC he most likely can be charged with running a non registered broker dealer. Review case against John Fife
Securities and Exchange Commission v. John M. Fife, Chicago Venture Partners, L.P., Iliad Research and Trading, L.P., St. George Investments LLC, Tonaquint, Inc., and Typenex Co-Investment, LLC, No. 1:20-cv-05227 (N.D. Ill. filed September 3, 2020)
Hey Buddy, Always have to one up me.
I have 76m
thatis funny, good work
thatis funny, good work
And, suppose shareholders have a matter that can’t wait until the next annual meeting? For example, they don’t like the direction that the company has taken, and they want to switch out a few directors? This happens less frequently, usually when an activist investor has gotten involved. At some companies, investors can also schedule a special shareholder meeting, subject to some varied and interesting rules, and a bit of strategy, which we explain here.
We can think of two principal advantages to demanding a special meeting:
1.It allows an investor to accelerate change at a portfolio company, so that you need not wait for the next annual meeting to restructure a BoD or make other changes.
2.It provides a unique strategy in facing off against company management, and allows an investor to demonstrate concrete, significant support for their program without necessarily needing a vote on that program
Cane how many would you buy
with three commitments we have 203 committed.
we need another 800m lets see how the other roommates chime in.
The elections company is valued around 10M which makes sense with 1m in earnings a tenX is a low mutiple for a tech company
Lets hear from the rest,
we need to know how many shares you currently own
Looks like I check in at the right time If you remember Nvragn…. I sold almost all about .001, and glad I did, BUT, I would buy more to be able to take over the company. There HAS to be companies out there that would buy up some share to be part of that.
For you newcomers to this site:
What do you call a Cow that cannot produce milk?
Well, there are 3 answers-
1. An Udder failure
2. A Miss-Steak
3. A Milk Dud
John Mathews currently holds the role of CEO of GAHC. Mostly everything he implements turns out to be a DUD. Hence the name Milk Dud.
It is the opinion of this board and likely the opinion of the majority of shareholders of GAHC- to exercise our collective voting power to remove the Milk Dud before he completely destroys what is left of the company. It would be good to know how many of us are ready to push this initiative forward and put the Milk Dud out to pasture. Do we have more yeas than nays? A great starting place would be for each and every one of us to email our displeasure with the Dud and Dud Jr.
I have 76 million and would be all for a takeover.
My losses are in the 60-70K range, so I'm very much in favor of replacing the Milk Dud with a more capable, results oriented CEO.
Well we are 13% of the way there,]Bbee and others let us know.' Please wake up your friends and get the numbers.
87% away from make our own destiny.
I have 50million
Here is a way that would be faster then a law suit. We need a little over 1B to take the company over. The would have to be done prior to reverse, since milk dud could have a few of the note holders convert and vote with him.
We take over ,install a new chairmen., give milk dud a preform our quit notice, if he cant close deals he is gone.
Lets show milk dud our shares I have 70m
sad but maybe true
I go in with the same fear and trepidation on any penny stock investment. Chances of winning are exponentially better than a lottery ticket purchase, but the price you pay to play can be very costly.
I first heard/read about this stock back in 2018 (I think) but it was being pitched as a bitcoin play. I learned some months later that it was in fact a blockchain play. Several months after that, I learned that it was a blockchain/voting play, and now almost 5 years later, it has become clear to me that the CEO has no idea how to brand this company anymore. He craftily maneuvered his way through the crypto craze, but it has run its course, and the Milk Dud has run out of marketing ideas and apparently money too.
This is/was a risky pick. I knew It could fail. I didn't think it would fail due to fear of failure. That's just nuts... this NEEDS to trust its structure and get out there. If it fails after it grows, so be it... but give it a chance and trust the many year's of work was worth it.
You raise a great question. My opinion is fear of failure. He gets these deals on paper but never finalize them. He pens a deal and never follows thru and the deals die on the vine. If he completes them they may fail and he cant hold himself up as the genesis he feels he is.
We should call for a shareholder vote and remove him, however first we would need to find a replacement. I think the person we should find is someone who know how th recover assets I researching there was a Chicago firm who notes he allowed to be converted after Finra ruled those type of notes were worthless. Mathews should have never let the firm convert. Also all previous conversions should be voided. The investor , John Fife , is in a 60m enforcement action with FINRA. I ejaculate he made over 5M on these notes. that 5m would pay for the the federal election licensing and Monies to pay off other toxic notes and run the company.
The ideal candidate would have experience in small cap companies, maybe a retired attorney, Anyone knows someone let me know.
In all honesty, he doesn't have to do much. Keep the current clientele, get a few more on board. Operate with a net positive cash flow. Get certified by the election board. The rest will take care of itself. I don't understand why he is incapable of doing these few tasks
The Milk Dud is hoping one by one, we lose interest, write it off as a bad investment and get on with our lives. In my view, this would be a huge mistake. If we lose our money, let's take the Dud down with us by suing him and Milk Dud Jr. with some drawn out expensive lawsuits. Why should they walk away winners if they are nothing more than cheats?
This has been manufactured by elitist and hedge funds to wipe-out the retail investor it's all a scam.
imo
G.L.
It's not so much the reverse split that bothers me as much as why the Milk Dud chose to exercise the split now. The last Q was a favorable, and yet, he claims he has been unable to attract new talent. How is offering up worthless stock going to lure in new talent?
How can the Dud afford to pay for new talent while he continues to pocket the profits rather than re-invest for the sake of growing the company?
Either the Milk Dud is having a mental meltdown, or this company is on the verge of collapse.
I believe the last thing the Dud wants is to see investors make money off of his toil.
Right or wrong, for the record, I voted NO on the R/S request!
Directors considered the potential lack of an ability to attract new employees, retain and motivate current employees, and raise potential capital for current acquisitions, mergers, or investments. That is pathetic, Milk Dud!
The reverse split is so important at this time. here is why:
1) All the commotion on the board recently it forced Mathews to act, if we keep up the pressure it will force him to do more.
2) The note is now we have been discussing is now convertible at.006. However his holding period will not start to after the split 2-3 months. The reason being under current note the holding period id void,Delaware law does not allow stock issued under par value. To qualify stock has to be fully paid. In addition at .006 conversion he will receive 19,169,912 shares of stock. After split there will be 166 million shares outstanding, he will have over 10% and becomes by rule and Insider and sales are restricted.
My counsel is doing an asset and insurance search, he be-leaves will still have damages by company issuing note. If stock goes back quickly to .0014 the price when note was issued,due to the reverse split we may loose our claim. However i don't think milk dude has the ability to do that. I do be-leave the directors and companies legal council will continue to push to company to close deals and bring value to stock.
This RS is going to hurt us, not sure how but share holders will pay. I am disappointed with everyone who voted yes on this!
Bbee
The first and foremost is there money to pay if we prevail. A class action, to me, seems to have to many moving parts. one law firm representing this small group would be the best.
Another benefit that hopefully results is milk dud (as you have crowned him) starts keeping promises to shareholders and implements all the partial deals he has had pending for the past year. It would come as no surprise that the conversations on this board have been leaked to him and his counsel. Hopefully counsel tells him to get to work and make your shareholders happy. But i doubt this from his past actions.
I too am suffering terrible financial loss from this fiasco. What remains unclear to me at this point is if a class action suit has more teeth than multiple individual lawsuits that could run into large sums of money. Whatever the course of action, we should try to build consensus.
I have heavy losses also, please keep me in the loop
Followers
|
358
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
32436
|
Created
|
02/22/11
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators Rockinboxers |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |