Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SUNNYVALE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 21, 2002--General Magic,
Inc. (Nasdaq:GMGC), a pioneer in enterprise voice infrastructure
software, today announced that two of its leading technical experts
will explore the state of the art in voice-enabled enterprise
applications at the VoiceXML Planet 2002 Conference & Expo, which will
be held at the DoubleTree Hotel in San Jose from Wednesday, March 20th
to Friday, March 22nd.
Pat Haleftiras, General Magic's chief technology officer, will
discuss "VoiceXML and Call Center Integration" in a presentation
beginning at 4:30 p.m., Friday, March 22. Attendees will learn how
VoiceXML technology can improve the effectiveness of their existing
call centers through automated self-service, reduced call times and
integration with their Web infrastructures. The session will cover
ROI, risks and benefits of an integrated call center solution.
Haleftiras oversees General Magic's technology initiatives, including
the implementation of industry standards in its flagship magicTalk(R)
Enterprise Platform and magicTalk Voice Gateway products.
Lizanne Kaiser, Ph.D., director of Application Frameworks, will
discuss "Effective Dialog & Grammar Design" at 2:00 p.m., Friday,
March 22. Her presentation will focus on the development of efficient
and modular grammars and dialogs as a key element in VoiceXML
application development. The session will review standards that are
being developed around ways of representing grammars, and will drill
into the mechanisms of writing the grammars and dialogs for VoiceXML
application development. It will cover various tools that are
available for VoiceXML grammar/dialog development and the
rules-of-thumb that developers can leverage in building effective
grammars. Co-presenting with Dr. Kaiser will be Pascal Deschenes, Core
Speech Technology Developer, InfoSpace, Inc.
About VoiceXML Planet Conference & Expo
VoiceXML Planet Conference & Expo will provide competitive insight
into VoiceXML standards and technologies and how they are being used
to collaborate, innovate and reshape the business landscape through
interactive speech applications. VoiceXML Planet Conference & Expo
will contain professional training and in-depth strategy sessions led
by industry experts in the form of business and technical tracks. The
exhibition hall will highlight products and service vendors and will
provide the information necessary to evaluate implementation options.
The event is hosted by VoiceXMLPlanet.com
(http://www.voicexmlplanet.com), and internet.com
(http://www.internet.com).
About General Magic
General Magic is a leading voice infrastructure software company
that provides enterprise-grade software and supporting voice dialog
design and hosting services that enable companies to quickly and
efficiently provide anytime, anywhere access to information and
services over the telephone. General Magic's VoiceXML & J2EE(TM)-based
solutions enable enterprises to easily integrate voice access into
enterprise applications using a broad selection of speech recognition
technologies and telephony interfaces. These solutions make voice a
strategic tool in helping businesses improve the customer experience,
reduce transaction costs, and provide high quality, voice branded
access to content and services. General Magic is headquartered in
Sunnyvale, Calif. For additional information, visit
www.generalmagic.com.
Thanks for that, Big-V! The way I feel, it is really good news. The most significant thing, to me, is that if GE is going to use the product, they must imagine GMGC will still be in business tomorrow. Or, you might say, even pessimists can bring their lunch for a while longer.
Fred
Fred -- re: "Fortunately, there are other avenues that GMGC is trying to pursue." --
Guess ya saw where GMGC has landed a software license and services agreement with General Electric (the mysterious Fortune 10 company revealed today): The Agreement provides that the Company will work with General Electric in the development and deployment of a voice-application (the "Voice Application"). The term of the Agreement is 36-months. The Voice Application is being developed and deployed on the magicTalk Enterprise Platform and will enable voice access to an existing General Electric web-based enterprise application. The Company has extended special pricing terms to General Electric for this Voice Application as an early adopter.
As such, apparently no significant revenues are being derived yet from their agreement with GE, but it sure nicely positions GMGC for potential revenues/fees down the road if things work out well. Plus, having such prestigious alliances as General Motors, IBM and now General Electric should prove to be an invaluable selling tool for GMGC as they go after additional business opportunities in the future.
I'm feeling better . . . hope you are!!
v
P.S. -- And as far as the current "priceyness" of the OnStar/VA service is concerned, don't worry about that . . . the economic laws of supply/demand and economies of scale will eventually bring the price down into Joe Sixpack's range (of course, "eventually" is the operative word here!!!)
No, V, I hadn't seen it. Actually, I'm home suffering from some one of those annoying little bugs that bites us from time to time.
I'm glad to see an attempt to put a positive spin on it. Some time back, Dave Gurgel wrote an opinion about the value and utility of the On-Star service, and, in all honesty, I thought he pegged it pretty well. It really is a bit pricey for general consumption. Fortunately, there are other avenues that GMGC is trying to pursue.
Ohhhh, just chalk it up to the fact that I feel miserable.
Fred
Sorry for the repeat post -- not sure why it happened.
Fred -- Didja see this news? (Came out yesterday, but I just ran across it.)
DETROIT (Dow Jones)--General Motors Corp.'s (GM) Onstar in-car-communications
unit is finding that 56% of its subscribers renew the service after the first
year, the cost of which is included in the purchase price of the car, a top
company official said Tuesday.
"The renewal rate last time I looked at it was 56%," GM Chief Financial
Officer John Devine told analysts in response to a question.
He didn't specify what time period that figure applies to, and a spokeswoman
declined to provide details. Onstar officials typically don't release the
renewal rate, a critical indicator of the success of their business, other than
to say their target is around 60%.
"It's been very successful," Devine said of Onstar's business. "There's more
success to come," he added, without elaborating.
(This report and related background will appear on The Wall Street Journal's
Web site, WSJ.com.)
In late 2000, GM began a major push to expand Onstar's subscriber base,
building the service in as standard equipment or as part of popular options
packages on many of its most popular models and including the first year of
service free. As those subscriptions have expired over the last few months,
Onstar has been trying to retain those subscribers as paying customers. Onstar
offers service plans ranging from $16.95 to $69.95 per month, as well as
pay-per-use cellular calling and Internet access.
Onstar's basic service includes a built-in cell phone and global-positioning
equipment to access a service center that can provide accident and other
emergency assistance. The service currently has about 2 million subscribers. GM
executives have said that while Onstar isn't profitable at the moment, it will
become a significant contributor to GM's bottom line in the next few years once
its paying subscriber base increases enough to cover its fixed costs.
- By Gregory L. White, The Wall Street Journal, 313-226-1256
(END) DOW JONES NEWS 03-19-02
05:37 PM- - 05 37 PM EST 03-19-02
Fred -- Didja see this news? (Came out yesterday, but I just ran across it.)
DETROIT (Dow Jones)--General Motors Corp.'s (GM) Onstar in-car-communications
unit is finding that 56% of its subscribers renew the service after the first
year, the cost of which is included in the purchase price of the car, a top
company official said Tuesday.
"The renewal rate last time I looked at it was 56%," GM Chief Financial
Officer John Devine told analysts in response to a question.
He didn't specify what time period that figure applies to, and a spokeswoman
declined to provide details. Onstar officials typically don't release the
renewal rate, a critical indicator of the success of their business, other than
to say their target is around 60%.
"It's been very successful," Devine said of Onstar's business. "There's more
success to come," he added, without elaborating.
(This report and related background will appear on The Wall Street Journal's
Web site, WSJ.com.)
In late 2000, GM began a major push to expand Onstar's subscriber base,
building the service in as standard equipment or as part of popular options
packages on many of its most popular models and including the first year of
service free. As those subscriptions have expired over the last few months,
Onstar has been trying to retain those subscribers as paying customers. Onstar
offers service plans ranging from $16.95 to $69.95 per month, as well as
pay-per-use cellular calling and Internet access.
Onstar's basic service includes a built-in cell phone and global-positioning
equipment to access a service center that can provide accident and other
emergency assistance. The service currently has about 2 million subscribers. GM
executives have said that while Onstar isn't profitable at the moment, it will
become a significant contributor to GM's bottom line in the next few years once
its paying subscriber base increases enough to cover its fixed costs.
- By Gregory L. White, The Wall Street Journal, 313-226-1256
(END) DOW JONES NEWS 03-19-02
05:37 PM- - 05 37 PM EST 03-19-02
I'll tell, ya, Pez, I really like Datek. But they keep me worried. I don't think their programming staff is very good. If you're a MicroSoft afficiando, it's no problem, but for the rest of us, it's just a question of time before they try to squeeze us all into that crummy, destructive, over-controlling, same-sized box. I hate that!
But, darn it, they have some GREAT features. I hope you checked them out. If you have any questions, let me know.
Fred
Fredm maybe I should rephrase that
to say...I really think somehow gmgc will survive this mess.
Of course WE'LL survive this mess - we may all be the poorer for it....
as ususal time will tell
Thanks for the tip on Datek - do you need a minimum to get that $10 trade?
I'll investigate their webisite myself when I have some time.
-hey maybe I should go there now instead of typing this.
Yo, Pez! re: "I actually think somehow we'll survive this mess."
That's EXACTLY the phrase I was looking for.
Re: trading, I'm trying to learn how. I brought one of my daughters in to work with me. We've been at it a few weeks, and the biggest thing we've learned is that we have a lot to learn. The mechanics are straightforward enough and I can often get the direction right. Apparently, the art is in the timing.
I use Datek. Although I complain about them, the more I learn the better I like the trading facilities they offer. They won't accept orders for more than 5,000 shares at a time, but at $10.00 a trade, multiple orders are not that bad. Of course, GMGC to the contrary notwithstanding, I avoid most of the really cheap stocks. GMGC got me there by the back door!
Nice seen a message from you.
Fred
Hi, there, Big-V. I liked Silicon Investor, too. It would be nice if we could get Seconds Out, EquityInvestor, John Madarasz, Thotdoc, and dgurgel to come over and join us. There were a couple of good folks on RB that I'd like to see over here, too. Of course, given the current state of GMGC, we could hardly expect serious people to join us HERE ... and iHub already has a JOKE board.
Now, how could I bake a nice, appealing candied apple to catch their attention? As you know, V, there's so much here on iHub that you risk overloading the reader when you start talking about it ... particularly us verbose types. Ah, well. We all must bear our cross.
Thanks for your note. I'm off to fight the desire to imagine that things will be different after the 22nd. Surely, these few years should have taught me better than that.
Fred
no I'm not gone Mr. Fred
I repeat I had recently doubled my shares when the stock hit .30 a couple of weeks ago, then sold those same shares at .37
I still hold my core shares at avg cost of 1.25
I will consider buying again - but the broker costs are getting steep - I use waterhouse and above 5000 shares costs extra - actually I haven't looked at their fee schedule in a while, and don't trade often so I don't even know what it is.
In the short term the stock could do anything - I follow dg's position and he's usually right - we'll see if there is room for another trade.
I'll hold my core until the company is bought or moves to small cap, reverse split, whatever the case.
I actually think somehow we'll survive this mess
Hi, Fred!
Yes, I'm here . . . it's good to "see" you again. From what I've experienced so far with iHub, I'm thrilled with the service (I just signed up for the Premium, Lifetime membership). The website has all the features (and more) that I've come to like about SI, but not the drawbacks of other investor boards (whose names I won't mention, but I'm sure you can guess which ones I mean!), some of which have deteriorated into incomprehensible, mindless banter or worse. I think the investorshub guys have come up with the magic formula for success.
Anyway, I'm looking forward to utilizing the service as much as time permits in the future, and participating in the discussions as best I can.
Re GMGC, there obviously isn't too much to say at this point as we await the outcome of the shareholder vote and news on customers/alliances/financing, etc. Meanwhile, my perspective on the stock and my holdings thereof (my average cost is just north of $2, so I've got much further to go to breakeven than you!) is identical to yours: I couldn't have said it any better than you did in your post I'm responding to.
Looking forward to chatting with you about GMGC in the future. Let's hope we have something more stimulating to talk about soon (the current silence is deafening!).
v-man
Hi, Pez. I glanced at your post before I wrote to V-Man, and, I think, I misunderstood it. You're not gone, yet, are you? I don't wish you any bad luck, or anything, but I'm glad you're still around.
As I said, I came close to unloading, but when I sat down and thought about it, I thought, "Why?" So, I'm still here and I'm here for the duration. I sent in my proxies supporting management (again). I hope they get the votes they need. If they don't get it, I think our prospects will go from dim to dark.
I think I'll sleep in on the morning of the 25th. If it's a blood-bath, I don't want to see it. If it's not, it'll still be there when I peek. (I won't know the news until I see it in the stock price because the silly speculation that will accompany the result it too much for me.)
See you, later.
Fred
Hey, V-Man, you around?
C'Mon over here from Raging Bull and join the poor ol' lonesome Pezman and me. Actually, it looks like Pezman is leaving ... I just glanced at his post but haven't responded to it yet.
Actually, if he bailed, I don't blame him. I seriously considered it this past week. When I thought about the valuation of our little firm, it made me blue. I finally decided against getting out for a couple of reasons. One of them is "In for a penny, in for a pound". I've averaged down, but my cost is still about $1.07 so we'd have to have a triple from here, just to get even. On the other hand, that money is gone and I'm still eating better than I ought so I don't really miss it. (It would make no sense to think about "what might have been" since it's not).
Another reason is that I think Ms. Layton has done a lot to keep our company afloat. I know there are whiners and nay-sayers out there who like to bad-mouth others, but I wonder if any of them have ever had to face the kinds of problems that Ms. Layton inherited when she came to GMGC. The fact that she inherited a crooked deck and has been fighting to clean it up and build a viable organization gives me confidence that she's going to make it. Not as quickly as many would like, I'm sure, but with our support, she'll pull it off.
And, finally, I want to see what happens. I want to see the ending. If I sold out, I'd put GMGC out of my mind and go on to the many other things that interest me. I'd probably never even know whether it made it or not. I don't spend much time looking back, there are too many traps in front of me. If I hold on, I'm going to know. I may not like it, but I'll know.
In all honesty, I think GMGC's prospects are dim, but "we ain't dead, yet."
Fred
how's everyone holding up
well I successfully traded this stock from .30 to .37...yep, sold my 2nd half, made a measly few hundred dollars after fees
now can I get back in again around 32-33
or does she drop to .30 again before the dilution
or do I wait till after the dilution
present shares avg 1.25
hmmm
Sort of eom, indeed, Pez.
Color me grim!
Well, I can't say I didn't have plenty of opportunity to extricate myself.
glub ... glub ... glub
It may not be the worst mistake I ever made, but it's way ahead of whatever's in second place.
Fred
sort of eom
busted support at .305
ouch
I'm not sure, Pez. My guess is that General Magic will send out a new ballot, but I'm not familiar with how those things work.
Last night, I peeked at a little of what's on R/B (even though that site is painfully slow for me), but I didn't learn much. I did see where Dave Gurgel said that the voice field was not taking off in the way he thought it would several years ago, and citing Nuance and Speechworks as examples.
That kind of tickled me because of my original reason for buying GMGC. I don't know if you ever happened to see those posts of mine, so I'll bore you with a summary, now:
I said, in early 2000, that I'd bought GMGC stock because I hated the technology. I don't want no darn machines talking to me, and I don't want to talk to them. Machines should just do what I want them to do and keep their mouths shut. If I'm going to talk, I want to talk to a human.
I went on to say that I bought GMGC stock because everything I've disliked during my lifetime has been a raging success, so this time I was going to play it smart and invest in a technology I disliked.
Aw, shoot!!!
Why did I have to be right ... THIS TIME???
Fred
vote attempt
can I change mine submitted thru proxy-vote on internet?
I voted abstain - so I was part of that little "problem"
Pez, I gather we're now waiting for another vote attempt in March. I too averaged down, but held on.
Well, for now, it's just wait and see.
Fred
Fred
consensus? beats the he** out of me
seems the only consensus is the company needs more money
I had actually doubled down at .37, to bring my avg cost down to around .84
then I sold that half of my posit at .38, with the thought that i will be able to buy again cheaper this summer - just a guess on my part
I see the pros & cons of both the 'yea' and the 'nea' votes - as I read the RB board regularly
the vote is really a no-win situation as I see it, for the retail shareholder
now, what do the collective god's think - those of the instititutional world and corporate world ....that's what will determine the future of gmgc...or are they waiting for signs from the retail shareholder?
and I haven't got a good clue
your guess is good as mine
Well, Pez, what's the consensus? I wonder if the tank we're going to go into will be big enough to hold us.
I told 'em to go ahead authorize a bunch more shares. I hope they can even sell them. From this point dilution is less of a threat than survival.
Ms. Layton ... please pull it off. Surely you can get blood from a stone! I know it's a tough job, but you've been doing pretty good so far. Don't give up now.
Fred
Hi, KoolChik
Since I gather that you'd like to vacate the vicinity, I hope the sale of your business goes through. Now that you and I have hooked up again, maybe you can get a rebate on your apartment rent ... just tell 'em you won't need the heat.
I'm not sure I ever picked up on your affection for dogs. I suppose that was a defense mechanism: I was probably afraid of being called a cur. Now that you no longer have to take care of the house, maybe you'd like to teach this old dog a few new tricks.
You'll really have to forgive my ignorance ... I don't know what "road runner" is. I thought it was a little birdie that looks like a blur. Don't know what you'd use it for, unless it was to confuse folks.
I'll try to peek in on the board you mentioned, but I'm unlikely to stay for a couple of reasons. The first is free time ... of which I don't have enough, and the second is that my membership on Yahoo is messed up. They were one of my early attempts to use the internet, and when I signed on as "Koikaze" I screwed it up some way. Now I can't use that alias. I tried to contact them about it, but it was a waste of time. It's not like iHub, where they really want to help their users.
Hang in there, ChillyChum.
Fred
fred, you know I'm your biggest fan , right after the pack. But they are only seasonal.....you are always there.
Anyway, my home is sold, my business may be sold in
april, I'm living in an apartment (heat included).
I could only have one dog with me, so I took my old bassett and my poor little scruffy dog is in doggy limbo, living with a family friend until I move....He's very sad.
I know longer go to RB (TOO SLOW) I use road runner so I don't understand.
I found a new board on yahoo (bprx)...Great people, just your type. Lots of info and help. C'mon over.
Miss you........Judy
Nah ... I know what REALLY happened to you .. you ran away to Green Bay and were such a distraction them poor boys couldn't even beat St. Louis. I know you've been in shock.
Now, when your first love has fallen on its face, you come crawling back to me looking for a little succor ... and finding, of course, a BIG SUCKER!
Whassup, beautiful? Did you get the business and the house sold? Looking for a spare bedroom?
C'mon, bring me up to date.
Incidentally, I love this site. You've never seen anything like it. Let me give you a couple of eye-openers to check:
This is where Big Bad Bob tells you about any changes he makes in the system and solicits your feedback.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=908
And this is the jailhouse ... that's where unruly users get put until they decide to behave like adults.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=38
And here's a board where a few folks are trying to figure out a new, revolutionary way to beat the market:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=41
And here's a really neat board. It has two marvelous features: Me pitching mad passionate woo (hey, you weren't around, so it was like I was divorced), and even more important, some of the finest details you'll find anywhere on the blessings of TMTA (Trasmeta, Inc.)
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=883
And, another one. This one is run by a charming chick (check out her signature line at the bottom of her posts), where I plan to mount a huge soapbox. I've also been known to speak kindly to the charming chick, as well.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=398
There! That should do as an introduction. Note how neat those "iBoards" are. You can set one up for RMBS (Rambus, Inc) or anything else that suits your fancy.
Hey, Kool-Toes, all my fooling around aside, I'm glad to hear from you. Maybe we can tease a bit, and get an occasionial smile.
Talk to you, later, I hope.
Fred
fred you devil, I tracked you down
It's been a long time and I miss our banter.
I agree with your complaint abour RB's slowness.
I only go there to see if your around, I finally asked and SEPH answered.
So here I is in all my frozen glory..........Judy
Very nice. I'm up in Middlesex County (if you read this, Poet, it's a location, not an attitude), enjoying the glorious spring!
... Not to mention the blessing of having optimists join the General Magic Lottery Club.
Fred
yes, living now in SJersey
wife's originally from N Jersey
You live in Jersey, Pez? Watchung, indeed.
Fred
nothing gnu, Watchung and wading eom
Pez and X, if you happen to drop buy (alternative spelling), what's gnu (alternative spelling)? I suppose we're all waiting for the conference call. At that point, I may have to go home so I can tune in on that OTHER board. It should be speculator's heaven.
Fred
Pez, I didn't know Dave was speculating about a buyout/sellout/takeover. That must have taken place on that "other" board that I used to frequent. Hmmmm. Maybe I'm better off now. Less noise.
Fred
xtra & Fred
You don't think Mr. Gurgel is trying to boost GMGC up to his target 70cents? Hoping to instigate some trading action on Rumor..
yes but that's okay cause I'm still long, mr gurgel definitely colors his commentary to suit his position in the stock, imo. Nothing against him for that because he provides a lot of interesting information with his posts
jusyt got back from BK myself and enjoyed the burger with my bun...hoping as well gmgc shows us a little more beef soon, agree climbing out of this price range/ market will be tough but I am an optimist
as to gurgel's speculation on possible buyout...anything can happen but I personally can't see it - I like the "magic" name....great reasoning huh?
Hi, X. I have, from time to time, considered the possibility that he is paid for his prolific prose. Ultimately, each time, I reached the conclusion that I didn't really care. I must say that in early 2000 he wrote some posts that he was pretty badly slammed for. I thought they were both rational and reasonable. Of course, they were later borne out.
Although I sometimes get a kick out of needling him, the fact is that my only objection is his penchant for denigration, or perhaps I should say for characterization. Assertions of the type "Maisie's voice was hoarse ... probably from too much drinking." are offensive.
Anyway, the more serious question is what will happen with our little jewel. I bought quite a bit during the summer and fall. Enough that .70 would be OK, but I'm looking for something over a $1.00, too. I don't expect it to happen quickly, though. We were in one mell of a hess and digging out is the very slow process of putting one brick on top of another.
I hope they flesh out the New Mexico deal. We could stand some more details, which could give us a yardstick to guesstimate other possible deals.
Ah, well. Patience and fortitude.
Fred
Lysdexics Untie!
You don't think Mr. Gurgel is trying to boost GMGC up to his target 70cents? Hoping to instigate some trading action on Rumor? I never thought he was so transparently one to jump sides of the fence...as some people accuse him of... But you gotta wonder sometimes about the effects of powerful mixed drinks.
I, personally, will remain rather miffed until GMGC is back above a buck.. call me old fashioned.. but I consider it an ethical point of redemption ...considering what has been said by Management.. still.. 70 cents is at least the right direction.
If there is anything solid to announce soon I can see nice upward movement.. but more ambiguity will not mix well with the year end results and the request for more shares..IMO.
There comes a time when you need to put something in between the bun to call it a Hamburger.
If Wendy's didn't put any meat in their buns how long would people keep buying Burgers?
I like to believe GMGC can Make a good Burger.. But I cannot wait forever without feeling a bit like a prisoner.
I don't want to end up calling GMGC "The Old Ball and Chain."
Hey! What's going on here. Have I gone dyslexic or do I see Dave Gurgel making a positive comment about General Magic?
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=16916996
Will wonders never cease?
Fred
Darn!!!! And the price action is looking so promising. Ahhh, such is life.
Fred
oh well, based on recent news of shares to be issued
I will have to revise my estimates soon
downward, unfortunately
I think that's a reasonable expectation, and I, too, think 40-cents should be an add-to trigger.
Fred
Fred
fwiw, he was out early yesterday, this am. he's in, as far as I can tell by his RB disclosure.
imo, we will see .60-.75 min (this spring) before we see .40 again, maybe this summer
if we do see .40 again, i will seriously consider adding
I didn't realize that. I thought he'd just gotten out (based on a post of his on Silicon Investor).
I would rather it not dip to 40-cents, but if it does I expect I'll buy some more. I've already got a fair amount, but the Warren Buffett notion that you should think of stocks like groceries; buy more of them when the price is low, appeals to me.
Yes, I'm aware of Dave's prognostication of the likelihood of more dilution, but I feel that Ms. Layton, et al, are doing a good job of getting General Magic into a profitable condition, and, within the limits imposed by the situation they inherited, are doing their best to protect the stockholders' interests.
Fred
maybe 4/10 of a dollar? eom
Well, Pez, we weren't about to hold half-a-buck. Even so, I think the pull-back is orderly and understandable. We'll be OK. (He said confidently)
Fred
My sentiments, exactly, Pez. On Raging Bull, I once ventured to suggest that there is an inverse relationship between the number of posts on a company's board and its stock price. Hmmm. Maybe that's why I'm happier on iHub.
Fred
slow and steady
I'll be happy if we can hold .half-a buck
Up 12-cents ain't all bad. Hyperion Partners issued a recommendation (which I haven't read) and offered a target of $1.50 a share. Here's the link to the news item on BigCharts:
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/news/articles.asp?guid={A8FD765E-704B-481C-9D5E-F1E1F2D3360D}&n...
Fred
Followers
|
3
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
228
|
Created
|
10/03/01
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |