Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I believe - with reasons from years ago - but leave me now
HERE - because the Senior Paper (Preferred Shares) never change in "price" or quantity - i.e. do not trade
THUS - the GOV needs a way to add to the original obligation for the IOUs that are written each quarter and any other obligation of F and F to TREASURY
SO the LP is > the "equity value" of the SP and is the amount the Treasury believes it would take to buy out the SP
some one want to show me where that is wrong?
95% ownership? they kept 79.9% for a reason
Tim Howard's comment on Treasury's options to monetize its stake in Fannie/Freddie. The math should be obvious to everyone:
— Alec Mazo (@Alec_Mazo) May 16, 2024
1. Warrants exercised, seniors written off: 80% of $250-$300bn market caps is $200bn-$240bn upon organic release from conservatorship in 24 months at 10-12x… pic.twitter.com/fSpbw7t4QL
This is now a trump trade.
True just a legalized form because gubmint can do no wrong.
silver, white and then bald. i know as my 4th job is giving masage, this inflation is killing me. i am bald already, 16 years did it.
In congressional testimony Calabria concurred when asked by warner.
You have no money to bet.
This is actually a correct post.
Oh wow. Sherwin Williams showed up end of day and did his magic.
I’m coming around to the view that getting rich off release of GSEs isn’t going to happen. Doesn’t mean I’m selling as I do a mumbling of release by Trump will drive this to 4 bucks quickly. It would benefit the Paulson of the world and still wouldn’t require gov to do anything.
So there are a few ways to win.
And many ways to lose.
What will happen to someone who already has gray hair?
if you will keep worrying about the day to day volatility, you will soon have grey hair. $1500.00.
Oh no. The gains are starting to evaporate. Raise the ASK they will pay.
My God in heaven.
Spreadsheet? Of what? Because your predictions of $1500/share are delusion.
even though i will win, i don't bet or gamble, have my spreadsheet unlike you. read your thinking again.
"It will be a painful fall to 5 cents." 🤣
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173631680
How much do you want to bet?
"Midas–For some reason the comment you submitted went into the blog’s spam file" even blogs know who is a nuisance . lol.
"for nor reason at all". Exhibit A that the author is a government stooge. Vermint!
kt is busy framing his 30 posts, formatting, editing takes more time and attention than what he pays to his publication. you will soon see all 30 of them posted within less than 100 seconds.faster than we can even open one
We really need KTCarney and kite boy to start chiming in right about now….
"Yes, that would benefit existing shareholders, but it would benefit Treasury even more, and thus would not be a giveaway “for no reason at all.”
meaning finally we get our $1500 after 16 years?
midas is a big short and was here, changed alias. may be kt or no name
with shorts falling 31% some people don't see in-between the lines
with inflation alone Fnma should be over $5
thx Brandon
LOL
you sure know how to analyze this stock "It will be a painful fall to 5 cents." 🤣
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173631680
I'll get a name when you actually learn how to analyze this stock.
706 posts on fnma alone isn't occassional not counting how much you may glued on. anyways i don't care, first get a name, there is 23me.com to help you
I'm not here 24/7, but you are.
I occasionally drop in just for the continuing sh*tshow.
i thought so first. but there wasn't gabby with you. did she move to moelis?
Hey wait a minute. That man was me.
I don’t think you understand, Capitalism is a Ponzi scheme. That’s why we have to keep growing; to keep the scheme afloat.
I heard the $5 meal was going to be put in to conservatorship and McDonald's wouldn't receive any money from the sales. lol.
anything goes for votes 🤣 you will see more till nov 5, then lights out. fannie freddie shareholders may be shown few carrots too .
but you bring up a good point. costco will be just fine for now. i saw this nice man trying to get hot dog but did not had costco card to purchase one and asked one of the customer in line to get for him. said he can't afford the card or any other meal and comes here for it. the employees chased him down. really sad to see the state of inflation. joke aside, the admin should ask costco to let anyone buy it.
only for a month. they were likely threatened to do it so that there is dip in inflation for a month and then drumroll. the stock market has become a ponzi scheme.
you'll wish it was here sooner until you read the s h i t you are eating to allow for that $5 poison, umm, errr, price tag
I heard that McDonald's $5 meal is only for a few months, just to attact and get customers
Curious ... over 4 mil volume up over 5% after the CFPB ruling ... go figure
What comes first: McDonald's $5 meal or FNMA @ $5?
wish the $5 mcdonald meal was here sooner to get back into it and buy some. at least we will have next month to do it. too bad it will be there for just a month. it will affect the inflation report, problem solved
fhfa must have whispered in treasury ears to let go some of the loot that the inflation is too high and they need money to survive until $5 mcdonald meal next month
"I've got 8 figures liquid, why would I want to go work with the serfs?"
and that is why you are 24/7 on a message board of penny stock rooting for its bankrupcty and reverse split? see folks are buying , and they know who you are.
imbellish ...
thanks ... just wanted to see your thoughts ...
Dude, you make no sense. FNMA is trading now for $1.60, why would it go under $1 after release from Conservatorship?
I think it will trade north of $100 after release. I think you are missing 2 zeros in your estimate.
If the precedent were set that the entire funding structure were to be strictly governed by "Appropriations made by Law" as defendants painted it, would that not ultimately nullify the funding mechanism in FNMA/FMCC's charters? I think Congress would then have to explicitly appropriate money each time the companies go to borrow from Treasury. Like explicitly in a bill. Last line Thomas's summary opinion sums it up:
"They offer no defensible argument that the Appropriations Clause requires more than a law that authorizes the disbursement of specified funds for identified purposes."
imbellish ...
You are correct. Those that worry about LP are just trying to cast doubt on the potential of the c shares. LP is irrelevant unless the companies file for BK liquidation; hence the name "liquidation preference."
Followers
|
2309
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
2
|
Posts (Total)
|
797494
|
Created
|
07/14/08
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators not one red cent ~NORC~ stockprofitter Ace Trader Patswil jeddiemack FOFreddie |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |