Quantum Biopharma Ltd (QNTM)

[Golden Cross]

$HUGE Developing Novel Solutions for Brain Disorders
https://fsdpharma.com

[Golden Cross]

$HUGE FSD Pharma Presents Positive Results on First-In-Human Phase-1 study of Lucid-21-302 (Lucid-MS) at Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS) 2024 Forum
https://accesswire.com/viewarticle.aspx?id=839246&lang=en

[Mpphotopro]

Looking for a bottom bounce here

[Golden Cross]

$HUGE Game Changer - Kevin Harrington (Original Shark Tank) updates on FSD Pharma and Unbuzzd.

[nit2win]

What "evasive cover?" Lol

Feel free to go down with this sinking ship!

I love how all these Einstein's tie their names to this brand new "miracle" drink then decide it might be a good idea to do some clinical trials to make sure they can support all their claims!

Who does that???

[StockItOut]

oh? please explain, for once.
all your arguments and claims have only been your opinion, unsupported by facts or evidence.

you'll just do the same again, claiming otherwise, and with insult as your evasive cover, is how we figure.

[nit2win]

Would love to hear the explanation for the comment "clearly you don't" since obviously I do!

[StockItOut]

Good question, clearly you don't.

[nit2win]

With the stock trading in the .70 cent range, I wonder how long before NASDAQ boots them down into the OTC Pinksheets?

[nit2win]

"Yet to have been right".....

Except for the fact that a quick look at my posting history shows I was warning people when HUGE was trading at $1.60.

Show me a single instance of where I've been wrong?

[nit2win]

I'm not on the wrong board. Nor, am I talking about the wrong company. I don't even post on the Safety Shot board.

I've been warning people about the sham operators of HUGE since the stock was at $1.60 and when tjey scammed GBB Labs before the were a public company.

So, who has the credibility?

[Randy1111]

Kinda funny. Listening to the baseless chirping . He is yet to be right. But have atter dude. I will be quietly laughing when FSD makes a run one of these days.

[StockItOut]

Wrong board. SafetyShot is thataway ----->

[nit2win]

What "switcharoo" are you referring to? This company is sunk, sunk, sunk!

It's only a matter of time before the SEC and FINRA start asking questions.

If you want to go down with this sinking ship that's your perogative!

[StockItOut]

not much

seems a worthless consideration

a topic switcharoo (as usual from you) from discussing the merits of the case that is for GBB SafetyShot to make, having first established only the merits of legal sufficiency.

[nit2win]

I wonder how much money they wasted on that pump marketing piece they blasted out into the market?

Desperate times lead to desperate measures.

[StockItOut]

The judge determined the case has legal merit, that is all. It is now up to Safety Shot GBB to show the facts and merits of its complaint.

[nit2win]

Actually, it puts to rest the BS that the case had no merit, which was what FD Pharma was trying to say, but lost in the ruling.

Honestly, with a signed NDA, the ability to prove that HUGE went to the GBB facility, were given confidential proprietary information, and samples of the actual product, combined with the timing of when FD Pharma "miraculously" came out with their own duplicate product, this lawsuit should be a slam dunk for Safety Shot!

[StockItOut]

GBB opinion PR only: "The Court’s decision to not dismiss our case demonstrates that we have a strong legal position based on the facts."

In fact, it is up to GBB to establish in court that it has any and sufficient "strong legal position based on the facts."

The court only established that GBB has sufficient enough legal complaint to proceed undismissed.

[nit2win]

IT'S NOT LIKE I HAVEN'T BEEN WARNING EVERYONE....

GBB Drink Lab. Inc (“GBB” or the “Company”), a maker of the world’s first rapid blood alcohol detoxification beverage, is pleased to announce that a federal court has refused to dismiss the Company’s ongoing lawsuit against FSD Pharma.

FSD Pharma (NASDAQ: HUGE), a clinical-stage biotech company, has violated a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with GBB and has breached the contract by attempting to steal information and launch GBB’s product without permission.

"Nowhere in the Amended Complaint does Plaintiff allege that all nineteen of the ingredients are necessary to create a parallel program or competitor drink, and this Court sees no reason to impose such a requirement. It is apparent, at least to this Court, that Plaintiff takes issue with Defendants’ development of a competing drink, which relies on most of the same ingredients (and methods for combining such ingredients) as Plaintiff’s proprietary beverage,” said the Court.

The Court added, “Drawing all inferences in Plaintiff’s favor, this Court concludes that Plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated that its trade secrets derived economic value from not being readily ascertainable by others. Plaintiff alleges that the unidentified investors pulled out of the contemplated deals “because of Defendants’ announcements (and the promotional content) related to the development and planned future launch of a competing product that utilizes GBB’s confidential information.”

The Court’s decision not to dismiss the case represents a major victory for the Company and GBB is aggressively continuing legal action against the theft of their confidential information and to stop FSD Pharma from launching their product.

“The Court’s decision to not dismiss our case demonstrates that we have a strong legal position based on the facts. We look forward to a full and fair proceeding to resolve this matter and we believe that we will be victorious,” said GBB CEO John Gulyas.

About GBB Drink Lab

GBB Drink Lab started with a vision of making a positive impact by offering practical, evidence-based solution to reducing Blood Alcohol Content. The company’s product has been meticulously crafted to optimize your ability to reduce the effects of alcohol to escape an inebriated state. GBB Drink Lab leadership team includes accomplished serial entrepreneurs, a former senior executive from one of the world’s largest beverage companies, and an industry leading expert in flavoring science and product formulation.

[StockItOut]

If your statements were not pejorative as insults what were they?

About and/or suggestive of me you stated, "either lacks common sense or has problems with dealing with the truth," and "you're the one with no substance," and "anyone who is long this stock will be a sucker."

I thought you would have clarified.

[nit2win]

Apology accepted. Glad we got that out of the way.

[StockItOut]

My mistake. I thought "either lacks common sense or has problems with dealing with the truth," and "you're the one with no substance," and "anyone who is long this stock will be a sucker," were intended insults from you. My apology.

[nit2win]

Fabricating things in order to defend yourself is another sign of a lack of intelligence. I might add it's also an ignorant thing to do.

[StockItOut]

Wasn't it your first post you dished the "name calling." By your logic, does this mean you're establishing yourself as one with lack of intelligence?

As to your latest reply, you're still back to 'wait two years for the proof of what I claim to come out in court documents, but believe me now even when I provide nothing to back up and support my claims'. That's your sign of... what? intelligence? insider knowledge? bias? conjecture?

[nit2win]

Didn't take a lot of brain power to resort to name calling when someone says something they don't like. Actually, it's a sign of a lack of intelligence.

The truth is in the filings.

Hang on to HUGE and you'll get exactly what you deserve and you can bet I'll remind you that everyone was warned.

[StockItOut]

What facts? You've supplied nothing to support your claim.

I just spun your spin right back at your claims you cannot support.

The former FSD Pharma CEO?, who self-interested issued himselff tons of shares for doing nothing, for failing, for wasting time and company resources, for collapsing the HUGE share price, and who shareholders en mass voted to fire? And where after this former FSD Pharma CEO's release FSD Pharma has developed world class teams and divisions of pharmaceutical researchers?

You're just a conspiratorial idiot!

Fact!

[StockItOut]

No, you don't, correct. Yet you claim you already know the facts that will take years to come out in court.

I just asked for you to evidence those supposed facts, that you claim to already know, that have yet "come out in court."

You issued insult instead of anything that shows the facts you claim.

That's an OTC yeeha!

[nit2win]

Not even a good try to spin total misinformation and a fabrication of the facts.

FD Pharma is the one who signed an NDA with GBB in order to do their "due diligence" for acquisition purposes. They weren't in the beverage space only the medical R&D space when they signed the NDA.

You can spin fabricated lies all you want it will never change the provable facts!

Oh, and these world class researchers are so great that their former CEO is also suing them for fraud, and to date, they haven't actually had any successes other than burning through a ton of cash.

[nit2win]

Don't get it twisted.....

I don't need to provide you with anything you ask.

The facts will come out in court and you can bet all those betting on the Canadian fraudsters running FD Pharma will be crying all the way to the bank.

[StockItOut]

Yup, seems GBB dangled its carrot to FSD Pharma that rejected GBB, where and because FSD Pharma was already underway creating its Unbuzzed drink, the reason GBB first solicited FSD Pharma.

Think about this timeline....

GBB gets access to much of FSD Pharma's information surrounding its now named Unbuzzed drink, its formulation, and samples by signing an NDA and negotiating terms to be acquired by the FSD Pharma company, and within weeks of the agreement being drawn up but not executed, FSD Pharma ghosts GBB having determined that GBB is a bunch of stock fraud crooks, without any legitimate product or claims, where to be clear to the Market FSD Pharma comes out with a press release stating they have a new division that will develop, produce, and market an alcohol inebriation counter-effects drink.

Essentially, we should believe that GBB was able to create a new drink over 10 years for $100,000 where FSD Pharma has a whole team of world class scientists with state of the art scientific research facilities. And oh, GBB's access to the FSD Pharma drink and formulation had nothing to do with GBB's pump n dump selling a basic common energy drink without any ingredient that actually reduces blood alcohol content, or that lines the stomach to prevent alcohol absorption.

GBB is betting that between FSD Pharma's strong financial position and having a competitive product, where GBB first solicited FSD Pharma (not the other way around) GBB decided to act fast, go to market first, irrespective of having no legitimate product, but none the less to promote its stock fraud pump GBB provided the Market an appearance of GBB's legitimacy, GBB sued FSD Pharma to support its pump n dump stock fraud public facing story in order to run its $SHOT stock price much much higher, where insiders and their shells could and did unload most to all their sub-penny acquired $SHOT shares.

Big mistake!

[StockItOut]

How is it your understanding, that they had an agreement contract drawn up?

[StockItOut]

More evasive blah blah, huh?

Consideration of the suit as a criminal case was by only you in our exchanges. You fabricate to suggest or convey otherwise. Fact.

You state, "If you're asking me to divulge Safety Shots formula..." Well no, I asked you what i actually asked uou, not your evasive suggestion that I asked you something I in fact didn't.

I asked you, of the known SafetyShot ingredients, what is or are the active ingredient(s) that reduce blood alcohol content and/or line the stomach, as SafeShot claims its drink does? You evaded in reply... as usual.

You again say, "My interest lies solely on the fact that FD Pharma tried to steal the drink." Yet you provide absolutely no evidence to support your conclusion and claim. Fact.

Therefore, your claims and conclusions is just conjecture, which is just your bullshit.

Fact.

[nit2win]

First, I'm not the one who implied the lawsuit was a criminal act. That was another poster who spoke about a "prosecution" which doesn't exist for civil matters. So I would take the insults down a notch since you're actually insulting another shareholder, which is a dumb move.

Second, the formula for Coca-Cola has been a closely guarded secret for over a hundred years. So, what you read as ingredients on a can doesn't have anything to do with the process or formulation of a product that makes it unique. If you're asking me to divulge Safety Shots formula, I would suggest you give them a call to find out why they say their drink is so special, since you don't see it on their can.

My interest lies solely on the fact that FD Pharma tried to steal the drink and by doing so have defrauded their shareholders with false press releases. The $53 million lawsuit should be a concern for everyone because this company will not survive after they lose.

[StockItOut]

Ah, back to name calling in lieu of substance to support your argument.

Of course it's a civil suit. Only a whacko would consider any discussion to include notion of it as a criminal suit.

I'm sorry you lack common sense and/or have problems dealing with the truth.

Coca was the ingredient in CocaCola. What's the effective ingredient(s) in the SafetyShot garbage that lowers blood alcohol content? That lines the stomach wall? Come on Mr. Criminal Suit.

[nit2win]

So???

Anyone who wants to be taken seriously should probably get their facts straight and also know the difference between a civil case and a criminal case.

Additionally, just because you read listed ingedients on a can doesn't mean that you are getting the full breadth of the process and formulation. Coca-Cola would be an excellent example of this.

Anyone who thinks GBB Labs would spend the money to file a $53 million claim for baseless reasons either lacks common sense or has problems with dealing with the truth.

[StockItOut]

"First, the lawsuit has been deemed valid and is already in front of a judge."
So?

"Second, this is a civil case not a crimibal case so there is no prosecutor."
So?

"If Celly Nu is foolish enough to try and put their drink into production with a formulation that was stolen they will most assuredly get hit with a restraining order and will be forced to wait until the outcome of the lawsuit or subject themselves to unnecessary litigation."
Blah, blah, blah...

"...with a formulation that was stolen." The Safety Shot ingredients evidence a standard energy drink.

All you've done is presume without a lick of supporting or cited documentation.

[nit2win]

First, the lawsuit has been deemed valid and is already in front of a judge.

Second, this is a civil case not a crimibal case so there is no prosecutor.

If Celly Nu is foolish enough to try and put their drink into production with a formulation that was stolen they will most assuredly get hit with a restraining order and will be forced to wait until the outcome of the lawsuit or subject themselves to unnecessary litigation.

[nit2win]

I never claimed a dispute of contract. Those were your words not mine.

I claimed theft of IP by reverse manufacturing a drink after FD Pharma signed an NDA and had been given samples of the drink and proprietary information regarding the formulation of the drink.

What did FD Pharma have that GBB wanted?

Cash and stock!

[StockItOut]

Thank you.
Yes, a projection of allegations is what has been presented as fact, with only the allegations presented to support those allegations. very m ag a.

[Randy1111]

You got a great argument SIO . Facts and practical reasoning always trumps name calling and a lack of a factual presentation. The truth always comes out in court and suing someone and taking them to court takes proof and a-lot of time. Nothing has been proven from the prosecution side and it will take a-lot of time before presenting both sides, If it ever makes it in front of a judge. I have popcorn and am waiting for the truth. So far all we have heard is projection of unproven facts. In the meantime I will wait to see what the Celly Nu team comes up with when they launch their product. I believe the CellyNu team is much more formidable than others in the market, complete with people from Celsius and Coca Cola with successful experience in sales marketing and distribution. If the product proves itself (and I believe it will) things will happen quickly. I would compare it to a war with the USA and Panama. The production, marketing and sales along with distribution is far more professional than any other company out there. Just my opinion on why I think I know what I own.

[StockItOut]

Have you seen the ingredients list for SafetyShot, it is only a standard energy drink.

Executed or not you claimed the issue of the dispute a contract.

Further, how do you know "there was an agreement that had been drawn up specifying terms which included cash and stock in FSD Pharma"? That's the proof I suggested you supply to substantiate your claim.

FSD stole the drink you say. How is it and why did GBB initially solicit FSD Pharma?

What does/did FSD Pharma have that GBB wanted?

[nit2win]

Great business people don't steal the ip of another company and call it their own.

Hence, the $53 million lawsuit that should they lose, HUGE will never recover from.

[Randy1111]

I am hoping you are right!!!!

[NEPTAZ]

I BELIEVE THAT THIS STOCK WILL BE ONE BEST PERFORMERS THIS 24/25 YRS. A GREAT GROUP OF BUSINESS PEOPLE !!!
HAPPY NEW YEAR !!!!

[nit2win]

Listen, you want to be pro FD Pharma and believe these Canadian conmen were able to develop a billion dollar revolutionary drink in a couple of months, then you deserve everything you'll get at the end of the day.

[nit2win]

First, it's not my lawsuit so I don't know where you would think I would start coming up with documentation.

Second, I never said anything about an executed agreement. I said there was an agreement that had been drawn up specifying terms which included cash and stock in FD Pharma.

Obviously, you can't sue for an agreement that wasn't executed. However, it's an important piece of evidence in proving just how deep the relationship was before FD Pharma thought it was better to steal the drink than pay for it.

[StockItOut]

But you know there was a contract how?

The crickets informed you?

[StockItOut]

Why if the lawsuit is about a much more significant broken contract agreement (as you've alluded and apparently fabricated), why is the suit filed by GBB about only a broken NDA? Why?

One answer to this 'why' is that you just made it up.


You could support your claim with substance of explanation and supportive citation of documentation, but you don't.

.

[StockItOut]

Why did GBB first solicit FSD Pharma? It wasn't the other-way-around.

.