Energous Corp. (WATT)

[Stock_Barber]

That video is amusing! Quite the share-marketing fantasy!

Will anyone buy a wireless charger that takes 24+ hours to charge something that has to be VERY close to the charger?

Hell no!

[Stock_Barber]

Similar FCC nonsense was used about a year ago to promote/dump shares. When they got FCC approval for their contact-based charger, they saw a similar, and short lived, bump from false expectations of a useless technology.

How did that work out?

Investing in technology requires technical knowledge...

[Major_Bankz]

Check out the Video==> https://www.energous.com/wireless-charging-2-0-video/

[power11]

VERY SIMPLE FOLKS !!
with a market cap of 100 million
WATT WOULD BE A GREAT take over candidate for many companies.
certainly 6-8 dollar a share would be a conservative takeover price.

[ZIA SPIRIT]

WATT will blow the lid off in After market hours.

[Stock_Barber]

Bullshit!

There are MAJOR disadvantages of WATT's technology over other established means to do wireless charging...

WATT's product was DOA!

[crudeoil24]

WATT > $$$$$ > massive ATM machine > everyone makin bank!

[crudeoil24]

Education is good . The FCC and WATT partnership is transforming WATT into an many international revenue streams from upcoming contracts.

[Stock_Barber]

Energous just withdrew its cumulative forecast, citing the coronavirus uncertainties and the bankruptcy of potential partner ZPower.

When in doubt, blame the Wuhan flu!

DOH!

[Stock_Barber]

What does that irrelevant cut and paste have to do with WATT?

Nothing... nothing at all...

[Roadtojourney]

Common this deserve better price??

[crudeoil24]

FCC & WATT > The FCC has mandatory requirements before a product can be used, sold, or even marketed in some cases. Depending on the type of equipment that the product is, manufacturers are required to meet the FCC requirements for Certification and Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (SDoC), formerly Verification or Declaration of Conformity (DoC). The most common FCC requirements are FCC Part 15 Subpart A, FCC Part 15 Subpart B, FCC Part 15 Subpart C and FCC Part 18.

A lot of manufacturers do not know or believe their products have to be tested for FCC compliance. This is due to a lack of information or research and the misconception that there is only a requirement if the product uses RF intentionally or is a wireless product, but that is not the case. FCC Part 15 Subpart B is for unintentional radiators that use IC chips, oscillators, clocks, or one of any other numerous active electronic components.

FCC Suppliers Declaration of Conformity (FCC SDoC), formerly Verification, is a process that requires the manufacturer to insure that their product complies with the requirements of the appropriate FCC rules and regulations. FCC Part 15 Subpart B lists the emissions limits and requirements. Testing to the appropriate test methods is typically the only way to prove the requirements are met. F2 Labs is an accredited laboratory with the equipment, experience, and expertise to help ensure your product is compliant with the appropriate regulations. For testing to FCC Part 15 Subpart B, there is no requirement for the test data or information to be submitted to the Commission for approval unless specifically requested. Products must be labeled appropriately to show that they are in compliance with the FCC rules for Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (FCC SDoC). These labeling requirements are also given in FCC Part 15.

Per the FCC KDB 996369 D01 Module Equip Auth Guide V02:

A host product itself is required to comply with all other applicable FCC equipment authorization regulations, requirements, and equipment functions that are not associated with the transmitter module portion. For example. Compliance must be demonstrated: to regulations for other transmitter components within a host product; to requirements for unintentional radiators (Part 15 Subpart B), such as digital devices, computer peripherals, radio receivers, etc.; and to additional authorization requirements for the no-transmitter functions on the transmitter module (i.e., Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity, formerly Verification or Declaration of Conformity) as appropriate (e.g., Bluetooth and Wi-Fi transmitter modules may also contact digital logic functions).

To ensure compliance for all non-transmitter functions, a host product manufacturer is responsible for ensuring compliance with the module(s) installed and fully operational. For example, if a host product was previously authorized as an unintentional radiator under the Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity, formerly Declaration of Conformity, procedure without containing a certified transmitter module, then a module is added, the host manufacturer is responsible for ensuring that the host continues to be compliance with the FCC Part 15 subpart B unintentional radiator requirements after the module is installed and operational. Because this may depend of the details of how the module is integrated within the host, the module grantee (the party responsible for the module grant) shall provide guidance to the host manufacturer for ensuring compliance with the Part 15 Subpart B requirements.

Click here for additional information

FCC Certification is covered under Part 15 Subpart C for intentional radiators. The most common types of intentional radiators are Wi-Fi or Bluetooth devices, remote control devices, intermittent transmitters such as garage door openers and alarm transmitters. Intentional radiators covered under FCC Part 15 Subpart C must have their product tested and certified by an accredited laboratory like F2 Labs, and then submitted for approval by the Commission or an approved Telecommunications Certification Body (TCB). Once the product is approved, a Grant is issued and the manufacturer can start to market and sell their product with the approved labeling.

The FCC Part 15 Subpart C rules for marketing, sales, and use of radio transmitters are fairly clear with regards to the limits and requirements of each test required, but FCC Part 15 Subpart C does not list the procedures for performing the tests. There are other technical standards used for the procedures and test methods. These standards are listed throughout FCC Part 15 rules like FCC Part 15.31. There are also other requirements not listed directly in the FCC Part 15 Subpart C rules. They are known as KDB’s that the Commission releases with additional requirements and sometimes even changes. These can be found on the FCC website under the Knowledge Database (KDB) section, but can be very difficult to navigate and understand if you are not sure what you are looking for. F2 Labs is very familiar with this process and can easily assist you through this process. Contact us for consultation, evaluation, and FCC testing Part 15 certification, Part 18 compliance testing, FCC SDoC testing, and more.

[Stock_Barber]

They will not get the cell phone market!

24+ hours to charge a phone!!!!

Again, the volume is on speculation and technical ignorance about the meaning of FCC approval!

This is a game, and it will CRASH when exposed!

TRADE IT, BUT DON'T BELIEVE IT!

[ZIA SPIRIT]

I am not sure why peole don’t think this is huge. The cell phone market alone is worth billions for them

[ANTI-BAGHOLDER]

We are talking about over $200 million in volume so far today!

[crudeoil24]

Yup!...

[ANTI-BAGHOLDER]

The cash flow says it all...

[ANTI-BAGHOLDER]

80 million in volume is massively huge

[crudeoil24]

FCC regulatory health and safety standards

[crudeoil24]

The company said the new transmitter is based on a single advanced antenna and newly developed chip components with an innovative system architecture, which eliminates the use of beam-forming techniques while passing applicable FCC regulatory health and safety standards. The new technology would make it easier for consumer electronic, medical, industrial and automotive manufactures to integrate the WattUp technology based on its simplified design, smaller footprint and reduced cost.

[Stock_Barber]

It is not HUGE...

Again, the FCC approval here is kind of like trying to sell a car radio that the volume can't be turned up above 1!

[Major_Bankz]

Safety Approval is HUGE, means it can be sold to Consumers.

[Stock_Barber]

just like saying FDA approval does not mean anything to a drug.

Not at all! Apples and oranges!

FCC approval is like UL approval, not FDA approval!

FCC/UL means a device passes safety tests. FDA verifies safety and efficacy!

These are basic FACTS and NOT subject to debate!

[Major_Bankz]

MY ELECTRIC SHAVER can use this TECH, HUGE!

[Major_Bankz]

JUST saw the WEBSITE amazing TECH ==> https://energous.com/

[Major_Bankz]

that's the funniest thing ever, just like saying FDA approval does not mean anything to a drug.

[Stock_Barber]

As I said... TRADE IT, DON'T BELIEVE IT!

FCC approval has no relation to market acceptance of the technology WHATSOEVER!

[StaleyCornell]

All you need to know is this hit 4.17

[Major_Bankz]

ITS A GO for me, the market seems to agree with me

[Stock_Barber]

Sorry, no go...

[Major_Bankz]

CELL Phones/ Accessories, Head Phones are HUGE market.

[Stock_Barber]

FCC VALIDATION NEWS is HUGE

No, it is not.

Look at what was ACTUALLY approved!

They cannot transmit enough power to be practical for real world applications!

There are FAR BETTER alternatives already on the market that aren't even being adopted!

[Stock_Barber]

Sure that would be HUGE... dangerous, inefficient, and impossible!

I know that it is technical, but let me summarize...

THE POWER LEVEL THAT THE FCC JUST APPROVED COULDN'T CHARGE A TELSA IN A MONTH!

If the FACTS matter...

[Major_Bankz]

Timing and NEWS is everything, FCC VALIDATION NEWS is HUGE!

[Major_Bankz]

Should go back to $20 this week.

[Stock_Barber]

Yup... and how did that pan out for investors who believed the company's nonsense at that price?

[Major_Bankz]

Imagine charging your Tesla wirelessly HUGE!

[Major_Bankz]

was $20 not too long ago

[Stock_Barber]

It won't hold... stocks move on misinformation and false rumors all the time.

At some point Wall Street traders and SCIENCE will always meet!

The SCIENCE always wins over ill-informed "to the moon" leap before one looks trading!

ALWAYS!

[Major_Bankz]

In WATT @ 3.03

[ANTI-BAGHOLDER]

WATT breaking out now

[S3lfMade]

Great move... Hopefully they cancel R/S vote scheduled for May now.

[StaleyCornell]

Don't look now

[StaleyCornell]

Epic move here

[Stock_Barber]

All the proof that anyone needs it right here:

[StaleyCornell]

Post link of that for proof. Thanks

[Stock_Barber]

NOTHING will happen with the technology... EVER!

They have tried to peddle this crap to 100's of companies... for MANY years... and how many have licensed it?

<cue the crickets>

No company was waiting for FCC approval to license this!

DOA!

[ZIA SPIRIT]

This could really turn out to be an incredible place to buy. Big things could happen here

[captbob2112]

LOL well this is fun and interesting!

Holding WATT from some years back with a $16 avg.
*snicker*

MAYBE ... !!

Congrats to those with more realistic averages!

[Stock_Barber]

Apple is fully aware of the technology and has already rejected it... "FCC approval", or not!