Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lol its still up 100% from a day before?? Imo
If you really knew the company and state of things you wouldn’t be saying that.
Tech is good. But no reg approval in SK and China and this is nowhere. Japan only approved Near Field. Products won’t launch without it and company needs $$ between now and that long timeline. Dilution. Again. And maybe once again.
Do your DD.
I think this is a battle with longs and shorts that were caught off guard yesterday. This thing just jumped to $4 from like $3.20 like it was nothing. More of that coming imo. News is too incredible.
Nice premarket buy this morning.
Gonna break $5 tomorrow. Short squeeze in progress.
Borrowed from my 1000%er gold stock to ride this one up. Glad I just had a hunch to check on this stock today. Had no idea about the latest news.
Upswing in motion after hours. Solid indicator to push $4 and above.
piece of crap.. gonna collapse back to $1.04. SOB
* * $WATT Video Chart 04-21-2020 * *
Link to Video - click here to watch the technical chart video
Crazy volume, could see one hell of a SQUEEEEZE...
And there you down, someone is very happy seems like ?? imo
Probably see $5 tomorrow.
On the contrary... sellers are finally doing their DD...
And realizing that FCC approval is meaningless!
It is not "certified"...
It is FCC approved because it was found not to emit energy that exceeds safety and radio interference limits.
That and $5 will get someone a cup of Starbucks!
The FCC approval costs like 2 grand, and is in no way a testament that the product works or is viable!
Suggesting that FCC approval means a product works or will sell... is like claiming a document with a notary stamp is truthful!
Maybe there will be a network of charging now this has been certified.
WITH A MARKET CAP OF 100 MILLION
Look at the insane cash flow
I work from home and constantly have my phone plugged in.
IT IS ALL ABOUT MARKET CAP AND VALUATION PERIOD.
AGAIN WITH A MARKET CAP OF 100 MILLION; THIS IS A GOOD FIT FOR MANY COMPANIES, 100 MILLION IS A SPIT IN THE BUCKET.
LET'S NOT OVER ANALYZE.
$20 by FRIDAY! maybe HIGHER.
No one spends 24+ hours in their car?
Sure they do. I work from home and constantly have my phone plugged in.
my PORSCHE Panamera needs this TECH to charge my CellPHONE in the CAR.
Again, no one wants a charger that requires the user to effectively place the device very near the charger and takes 24+ hours to charge the device!
I can place a device on a competitor's charger and get a full charge in under an hour!
DOA!
Agree, add at dip
$20 by Friday! my ELECTRIC SHAVER needs one of this.
That video is amusing! Quite the share-marketing fantasy!
Will anyone buy a wireless charger that takes 24+ hours to charge something that has to be VERY close to the charger?
Hell no!
Similar FCC nonsense was used about a year ago to promote/dump shares. When they got FCC approval for their contact-based charger, they saw a similar, and short lived, bump from false expectations of a useless technology.
How did that work out?
Investing in technology requires technical knowledge...
VERY SIMPLE FOLKS !!
with a market cap of 100 million
WATT WOULD BE A GREAT take over candidate for many companies.
certainly 6-8 dollar a share would be a conservative takeover price.
WATT will blow the lid off in After market hours.
Bullshit!
There are MAJOR disadvantages of WATT's technology over other established means to do wireless charging...
WATT's product was DOA!
WATT > $$$$$ > massive ATM machine > everyone makin bank!
Education is good . The FCC and WATT partnership is transforming WATT into an many international revenue streams from upcoming contracts.
Energous just withdrew its cumulative forecast, citing the coronavirus uncertainties and the bankruptcy of potential partner ZPower.
When in doubt, blame the Wuhan flu!
DOH!
What does that irrelevant cut and paste have to do with WATT?
Nothing... nothing at all...
Common this deserve better price??
FCC & WATT > The FCC has mandatory requirements before a product can be used, sold, or even marketed in some cases. Depending on the type of equipment that the product is, manufacturers are required to meet the FCC requirements for Certification and Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (SDoC), formerly Verification or Declaration of Conformity (DoC). The most common FCC requirements are FCC Part 15 Subpart A, FCC Part 15 Subpart B, FCC Part 15 Subpart C and FCC Part 18.
A lot of manufacturers do not know or believe their products have to be tested for FCC compliance. This is due to a lack of information or research and the misconception that there is only a requirement if the product uses RF intentionally or is a wireless product, but that is not the case. FCC Part 15 Subpart B is for unintentional radiators that use IC chips, oscillators, clocks, or one of any other numerous active electronic components.
FCC Suppliers Declaration of Conformity (FCC SDoC), formerly Verification, is a process that requires the manufacturer to insure that their product complies with the requirements of the appropriate FCC rules and regulations. FCC Part 15 Subpart B lists the emissions limits and requirements. Testing to the appropriate test methods is typically the only way to prove the requirements are met. F2 Labs is an accredited laboratory with the equipment, experience, and expertise to help ensure your product is compliant with the appropriate regulations. For testing to FCC Part 15 Subpart B, there is no requirement for the test data or information to be submitted to the Commission for approval unless specifically requested. Products must be labeled appropriately to show that they are in compliance with the FCC rules for Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (FCC SDoC). These labeling requirements are also given in FCC Part 15.
Per the FCC KDB 996369 D01 Module Equip Auth Guide V02:
A host product itself is required to comply with all other applicable FCC equipment authorization regulations, requirements, and equipment functions that are not associated with the transmitter module portion. For example. Compliance must be demonstrated: to regulations for other transmitter components within a host product; to requirements for unintentional radiators (Part 15 Subpart B), such as digital devices, computer peripherals, radio receivers, etc.; and to additional authorization requirements for the no-transmitter functions on the transmitter module (i.e., Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity, formerly Verification or Declaration of Conformity) as appropriate (e.g., Bluetooth and Wi-Fi transmitter modules may also contact digital logic functions).
To ensure compliance for all non-transmitter functions, a host product manufacturer is responsible for ensuring compliance with the module(s) installed and fully operational. For example, if a host product was previously authorized as an unintentional radiator under the Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity, formerly Declaration of Conformity, procedure without containing a certified transmitter module, then a module is added, the host manufacturer is responsible for ensuring that the host continues to be compliance with the FCC Part 15 subpart B unintentional radiator requirements after the module is installed and operational. Because this may depend of the details of how the module is integrated within the host, the module grantee (the party responsible for the module grant) shall provide guidance to the host manufacturer for ensuring compliance with the Part 15 Subpart B requirements.
Click here for additional information
FCC Certification is covered under Part 15 Subpart C for intentional radiators. The most common types of intentional radiators are Wi-Fi or Bluetooth devices, remote control devices, intermittent transmitters such as garage door openers and alarm transmitters. Intentional radiators covered under FCC Part 15 Subpart C must have their product tested and certified by an accredited laboratory like F2 Labs, and then submitted for approval by the Commission or an approved Telecommunications Certification Body (TCB). Once the product is approved, a Grant is issued and the manufacturer can start to market and sell their product with the approved labeling.
The FCC Part 15 Subpart C rules for marketing, sales, and use of radio transmitters are fairly clear with regards to the limits and requirements of each test required, but FCC Part 15 Subpart C does not list the procedures for performing the tests. There are other technical standards used for the procedures and test methods. These standards are listed throughout FCC Part 15 rules like FCC Part 15.31. There are also other requirements not listed directly in the FCC Part 15 Subpart C rules. They are known as KDB’s that the Commission releases with additional requirements and sometimes even changes. These can be found on the FCC website under the Knowledge Database (KDB) section, but can be very difficult to navigate and understand if you are not sure what you are looking for. F2 Labs is very familiar with this process and can easily assist you through this process. Contact us for consultation, evaluation, and FCC testing Part 15 certification, Part 18 compliance testing, FCC SDoC testing, and more.
They will not get the cell phone market!
24+ hours to charge a phone!!!!
Again, the volume is on speculation and technical ignorance about the meaning of FCC approval!
This is a game, and it will CRASH when exposed!
TRADE IT, BUT DON'T BELIEVE IT!
Followers
|
112
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
1816
|
Created
|
03/28/14
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |