Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
My Brain is Like a Sieve - Thomas Dolby
Danilo Perez—Across the Crystal Sea
Gordon Lightfoot - Wreck Of The Edmund Fitzgerald
Yep. And unfortunately in so many other places...
"They picked on the wrong guy.
It seems to me that there is no limit to the damage done by
the combination of ignorance and greed. They both run rampant
in the music business."
This case got the ball rolling;
What made it different is that Harrison jacked the melody........a PA copyright "No No."
The Chiffons - He's So Fine
They picked on the wrong guy.
It seems to me that there is no limit to the damage done by
the combination of ignorance and greed. They both run rampant
in the music business.
You would know Sheeran has experience in the area - Ed Sheeran wins Shape of You copyright case and hits out at 'baseless' claims
Published 6 April 2022
IMAGE
Ed Sheeran has won a High Court copyright battle over his 2017 hit Shape of You.
A judge ruled on Wednesday that the singer-songwriter had not plagiarised the 2015 song Oh Why by Sami Chokri.
Chokri, a grime artist who performs under the name Sami Switch, had claimed the "Oh I" hook in Sheeran's track was "strikingly similar" to an "Oh why" refrain in his own track.
After the ruling, Sheeran said such "baseless" claims "are way too common".
In a video on social media, he said there was now a culture "where a claim is made with the idea that a settlement will be cheaper than taking it to court, even if there's no basis for the claim".
He added: "It's really damaging to the songwriting industry. There's only so many notes and very few chords used in pop music.
"Coincidence is bound to happen if 60,000 songs are being released every day on Spotify. That's 22 million songs a year and there's only 12 notes that are available."
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-61006984
He makes a good point there.
Ed Townsend - For Your Love
To be clear,
I only know what the plaintiffs counsel should have known.
I wouldn't be surprised if Sheeran counter sued for this frivolous
lawsuit. It became obvious to me long ago, that there's no
such thing as bad publicity in the entertainment business.
Sheeran will benefit greatly, but in this case, I think the Townsend
estate will wind up paying out a lot of money with no upside.
You obviously know more. Glad the jury backed your position up.
I'm surprised the jury took 3 hours
to reach that decision. It was a no-brainer based on the evidence.
Ed Sheeran wins copyright infringement lawsuit involving 'Thinking Out Loud'
June 24, 2015 - "MARVIN GAYE & TAMMI TERRELL "Ain't no Mountain High Enough"
Video no longer unavailable -- copyright claim"
Related: Ed Sheeran live at the MCG in Melbourne 2nd of March 2023
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171348126
The case involved "Thinking Out Loud" and Marvin Gaye's "Let's Get It On."
By Aaron Katersky and Meredith Deliso
May 5, 2023, 3:58 AM
VIDEO - Ed Sheeran speaks after being found not liable for copyright infringement
"These claims need to be stopped so the creative process can continue and we c...
Ed Sheeran has defeated a copyright infringement lawsuit involving his Grammy-
winning song "Thinking Out Loud" and the Marvin Gaye classic "Let's Get It On."
A Manhattan jury has found the musician did not engage in willful copyright infringement
following a trial that saw Sheeran playing guitar and singing in court.
The jury reached its decision after roughly three hours of deliberations.
Sheeran, seated at the defense table in a suit and tie between his lawyers, hugged his attorneys when the verdict was read.
"I'm obviously very happy with the outcome of the case. And it looks like I'm not having to retire from my day job after all," Sheeran told reporters outside the courthouse. "But at the same time, I'm unbelievably frustrated that baseless claims like this are allowed to go to court at all."
https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/jury-reaches-verdict-ed-sheeran-copyright-infringement-case/story?id=99022695
As I recall, among his other achievements,
Ed Townsend was a lawyer. He knew there was no case for
the writer, but after he passed away, I presume the "estate"
filed this lawsuit fishing for money..
If the 2014 song was an obvious ripoff, why wait so long before filing a lawsuit?
Ed Townsend's estate only holds a PA
(writer's) copyright on the melody, words and vaguely, the chord changes
on Let's Get It On. While a lot of the changes are similar, they're not exclusive,
and the melodies are totally different. IMO, the suit will fail based on all of that being true.
The rightful party to sue Sheeran, in this case, would be Motown Records, who
holds the SR copyright (a particular & unique configuration of sounds).
on the actual recording, from which it was sampled, if they were used
w/o permission.
Most probably, a fee was paid to obtain those samples from the original record, as
is now the absolute necessity in big time production.
ED SHEERAN VS. MARVIN GAYE LAWSUIT: Let's Compare!
Copyright infringement or coincidence?
Or legitimate use of a common chord progression?
I lean towards the latter. I would not immediately think of one of these songs if I heard the other.
Did Ed Sheeran Copy Marvin Gaye's "Let's Get It On"?
Marvin Gaye - Let's Get It On
Lenny Kravitz - How Long Have You Been Blind (Harry Belafonte Tribute)
Harry Belafonte - Day-O (The Banana Boat Song)
John Coltrane - Giant Steps (full album)
Hey, Stiv. Hope all is well. Really liked that second one a lot!
Ylvis - Trucker's Hitch
(Okay, a little silly.)
Ylvis - The Fox (What Does The Fox Say?)
Paul McCartney and Wings -Love Is Strange
Commander Cody and His Lost Planet Airmen - Hot Rod Lincoln
Isao Tomita - Snowflakes Are Dancing
Frank Zappa - Work With Me Annie / Annie Had A Baby
Sad songs say so much!
Use Q7XJb7aWv80 not =Q7XJb7aWv80&t=15s
Thank you for trying to share your musical interests.
Window Washer Blues
Plus, eliminate any space between [yt] link
Nowwhat2 Look up song_by_name & try_again.
What ?.....You made that one (those ones) WORK ?.....Oh, nice !
Thanks !......Excellent.....Cheers !
You found it! A defective one. I tried just using the link, no space, and got a blank too.
So, you'd just have to use XqrYPyLYZbY and the brackets like you just did. Just the stuff between the = and the &.
HAGO!
Oh !......So we only go up to the & sign now !
Lemme try......Ah !....Nice ! Thanks
Read carefully.
You only need what comes after the = and before the &
Q7XJb7aWv80
Secondly, you don't want that space between the y and t.
Or just post the ENTIRE link, including the http:
Either way works.
Thanks guys but nope.....Darn.
The old = thing (with y) don't work neither
[y t]Q7XJb7aWv80&t=15s[/y t]
Too many = signs in there ?
Now without the space
Followers
|
309
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
239966
|
Created
|
05/25/04
|
Type
|
Premium
|
Moderator Missy | |||
Assistants murrayhill Old_Drummerman |
Welcome to the board. Feel free to post some of your favorite music vids. Sit a spell. Stay a while!
Posts Today
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
239966
|
Posters
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Assistants
|
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |