Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
could happen come New Ur
Here is the proper respond from the poster.
"Talking about DIGAF. Obviously, now you have no attachment because they are under investigation. You did indeed have relationships with them. This was announced around the time their stock was haulted."
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/digatrade-provides-shareholder-133000685.html.
What they say is 100% illegal because shareholders has stake in the company.
They were reminded of some facts But they never responded back to the poster.
This is total BS it doesn't make any sense.
Lol you asked…
Your information is incorrect which means you are likely not a shareholder. Securter is a private company communicating with their shareholders directly advising them of all latest developments. FYI there is no longer any relationship between $DGIF / Mr.Moynes and Securter.
— Securter (@securter) October 10, 2022
give us the link!!
Assuming English is your second language?.
Stop posting BS lies.
That could take a while.
Twitter post from 10/8/22
“Securter is a private company communicating with their shareholders directly advising them of all latest developments. FYI there is no longer any relationship between $DGIF / Mr.Moynes and Securter.”
That is total and complete nonsense BS.
Securter Has responsibility to DIGAF's shareholders by law To release a statement to inform them of such a change because they have more than 15% stake in the company unless They want a lawsuit on their hand.
LMFAO..
New Securter Systems Inc IHUB board.
Go here to post about Securter:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Securter-Systems-Inc-fka--41622
The termination was not a public event. Got it directly from Securter. They needed to distance Securter from the fall out from DIGAF and Brad.
Don't expect anything until the case with SEC is settled.
things will start to move on the right direction once he is cleared.
I'm thinking a merger.
When is Securter going to IPO thou? On Canadian exchange? How are the DIGAF shareholders going to benefit or receive those Securter shares?
DIGAF is still 'Pink Current' because of its recent filings in May-June, 22 but "Caveat Emptor " status currently and can't be traded (Only can sell). Next filings come due in just a few months, April-May, 23.
Brad is gone. The website is dead.
http://www.digatradefinancial.com/
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DIGAF/disclosure
Anyone got response from Securter or Brad?
Even Moneymaker pumped and sold his shares. He is gone.
Digatrade owns 4,396,000 of a total issued and outstanding of 28,506,000 shares of DIGAF. It's very simple concept. That means If you are an the existing shareholders of DIGAF, You own Part of Securter's Shares. Securter Only has 28,506,000. Usually insiders / founders Owns Up to 30 to 40% of these shares That makes 4,396,000 A big deal because of such a low float .
Hopefully that helps.
And yes DIGAF Shareholders will be Just like Regular shareholders of Securter.
The details will be provided at the time of IPO.
"Securter terminated Digatrade’s marketing agreements with cause."
Really? Can you verify that? provide a link where you got that information from.
And yes DIGAF Shareholders will be Just like Regular shareholders of Securter.
The details will be provided at the time of IPO.
I said it on a prior post and everyone thought I was wrong. Securter dropped DIGAF and any “contract” they may have had. Brad is a fraud and we’re all going to lose money. You can’t even trade this on an exchange (in the US at least) so it doesn’t matter what Securter does. Brads lawyers are going to be expensive so he’s going to liquidate any thing he can to pay for council (likely including his Securter shares if he can).
The only “hope” is that they can somehow prove this didn’t happen. I’d put it at 10000:1. Good luck hoping.
When is Securter IPO?
How are the DIGAF shareholders going to benefit from owing Securter shares if DIGAF isn't relisted for trading? tia.
Securter terminated Digatrade’s marketing agreements with cause.
Sorry, a little late to the earlier discussion but here are three points I would like to share.
1) I did get caught in the pump and dump scam that is being referred to, so it did exist.
2) Securter terminated Digatrade’s marketing agreements with cause.
3) Yes, DIGAF still holds the shares people are referring to in Securter. Question is, will share holders ever see a dime from them even if Securter rockets up?
JUST HAVE TO WAIT IT OUT
How about DIGAF?
Any opinions? tia.
Ditto, I’m in deep too.. I’m such a sucker…. Keep sending the good news..
All he needs to prove is reasonable doubt with a good lawyer. This MF better win this. Stock May never recover tbh. Hope I’m wrong. I’m in deep.
Agreed. he must be innocent of all allegations to demand TBJ.
in these financial cases with SEC, if there is the slightest chance of guilt, they usually bow down to SEC demand. Like I said before, someone must have tipped them off out of Avenge not facts. That's why he's standing up to fight these allegations. it took him a while but that explains he was probably preparing his case. Trial by jury on behalf of the defendant in most cases have a favorable outcome.
Wish I could buy some more shares now is really worth the gamble.
He should win ~ TBJ
Good news. Why deny something that is inevitable unless it isn't. Therefore, sec has donuts. We will see but if he was guilty and they had the goods why prolong it and fight it or reject it as he has done. Something not right here lets see if this skyrockets down the line but only time will tell. All lies will be revealed.
Finally some good news. It's more likely, SEC being misinformed.
it's like someone has tipped them off out of Avenge not facts.
i like that he came forward challenging these accusations.
Well, if he is truly innocent, he’ll show that every dollar did indeed pay off debt. The hidden accounts will likely never be traced back to him (even if he was using them). I guess the only way they can tie him to those funds would be his lifestyle. His salary was known for years so if he’s living well beyond that, he’ll have to show where that income came from. If he can’t, then he’s done for (which is likely the case anyway). The SEC has the dirt. They wouldn’t waste their time on a nobody unless they already had the proof. The fact he was dealing with a fraud who has been prosecuted and fined smells super fishy. It’ll be easy to prove the case based on that along with following the money. Hope I’m wrong… this will all take time to play out. Odds are not in any stuck shareholders favor.
2022-10-28 20:30 ET - Street Wire
See Street Wire (U-*SEC) U S Securities and Exchange Commission
by Mike Caswell
Bradley Moynes, a Vancouver man accused by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of running a $6-million pump-and-dump on the OTC Markets, denies that he did anything wrong. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The SEC says that Mr. Moynes unloaded millions of shares in a cryptocurrency listing during a paid promotion that boosted the stock to 96 cents. He had held the stock through nominee accounts, according to the SEC.
The denials from Mr. Moynes are contained in an answer that he filed in federal court in Boston on Friday, Oct. 28. The document is 11 pages long, but it contains few details. In response to most of the SEC's allegations, Mr. Moynes flatly denies any wrongdoing. He does admit to many routine things, such as the fact that he is 51 years old and lives in British Columbia.
One of Mr. Moynes's more interesting admissions is that he was a client of West Vancouver's Frederick Sharp. The SEC separately charged Mr. Sharp, claiming that he ran a service that catered to those looking to run a stock market scheme. He and his group provided encrypted communications and a network of offshore companies that penny stock promoters used in multiple pump-and-dump schemes. His group facilitated the sale of about $1-billion worth of stock, according to the SEC. Mr. Sharp did not answer the case, and on May 12, 2022, the SEC won a permanent ban and a $52.9-million judgment.
The SEC said that Mr. Sharp helped Mr. Moynes secretly hold shares. By using Mr. Sharp's services, Mr. Moynes was able to fraudulently conceal that he was selling shares of two companies when he was serving as the president of those companies, the SEC claimed. While Mr. Moynes admits to becoming one of Mr. Sharp's clients in 2014, he denies that he used any illicit services or that there was anything illegal about Mr. Sharp's operation.
Mr. Moynes also denies that he had any association with Luis Carrillo, a known securities violator who allegedly boosted Mr. Moynes's company through a boiler room in Colombia. The SEC said that the boiler room encouraged investors to buy while Mr. Moynes issued news releases about new business ventures. As with the other portions of his answer, Mr. Moynes provides no details, simply denying that he did anything wrong.
In legal terms, Mr. Moynes says that the SEC has failed to state a claim, lacks jurisdiction and filed the case too late. He also says that he acted in good faith and did not intend to deceive, mislead or defraud investors, among other things. He asks that the case be dismissed, and demands a trial by jury.
The denials from Mr. Moynes come four months after the SEC charged him, filing a civil complaint on June 27, 2022, in the District of Massachusetts. The case arose in part from the promotion of an OTC Markets listing called Digatrade Financial Corp., which called itself a "global digital asset exchange and blockchain development services company." The SEC claimed that Mr. Moynes set himself up as the hidden owner of a large block of shares in early 2014. The stock, supposedly issued to settle old debts, was held through nominee entities, according to the complaint.
As part of the scheme, Mr. Moynes directed manipulative trades designed to support and inflate the price of Digatrade, the SEC claimed. According to the complaint, he had traders purchase the stock at the end of the day, a practice known as marking the close. In one example provided by the SEC, Mr. Moynes's trades boosted the stock to a 57-cent close, up from 25 cents the prior day. The trading came alongside activity by the Colombian boiler room operation, the SEC said.
The scheme, as set out by the SEC, began to attract regulatory attention in December, 2016, when FINRA (the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) questioned Mr. Moynes about Digatrade's volume and price increases. In particular, FINRA noted that the activity accompanied news releases that Mr. Moynes had issued as president. According to the SEC, Mr. Moynes told FINRA that he did not trade the stock and did not know anyone who had.
About a month later, Mr. Moynes found himself needing more shares to carry on the scheme, the SEC said. According to the complaint, he arranged the issuance of eight million shares in a purported shares-for-debt deal. Once again, he placed the shares in nominee accounts and unloaded the stock on the market, the SEC said. He repeated this pattern many times over 2018, according to the SEC.
In all, the trading generated $5.9-million, the SEC said. Of that, Mr. Moynes and companies associated with him received $1.5-million, according to the complaint. The SEC further claimed that Mr. Moynes realized $256,000 in gains through a scheme with another stock, Formcap Corp., which was supposedly an oil and gas explorer. That stock no longer trades.
The SEC is seeking a permanent ban, disgorgement of gains and an appropriate fine. Digatrade, which hit a 96-cent high during the scheme, was last at 0.01 cent.
Prior to his present trouble, Mr. Moynes worked in the brokerage industry. He was at Georgia Pacific Securities Corp. until 2000, when he began work at a predecessor company to Digatrade.
Whatever happened to MM34
SOON
.25 COMING
.25 FORTH WITH
Not sure.
But no online buy order for ETrade.
How many are tradable on American exchanges?
DIGAF SECURITY DETAILS
Share Structure
Market Cap Market Cap
512,691
10/19/2022
Authorized Shares
Unlimited
10/12/2022
Outstanding Shares
1,708,969,288
10/12/2022
Restricted
10,673,449
10/12/2022
Unrestricted
1,698,295,839
10/12/2022
Held at DTC
1,698,228,377
10/12/2022
Float
368,513,533
11/05/2019
Par Value
No Par Value
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DIGAF/security
You are twisting facts it's pointless responding to your nonsense.
I told you this is not about Brad.
SECURTER has product You are clueless Just posting BS.
https://twitter.com/securter
It takes time for a start up company to set up things right.
The other hurdle is getting through court proceedings. So far, we’ve heard ZERO from Digatrade. Nothing.
Nobody in the US can even trade the stock. This thing is going nowhere.
It sounds like DIGA will need to pay for some lawyers soon. Curious where all that $ is going to come from.
As far as their “marketing agreement”…. SECURTER has no product. They have been talking since when, 2019? When was that marketing agreement signed? 2020? It’s going on the 3rd year and they still don’t have a product selling. Who are they marketing to? Goats?
Good luck with that.
Digatrade owns 4,396,000 of a total issued and outstanding of 28,506,000 shares of Securter Systems AND the exclusive marketing and distribution rights to the technology for two key territories: South America and the United Kingdom. When they go IPO, Shareholders have the sweet spot.
This is not about Brad.
You don't seems to have much understanding just babbling.
Lol. Ok. The fact that Brad is no longer on linked in, website is gone, twitter is deleted means they are done. He’s in hiding. Keep on believing….
You don't seems to understand. Digatrade is an equity shareholder in Securter Already. The recent incident does not change That fact. In other words Digatrade's Shareholders Took a stakes in Securter. Website not existing, probably have to do with Securter Going IPO soon DIGAF could be changed to a different ticker. And yes, in five years, a lot could happen let's hope the planet is not destroyed by nuclear war.
My last post for the day.
So you think that 5 year marketing agreement is still valid when said company is non-existent? The internal ownership will likely be figured out internally. Doubt Securter would touch this stock based on its condition. Website doesn’t even exist anymore. Company is gone and so should be your hopes of some type of buyout. Lol. Nobody would touch this ticker. It’s cancerous.
Wrong. unbeREEvable is correct. Digatrade acquired an exclusive five-year Licensing Agreement By diluting shareholders in order to inquire 17% stake.
It's true at the moment that Securter Is a private company but... .....
Going IPO is in progress
............................................................................................................................
As an equity partner of Securter, Digatrade provides an update on the Securter progress towards its public listing and that it continues to advance its planned Initial Public Offering ("IPO") with the Prospectus now under review by the Underwriter. Securter's IPO process continues to move forward with the financial audit, merit assessment and detailed corporate review now completed.
...........................................................................................................................
https://securter.com/
That's what launching soon means in their website.
Talk about misinformed!! guess who?
Twitter: Your information is incorrect which means you are likely not a shareholder. Securter is a private company communicating with their shareholders directly advising them of all latest developments. FYI there is no longer any relationship between $DGIF / Mr.Moynes and Securter.
Digatrade is an equity shareholder in Securter.
I am surprised you didn't know that.
We have 17% of their stock, a service agreement and we diluted our shares to help fund their start up no affiliation? really?
Why would they? They don’t need DIGAF for anything. They’ve publicly stated that they have zero affiliation with Diga. I think they deleted my tweet but they said they had nothing to do with them. Doubt it brah.
You are partially right. But I am expecting A surprise from SECURTER.
Either a buyout, or share conversion.
https://securter.com/
The stock and company are dead. This board will be deleted eventually. Website down, no more Brad on social media or professional websites… looks like black and white stripes to me.
Followers
|
394
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
42940
|
Created
|
02/11/11
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |