Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Unless they go up 10,000%+
Triple zero stocks suck 666
Lol! Some fellow malt mates meandering around murky ihub
Did I hear correctly Trump is going
Back to Jamaica now?
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=where+was+trump+born
Trump says if you don’t love America, leave it.
— VICE News (@VICENews) July 19, 2019
He’s been bashing the U.S. for years. pic.twitter.com/Kyk5oRXx1U
That Anita is very nice.
U know a lot of pretty girls ;).
Almost bed time
In Reply to 'Nitwit' on 'Da Lair 666'
;), Yeah, weird - like a contract/job
Years later, even after so much
Attention to detail at the time
Just a blur
I think we remember
What is important to us
In the Now
At the Here
Everybody knows
this
is
NowHere, lol
Thanks!
I don't even remember posting that
Good point Nit
Almost like a prison sentence
Much more than 231 views
All women seem hotter, when drinking
Alex Jones INFOWARS 2001 - 911 Twin Towers Full Report (5 Hours)
231 views
Huh? ,
Ignor-what?
12 year plan
Everyone ignores us
Music and our evolution
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/the-nerve-pt-2-how-music-made-us-evolve-as-humans-1.5206595
Cheers!, Happy 4th!,..
https://imagez.tmz.com/image/c6/16by9/2019/07/01/c6ba546d3a2d4b4fa4b59b3401ee8551_xs.jpg
Wonder if ipub will have a banner
Happy Canada Day ;)
L.A. has 333 follows - something half diabolical bout' dat (?).
Jon Meacham and Tim McGraw: How Country Music Explains America’s Divided History
It’s never just about right versus left. In songs and in politics, things are more complicated.
By Jon Meacham and Tim McGraw
Mr. Meacham and Mr. McGraw are the authors of “Songs of America: Patriotism, Protest, and the Music That Made a Nation.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/15/opinion/sunday/country-music-tim-mcgraw-jon-meacham.html
Avg. response time 5 seconds
jon stewart 911 comp
Jon Stewart testifies for September 11 Victim Compensation Fund: "Accountability doesn’t appear to be something that occurs in this chamber…I'm sorry if I sound angry and undiplomatic, but I am angry, and you should be too." pic.twitter.com/njxJzSmzSJ
— CSPAN (@cspan) June 11, 2019
Bounded reflexive human animal machinations
https://d2r55xnwy6nx47.cloudfront.net/uploads/2019/06/Shuttlecock_Universe_2880x1620_Lede-2880x1620.jpg
I've always known space and time were human constructs (useful for some/annoying to others)
https://d2r55xnwy6nx47.cloudfront.net/uploads/2019/06/No-boundary-Graphic-v5-897x1720.jpg
Much like the arrogance of putting words in God's mouth (not talking minisuperspace ;)
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0690/5113/products/17103_5a33029bc86929.93921092_rockoutshuttlecockout.postcard_1000x.jpg?v=1550692046
https://www.google.com/search?q=to+know+that+one+does+not+know+is+true+knowledge+images&tbm=isch&source=univ&client=firefox-b-d&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjrh8C4odziAhXCMd8KHYFEC1MQsAR6BAgGEAE&biw=1270&bih=839
https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-debate-hawkings-idea-that-the-universe-had-no-beginning-20190606/?utm_source=pocket-newtab
I am the centre of then universe
The wind of time is blowing through me
And it's all moving relative to me
It's all a figment of my mind
In a world that I've designed
I'm charged with cosmic energy
Has the world gone mad or is it me?
I'm the creator of this universe
And all that is was meant to be
So that we might learn to see
The foolishness that lives in us
And stupidity that we must suss
How to banish from our minds
If you call this living, I must be blind
People With Extreme Political Views Have Trouble Thinking About Their Own Thinking
.. one characteristic of those who hold extreme beliefs—their metacognition, or ability to evaluate whether or not they might be wrong.
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/people-with-extreme-political-views-have-trouble-thinking-about-their-own-thinking?utm_source=pocket-newtab
Thanks Mang!.
OT:
Specioul
Spatial
Don't tell me how the universe is altered
When you find out how he gets paid, all right..
Hey Nit!.
Search function not working
I was going to link to
The last time you played that song ;).
OT:
I see you have 1998 followers now
Have you started to feel any of the
Symptoms of a millennium bug?.
Tenacious D vs the devil
I still see it in my mind like yesterday
The Legendary Power Of Eric Butterbean!
https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/2019/04/10/genx/47683de6bfec9d204ccef81eae871ee5c72c9400/genx-lisabonet.jpg
The greatest scam the music industry ever pulled off — well, hmm, one of the top 12 scams the music industry ever pulled off — CDs drained the wallets of a generation, starting in the later half of the early ’80s, with almost no tangible or long-term benefit. (Except when Prince released “Lovesexy” in 1988 and it was all one track and you couldn’t skip songs. That was awesome.) A very few CDs became cool dresses, and the rest became coasters and trash. And an entire generation learned to never trust again. — Choire Sicha
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/05/14/style/generation-xers.html?utm_source=pocket-newtab
Lol, 10.oo4 bud..
Awesuspicious post 10000 - gotta be spacial, lol..
.. azz pocket full of wisekeyz;
You can stand me up at the gates of hell
https://www.npr.org/2019/05/08/721228788/tom-petty-i-wont-back-down-american-anthem-resolve?utm_source=pocket-newtab
Psychologist Analyzes Donald Trump’s Voters, And Notes FIVE KEY TRAITS They All Have In Common
The mindset of a (rabid & unreasoning)Trump supporter has interested the mental health community since early in Trump’s campaign, but in a recent paper published in the Journal of Social and Political Psychology, Thoman Pettigrew, a psychologist and UC Santa Cruz professor, narrows the mentality to five different psychological phenomena.
1. Authoritarian Personality Syndrome (APS)
People with this syndrome believe in total and complete obedience to an authoritarian figure, even at the cost of their own personal freedom. They have little to no concern for truth, opinions, or the needs of others. They generally display aggression toward other groups and have a strict hierarchal view of society. They also find absolutist terms such as “complete disasters,” “losers,” and “fake” appealing.
2. Social Dominance Orientation (SDO)
SDO is similar to APS, but the people with SDO favor the societal hierarchy of groups, especially when there is a structure that gives a high-status group dominance over low-status ones. Trump appeals to the SDO mindset by making clear divisions between the high-status group (White) and the assumed lower status groups (everyone else).
3. Prejudice
While not every single one of Trump’s supporters is prejudiced against ethnic and religious minorities, many of them certainly are. Republicans, at least since the Nixon era, have favored a “southern strategy” which appeals to bigotry and laces speeches with “dog whistles”—code words to signal prejudice toward minorities, such as “animals,” as Trump recently used to describe Mexican immigrants. But that is subtle for Trump, even if less subtle than dog whistles used to be. Appealing to prejudice is why Trump demands people say “radical Islamic terrorism.”
4. Intergroup Contact
Or, more accurately, a lack thereof. Intergroup contact reduces prejudice when members of one group interact with people outside of their group. But many Trump supporters don’t have this experience. A 2016 study found that “…the racial and ethnic isolation of Whites at the zip-code level is one of the strongest predictors of Trump support.” In fact, Trump’s support increased the more physically distant voters were from the Mexican border.
5. Relative Deprivation (RD)
RD is about entitlement, and the anger one feels when they compare their station in life to those they feel are inferior or even equal to them. They believe others have unfairly gained more success than they had. While prejudice can play a role, RD also explains the non-bigoted Trump voter. They see their economic status dwindle, and are given someone to blame, such as China or Mexico, even if this claim is not accurate. These kinds of voters made Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Ohio swing to Trump.
If Pettigrew is correct, it certainly reiterates the idea that Trump supporters are “working class” citizens angry at the Democratic and Republican “elite”—and it is why Trump is now so set on attacking his own party.
NICOLE JAMES on "Tomi Lahren is a Pole Dancer" on FB
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148599401
Da Lair's been scammed:
https://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/640-width/images/print-edition/20190413_USP001_0.jpg
THE ROAD to Hell is paved with good tarmac. Water runs clear in its creek. The township in Michigan has only 72 residents, Hellians, but offers attractions aplenty. Post-office staff singe cards and stamp them, in blood-red ink, from Hell. Two bars—the Hell Hole and Hell Saloon—bustle with customers. Both of them, and a mini-golf course, are decorated with ghouls and monsters. Chuckling tourists browse a shopful of perdition-themed souvenirs. Most popular are T-shirts with slogans such as “Hell is my happy place”.
John Colone owns Screams, an ice-cream stall, and much of the commercial centre. His red-roofed wedding chapel last year hosted 81 marriage ceremonies (including ten same-sex ones). He also threw three “living wakes” for sick customers who wanted to party in Hell before they died. Some 150 people a year pay $100 to be declared Hell’s mayor for a day. Tourist-money generates 18 local jobs.
https://www.economist.com/united-states/2019/04/13/what-small-town-america-can-learn-from-a-town-called-hell
The huge challenges today to the preservation of human rights don't come out of the blue. They come out of a result of systemic weaknesses in those extraordinary, magnificent treaties: the UN Charter, all the Declarations of Humans Rights… Gareth Peirce
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/human-rights-under-attack-gareth-peirce-on-the-new-dark-age-1.4895455
HILLARY CLINTON: MUELLER DOCUMENTED A SERIOUS CRIME AGAINST ALL AMERICANS. HERE'S HOW TO RESPOND.
By Hillary Clinton
April 24 at 4:44 PM
Hillary Clinton was the 2016 Democratic nominee for president.
Our election was corrupted, our democracy assaulted, our sovereignty and security violated. This is the definitive conclusion of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report. It documents a serious crime against the American people.
The debate about how to respond to Russia’s “sweeping and systematic” attack — and how to hold President Trump accountable for obstructing the investigation and possibly breaking the law — has been reduced to a false choice: immediate impeachment or nothing. History suggests there’s a better way to think about the choices ahead.
Obviously, this is personal for me, and some may say I’m not the right messenger. But my perspective is not just that of a former candidate and target of the Russian plot. I am also a former senator and secretary of state who served during much of Vladimir Putin’s ascent, sat across the table from him and knows firsthand that he seeks to weaken our country.
I am also someone who, by a strange twist of fate, was a young staff attorney on the House Judiciary Committee’s Watergate impeachment inquiry in 1974, as well as first lady during the impeachment process that began in 1998. And I was a senator for New York after 9/11, when Congress had to respond to an attack on our country. Each of these experiences offers important lessons for how we should proceed today.
First, like in any time our nation is threatened, we have to remember that this is bigger than politics. What our country needs now is clear-eyed patriotism, not reflexive partisanship. Whether they like it or not, Republicans in Congress share the constitutional responsibility to protect the country. Mueller’s report leaves many unanswered questions — in part because of Attorney General William P. Barr’s redactions and obfuscations. But it is a road map. It’s up to members of both parties to see where that road map leads — to the eventual filing of articles of impeachment, or not. Either way, the nation’s interests will be best served by putting party and political considerations aside and being deliberate, fair and fearless.
Second, Congress should hold substantive hearings that build on the Mueller report and fill in its gaps, not jump straight to an up-or-down vote on impeachment. In 1998, the Republican-led House rushed to judgment. That was a mistake then and would be a mistake now.
Watergate offers a better precedent. Then, as now, there was an investigation that found evidence of corruption and a coverup. It was complemented by public hearings conducted by a Senate select committee, which insisted that executive privilege could not be used to shield criminal conduct and compelled White House aides to testify. The televised hearings added to the factual record and, crucially, helped the public understand the facts in a way that no dense legal report could. Similar hearings with Mueller, former White House counsel Donald McGahn and other key witnesses could do the same today.
During Watergate, the House Judiciary Committee also began a formal impeachment inquiry that was led by John Doar, a widely respected former Justice Department official and hero of the civil rights struggle. He was determined to run a process that the public and history would judge as fair and thorough, no matter the outcome. If today’s House proceeds to an impeachment inquiry, I hope it will find someone as distinguished and principled as Doar to lead it.
Third, Congress can’t forget that the issue today is not just the president’s possible obstruction of justice — it’s also our national security. After 9/11, Congress established an independent, bipartisan commission to recommend steps that would help guard against future attacks. We need a similar commission today to help protect our elections. This is necessary because the president of the United States has proved himself unwilling to defend our nation from a clear and present danger. It was just reported that Trump’s recently departed secretary of homeland security tried to prioritize election security because of concerns about continued interference in 2020 and was told by the acting White House chief of staff not to bring it up in front of the president. This is the latest example of an administration that refuses to take even the most minimal, common-sense steps to prevent future attacks and counter ongoing threats to our nation.
Fourth, while House Democrats pursue these efforts, they also should stay focused on the sensible agenda that voters demanded in the midterms, from protecting health care to investing in infrastructure. During Watergate, Congress passed major legislation such as the War Powers Act, the Endangered Species Act and the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973. For today’s Democrats, it’s not only possible to move forward on multiple fronts at the same time, it’s essential. The House has already passed sweeping reforms that would strengthen voting rights and crack down on corruption, and now is the time for Democrats to keep their foot on the gas and put pressure on the do-nothing Senate. It’s critical to remind the American people that Democrats are in the solutions business and can walk and chew gum at the same time.
We have to get this right. The Mueller report isn’t just a reckoning about our recent history; it’s also a warning about the future. Unless checked, the Russians will interfere again in 2020, and possibly other adversaries, such as China or North Korea, will as well. This is an urgent threat. Nobody but Americans should be able to decide America’s future. And, unless he’s held accountable, the president may show even more disregard for the laws of the land and the obligations of his office. He will likely redouble his efforts to advance Putin’s agenda, including rolling back sanctions, weakening NATO and undermining the European Union.
Of all the lessons from our history, the one that’s most important may be that each of us has a vital role to play as citizens. A crime was committed against all Americans, and all Americans should demand action and accountability. Our founders envisioned the danger we face today and designed a system to meet it. Now it’s up to us to prove the wisdom of our Constitution, the resilience of our democracy and the strength of our nation.
-washingtonpost.com
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hillary-clinton-mueller-documented-a-serious-crime-against-all-americans-heres-how-to-respond/2019/04/24/1e8f7e16-66b7-11e9-82ba-fcfeff232e8f_story.html?utm_term=.c6a164e5c3e5
On Friday, Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote on Twitter that “the House should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States.”
In another tweet she explained:
“To ignore a President’s repeated efforts to obstruct an investigation into his own disloyal behavior would inflict great and lasting damage on this country, and it would suggest that both the current and future Presidents would be free to abuse their power in similar ways.”
I worry that inaction enshrines that idea that the American president is above America’s laws. I worry that silent acquiescence bends our democracy toward monarchy, or dictatorship.
As Thomas Paine wrote in 1776, “In America the law is king.” He continued: “For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other.”
Who will we let be king in this country, the president or the law?
-newyorktimes.com
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/21/opinion/impeach-donald-trump.html
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |