Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Check Twitter-they will be posting a few comments on their website being hijacked.
No, they are working on the numbers.
I would hope they weren't waiting for inquires, or complaints to keep us better informed. Great they got the email fixed, now let's look at the where the company is going.
I would like to see the company I was looking at a year ago.
Thanks for the update though, I hope it propels us forward.
0006 wrf chief? share the working email please. curious who is in charge this decade
Company e-mail account was jacked so company was not receiving any inquiries from shareholders, all fixed now.
That would be a nice change.
Good news coming.
Stick with the facts.Tony never paid for control and the 250 mil shares that were mine.Nobody can show proof of payment because it never happened. If I'm lyin he can sue me now,no? IF I damaged him then why didn't he sue me then?
Did I have a problem at the time with a totally unaffiliated company where I said something on the phone and for that I pled and did a yr probation and a 2500 fine over 10 yrs ago.Ya think the timing and why I didn't sue matters?If I bring an action you can bet this stock will be gone due to the Sec being noticed in the action.Lpok around its happend many times in disputes such as this. Again nobody can prove payment for my 250 mil shares and the control stock.Dont play games with fake noise..
is the 200k he owes tony from the 1.5 million? tony had to be the one who issued them shares twitums
Hopefully they have their bearings again, and this can move forward.
Cons will lie, cheat and blame others as part of their greedy scams. If one repeats a message/thought many times, they know a majority of readers will believe their BS as truth. Why is CCAJ filing these last 2 Q's? That is where one should research.
Now my memory is coming back from my past dealing with this. Now things are making much more sense, and who is who. Thanks.
Spoke with Tony and lawyer for CCAJ. Jeff is a crook, owes Tony $200k, Tony said if this con, Jeff, had a case then why no lawsuit. Because then Tony would sue the scum and he'd be in jail. Jeff & his 3 con friends took approx. $1.5M out of company and avoided 10yrs in jail on a plea bargain. That is the real story not the BS Jeff posts.
Before anyone on this board believes anything that this con posts-read this court case decision.
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2014/comp-pr2014-105-berkowitz.pdf
Leaving for a long holiday weekend, but I'll leave you with this question as it's the only one I have at this point and I will get the answer.Did the company know that Tony didn't pay me for control?I know that a certain atty said she would write the opinion letters for the stolen shares to clear,they were never cleared so why not lol?Could it be that pesky rule called proof of purchase?. Soon come..
Nobody cares what happened to the assets and $$$ that were listed in the filings prior to the company going quiet?After getting rejected by finra the company goes quiet then files zeros?Some pump site comes out saying this is a blank check company when they fought to be called a nonshell?Then they come out with filings showing no $$ and no assets or lookin like a blank check company .Yall still think they have legitimate control but then why do they act like they know they dont .We shall see tick tock lol goes the clock..
The company applied to Finra to do a reverse which I hope they get done and got turned down when they did not supply Finra with certain information. What could that information be that the company couldn't supply that would give them the corporate action they so desired?
Well today was a little downhill walk.
Yes. Not going to post here until people like you get with reality.
witch hunt---framed...2014 chief.....got anything ccaj related? tia
. United States v. Jeffrey Berkowitz, Case No. 14-20342-CR-Scola
Jeffrey Berkowitz, 57, of Palm Beach County, a stock promoter, was charged by information with conspiracy to engage in a scheme to manipulate the publicly quoted share price and trading volume of Face Up Entertainment Group (FUEG) stock, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371. FUEG, a Florida corporation, is purported to be in the business of operating an internet gaming website.
The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Sherwin.
Mr. Ferrer commends the investigative efforts of the FBI, IRS-CI, USSS, USPIS, SEC, FDIC-OIG, CFTC, FTC, and the State of Florida’s Office of Financial Regulation.
An indictment or information is merely an accusation and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
A copy of this press release may be found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/fls. Related court documents and information may be found on the website of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida at http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov
They did not meet the requirements needed for approval of the R/S NOT! the fact that they are legit owners of the company. Filings proves ownership of the company not some loser who claims differently.
Do tell me why Finra denied the reverse split application and why the company didn't produce the documents that Finra requested to approve it? I wonder if the company knew that the control shares plus my 250 mil shares were not paid for by Tony? Discovery is a bitch and I'm not talking about spaceships.
did you ever get the $ back georgie conned you or tony out of?
Cons always cry they were screwed. They live in a fantasy land built on their complete failure as businessman. SEC official that worked with Tony, Dan and their attorney warned them of these few crooks/cons that were part of old guard. A lot of noise from the real crooks. Stay tuned for the coming events.
Yet, not taking him to court for what is rightfully yours. $100,000 might not be much for some, but that is a lot of money to let some one walk away with, not to mention forcing the obeyance of the contract.
We all talk of cleaning up these companies, forcing them to adhere to contracts seem like a start in the right direction.
Over the years Tony promised to pay what he owed me when he sold it and I have emails not only from him In this regard. .The fact of the matter is there is a contract,down payment and no performance or proof of performance with emails saying he was gonna give it back.You see once he sold the control shares,he started the clock again.Tony screwed others in this deal that I have emails from I bet they'd have no problem being depo'd.I tried to do what I do which is negotiate..
I agree with the freedom to do a person's own thing, but a little curious as to why as you mentioned all of the civil theft against you no charges have been filed? That alone would give a some validity to your accusations. Not that you would come here, and spread false information, but I hope you can see my point.
Lawyer up, Civil theft equals treble damages and I'm owed over $100k plus interest ..I've got the dp check,the contract,emails from Tony,Dan and others.Anybody have proof of payment for the control shares, that Tony sold via a fraudulent conveyance?lol..
And per the Q reports, the Float has stayed the same which was the only good news thus far!
Float: 593,902,574 as of June 30, 2023.
Even if the recent Q reports aren't complete at least they give this board something to talk and speculate about instead of silence!
It is funny how just the smallest of details of the announced assets not being forth coming that brings perspective to any stock. With all of the changes that the stock market put in place to bring more transparency to help prevent fraud I don't get what these people are doing after spending the time and money to get the company back up and running in this new era that is the market.
They own the company. R/S in pinks is a farce. They have money to file and pay all the entities who give advice. My question is: Where are the units being built, sold, restored?
The most disturbing thing for me about the R/S was the target price they were suggesting didn't come near the share ratio they were wanting to do. The company achieves the R/S, but still lacking in what they need in share price value increase. What do they do then another R/S?
If what Jaybee says is true as far as control being transferred then we know the company has control. Whether paid, or not properly we can't be sure.
Ok we shall see,being the clock began anew when Tony sold what he never paid for which is civil theft,fraud and a number of other lovely issues lol...I actually hope they put the cash and assets back in for good reason lol.But if they pulled the assets out like Tony did with ES because he knew he didn't control it, Houston we have a problem lol..I'll say it again I'm the one who last had legitimate control,I sold that control to Tony who never paid for it.
..
They don't want to give out numbers/specifics till their agenda is met. Reasoning?? They aren't talking!
That is a given, but shareholders should have a vote beyond that common practice. One shareholder-one vote regardless of shares held. This prevents the company from using their power (in numbers) to effect most important decisions.
It would seem who controls the company would be a public domain fact somewhere. As for as shareholder approval on the R/S, if we approved the officers, and they hold majority share, I can see a truth in their statement even if the headcount of shareholders said no. That has been the way of most stocks, and I have been in some nightmares.
Yes, still a lot of unanswered questions. The only thing new are the filed reports even though they are missing the financial info. I assume we will see Amended reports soon. My assumption is they finally filed both Q reports to get current again, but need to amend/complete the reports. We'll see how this all pans out in the coming days/weeks/months. I'm not expecting to know the reality until 2024, whether good or bad!
I did not appreciate the report from CCAJ that investors approved the R/S. We voted to approve the various board members not the R/S. I'm very sure that if we shareholders were polled about the R/S we would NOT approve. Only a fool would OK a R/S at this stage of development, no matter all the BS lines about increase in shareholder value. We've all heard that line in the pink world and 90% of the time it destroys the stock. The news ruined what momo CCAJ had, upon the announcement.
You all have to remember that CCAJ was on track to get listed & fully reporting if the 3 companies they were in talks with joined. But all three so no advantage to becoming part of CCAJ. CCAJ may be trying to change this but so far no word on this being accomplished.
I'm waiting for the OTC people to clear up some questions -then I'll know more. If they don't respond, then we wait for the clarification on the R/S, from the company website.
What about the lack of financial information?Where's the $$$ and assets, that were listed in the last q filed?This could get very interesting from a legal standpoint..
What about the lack of financial information?Where's the $$$ and assets, that were listed in the last q filed?This could get very interesting,
If I am reading this right, no change in control. So we have the same nagging problem?
I see some new filings on OTC Markets. Looks like CCAJ is getting closer to Current again.
Followers
|
342
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
95067
|
Created
|
09/30/04
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |