Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Petrolifera Petroleum Limited
PDP - TSX
January 2, 2007
Petrolifera Exits 2006 on a High Note
Calgary, Alberta Petrolifera Petroleum Limited announces today it achieved a peak level of daily oil production from Puesto Morales in Argentina of 13,400 bbl/d of light gravity crude in late December 2006.
ARGENTINA
The achieved production level was primarily from twelve of the fourteen new wells drilled by Petrolifera since late 2005. Ten of the wells continue to be flowing oil wells with the remaining two (1019 and 1024) on pump. Additionally, wells 1018 and 1032 are either being tested or awaiting completion and the company also plans to conduct remedial activity at 1004, which remains a flowing oil well at this time. The best flowing wells in descending order are 1013, 1012, 1010, 1003 and 1015 with water cuts for these wells averaging a very modest 0.1 percent. The indicated water cut for all production, including the old stripper wells from Puesto Morales Sur, remains very low at approximately 2.5 percent. It should be noted daily production rates may fluctuate for a variety of reasons, including work over activity, testing and natural gas conservation initiatives. A fourth quarter operating update will be provided once more detailed information is available to the company.
Associated and non-associated natural gas sales volumes currently approximate 1.8 mmcf/d (300 boe/d, using a conversion rate of six mcf per barrel of crude oil.) Readers are cautioned that the conversion used in calculating barrels of oil equivalent is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable to the burner tip and does not necessarily represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Furthermore, boes may be misleading if used in isolation. This rate is anticipated to improve towards 3 mmcf/d in the near future.
Accordingly, total peak daily production and sales achieved during the month of December 2006 was 13,700 boe/d. A portion of total natural gas volumes was utilized for fuel gas. It is anticipated that surplus volumes not presently being sold will be utilized for pressure maintenance and additional sales once field facilities are completed. Production results in total were in line with the companys expectations and guidance.
Drilling is now anticipated to commence in late January 2007 or early February 2007 as the new rig to be utilized suffered minor damages during the offloading process. Repairs are underway in the contractors yard in Neuquin, as is the conversion to an 1100 meter drilling rig of the new service rig contracted to Petrolifera. It is now estimated that the third drilling rig will arrive in Argentina in late January 2007, after which it will be cleared through customs for use by a target date of mid-March 2007. Initial drilling is targeted to evaluate locations offsetting the companys more prolific or higher productivity wells. Drilling on the Rinconada Block will also be undertaken in 2007.
Petrolifera is investigating the introduction of pressure maintenance at Puesto Morales. A water injection study is in progress, including design of optimum injection patterns. Petrolifera also anticipates reinjection of some solution gas into wells 1003 and 1010 in the northern culmination, as they are in the structurally highest position on this accumulation. It is anticipated the combination of water injection and natural gas reinjection will assist Petrolifera in maintaining its optimum base production, which can then be supplemented by the impact of the numerous new wells planned for Argentina during 2007. The companys crude oil pipeline is operational and increased oil volumes will be shipped through the pipeline as soon as the expanded water pipeline and treatment facility are completed and available for on-site processing. In the interim, approximately 75 percent of produced volumes continue to be trucked to third party treatment facilities.
The 252 square kilometer 3D seismic program designed to secure 100 percent coverage over the Puesto Morales Block and the accessible portion of the Rinconada Block has been completed. Data is being processed and interpretation is proceeding as data comes available, with final mapping of potential new locations scheduled for completion by the end of March 2007.
The company continues to examine new opportunities in Argentina, including exploratory acreage and now producing properties with development potential which have recently been made available for sale.
PERU
Test flights for the Companys extensive aeromag/gravity survey over Block 107 in the Ucayali Basin, Peru have now been completed and the program is anticipated to commence in January 2007. Petroliferas Environmental Impact Assessment for Block 107 has been completed and submitted to the relevant government authorities for review and acceptance. Presently, the company is hopeful its seismic program will commence in the Spring 2007 upon receipt of timely authorization and approvals.
The companys geochemistry program over three project areas within Block 106 is now complete and the data is being analyzed and interpreted. Results are expected to impact on the location and orientation of seismic programs anticipated for the Fall 2007 over Block 106.
OTHER
Petrolifera is awaiting confirmation of its application to secure agreements over a number of exploratory areas in Colombia.
The company remains in a strong financial condition with growing production, cash flow, working capital and no debt.
Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements, including but not limited to estimated reserves and future net revenues, future exploration and development plans, anticipated future production, future capital expenditures and anticipated completion of infrastructure and transportation systems. . These statements are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to risks associated with the oil and gas industry (e.g. operational risks in development, exploration and production delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of reserve estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections in relation to production, costs and expenses and health, safety and environmental risks), the risk of commodity price and foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the uncertainty associated with negotiating with foreign governments and risk associated with international activity. Additional risks and uncertainties are described in the company's Annual Information Form which is filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
The company's ability to complete its capital program and potentially increase production volumes and reserves is dependent on access to services, drilling rigs and equipment. Similarly, the company's ability to increase sales of oil and natural gas is dependent on completion of certain infrastructure and transportation systems that are currently under construction. There can be no assurance that the company will be able to access the required services and equipment based on the company's planned timetable to ensure the completion of the company's capital program and the construction of required infrastructure and transportation systems. Due to the risks, uncertainties and assumptions inherent in forward-looking statements, prospective investors in the company's securities should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements contained in this press release are made as of the date hereof and are subject to change. The company assumes no obligation to revise or update forward looking statements to reflect new circumstances, except as required by law.
Hi cosmo I am not going to buy back into OCL. I am giving a chance to <<BNC, TSX-V>> Bought some this morning....
Smile
janet
what about ocl - any good at .28 - I am thinking of getting back in to that one
COSTA Energy Inc.
TSX - V: COE
December 29, 2006
COSTA Closes $1.5 Million Financing
CALGARY - COSTA Energy Inc. announced today that it has closed the previously announced financing and has issued 9,090,910 Common Units (as defined below) at $0.11 per unit and 3,703,706 Flow-Through Units (as defined below) at $0.135 per unit on a private placement basis. Each Common Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (a "Warrant"). Each Flow-Through Unit consists of one common share, issued on a "flow-through basis" for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada), and one Warrant. Each Warrant will entitle the holder thereof to purchase one common share at a price of $0.145 per share until March 31, 2008. Gross proceeds from the issuance of the Common Units and Flow-Through Units are $1.5 million, and will be used to fund COSTA's ongoing exploration program, for working capital purposes and to repay obligations under certain outstanding debentures.
With this new financing, COSTA now has 24,403,576 common shares, 2,350,151 non voting shares, 12,794,616 warrants and 974,395 options to acquire an equivalent number of common shares issued and outstanding. MHI Energy Partners and/or their associates and affiliates (collectively, "MHI") now hold 6,669,557 common shares, 1,771,067 non-voting shares, 5,003,182 warrants and 53,970 options (approximately 30.7% of the issued and outstanding common shares (excluding non-voting shares) on a diluted basis, and approximately 33.3% of the issued and outstanding shares on a diluted basis).
The Company's board of directors is now comprised of Messrs. Curtis D. Bartlett, Terry D. Brooker, Timothy S. Granger, Ron D. Miller and Ronald E. Newman. The officers of the company will be Mr. Terry D. Brooker as President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. David F. Campbell as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
The common shares and Warrants issued pursuant to this private placement are subject to a four month statutory hold period. A commission of 5.0% of the gross proceeds was paid to registered dealers who arranged for subscribers other than MHI and its affiliates and associates.
This new funding will significantly improve the Company's financial position and allow a continuing development program to grow the Company's production base. At the same time, the Company has taken significant steps to reduce its general and administrative costs and to create a positive cash flow from the current production. The initial drilling focus will be at Veteran, subject to continuing positive production results from a new well, and a new horizontal development of an existing field at Macoun, Saskatchewan.
COSTA is a Calgary based junior oil and gas company, which explores for, develops, produces, and sells crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas in Alberta, British Columbia and Saskatchewan.
The TSX Venture Exchange has in no way passed upon the merits of the proposed transaction and has neither approved nor disapproved the contents of this press release.
Forward Looking Statements: Certain information regarding COSTA in this news release including management's assessment of future plans and operations and the timing thereof, may constitute forward-looking statements under applicable securities laws and necessarily involve risks including, without limitation, risks associated with oil and gas exploration, development, exploitation, production, marketing and transportation, loss of markets, volatility of commodity prices, currency fluctuations, imprecision of reserve estimates, environmental risks, competition from other producers, inability to retain drilling rigs and other services, delays resulting from or inability to obtain required regulatory approvals and ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources. As a consequence, COSTA's actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly no assurance can be given that any events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or, if any of them do so, what benefits COSTA will derive therefrom. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhausted. Furthermore, the forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as at the date of this news release and COSTA does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable securities laws.
Requests for shareholder information should be directed to:
Mr. Terry D. Brooker, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
COSTA Energy Inc.
(403) 206-3430
Email: tbrooker@costaenergy.com
I was just about to post as I just noticed it!
Good morning Tackler, GUL is back.....going up and
singing again.......lololol.....
Happy New Year
janet
Vast Exploration Inc (C-VST) - News Release
Vast Exploration marks path to Compass acquisition
2006-12-22 11:01 ET - News Release
Shares issued 19,955,853
VST Close 2006-12-15 C$ 0.41
Mr. Don Parker reports
VAST EXPLORATION TO ACQUIRE COMPASS PETROLEUM LTD AND RECEIVE 960 BOE/D-SAMSON OIL AND GAS TO THEN ACQUIRE 50% SHARE
Vast Exploration Inc. has entered into a letter agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Compass Petroleum Ltd., a private Alberta corporation active in the oil and gas industry. Vast has also entered into a letter agreement with Samson Oil and Gas Inc., a private Alberta corporation wholly owned by the Samson Cree Nation, whereby Samson will acquire 50 per cent of the Compass shares upon the closing of the acquisition on similar terms.
The outstanding share capital of Compass consists of 20,645,409 common shares. In addition, Compass has granted options entitling holders to purchase up to a total of 750,000 additional common shares and has issued purchase warrants entitling holders to acquire up to a total of 1,975,000 additional common shares. In the letter agreement, Vast has agreed to pay cash consideration of $2.09 per share for each Compass share purchased. The purchase price of the Compass shares was calculated on the basis of an ascribed value for Compass of $52.5-million, less outstanding net debt (approximately $7.2-million) and certain other adjustments agreed to by Vast and Compass, and assumes that all outstanding options and warrants of Compass will be exercised at or prior to closing. Compass had net sales of 960 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/day) in the month of October, 2006, and has over 89,000 net acres of land in the assets being acquired. As at June 30, 2006, working interest reserves for the properties were 2,812 thousand barrels of oil equivalent (Mboe) of proved and 4,398 Mboe of proved plus probable. Based on October sales volumes, this results in a reserve life index of eight and 12.5 years respectively. Samson currently owns approximately 13.9 per cent of the issued and outstanding common shares of Vast (see news in Stockwatch on Oct. 25, 2006).
"This is an outstanding acquisition for Vast," said Don Parker, president and chief executive officer. "It gives Vast instant net production of 480 boe/day with the potential to expand to 800 boe/day with well-defined development projects. With our partner Samson, we think we can build on the Compass exploration potential even further. It is also encouraging that the two major shareholders of Vast, Samson and management, have agreed to backstop the financing by maintaining their share of the equity positions in Vast."
This acquisition by Vast will provide cash flow from which it can finance its future exploration and development opportunities, including those relating to the previously announced joint venture with Samson to pursue and develop treaty entitlement lands in Saskatchewan.
Terms of proposed acquisition, Vast financing and participation agreement
The letter agreement, which was negotiated at arm's length between Vast and Compass, contemplates that Vast will acquire, by way of an exempt takeover bid, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Compass pursuant to individual purchase and sale agreements to be entered into with holders of outstanding Compass shares (including any Compass shares issued prior to completion of the acquisition upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants). As contemplated by the letter agreement, Vast has provided a $2-million deposit to Compass, which Compass will be entitled to retain in the event the acquisition is not completed, other than as a result of a breach by Compass of its obligations under the letter agreement or in the event of a material breach by Compass of the representations and warranties provided by Compass in the letter agreement. Vast and Compass propose to negotiate and enter into a preacquisition agreement by Jan. 12, 2007. The letter agreement provides for various conditions in favour of Compass including that Vast must demonstrate financial capability to complete the acquisition by Feb. 15, 2007, and that the purchase of the outstanding Compass shares must be completed no later than Feb. 22, 2007.
As contemplated by the letter agreement, Compass proposes to undertake certain reorganization transactions prior to completion of the acquisition, which will result in various existing assets of Compass being transferred to a newly formed corporation, such that those assets will not be assets of Compass at the time of completion of the acquisition. Those assets include office furniture and equipment currently owned by Compass and its affiliates and certain interests in oil and gas properties, to which Vast ascribed no value in connection with its evaluation of Compass.
In order to complete the acquisition, Vast will be required to complete a financing, which may involve the issuance of equity, debt or a combination thereof. Discussions with respect to the method of financing are continuing, and will be the subject of a separate press release once details are finalized.
Vast and Samson have entered into a participation agreement dated as of Dec. 17, 2006. The participation agreement contemplates that Vast will transfer one-half of the shares acquired by it to Samson. As consideration, Samson will be responsible for 50 per cent of the purchase price as well as all other costs associated with the acquisition. Vast and Samson have each provided 50 per cent of the $2-million deposit to Compass. It is anticipated that Vast, Samson and their respective professional advisers will work together to complete the due diligence, any required financing and otherwise satisfy the conditions precedent to the completion of the acquisition. Each party will be responsible for financing its share of the costs of the acquisition, including the deposit, due diligence and closing costs and the payment of the final purchase price, and has indemnified the other party for losses attributable to non-performance of financial obligations.
The acquisition and the Vast financing remain subject to, among other things, receipt of all applicable regulatory approvals, the completion of satisfactory due diligence and other matters. Vast expects that all conditions precedent will be satisfied in the ordinary course. The acquisition constitutes a "fundamental acquisition" and the Vast financing may potentially result in the creation of a new "control person" or in a "change of control" for Vast within the meanings of such terms in the applicable policies of the TSX Venture Exchange. If the approval of the Vast shareholders is required, Vast will make application to the exchange in an effort to have the exchange accept written evidence of informed consent without the necessity of holding a formal shareholders meeting. Vast anticipates releasing details regarding the Vast financing in the near future and, if required, the filing of a filing statement with the exchange during January, 2007.
Compass
Compass was incorporated on Sept. 23, 2002, under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta), and is based in Calgary, Alta. Since its incorporation, it has been actively involved in the business of exploring for and producing oil and gas, and has amassed approximately 89,710 net acres of land consisting of Crown and freehold leases held by Compass. In October, 2006, Compass had sales of 960 boe/day from its properties located in Alberta, which production consisted of 503 barrels per day (bbl/d) of oil and natural gas liquids and 2,743 thousand cubic feet per day of gas. Information respecting the principal properties of Compass is summarized below.
Grand Forks, Alta. -- Twp. 11 Rge. 13 W4
Compass holds a 76-per-cent average working interest in 18,905 acres of land in the Grand Forks area of Alberta. The primary production is medium gravity oil from the Jurassic Sawtooth sandstone at an average reservoir depth of 900 metres. A minor amount of gas is produced from the Cretaceous Bow Island and Second White Specks sands at shallower depths. Compass operates over 80 per cent of its production from 56 oil wells and four gas wells. October, 2006, sales totalled 501 bbl/d of oil and 132 thousand cubic feet per day of gas. In this area water is reinjected in the majority of the pools so that reservoir pressure is maintained and decline profiles remain constant.
Total proved reserves of 1,354 Mboe and probable reserves of 817 Mboe have been assigned to the property. There are five locations assigned proved undeveloped reserves and two locations assigned probable based on well control, offset production and extensive 3-D seismic. Compass operates six of the eight oil batteries it has an interest in.
Wrentham/Weston, Alta. -- Twp. 6, Rge. 15 W3
Compass has an average working interest of 56 per cent in 33,290 acres of land in Alberta, 50 kilometres southeast of Lethbridge, near the Montana border. There are 11 producing gas wells on the property and Compass operates nine of them. The majority of the production is from the Baron's sandstone. In October, 2006, net sales averaged 233 thousand cubic feet per day of gas from the property.
Total proved reserves of 44 Mboe and probable reserves of 17 Mboe have been assigned to the property. One new well, recently tied in, is not included in the above reserve assignments.
Lacombe, Alta. -- Twp. 40, Rge. 27 W4
Compass has an average 53-per-cent working interest in 12,181 acres of land in the Lacombe area of central Alberta. The company operates 11 producing wells of which seven are producing Horseshoe Canyon coal bed methane wells, three are from the Edmonton/Bearpaw sands, and one is a Viking oil and gas producer. In October, 2006, net sales totalled 439 thousand cubic feet per day of gas and two bbl/d of oil and natural gas liquids from this asset.
Total proved reserves of 811 Mboe and probable reserves of 521 Mboe have been assigned to this property. Sixty-six undrilled locations have been identified in Lacombe primarily focused on the Horseshoe Canyon coals that at are at depths of less than 750 metres.
Vilna, Alta. -- Twp. 59, Rge. 13 W4
Compass has an average 77-per-cent working interest in 37,120 acres in the Vilna area of central Alberta. The company operates 19 producing gas wells in the field with several shut-in wells scheduled to be tied in this winter, adding to production volumes. Net sales for October, 2006, averaged 1,789 thousand cubic feet per day of gas from Vilna.
Total proved reserves of 416 Mboe and probable reserves of 166 Mboe have been assigned to this property. Four wells are awaiting tie-in and three uphole Viking zones have been identified for future development. No reserves have been assigned to the 13,344 net acres of prospective undeveloped land in the area.
Grassland, Alta. -- Twp. 68, Rge. 19 W4
Compass has a 70-per-cent working interest in 2,560 acres of land in the Grassland area of central Alberta. There are three standing Grand Rapids gas wells awaiting tie-in in the area. Discussions are well advanced with an industrial user in the area to purchase the gas through a direct sales contract. Net production is expected to exceed 500 thousand cubic feet per day from these wells. Total proved reserves of 89 Mboe and probable reserves of 44 Mboe have been assigned to this property.
Craigend, Alta. -- Twp.64, Rge. 11 W4
In the Craigend area Compass has a 61-per-cent average working interest in 28,800 acres of land. The area contains an extensive Viking shallow gas resource play. There are 10 producing Viking wells on the property already. Net sales totalled 132 thousand cubic feet per day of gas in October, 2006, from Craigend.
Total proved reserves of 92 Mboe and probable reserves of 18 Mboe have been assigned to Craigend. Additionally, Compass has received four-well-per-section holding status for the area and as a result now has 75 infill locations available for drilling. These locations are not included in the engineering evaluation.
Sproule and Associates, Petroleum Consultants of Calgary, Alta., an independent qualified reserves evaluator, has prepared a report in respect of certain of Compass's properties (specifically, the Craigend, Davey Lake, Grand Forks, Grand Forks East, Grassland, Lacombe, Purple Springs, Vilna, Weston, Wolf Island and Wrentham areas) entitled "Evaluation of Certain P&NG Reserves of Compass Petroleum Partnership" dated Sept. 25, 2006, with an effective date of June 30, 2006. The Sproule report complies with the requirements of National Instrument 51-101 as adopted by the Canadian securities regulators. Certain information respecting the oil and gas reserves of Compass and the present worth value of the estimated future net cash flows attributed thereto in the Sproule report is set out in tables.
SUMMARY OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES
AS OF JUNE 30, 2006
Net to appraised interest
Escalated prices and costs
Reserves
Light and medium oil Sales Natural gas
gas liquids
Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net
Reserves category (MSTB) (MSTB) (MMscf) (MMscf) (Mbbl) (Mbbl)
Proved developed
producing 1,058.9 933.8 3,273 2,862 11.6 7.2
Proved developed
non-producing 0.0 0.0 1,116 954 0.0 0.0
Proved undeveloped 239.0 216.6 4,614 4,055 1.9 1.3
Probable
additional 785.9 664.5 4,746 4,122 9.3 5.7
------- ------- ------ ------ ---- ----
Total proved plus
probable 2,083.8 1,814.9 13,749 11,993 22.8 14.2
======= ======= ====== ====== ==== ====
NET PRESENT VALUES OF FUTURE NET REVENUE
INCLUDING ALBERTA ROYALTY TAX CREDIT
Net to appraised interest
Escalated prices and costs
Before income taxes discounted
at (%/Year)
0 10 15
Reserves category (M$) (M$) (M$)
Proved developed producing 39,090 29,130 26,147
Proved developed non-producing 4,763 3,827 3,477
Proved undeveloped 15,982 9,441 7,362
Probable additional 34,770 17,799 13,850
------ ------ ------
Total proved plus probable 94,604 60,196 50,836
====== ====== ======
Merry Christmas KD!
Winstar Resources Ltd.
WIX-TSX-V
December 21, 2006
Winstar Releases Updated Production Data from its Southern Tunisian Chouech Es Saida #5 and Chouech Es Saida #7 Wells
CALGARY Winstar Resources Ltd. today updated its production data released on November 29, 2006 from its 100% net working interest, operated Chouech Es Saida #5 well (CS #5) recompletion and released new production data from its workover at its 100% net working interest, operated Chouech Es Saida #7 well (CS #7) in Southern Tunisia.
Subsequent to the November 29, 2006 news release, at CS #5 the Company removed obstructions in the production tubing or flow string and conducted a production test over the zone which had recorded a preliminary stabilized flow rate of 130 cubic meters per day ("m3/d") or 820 barrels of oil per day ("bopd") on a 14/16 inch choke. While recovering the perforating debris and other downhole obstructions from the tubing, the CS #5 well was produced at flow rates ranging from 100 to 150 m3/d or 629 to 943 bopd, to the central production facility at Winstars (100% working interest) Chouech Es Saida Concession.
Upon the successful termination of fishing operations, downhole pressure gauges were installed and a production test of the zone within the Triassic Trias Argilo-Greseux Inferieur (TAGI) Sandstone Formation was conducted. During that production test the well recorded a final stabilized rate of 146 m3/d or 918 bopd, of 41 degree API gravity crude with no trace of water production, on an 18/64 inch choke with a flowing wellhead pressure of 95 bars or 1380 pounds per square inch (psi).
The well was subsequently shut in to acquire build-up pressure measurements. The final analysis of the down hole pressure data is expected in January 2007.
Following the shut-in period the CS #5 well was re-started and is currently flowing to the central production facility at a stable rate of 163 m3/d or 1025 bopd with associated gas production of approximately 30,000 m3/d or 1,064 thousand cubic feet per day (mcf/d).
Winstar is producing and selling crude oil from Chouech Es Saida at a corporate record rate and is currently in negotiations with the Tunisian Company of Electricity and Gas (Societe Tunisienne de lElectriciti et du Gaz or STEG) to permit natural gas sales. The engineering and sourcing of key equipment to allow gas sales is underway. The Company is hopeful that it will be begin producing and selling approximately 100 to 200 barrels of oil equivalent (boepd) of natural gas into the Tunisian domestic market sometime in February or March 2007.
Natural gas and oil are anticipated to be sold from the Chouech Es Saida Concession at prices comparable to the Company average price received during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 in Tunisia being $72.48 per barrel of oil and $7.68 per Mcf of natural gas.
On December 15, 2006, the Company finished reactivating the CS #7 well by installing a new and larger down hole electric pump and cable. The well has been shut-in since September 21, 2006 when the original, smaller down hole pump failed. Prior to that failure the well was producing 24 m3/d or 150 bopd.
The CS #7 well with larger pump capacity is now capable of producing an estimated 41 m3/d or 258 bopd. Further to reactivation of CS #7, the well had to be shut-in, due to transportation limitations along the Companys 100% working interest and operated 80 kilometre 6 inch sales or export pipeline connecting Chouech Es Saida north to El Borma. The Company is replacing three small triplex pumps capable of delivering a maximum of 1069 bopd with one large triplex pump with a design capacity of 3,000 bopd. This modification is expected by year end 2006, at which time the CS #7 well will once again commence production.
Winstar is currently producing (and selling) some 2,350 boepd (Canada 550 boepd, Tunisia 1,200 boepd and Hungary 600 boepd) and anticipates it will exit the year at 2,900 boepd (Canada 500 boepd , Tunisia 1,700 boepd and Hungary 700 boepd).
About Winstar
Winstar Resources Ltd. is Calgary-based junior oil and gas company, which explores for, develops, produces, and sells crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas in (Alberta) Canada, Tunisia and Hungary. Winstar's common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol WIX.
BOE
References herein to boe mean barrels of oil equivalent derived by converting gas to oil in the ratio of six thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of gas to one barrel (bbl) of oil. Boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf:1 bbl is based upon an energy conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
COSTA Energy Inc.
TSX - V: COE
December 21, 2006
COSTA Announces Alderson Production Restriction
CALGARY COSTA Energy Inc. announces that it has received notice dated December 20, 2006, from Imperial Oil Resources ("Imperial") that effective February 1, 2007, it intends to cease accepting gas from COSTA for custom processing at Imperial's Redcliff North gas plant.
This would shut in production of approximately 345 mcfd net from COSTA's Alderson field. This represents about 35% of COSTA's current net production of 175 boepd. For the 9 months ended September 30, 2006, the Company's Alderson production averaged about 340 mcfd, equivalent to 57 boepd or 41% of the Company's total average production of 139 boepd. Due to the low operating costs of this shallow gas field, Alderson revenue after royalties and operating costs was approximately $383,000, representing 57% of a total net revenue of $669,000 for the period.
Imperial has committed "to work with (COSTA) to minimize disruptions to (our) Alderson production to the extent reasonably possible" and COSTA hopes that an equitable solution can be found. COSTA has begun to explore alternatives to allow Alderson to continue production. These range from alternate custom processing arrangements to regulatory support to construction of a new COSTA compressor station; however, most of these alternatives would likely still involve a significant shut-in time.
This notice from Imperial has the potential to significantly affect the Company and therefore is a material event that could impact the previously announced and yet to close $1.5 million financing.
COSTA is aCalgary based junior oil and gas company, which explores for, develops, produces, and sells crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas in Alberta, British Columbia and Saskatchewan.
The TSX Venture Exchange has in no way passed upon the merits of the proposed transaction and has neither approved nor disapproved the contents of this press release.
Oil Equivalent Conversion: Barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") amounts have been calculated using a conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil and natural gas liquids equivalent. This ratio is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead or point of sale. Barrel of oil equivalents may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation.
Forward Looking Statements: Certain information regarding COSTA in this news release including management's assessment of future plans and operations and the timing thereof, may constitute forward-looking statements under applicable securities laws and necessarily involve risks including, without limitation, risks associated with oil and gas exploration, development, exploitation, production, marketing and transportation, loss of markets, volatility of commodity prices, currency fluctuations, imprecision of reserve estimates, environmental risks, competition from other producers, inability to retain drilling rigs and other services, delays resulting from or inability to obtain required regulatory approvals and ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources. As a consequence, COSTA's actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly no assurance can be given that any events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or, if any of them do so, what benefits COSTA will derive therefrom. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhausted. Furthermore, the forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as at the date of this news release and COSTA does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable securities laws.
Requests for shareholder information should be directed to:
Mr. Terry D. Brooker
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
COSTA Energy Inc.
(403) 206-3430
Email: tbrooker@costaenergy.com
VST Vast halted
Encana will do fine.
"...the basic elements of our budget involve lower upstream capital and a moderated rate of growth with an emphasis on maximizing project returns."
Thx kd
They don't make it sound like the end of the world eh? Damage control I guess.
Reading this and the 3rd qtr release they are recovering a lot of the same ground it seems to my unsophisticated eye and mind.
-expect to generate between $1.3 and $2.1 B free cash flow. This compares to the $5B net earnings in the first 9 months of '06
-per share cash flow to grow by 16%. This is the same number from the 3rd qtr release: "During the first nine months of 2006, the cash flow per share is up 16 per cent compared with one year earlier and operating earnings continue to grow.
-still going to drill 4200 wells, seems like still a huge program ..."moderate rate of growth... current overstressed condition of the industry...an issue we expect to visit on an ongoing basis." Tightening the screws on the service industry.
So they are going to increase the divvy and buy back shares with the money they are cutting back from exploration? The strategy is to lower the float and have per share production numbers, net earnings increase through the diminished float?
This is what Citigroup found distasteful? You don't grow you get punished I guess.
Some commentary on ROB
3:20 PM ET
Trading Day with Pat Bolland
Buy, Sell, Hold
Susan Prince, reporter, Report on Business Television
You had to remind me didnt you?
Petrolifera Petroleum Ltd.
TSX PDP
December 11, 2006
Petrolifera's Argentina Drilling Success Continues
CALGARY - Petrolifera Petroleum Limited announced today that its RN.PM a-1032 well, situated southwest of the recently-tested 1019 oil well on the northern portion of its Puesto Morales Block in the Neuquin Basin, Argentina, is in the process of being cased as an indicated multi-zone oil discovery after completion of drilling and logging procedures. This marks the fourteenth successive oil well or indicated oil well drilled by the company on its Argentinean concession since late 2005. There have been no dry holes and many of the wells are multi-zone discoveries of light gravity crude oil and/or natural gas, in solution or non-associated in the Quintuco Formation.
As a consequence, Petrolifera's production of crude oil has consistently increased since late 2005 from about 300 barrels of oil equivalent per day ("boe/d) to around current levels of approximately 12,000-12,500 boe/d, including current natural gas sales of approximately 3.5 mmcf/d, over double previous volumes. These are being delivered to a local market through a recently-expanded low pressure gas line. Additional natural gas volumes are anticipated in 2007 once a new high-pressure natural gas pipeline, connecting to existing infrastructure in the region, is completed. Initial volumes are then anticipated to approach approximately 20 mmcf/d, with further increases possible over the balance of 2007, upon completion of a new gas plant and related facilities, targeted for the third quarter 2007.
Further crude oil production increases are also anticipated by year end 2006 as the company's 100 percent-owned 1019, 1018 and 1032 wells are completed and placed onstream, productive capacity of other wells is more fully realized and remedial work is conducted at previously-drilled wells during the ensuing month before the company's anticipated 50-well 2007 drilling program is reactivated in mid-January.
Readers are cautioned that the conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil used in calculating barrels of oil equivalent is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable to the burner tip and does not necessarily represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Furthermore, boes may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation.
Thirty Day Program
During the next thirty days and over the holiday season, Petrolifera plans to test, complete and tie-in the 1019, 1018, 1032 and 1024 wells. Testing at the 1019 well is now complete and the well is producing fluid at a rate of approximately 320 bbl/d from zones in the Sierras Blancas and Catriel Formations, with a measured 70 percent oil cut, resulting in a flow rate of approximately 235 bbl/d of crude oil. As small fracs were conducted on several of the productive zones in the well, it continues to clean up and may yield increased oil volumes over time. Of note is that crude oil production is being obtained for the first time from the zones in the Catriel Formation. Follow up drilling, including wells to evaluate the Punta Rosada Formation at structurally higher positions on this northeastern culmination, will occur next year. A number of directional wells will be required due to the proximity of surface locations to the water reservoir in the region.
The 1018 well is standing cased as an indicated oil discovery and it will be tested during the next month, as will the 1032 discovery, which as indicated appears to be very encouraging based on shows while drilling and subsequent log analysis. In addition to these testing and completion programs, Petrolifera plans to install a pump in the 1024 well and complete it for production from a new previously-untested zone in the Sierras Blancas Formation. Remedial work is also planned at the 1004 well, which continues to flow oil but at rates below its productive capacity. Production from this wide variety and number of zones at Puesto Morales underscores the continuing prospectivity of the region. During 2007, additional work to evaluate the indicated oil-bearing zones in the Quintuco Formation will also be undertaken.
Most if not all of the planned work during the next month will be conducted with the existing service and completion rig under contract to Petrolifera. These testing, completion and remedial programs are expected to contribute additional productivity to Petrolifera in line with prevailing 2006 and 2007 guidance as contained in the company's presentation to shareholders in October, 2006; this is posted under Investor Information - Presentations on the company's website at www.petrolifera.ca.
Rigs
Petrolifera is pleased to report that it expects to have three and possibly four drilling rigs available to it for its anticipated record drilling program in Argentina during 2007.
The new service rig contracted to the company and recently imported into Argentina for next year's activity has now been released from customs. Petrolifera and the drilling contractor/owner of this rig have now agreed to convert it to a drilling rig and it should be operational by mid-February, 2007. This rig will then primarily be used to drill shallower wells around 1,000 meters on the Rinconada Block to the east of Puesto Morales.
The new truck-mounted drilling rig which was imported into Argentina is presently in customs. It is expected to be released shortly and is anticipated to be operational by about mid-January, 2007, at which time Petrolifera will recommence its drilling campaign at Puesto Morales. A second new drilling rig being imported into the country is now anticipated to be available by mid-March 2007. Importantly, this drilling rig will also be able to be utilized for completions, which should streamline Petrolifera's program.
Accordingly, Petrolifera anticipates having three drilling rigs available to it throughout most of 2007. Furthermore, the company was recently offered a fourth rig by an established Argentinean contractor; this is also a new rig which would be available by mid-year 2007. A decision on whether to contract this rig is under evaluation; Petrolifera is examining if additional suitable and qualified supervisory personnel are available to effectively manage a further expansion of its drilling operations.
Facilities and Pipeline
The company is pleased to report that deliveries of Puesto Morales crude oil through its newly-installed six-inch crude oil pipeline, which connects to main transmission facilities situated approximately 25 kilometers west of the field, commenced approximately one week ago. Initial deliveries are approximately 600 cubic meters per day (approximately 3,700 bbl/d), with the balance of Petrolifera's production still being trucked to third party processing and delivery facilities. As previously noted, this will continue until the company's own expanded treatment and water handling facilities are completed in the spring of 2007. The expansion and consequent delay in completion of these facilities was necessitated by the company's significant drilling success in the second half of 2006 and due to the likelihood of introducing some form of pressure maintenance to its operations during 2007. This would assist the company in sustaining, extending and expanding its growing production levels in ensuing years.
As previously mentioned, design and construction of a high pressure natural gas pipeline and a related natural gas plant to capture and sell solution gas produced in conjunction with the company's Sierras Blancas and Punta Rosada crude oil is proceeding; Petrolifera also plans to drill approximately ten Quintuco natural gas wells in the first half of 2007 to augment the solution gas volumes with deliveries of non-associated natural gas from this extensive gas reservoir. Completion of the gas plant will also permit the company to recover natural gas liquids for sale by the third quarter of 2007.
Other
Petrolifera has now completed its new 3D seismic program over the balance of the Puesto Morales and Rinconada Blocks which had not previously been evaluated. The data will be processed and then interpreted. It is hoped that a number of additional drillable prospects will emerge from this program in a manner similar to that which occurred on the northern portion of the Puesto Morales Block, which upon drilling has led to the significant production gains experienced through 2006.
Petrolifera has had a very successful 2006 and will be busy augmenting its Argentinean production base with completions and workovers during the next month, following which time the company will reactivate its multi-rig, multi-well drilling program for 2007 on both the Puesto Morales and Rinconada Blocks which comprise the company's 100 percent-owned concession. With over six times as many wells anticipated for Argentina in 2007 as compared to wells drilled in 2006, the company remains optimistic over its ability to add significant reserves and productivity next year. The company anticipates financing its total $130 million 2007 capital budget in Argentina, Peru and one other country in South America from forecast net revenues in Argentina. Surplus funds will be added to working capital, which now stands at approximately $45 million. Petrolifera has no debt.
Forward Looking Statements
Crescent Point Energy Trust
TSX: CPG.UN
December 12, 2006
Crescent Point Energy Trust and Mission Oil & Gas Inc. announce revised merger terms and intention to reschedule shareholder meeting
CALGARY - Crescent Point Energy Trust and Mission Oil & Gas Inc. announce that Independent Committees of both Boards of Directors have unanimously approved a proposal pursuant to which Crescent Point and Mission will revise the terms (the "Revised Plan") of the previously announced Plan of Arrangement (the "Plan") under which all of Mission's issued and outstanding shares will be exchanged for trust units of Crescent Point. The Independent Committee of Mission's Board of Directors has further agreed to terminate the special meeting of the holders of the common shares of Mission (the "Meeting") scheduled for December 18, 2006 and reschedule the Meeting for early February, 2007. Mission will also seek a further amendment of the interim order of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta to permit the rescheduling of the Meeting to on or about February 8, 2007 and to establish new dates for the deposit of proxies and the filing of notices of objection. Mission will press release the details in respect of the new dates for the deposit of proxies and the filing of notices of objection after the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta rules on the proposed amendment of the interim order.
REVISED PLAN
Under the terms of the Revised Plan, each issued and outstanding common share of Mission will be exchanged for 0.695 trust units of Crescent Point plus cash in the amount of $0.78 per Mission common share (comprised of Mission's prorata share of the December 2006 and January 2007 distributions plus $0.50 per Mission share). Based on the above exchange ratio, Crescent Point will issue an estimated 31.8 million trust units, assume approximately $46.5 million of net debt (net of option proceeds) and pay approximately $35.7 million in cash for a total consideration of approximately $647 million, or approximately $13.12 per Mission share, based on Crescent Point's December 11, 2006 closing price of $17.75. The Trust currently owns approximately 3.8 million Mission shares, which it purchased for $30 million, or $7.90 per Mission share, and has a total current value of approximately $50.0 million. Incorporating the Trust's existing ownership, the effective purchase price is approximately $627 million.
In agreeing to the Revised Plan, Crescent Point and Mission have agreed that either Mission or Crescent Point may terminate the arrangement agreement, without the payment of any termination fee to the other, upon receipt and review of the Proposals. The Revised Plan requires the requisite approval of Mission shareholders along with customary regulatory, court and other approvals.
An information circular in respect of the Revised Plan is expected to be mailed to Mission's shareholders in early January, 2007. This will allow the Revised Plan to be implemented on or about February 9, 2007, allowing shareholders of Mission who receive units of the Trust pursuant to the Revised Plan to receive the February distribution on the trust units payable March 15, 2007, which distribution is expected to be $0.20 per trust unit.
RATIONALE
On October 31, 2006, the federal Minister of Finance announced proposed changes to the Income Tax Act (Canada) affecting the taxation of income trusts, such as Crescent Point, and their unitholders (the "Proposals"). Mission's and Crescent Point's respective determination to reschedule the Meeting arises out of the continued consideration of the Proposals by the Independent Committee of the Board of Directors of Mission and the Independent Committee of the Board of Directors of the administrator of Crescent Point.
The rescheduling of the Meeting is expected to provide Mission's shareholders and the Independent Committees of the Boards of Directors of Crescent Point and Mission the opportunity to fully consider the guidelines setting out the application of the Proposals, which are expected to be provided by the Department of Finance before Christmas. Assuming announcement of the guidelines before Christmas, the Independent Committees will each determine if the Revised Plan is, in the case of Crescent Point, in the best interests of Crescent Point and its unitholders, and, in the case of Mission, in the best interests of Mission and its shareholders. The Independent Committees of the Boards of Directors may be required to re-evaluate their options with respect to the Revised Plan and timelines depending on the timing of the Department of Finance guidelines. A further press release will be issued by Mission and Crescent Point once the Independent Committees of the respective Boards of Directors have made a determination in this regard.
Since the announcement of the Plan on September 11, 2006, Mission has continued to successfully implement its capital program developing its Bakken light oil play. Drilling and fracture stimulation results and the start-up of the Mission Viewfield gas plant have all been positive and have exceeded Crescent Point's expectations. Based on the above, Crescent Point has increased its internal estimate of Mission's pro forma 2007 production profile from 5,500 boe/d to more than 6,000 boe/d. Crescent Point's management, Independent Committee of the Board of Directors and financial advisors are of the view that the rescheduling of the Meeting and the continued positive results of Mission's capital program support an increase in the consideration given to Mission shareholders.
FINANCIAL AND STRATEGIC ADVISORS
BMO Capital Markets and Scotia Waterous are acting as financial advisors to Crescent Point with respect to the Revised Plan. BMO Capital Markets and Scotia Waterous have advised the Independent Committee and Board of Directors of Crescent Point that, subject to review of the Proposals, they intend to provide opinions, as of the date of the information circular in respect of the Revised Plan, that the consideration offered pursuant to the Revised Plan is fair from a financial point of view to the Crescent Point unitholders.
GMP Securities L.P. and Orion Securities Inc. are acting as financial advisors to Mission with respect to the Revised Plan and GMP Securities L.P. has advised Mission's Independent Committee and Board of Directors that, subject to review of formal documentation, the consideration to be received by Mission shareholders is fair from a financial point of view. Tristone Capital Inc. acted as strategic advisor to Mission in connection with the Revised Plan.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Mystique Energy Inc.
TSX-V: MYS
December 14, 2006
Mystique Energy Issues Options to Non-Management Staff
CALGARY - Mystique Energy, Inc. announces that the directors of Mystique have approved the issuance of 1,392,500 options to non-management staff to purchase common shares of Mystique at an exercise price of $0.25. Options were not granted to officers or directors. The options were granted under the terms of Mystique's option plan which was approved by shareholders at the 2006 annual general meeting.
With the granting of these options, Mystique will have 59,840,682 shares outstanding, and 5,713,775 options, totaling 65,554,457 shares fully diluted.
About Mystique:
Based in Calgary, Mystique is involved in the exploration and exploitation of petroleum reserves in western Canada.
Disclaimers:
Use of the term barrels of oil equivalent "boe" may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 mcf:1 bbl is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
This news release may contain forward-looking information. Actual future results may differ materially from those contemplated. The risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could influence actual results are described in documents filed with regulatory authorities.
The TSX Venture Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
For further information:
Vic Luhowy,
President & Chief Executive Officer
Mystique Energy, Inc.
Tel: (403) 261-3634
Fax: (403) 265-3348
vic@mystiqueenergy.ca
www.mystiqueenergy.ca
Putin's Resource Nationalism Forces Shell to Sell
By Cyril Widdershoven
11 Dec 2006 at 02:32 PM EST
AMSTERDAM (ResourceInvestor.com) -- The unexpected news that British-Dutch oil and gas major Royal Dutch Shell [NYSE:RDS-B; LSE:RDSA] has offered to cede control over its Russian venture in Sakhalin does not bode well for the international investment community in the country. International news sources have reported that Shell has offered the Russian government to cede control of the $22 billion Sakhalin-2 project, which has been always seen as one of Shell’s main core projects on which it is building its future.
At the same time, Shell’s defeat on the hands of Russia’s President Vladimir Putin shows Russia’s nationalistic economic politics to become stronger. Official sources have stated that the deal has been reached between Shell and the world’s largest gas company Russia’s Gazprom, but analysts see the latter development as victory of Russia’s ruling elite, currently being supported by Putin. After years of selling out to Russian oligarchs and international investors, Putin has been putting in place a totally nationalistic resource based policy, by which he wants to show that the Kremlin still holds real power, not the market economics introduced under his predecessors.
Shell’s defeat also could mean the start of an all-out war between Russia’s ruling nationalistic elite, which has been vying for a new power position of companies such as Gazprom and Rosneft, and the international investment community. The latter has been the main backer of Russia’s current economic growth, but could now be confronted by a position in which it will be receiving major losses or increased Russian participation in all projects in place or lined up for the coming years.
Reuters reported in the last hours that Shell has been in talks since weeks with the Russian government and Gazprom to solve its ongoing ‘environmental conflict’ regarding Sakhalin-2. Because several Russian government institutions have objected to Shell’s operations on Shakhalin-2, the project has been delayed, while several other oil and gas projects have been put on hold totally. Reuters also reported that Shell has committed itself to sell part of its current 55% equity stake in Sakhalin-2, which would be offered to Gazprom. Gazprom has been hunting Shell, and other European players in Russia’s hydrocarbon sector, such as [NYSE:TOT] and BP [NYSE:BP], for a partial retreat of Western interests.
In a reaction given by Jeroen van der Veer, CEO of Shell, stated that talks have been held but no information has been given regarding the outcome. Shell’s CEO has met with Gazprom head Alexei Miller in Moscow last week. Not only Shell’s Russian operations could now be under threat, as Gazprom will continue to keep the pressure on.
Analysts also expect that Miller, backed by Putin, will increase overall pressure on the British-Dutch major in a move to get an opening in another venture targeted by Gazprom for years, Shell’s American LNG operations. Until now, Shell has vigorously declined any moves this way but the Sakhalin-2 developments don’t bode well for this operation too. Several Russian government officials have stated that the Sakhalin-2 issue is not even solved yet, as environmental issues are still of concern. Based on independent assessments, this could mean that Sakhalin-2 keeps blocked as long as Shell is not willing to give Gazprom a stake in the U.S. re-gasification business too.
With Shell on its knees, the time could be right for Putin’s supporters to redirect part of their nationalistic efforts to other players in Russia. American sources have stated that a main target could be the immense investments and stakes held by the Anglo-Russian venture TNK-BP. Part of BP’s future growth depends on its Russian investments and potential production capacity of the TNK-BP venture. If this would come under pressure by Putin or Gazprom, the future of BP also could be partly in doubt.
Russian analysts have warned that growing resource nationalism in Russia is not based on commercial considerations but have been fed by the upcoming Russian general elections in December 2007. Putin supporters seem to be heading for all out control of the national hydrocarbon reserves largely to fund or support upcoming Putin successors. It seems that Putin has decided to revoke his former commitments to honour international agreements and to step into the same policy implemented by his predecessors, Gorbatshov and Jeltsin. Both former leaders needed a new oligarchy to build their respective power base on.
Russia’s energy sector is at present, next to its steel and metal sectors, the only viable economic sector on which future growth can be build upon. To hold the power in the latter sectors means holding the power in Russia. Shell, BP, Total and others will have to assess the current situation, partly lick their wounds and try to see if there is a future in Russia at all. For most operators no choice other than sucking up to Putin is there, even that cost overruns, diminishing profit margins or lower production shares will have a debilitating effect on share prices at present.
It seems that the oil war has started, this time not in the Middle East but in the East. Russia’s current drive to regain its position as power broker in the oil and gas sector has been promoted to full functionality. Hopefully, the latter will not mean that other producers (OPEC, Mexico, Angola, Egypt) will follow into the steps of Putin.
For consumer countries the current developments also don’t bode well. Gazprom’s stranglehold over Europe already has become a main geopolitical worry. Its increased power position in Russia’s crude oil sector, in combination with its already existing monopoly in natural gas, only will decrease Brussels powers to counter.
Shell has played a tough game, but as sometimes is the case in football, even when you play a super game, a referee (Putin) can change the game to the opposite. Offices in The Hague will be alight for several days, having consultants and managers trying to assess the situation. However, as long as investors don’t learn from their mistakes, national governments always will be able to gain the overhand.
Shell, BP and others are now paying the price of the combination of politically unwell Europe and commercial mistakes. The Russian bear has shown its claws again, and investors are currently retreating into their ‘Shells.’
http://www.resourceinvestor.com/pebble.asp?relid=27056
tackler,
Yes, I had to reread that sentence and think about it.
For example, we think of a continuous increases in costs, prices, and wages as an inflationary spirals and then
continuous decreases in costs, prices, and wages as a deflationary spirals.
If we look at the continuous increased use of energy by China and India, it is indeed spiraling up due to the acceleration in industrialization.
I'm still waiting for my portfolio to spiral up; it just meanders.
LOL, I should have bought Aurelian Resources, that is indeed the ultimate stock price spiral increase over the last year.
Your point is well taken, soaring would have been a better word.
Now let's see what happens to Dejour's stock price.
Take care,
sumisu
LOL I think they mean soaring...
"spiralling demand for energy"
I suppose it can mean both but I always think of spiralling as dropping.
Dejour's Common Shares List on the OTC Bulletin Board
Monday December 11, 6:21 pm ET
TSX-V: DJE
VANCOUVER, Dec. 11 /CNW/ - Dejour Enterprises Ltd. ("Dejour") (TSX-V: "DJE", TSX-V: "DJE.WT", OTCBB: "DJEEF") announces its application to the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) has been accepted and the Company has formally begun trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol DJEEF.
Robert L. Hodgkinson, Chairman & CEO, of Dejour Enterprises Ltd. states "this listing, complete with registered US market makers, will lead to increased liquidity for all Dejour shareholders and provide US investors with improved access to our market in a more efficient manner. We are thankful for the efforts of Westminster Securities in this regard."
Dejour continues to actively trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under its current trading symbol (DJE.V) and also the Frankfurt Exchange (D5R). Average daily share trading volume for 2006 has been in excess of 300,000 shares.
About Dejour
Dejour Enterprises Ltd. is a Canadian energy-focused company developing and leveraging high impact exploration investments in both uranium and oil and gas resulting from the global market's dwindling conventional supply and spiralling demand for energy. The Company is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (DJE.V), OTCBB (DJEEF), and Frankfurt (D5R). Dejour is a reporting issuer to the SEC. Refer to www.dejour.com for company details or contact the Office of Investor Relations at investor(at)dejour.com
DEJOUR ENTERPRISES LTD.
Robert L. Hodgkinson
Chairman and CEO
THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY
OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
For further information
Suite 1100-808 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 2X4, Telephone: (604) 638-5050, Facsimile: (604) 638-5051, Email: investor@dejour.com, www.dejour.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Dejour Enterprises Ltd.
Alberta Clipper budgets $60-million for 2007 drilling
2006-12-08 09:54 ET - News Release
Mr. Kel Johnston reports
ALBERTA CLIPPER ENERGY INC. (ACN - TSX) ANNOUNCES 2007 CAPITAL BUDGET
Alberta Clipper Energy Inc.'s board of directors has approved a $60-million capital budget for 2007. The budget projects drilling 27 wells (14.6 net) in the company's three core operating areas. Of the $60-million, approximately $42-million will be spent in western Alberta, $16-million in northeast British Columbia and $2-million in central Alberta. Over 90 per cent of the capital program will be invested in drilling and associated development activities with 66 per cent of the budget being allocated to light oil targets on the Sylvan Lake Leduc play. Based on this capital program, the company forecasts a 2007 exit rate of between 3,000 and 3,500 barrels of oil equivalent per day.
With Alberta Clipper having attained a 100-per-cent exploration success rate on the Leduc light oil play in 2006, a significant proportion of the company's 2007 capital program will be dedicated toward extending the play along the Leduc Rimbey trend outside of the existing producing-area boundaries. Alberta Clipper has budgeted to drill 10 Leduc exploratory wells in 2007 at working interests of between 50 and 100 per cent. In addition, seven lower-risk Leduc development wells will be drilled over the course of the year as follow-ups to recent discoveries made by the company.
A total of 27 wells are planned for 2007, including 11 that are classified as exploratory and 16 of a development nature. The $60-million budget also anticipates the preinvestment of approximately $4-million on land and seismic in the company's core areas. The company currently holds approximately 230,000 acres of net undeveloped land and 3,100 square kilometres of 3-D seismic data in its core operating areas.
Current production is 1,800 boe/d with an additional 250 boe/d that is expected to be on production prior to year-end, allowing the company to attain its 2006 exit rate target of 2,000 boe/d.
As a result of the year-round access now provided by the new road at Trutch, Alta., Clipper has accelerated one well from its first quarter 2007 drilling program into the fourth quarter of 2006. The company has drilled two wells during the fourth quarter and is nearing total depth on a third at Trutch. The first well tested at rates of up to 1.2 million cubic feet per day and the second well is being prepared for completion and testing. Both wells are expected to be on stream prior to year-end bringing the total producing well count at Trutch to nine. The well that is currently drilling and the final well to be drilled prior to year-end are both expected to be on stream prior to the end of the first quarter of 2007 pending successful test results.
At Sylvan Lake, Alberta Clipper has also accelerated the drilling of a 100-per-cent Leduc location from the first quarter of 2007. The 6-15-37-5W5 well is targeting a Leduc pinnacle reef and is expected to reach total depth prior to the end of the year. In addition, a further Leduc well at 7-5-38-4W5 is undergoing completion and testing operations and is expected to be producing by the end of the year, bringing the total number of new Leduc wells brought on stream in 2006 to eight. One final Leduc exploratory drilling location is expected to spud in late December.
First quarter 2007 activity will include five Leduc locations at Sylvan Lake and two drilling locations, and two recompletions at Trutch targeting Halfway gas. In addition, construction will begin on the company's new 5,000 bopd battery at Sylvan Lake where the company is near the limitations of the existing battery. The new capacity will allow the company to fully optimize its existing wells and will provide processing capacity for future exploration and development activity.
Alberta Clipper's 2007 capital program will continue to focus on its light oil play at Sylvan Lake and its resource gas development project at Trutch. The preinvestment made during 2006 in land, seismic and infrastructure in these areas will allow the company to allocate a larger component of its total 2007 budget to drilling. The 2007 drilling program exposes the company to both multiple high-impact, light-oil prospects, each with the ability to have a material impact on the company, and a predictable gas development program that will provide an inventory of locations for many years.
We seek Safe Harbor.
Bulldog Resources Announces Additional Fertile Locations, a New Pool Discovery, a Strategic Acquistion, and Initial 2007 Guidance
Thursday December 7, 7:06 pm ET
CALGARY, ALBERTA--(CCNMatthews - Dec. 7, 2006) - Bulldog Resources Inc. (TSX:BD - News) is pleased to announce an expansion of our horizontal drilling inventory at Fertile, a new pool discovery and a strategic asset acquisition in Southeast Saskatchewan, and our initial 2007 guidance.
Operational Update
An Exceptional Light Oil Pool
Our step out drilling using vertical stratigraphic test wells has significantly expanded the defined size of the Fertile light oil pool. To date, seven vertical stratigraphic test wells have logged and cored the reservoir confirming an aerial pool size in excess of 3.5 sections. Based on our vertical delineation drilling, 17 horizontal oil wells (8.5 net) and normal 150 meter inter well spacing, we have identified approximately 35 additional horizontal drilling locations (17.5 net) setting up a very active program for 2007.
Bulldog has a 50% working interest and is the operator of the Fertile property.
Fertile Production Facilities
We have pursued three initiatives to improve the production and economics of our Fertile operations:
- We recently completed a second expansion of the Fertile production facilities to 4,800 Bbls/day through the installation of a second treater and free water knock-out.
- Enbridge Pipelines Inc. has completed an oil pipeline tie-in to the Fertile central oil battery. This pipeline will eliminate oil trucking expenses (which were $1.29 per Bbl in Q3, 2006) as well as eliminate potential disruption in transporting our oil production during spring break up.
- Construction has commenced on a pipeline to recover natural gas volumes produced at the Fertile facility. This pipeline will eliminate flaring and provide improved resource conservation and economics. Completion of the pipeline is expected in early 2007 and will result in gas sales of approximately 250 mcf/day net. Payout of the estimated $1.3 million required to build the pipeline is approximately 18 months.
A New Pool Discovery at Browning
The expansion of our exploration program has resulted in a new pool light oil discovery in Southeast Saskatchewan.
At Browning, Bulldog has drilled one vertical and one follow up horizontal well resulting in 140 Bbls/day of net oil production. Additional drilling is planned for 2007 on this 100% owned property. Bulldog operates a 96% working interest oil facility near this discovery.
A Strategic Acquisition
After a sales process, Bulldog, though a series of transactions, has entered into an agreement to acquire oil and gas assets of a privately held oil and gas company whose President is the Chairman of the Board of Bulldog. The transaction was approved by the remaining independent members of the Board of Directors prior to its completion.
The properties are located in Bulldog's operating area of Southeast Saskatchewan and are near our existing properties. The property acquisition is subject to regulatory and other approvals and is expected to close in January, 2007.
The consideration to be paid by Bulldog is $17.0 million consisting of 2,500,000 common shares issued from treasury and $7.0 million cash.
This strategic acquisition increases Bulldog's undeveloped land holdings, reserves, production volumes and cash flow. It expands our drilling opportunities with a diversified inventory of prospects on play types Bulldog has enjoyed previous success.
- Production:
Estimated January 2007 production (light oil) 300 Bbls/day.
- Land:
Bulldog will acquire interests in more than 5,000 net acres of undeveloped land (valued by Bulldog at approximately $1.0 million).
- Drilling locations:
Greater than 17 gross horizontal and vertical drilling locations.
- Reserves:
Three of the properties were evaluated by GLJ Petroleum Consultants. Bulldog did an internal evaluation on all the properties for proven and probable reserves and is acquiring these assets at a competitive market price. NI 51-101 does not permit the publishing of internal estimates of reserves.
The acquisition metrics of this transaction are favourable. Excluding the valuation attached to undeveloped land, our cost is approximately $53,500 per flowing Boe and the cash flow multiple based upon our 2007 projections is less than four times. While we are precluded from publishing a reserve cost per barrel, management has thoroughly evaluated the properties and is comfortable that the acquisition is competitive with recent market transactions. Our analysis also concludes that this acquisition is accretive on a per share basis, to Bulldog's reserves, production volumes and cash flow.
On closing of the acquisition in mid-January, Bulldog will have 27,459,202 common shares outstanding and 29,766,702 common shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis.
Initial 2007 Guidance
First Quarter Capital Expenditures
Bulldog's Board of Directors has approved a first quarter capital expenditure budget of $8.0 million. Seven horizontal wells and one vertical well (3.50 net) are planned for the Fertile property. Five wells (2.68 net) are planned for other areas including the acquisition properties.
We continually focus on the expansion of our drilling opportunities. In Q1, 2007 we have planned seismic expenditures of approximately $0.8 million and land expenditures of approximately $0.5 million to provide additional growth opportunities.
We will update our 2007 capital expenditure program in the second quarter after we have further evaluated the acquired properties and the results of our expanded exploration program are integrated into our plans.
Initial 2007 Average Production Forecast
Due to the evolving nature of our 2007 capital expenditure plans, we have forecasted Bulldog's initial 2007 average annual production at 1,700 Boe/day. We intend to provide an up-date to this forecast as our operations progress.
Initial 2007 Cash Flow Guidance
Based upon our initial average production forecast of 1,700 Boe/day and a 2007 estimated WTI oil price of US$60/Bbl, we project Bulldog will cash flow $24 million or $0.88 per share basic in 2007.
Positioned for Continued Growth
Strong Financial Position
Proforma the property acquisition, Bulldog will have approximately $4.3 million of net debt at December 31, 2006. This would represent approximately 0.2 times 2007 forecasted cash flow. Our bank lines of credit are in the process of being formally expanded and we estimate the authorized facility will exceed $14 million. Our strong cash flows and expanded bank line will position Bulldog to pursue additional expansion activities in 2007.
Expanding Growth Opportunities
The expansion of the number of horizontal locations at Fertile and the acquisition of the private company properties provides Bulldog with an exciting inventory of development and step out drilling opportunities. Expansion of our high impact exploration initiatives will provide Bulldog with a range of risk/reward drilling projects. We will continue to evaluate potential acquisitions within our activity areas.
Top Operating Performance
BMO Capital Markets recently compared the third quarter results of 31 public junior companies in Canada. According to the BMO report, Bulldog Resources had the highest cash flow netback in the industry at $56.86 per Boe, compared to the industry peer median of $23.22 per Boe. Bulldog's operating expenses were the lowest of the junior companies at $1.78 per Boe compared to the group median operating expenses of $9.25 per Boe. Bulldog led all junior companies with quarter over quarter production per share growth of 95%.
Forward Looking Information
Certain statements included in this press release constitute forward-looking statements under applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements or information typically contain statements with words such as "anticipate", "believe", "expect", "plan", "intend", "estimate", "propose", or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. Forward-looking statements or information in this press release include but are not limited to capital expenditures, business strategy and objectives, net revenue, future production levels, developments plans and the timing thereof, operating and other costs, royalty rates etc. Such forward looking information involves substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Most of these are beyond Bulldog's control and include: the impact of general economic conditions, industry conditions, volatility of commodity prices, currency fluctuations, imprecision of reserve estimates, environmental risks, competition from other producers, and the availability of qualified personnel and services, stock market volatility, and the access to sufficient capital from internal and external sources.
Such forward-looking statements or information are based on a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect. Although Bulldog believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements or information are reasonable, undo reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements because Bulldog can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements or information are based on current expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by Bulldog and described in the forward-looking statements or information.
Finally, in the presentation of the press release Bulldog uses two terms that are universally applied in analyzing corporate performance within the oil and gas industry as explained below.
Cash Flow - This measure is considered critical within our industry both in terms of measuring success in our historical operations and being an indicator of funding sources for on-going efforts to replace production volumes and increase reserve volumes. Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires that "funds flow from operating activities" be the measurement focus. This latter term is derived from "cash flow from operations" as defined by Bulldog adjusted for the change in non-cash working capital. Bulldog believes "cash flow " and "cash flow per share" to be more meaningful measures of our performance and therefore have used these terms throughout this press release. Accordingly, Bulldog is required to advise the reader that: (a) these are non-GAAP measures for purposes of Canadian accounting standards; and (b) our determinations may not be comparable to those reported by other companies.
Meaning of Boe and Boe/day - When used in this press release, boe means a barrel of oil equivalent on the basis of 1 boe to 6 thousand cubic feet of natural gas. Boe/day means a barrel of oil equivalent per day. Boe's may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 1 boe for 6 thousand cubic feet of natural gas is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the well head.
Contact:
Ken McKay
Bulldog Resources Inc.
President & CEO
(403) 266-6902
Rob Kraft
Bulldog Resources Inc.
Chief Financial Officer
(403) 266-6902
Email: Email: info@bulldogresources.ca
Website: www.bulldogresources.ca
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Bulldog Resources Inc.
Petroleum Producers Forecast Strong Oilpatch Spending for 2007
By Judy Monchuk
05 Dec 2006 at 10:22 AM EST
CALGARY (CP) -- Canada's oil and gas producers will ease off spending in 2007, a move driven by doubts about natural gas prices and several oilpatch giants scaling back growth projections, according to the industry's main association.
''It's a slowdown, but it's more like a foot off the accelerator rather than someone jamming on the brakes,'' Greg Stringham, vice-president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, said Tuesday.
Industry spending for next year is forecast at C$41 billion, down from the C$44 billion expected by the end of 2006 and 2005's record C$45 billion in expenditures, Stringham said.
Several oilpatch heavyweights recently announced plans to curtail their natural gas drilling operations because of weak prices and spiralling costs in Alberta's overheated economy.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. [TSX:CNQ] said recently it would slash its 2007 drilling activity by 46% compared with this year's activity, part of C$1.5 billion in cuts designed to ''push back'' on prices charged by service providers and suppliers.
Talisman Energy Corp. [TSX:TLM; NYSE:TLM] is deferring about C$1 billion in spending on exploration and development projects in 2007, although it still plans to spend about the same on exploration as it did this year, about C$4.8 billion.
''From an overall economic perspective, from the economy of Alberta and the economy of Western Canada, this moderation really does take some of the crisis mentality out of the inflating costs we've had,'' said Stringham.
''Many of our guys are looking at this and saying the levels we're at right now are probably more sustainable than the rampant levels of growth we've had over the last three years.''
Costs are starting to ease slightly, especially on rig rates as more rigs sit idle. There are also indications that capital material costs such as steel, which is set on a global scale, are also flattening out.
The drilling industry has projected drops in exploratory drilling for the balance of 2006 and through 2007. That could change quickly if natural gas prices jump or a prolonged bout of cold weather reduces the record stockpiles of natural gas in the United States.
Natural gas prices were US$7.70 per 1,000 cubic feet on Tuesday, a long way from the dizzying heights of US$14 in mid 2005. But gas prices stuck near US$4 for weeks this past summer and that makes producers nervous about long-term prospects.
''There is a worry that the natural gas prices we saw below C$4 make some of that gas, particularly coal bed methane, uneconomic,'' said Stringham.
The moderation in spending does not extend to the oilsands of northern Alberta, where spending is expected to jump C$1.5 billion to C$12.5 billion in 2007. Industry has projected to spend C$100 billion in the oilsands over the next decade.
© The Canadian Press 2006
Dr. Michael A. Berry to Join Dejour Board of Advisors
Monday December 4, 1:39 pm ET
TSX-V: DJE
VANCOUVER, Dec. 4 /CNW/ - Dejour Enterprises Ltd. (TSX-V: DJE - News, DJE.WT - News) is pleased to announce the appointment of Dr. Michael Berry to its Board of Advisors, consulting to the Company on financial affairs.
Dr. Berry is a pioneer in the emerging field of "discovery investing" - investing in companies that focus on discovering natural resources or developing new medical and high technology. In 1999, he recognized the global commodity cycle and developed techniques for wealth creation through discovery in energy and mining companies.
Previously, Dr. Berry successfully managed small and mid cap value funds for Heartland Advisors and Kemper Scudder. His research in the study of behavioural strategies for investing has been published in numerous academic and practitioner journals.
Dr. Berry was a professor of investments at the Darden School, University of Virginia, and has held the Wheat First Endowed Chair at James Madison University. He publishes daily 'Morning Notes by Michael Berry', discussing geopolitics and their effect on capital markets. His contact information is isa529(at)aol.com.
"Mike Berry is an inspiration in the field of discovery investing. He has provided Dejour management with enlightened insight focused on the needs and opportunities of the public market states Robert L. Hodgkinson, Chairman and CEO. "It is anticipated that Dr. Berry will greatly assist Dejour to maximize market exposure as Company energy strategies continue to evolve."
Mr. Berry's contract with Dejour will span an initial term of two years, and include 200k options vesting over that period, with a monthly retainer subject to certain provisions.
THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY
OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
For further information
DEJOUR ENTRPRISES LTD., Robert L. Hodgkinson, Chairman and CEO, Suite 1100-808 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6C 2X4, Telephone: (604) 638-5050, Facsimile: (604) 638-5051, Email: investor@dejour.com, www.dejour.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Dejour Enterprises Ltd.
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has come across a list of junior stocks with little to no debt, decent assets (land holdings) and good management? Fom time to time I have seen different companies mentioned but never wrote them down (stupid Still).
I'm hoping someone has seen such a list or knows of a few companies like this to get such a list started. Thank you.
Tim
Toronto stocks set record highs on oils, golds
Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:54 PM EST
TORONTO (Reuters) - The Toronto Stock Exchange's main index spiked to record highs on Thursday as surging oil and bullion prices lifted energy and gold-mining issues.
After peaking at a record 12,782.55 earlier in the day, the S&P/TSX composite index <.GSPTSE> closed 84.22 points higher than Wednesday's record close, or 0.7 percent, at 12,752.38. Seven of the TSX index's 10 main groups were up.
Entering what historically is its best month, the TSX index climbed 3.3 percent in November, which kicked off with a 294.20-point freefall following the federal government's decision to tax income trusts in the same way it taxes corporations.
Crude oil and gold futures, telling barometers for the resource-laden index, punched through multiple-month highs on Thursday, yanking up Toronto's heavily-weighted energy and materials sectors.
U.S. crude hit $63.77, its highest level in two months, on news that Angola, Sudan and Ecuador expressed interest in joining OPEC -- a move that would strengthen the cartel's market muscle.
Among those oil and gas producers benefiting, Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (CNQ.TO: Quote) jumped C$1.12, or 1.8 percent, to C$61.90.
Meanwhile, spot gold hit a six-month high above $640 an ounce as the U.S. dollar fell further against major currencies.
Gold producers soared 4.9 percent, the subsector's biggest leap since June, and represented the four biggest gainers in the TSX materials group. Those included Yamana Gold Inc. (YRI.TO: Quote), up 99 Canadian cents, or 7.2 percent, at C$14.74, and Kinross Gold Corp. (K.TO: Quote), which rose 63 Canadian cents, or 4.6 percent, to C$14.34.
The financials sector, which represents about one-third of the benchmark index, dipped for a fifth straight session -- even as Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO: Quote) reported impressive fourth-quarter earnings.
The country's largest bank was among the TSX's biggest losers by weight, falling 18 Canadian cents, or 0.3 percent, to C$53.28.
($1=$1.14 Canadian)
Ya maybe a hollow threat.
tackler,
"including flooding the oil market to crash prices and thus limit Iran's ability to finance Shi'ite militias in Iraq"
Saudi Arabia has been promising to increase oil production for a while, not just for humanitarian purposes. It has not. I believe that Ghawar, its biggest oil field, and which has been producing oil since the late 1940's, is already in decline.
This is a tragic mess in Iraq; I don't think there will ever be a resolution. And it all centers around oil.
sumisu
Seems like everyone has a stake in Iraq.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Using money, weapons or its oil power, Saudi Arabia will intervene to prevent Iranian-backed Shi'ite militias from massacring Iraqi Sunni Muslims once the United States begins pulling out of Iraq, a security adviser to the Saudi government said on Wednesday.
Nawaf Obaid, writing in The Washington Post, said the Saudi leadership was preparing to revise its Iraq policy to deal with the aftermath of a possible U.S. pullout, and is considering options including flooding the oil market to crash prices and thus limit Iran's ability to finance Shi'ite militias in Iraq.
"To be sure, Saudi engagement in Iraq carries great risks -- it could spark a regional war. So be it: The consequences of inaction are far worse," Obaid said.
The article said the opinions expressed were Obaid's own and not those of the Saudi government.
"To turn a blind eye to the massacre of Iraqi Sunnis would be to abandon the principles upon which the kingdom was founded. It would undermine Saudi Arabia's credibility in the Sunni world and would be a capitulation to Iran's militarist actions in the region," he said.
President Bush will meet Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki in Jordan on Wednesday to discuss a surge in Sunni-Shi'ite violence in Iraq.
Bush has said he does not support calls for a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, but he is expected soon to receive proposals for possible changes in U.S. policy in Iraq from a bipartisan panel.
Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil producer and exporter and a close U.S. ally, fears Shi'ite Iran has been gaining influence since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq toppled Saddam Hussein's government.
Vice President Dick Cheney held talks with Saudi King Abdullah in Riyadh on Saturday. Details were not disclosed.
Obaid said Cheney's visit "underlines the pre-eminence of Saudi Arabia in the region and its importance to U.S. strategy in Iraq."
He said if the United States begins withdrawing from Iraq, "one of the first consequences will be massive Saudi intervention to stop Iranian-backed Shi'ite militias from butchering Iraqi Sunnis."
Obaid listed three options being considered by the Saudi government:
- providing "Sunni military leaders (primarily ex-Baathist members of the former Iraqi officer corps, who make up the backbone of the insurgency) with the same types of assistance," including funding and arms.
- establishing new Sunni brigades to combat the Iranian-backed militias;
- or the Saudi king "may decide to strangle Iranian funding of the militias through oil policy. If Saudi Arabia boosted production and cut the price of oil in half ... it would be devastating to Iran ... The result would be to limit Tehran's ability to continue funneling hundreds of millions each year to Shi'ite militias in Iraq and elsewhere."
Not realy.
Maybe harper will sell the west coast Russia.
Why not?
Between logging, over fishing of the salmon resource and urbanization BC doesn't have an environmental leg to stand on.
You think that it'll ever happen?
B.C.'s offshore resources would 'transform' province
The benefits would be enormous, chamber lunch told
Scott Simpson
Vancouver Sun
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
CREDIT: Peter Battistoni, Vancouver Sun
Danny Williams, premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, is former president of an offshore oil and gas company.
British Columbia's vast offshore oil and natural gas resources should be recognized and developed as one of Canada's best opportunities for economic growth, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams told a receptive audience at a B.C. Chamber of Commerce luncheon on Monday.
Williams, one-time president of an offshore oil and gas company working off Canada's fossil-fuel-rich east coast, said it would be easy to adopt a pessimistic attitude and shy away from the rich opportunity off B.C.'s coast.
But he said the opportunities are too great to ignore, and that the industry can develop in a way that will minimize adverse environmental impacts.
Williams said Newfoundland's three offshore oil and gas projects, coupled with resource developments such as the Voisey Bay nickel deposit, have given the province the strongest rate of economic growth in Canada.
B.C. can expect the same, Williams suggested.
"It would completely transform what is already a very, very beautiful province," he said.
At peak production, the three Newfoundland projects will account for almost 50 per cent of Canada's annual production of light crude oil -- and further reserves showing even greater potential have been estimated.
"Newfoundland and Labrador has sometimes been described disparagingly as the poor cousin of Confederation -- as defeatists who do not want to know, or do not know, how to take care of themselves," Williams said.
"The unemployment rate in 2006 is the lowest it has been in 25 years. Since 1996, the average annual labour force has grown by nine per cent. In 2006, personal income will grow by four per cent."
B.C.'s offshore oil and gas resources are believed to be the largest of any single North American jurisdiction. They have been locked up under a federal moratorium for more than 30 years, although the provincial government is eager to see Ottawa lift its ban on exploration and development.
Paraphrasing Winston Churchill, Williams said, "It's easy to be very pessimistic, and I can give you five reasons to say why not."
But he said there are "ways of doing it responsibly.
"The benefits that could come back to British Columbia ... would be enormous," Williams added.
He noted that Prime Minister Stephen Harper has expressed a desire to make Canada into an international "energy powerhouse" and said development of the B.C. offshore, coupled with expanded activity in his own province, would help accomplish that vision.
"The implications are huge, the energy implications for this country," Williams said. "We have a responsibility as provinces and as a country to seize this great opportunity, and we are going to be world leaders here. We think British Columbia is a great opportunity."
Last week, B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell mentioned during a question-and-answer session with a business audience in Hong Kong that exploration could be underway within two to three years.
Over the past two years since a federal government panel declined to offer a definitive verdict on the merits of the moratorium, the provincial government has been working at a grassroots level, with first nations and coastal communities, to make an economic case for commencing exploration.
Williams urged the chamber, one of the industry's strongest proponents in B.C., to "keep the attention level up."
"Your premier is basically indicating that he wants this advanced ... within the next three or four years. You need to work with those that are confident, but you also need to educate those that are negative so that you can show to them the benefits that will come."
Chamber president John Winter described Williams's speech as "some words of wisdom from people who've done it.
"The thing about the offshore industry around the world is that every location is unique in its own ability to get it done, but the results, the benefits, are the same for everybody who's in the business.
"As long as you can negotiate the best kind of economic deal and look after the environment at the same time. Anybody who has seen the North Atlantic knows that if you can overcome those obstacles, I don't think the ones presented here are any more formidable."
Pyramid Petroleum Inc.
TSX-V: PYR
November 27, 2006
Pyramid Petroleum provides operations update - additional assets in Alberta and Montana improve prospects and reserves
CALGARY - Pyramid Petroleum Inc. today announced new drilling prospects in Alberta, the acquisition of an additional working interest in its Alberta and Montana assets, the opening of an office in Indonesia and the signing of an investor relations agreement with Iradesso Communications.
Ilyas Chaudhary, Chairman and CEO of Pyramid noted substantial progress is being made in growing the value of the Company: "Our new drilling prospects in Alberta have the potential to significantly increase out production and reserves, and the acquisition of an additional working interest in our existing Alberta and Montana assets will improve our operating results going forward. We are currently in negotiations for farm-in opportunities in Indonesia and the opening of our representative office in Jakarta reflects our confidence in the ultimate success of these negotiations. As well, we have contracted Iradesso Communications to improve our efforts to keep the market informed of our progress."
New Drilling Prospects in Alberta
Pyramid has acquired 160 acres of crown land in the Thompson Lake area of eastern Alberta, where the Company is targeting light oil formation in the Dina sandstone. A seismic has identified a potential oil-bearing formation at a depth of less than 1,000 metres. As well, Pyramid has entered into a seismic option and farm-in agreement on four parcels of land totaling 2,040 acres in the Provost area of southeastern Alberta. Pursuant to the agreement, Pyramid intends to fund the drilling of two wells, earning 100 percent for each parcel, subject to an overriding royalty. Trade seismic on these lands has been acquired and reprocessed and is currently being evaluated. Pyramid anticipates mapping two drillable prospects on these lands. The primary objective is Dina light oil at a depth of less than 1,000 meters, which is a productive zone throughout the area. Rig availability and services has recently improved significantly in Alberta, and Pyramid plans to drill these prospects in the first quarter of
2007.
Acquisition of additional working interest in Alberta and Montana
Pyramid has purchased, subject to stock exchange approval, an additional 0.75 percent working interest in the Alberta and Montana assets in which the Company previously announced a 5.09 percent working interest on May 4, 2006. The purchase consists of Pyramid's CEO's remaining interest in 49 producing oil wells and 963 producing gas wells; 200 wells that are currently not producing, some of which could be put on production with minimal expenditure; 560,000 acres of developed land and 850,000 acres of undeveloped land; 450 miles of pipeline system; and one gas processing plant. Pyramid has issued a promissory note in the amount of US$600,000 as payment in full for the purchase of the 0.75 percent interest in the assets. The promissory note is due on March 31, 2008 and carries an annual interest rate of 8 percent. The purchase will add proved reserves of 144,000 barrels of oil equivalent ("boe") to Pyramid.
Representative office in Indonesia
Pyramid has opened a representative office in Jakarta, Indonesia to expedite current negotiations of farm-in arrangements and to assist in identifying new opportunities in the region.
Investor relations agreement
Pyramid has signed an agreement, effective November 1, 2006, with Iradesso Communications Corp. ("Iradesso"), a Calgary-based investor relations firm, to assist the Company to communicate its plans and results to the investment community. The TSX Venture Exchange requires that details of the arrangement between Pyramid and Iradesso be disclosed. Iradesso will provide investor relations consulting and design services at a rate of $6,000 per month. The agreement is binding until January 31, 2007, after which either party can amend or terminate the agreement on 30 days' notice. Iradesso's role includes development of Pyramid's communications materials, including website, corporate profile and corporate presentation, as well as development of Pyramid's annual and quarterly reports and other marketing materials to ensure Pyramid communicates effectively with investors. Iradesso will also answer investor questions, set up investor meetings and proactively share the Pyramid story with investors. Ken Wetherell will be Iradesso's main investor relations contact for Pyramid. Iradesso and its employees do not currently have any interest, directly or indirectly, in Pyramid.
About Pyramid
Pyramid Petroleum is an oil and gas exploration and production company based in Calgary, Alberta. The Company's focus is on development of domestic and international hydrocarbon projects. Pyramid has non-operated working interests in producing properties located in Alberta, Montana and the Gulf of Mexico. The combined production net to Pyramid from these properties is currently approximately 325 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boepd).
The Company's shares are listed on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol PYR.
Resource Potential of Dejour Piceance/Uinta Properties Pegged at 5.3 Trillion Cubic Feet of Natural Gas and 2 Billion Barrels of Oil
Friday November 24, 6:49 pm ET
TSX-V: DJE
VANCOUVER, Nov. 24 /CNW/ - Dejour Enterprises Ltd. ("Dejour") (TSX-V: "DJE", TSX-V: "DJE.WT", OTCBB: "DJEEF") announces that it has received reports evaluating the resource potential of its 'Retamco JV' properties in the Piceance and Uinta Basins (see press release dated June 26, 2006) (the "Retamco JV"). The report, authored by Houston Texas based W.D. Von Gonten & Co., Petroleum Consultants (dated October 24, 2006) states there is a resource potential for 4.107 Trillion Cubic Feet of natural gas and 2.055 Billion Barrels of Oil, to the 100% interests. Dejour is assigning this potential to the category of 'undiscovered' resources pursuant to NI 51-101 requirements. Additionally, Williams & Associates, Petroleum Consultants, of Midland Texas calculates the potential resource of associated Coal Bed Methane to be in excess of 1.2 TCF. Dejour is assigning this potential to the category of 'prospective' resources, again pursuant to NI 51-101.
The Von Gonten report, prepared for Retamco Operating Inc., partner/operator of the Retamco JV, and a significant shareholder of Dejour, as a result of the Retamco JV, assigns resource potential to 14 of the 18 project areas within the Piceance and Uinta Basins. The remaining project areas will be reported shortly.
Subsequent to the report, Delta Petroleum (NASD-DPTR) reported a significant discovery in the Paradox Basin (Southern Uinta), a project area in which Dejour holds a 25% interest in 24,500 acres of lands previously unvalued within the Von Gonten report.
Dejour owns a 25% WI in the gas resource potential and 12.5% WI in the oil resource potential as discussed in these reports. Certainty of the economic viability of this resource potential at this time is not yet determined, based on COGE standards - see below.
The Retamco JV, which includes Dejour (TSX.V-DJE), Brownstone Ventures (TSX.V-BWN) and Retamco Operating Inc., has requested that W.D. Von Gonten & Co. update their report and, where appropriate, establish proven undeveloped reserves (PUD) in areas where extensive drilling and production activity have taken place. This report is expected early in 2007.
Dejour has been advised by Retamco that drill permits are expected to be approved in December by the Colorado Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that will allow the drilling of four 12000' wells proposed on the Barcus Federal Prospect, a 3 section-1920 acre lease block that forms part of the Retamco JV Rio Blanco Project Area. A drill rig currently operating on adjacent lands will be available early in January 2007. Additional permits should be forthcoming early in the New Year.
Retamco further advised that Exxon Mobil has recently completed for production 4 wells on acreage surrounding this lease block, each at flow rates greater than 2.5 million cubic feet per day, from the Mesa Verde sand, the major blanket resource zone being exploited in the Basin. Wells in this area are usually drilled on 10 acre spacing units.
In a recent release (dated October 15, 2006), Exxon disclosed plans to move 14 rigs to this project, build a town site for 600 personnel, and drill 1000 wells over the foreseeable future to exploit the reserves on these lands. Retamco also advised that Williams Co., a major US operator of pipelines, is in the final stages of completion of a 36" gas line able to transport large quantities of gas from this area beginning early in 2007. This pipeline is located in close proximity to the Barcus Federal Prospect, with available capacity. Authorization for expenditures (AFE's) are now being prepared.
About the Piceance/Uinta Basin
The Piceance/Uinta Basin, heart of the Rockies, is part of the most active gas production region in the US, where proven reserves and daily production rates now exceed the Gulf of Mexico, according to the Oil & Gas Investor (November 2006). Currently over 100 rigs are active in the Basin - 100% utilization.
"Consulting and research firm Wood Mackenzie says the top 34 E&P companies working in the region today could drill as many as 43,000 wells in Rockies in the next five years...with planned expenditures of nearly $25 billion during that timeframe...drawn by the vast reserve potential." (Oil & Gas Investor, November 2006).
"This Piceance/Uinta Basin Project represents another focused energy investment designed to provide both high impact and leverage to the expanding Dejour energy asset base. We are very pleased with the proposed activity on and adjacent to Company project lands and expect the value of this investment, both land and resource, to continue to escalate," quotes Robert L. Hodgkinson, Chairman & CEO.
R. Marc Bustin, Ph.D., P.Geol., FRSC is the qualified person for Dejour's oil and gas projects.
About Dejour
Dejour Enterprises Ltd. is a Canadian energy focused company exploring and developing high impact uranium and oil and gas exploration investments that exist as a result of the global market's decreasing conventional supply and increasing demand for energy. The Company is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (DJE.V), OTCBB (DJEEF), and Frankfurt (D5R). Dejour is a reporting issuer to the SEC. Refer to www.dejour.com for company details or contact the Office of Investor Relations at investor(at)dejour.com
About the Canadian Oil & Gas Handbook (COGE)
The Canadian Oil & Gas Evaluation handbook defines "undiscovered resources as those quantities of oil & gas estimated on a given date to be contained in accumulations yet to be discovered," and "prospective resources as those quantities that would be technically and economically viable to recover from undiscovered accumulations."
THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY
OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
Statements in this release that are forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties concerning the specific factors disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in the Corporation's periodic filings with Canadian securities regulators. Such information contained herein represents management's best judgment as of the date hereof based on information currently available. The Corporation does not assume the obligation to update any forward-looking statement.
For further information
DEJOUR ENTERPRISES LTD.: Robert L. Hodgkinson, Chairman and CEO, Suite 1100-808 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 2X4, Telephone: (604) 638-5050, Facsimile: (604) 638-5051, Email: investor@dejour.com
www.dejour.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Dejour Enterprises Ltd.
Prairie Girl - fist, thanks for you thanks on the aticles.
second, i'm encouraged that one of my mentors was right on target when he stated:
"The investments of the future are outside the U.S."
- Warren Buffet
around that time he became a major shareholder in a huge iron company based in Israel.
Canada is a major player in the PM's and BM's ,...
i've been collecting shares of various CA companies that are poised for a move when all reason comes into view.
sumisu - glad you found value in the content and information. :)
Thank you very much for posting these two articles, which are extremely enlightening.
nlightn,
The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming.......
Thanks for the posts. I noticed the author's name, F. William Engdahl, of these articles. He has extensive background on this topic as evidenced by his book "A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order."
Jim Puplava interviewed him on 09 24 05 and he was very insightful. Here is the link:
http://www.financialsense.com/Experts/2005/Engdahl.html
Thanks again,
sumisu
THE EMERGING RUSSIAN GIANT, Part 2
Washington's nightmare
By F William Engdahl
(For Part 1 in this two-part report, Moscow plays its cards strategically, click here.)
Ironically, the aggressive Washington foreign policy of the era of Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld since 2001 has done more to nurture the one strategic combination in Eurasia most dreaded by Washington political realists such as Henry Kissinger or Zbigniew Brzezinski, namely a strategic military and economic cooperation on a deep, long-term basis between two former Cold War foes, China and President Vladimir Putin's Russia.
Putin has taken a number of steps in recent months to shore up relations with Russia's most important potential strategic Eurasian partner, China. In March he went to Beijing to discuss increased bilateral energy cooperation, a theme dear to the heart of energy-hungry China. Top on that agenda was China's wish that a pipeline from Taishet in Siberia be built to bring oil to Daqing in China. In addition, the China National Petroleum Co (CNPC) and the Russian Rosneft oil company signed several agreements for joint energy projects. And Gazprom and CNPC signed a memorandum of understanding to supply Russian natural gas to China.
With Sudan and the Middle East under increasing pressure from the United States, Sino-Russian energy cooperation has moved to the top of China's foreign-policy agenda. At the end of this month, Russia and China will meet again in Moscow to discuss further energy cooperation.
As well, Russia is a major supplier of arms to China, and military cooperation between the two states is increasing. In 2001 the two signed the Russia-China Friendship and Cooperation Treaty, the first such bilateral treaty since 1950. A major point covered "joint actions to offset a perceived US hegemonism". That was two months before September 11 and the ensuing Iraq invasion. In August 2005 the two countries held their first joint military exercises to increase bilateral coordination in "fighting the war on terrorism".
They realize more than one can play the game. In May, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov hosted the chief of staff of the People's Liberation Army and discussed increased cooperation in the context of Russia's and China's leading role in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Russia will increase deliveries of selected military technology to China as well as train Chinese military at the institutes of the Russian Ministry of Defense.
With this bilateral cooperation in mind, a broader look at Russia's use of energy to build a counterweight to US dominance in Eurasia is instructive.
Russian energy geopolitics
In terms of overall standard of living, mortality and economic prosperity, Russia today is not a world-class power. In terms of energy, it is a colossus. In terms of landmass, it is still the single largest nation in the world. It has vast territory and vast natural resources, and it has the world's largest reserves of natural gas, the energy source currently the focus of major global power plays. In addition, it is the only power with the military capability to match that of the United States, despite the collapse of the Soviet Union and consequent deterioration of the Russian military.
Russia has more than 130,000 oil wells and some 2,000 identified oil and gas deposits, of which at least 900 are not being exploited. Oil reserves have been estimated at 150 billion barrels, similar perhaps to Iraq. They could be far larger but have not yet been exploited because of the difficulty of drilling in some remote Arctic regions. Oil prices above US$60 a barrel begin to make it economic to explore in those remote regions.
Currently, Russian oil products can be exported to foreign markets by three routes: Western Europe via the Baltic Sea and Black Sea; the northern route; the Far East to China or Japan and East Asian markets. Russia has oil terminals on the Baltic at St Petersburg and a newly expanded oil terminal at Primorsk. There are additional oil terminals under construction at Vysotsk, Batareynaya Bay and Ust-Luga.
Russia's state-owned natural-gas pipeline network, its so-called "unified gas-transportation system", includes a vast network of pipelines and compressor stations extending more than 150,000 kilometers across Russia. By law only the state-owned Gazprom is allowed to use the pipelines. The network is perhaps the most valued Russian state asset outside the oil and gas itself. Here is the heart of Putin's new natural-gas geopolitics and the focus of conflict with Western oil and gas companies as well as the European Union, whose energy commissioner, Andras Piebalgs, is from new North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member Latvia, formerly part of the Soviet Union.
In 2001, as it became clear in Moscow that Washington would find a way to bring the Baltic republics into NATO, Putin backed the development of a major new oil port on the Russian coast of the Baltic Sea in Primorsk at a cost of $2.2 billion. This project, known as the Baltic Pipeline System (BPS), greatly lessens export dependency on Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. The Baltic is Russia's main oil-export route, carrying crude oil from Russia's West Siberia and Timan-Pechora oil provinces westward to the port of Primorsk on the Gulf of Finland. The BPS was completed in March with capacity to carry more than 1.3 million barrels per day of Russian oil to Western markets in Europe and beyond.
Also in March, former German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder was named chairman of a Russian-German consortium building a natural-gas pipeline going some 1,200km under the Baltic Sea. Majority shareholder in this North European Gas Pipeline (NEGP) project, with 51%, is the Russian state-controlled Gazprom, the world's largest natural-gas company. The German companies BASF and E.On each hold 24.5%. The project, estimated to cost 4.7 billion euros ($5.8 billion), was started in late 2005 and will connect the gas terminal at the Russian port city of Vyborg on the Baltic near St Petersburg with the Baltic city of Greifswald in eastern Germany.
The Yuzhno-Russkoye gas field in West Siberia will be developed in a joint venture between Gazprom and BASF to feed the pipeline. It was Gerhard Schroeder's last major act as chancellor, and provoked howls of protest from the pro-Washington Polish government, as well as Ukraine, as both countries stood to lose control over pipeline flows from Russia. Despite her close ties to the US administration of President George W Bush, Chancellor Angela Merkel has been forced to swallow hard and accept the project. Germany's industry is simply dependent on the Russian energy import. Russia is by far the largest supplier of natural gas to Germany.
The giant Shtokman gas deposit in the Russian sector of the Barents Sea, north of Murmansk, will ultimately also be a part of the gas supply of the NEGP. When completed in two parallel pipelines, NEGP will supply Germany up to 55 billion cubic meters more a year of Russian gas.
In April the Putin government announced the first stage of construction of the East Siberia-Pacific Ocean Pipeline (ESPO), a vast oil pipeline from Taishet in the Irkutsk region near Lake Baikal in East Siberia to Perevoznaya Bay on Russia's Pacific Ocean coast, to be built at a cost of more than $11.5 billion.
Transneft, the Russian state-owned pipeline company, will build it. When finished, it will pump up to 1.6 million barrels per day of oil from Siberia to the Russian Far East and, from there, on to the energy-hungry Asia-Pacific region, mainly China. The first stage is due to be completed by the end of 2008. In addition, Putin has announced plans to construct an oil refinery on the Amur River near the Chinese border in Russia's Far East to allow sale of refined products to China and Asian markets. At present the Siberian oil can only be delivered to the Pacific via rail.
For Russia, the Taishet-to-Perevoznaya route will maximize its national strategic benefits while taking oil exports to China and Japan into account at the same time. In the future, the country will be able to export oil to Japan directly from the Nakhodka port. Oil-import-dependent Japan is frantic to find new secure oil sources outside the unstable Middle East.
The ESPO can also supply oil to the Republic of Korea and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, by building from Vladivostok branch lines leading to the two countries and to China via a branch pipe between Blagoveshchensk and Daqing. The Taishet route provides a clear roadmap for energy cooperation between Russia and China, Japan and other Asia-Pacific countries.
Sakhalin: Russia reins in Big Oil
Late last month a seemingly minor dispute exploded and resulted in the revocation of the environmental permit for Royal Dutch Shell's Sakhalin II liquefied-natural-gas project, which had been due to deliver LNG to Japan, South Korea and other customers by 2008. Shell is lead energy partner in an Anglo-Japanese oil and gas development project on Sakhalin, a vast Russian island north of Hokkaido, Japan.
At the same time, the Putin government announced that environmental requirements had also not been met by ExxonMobil for its De Kastri oil terminal built on Sakhalin as part of its Sakhalin I oil and gas development project. Sakhalin I contains an estimated 8 billion barrels of oil and vast volumes of gas, making the field a rare "super giant" oil find, in geologists' terminology.
In the early 1990s the government of Russian president Boris Yeltsin made a desperation bid to attract needed investment capital and technology into exploiting Russian oil and gas regions at a time when the government was broke and oil prices very low. In a bold departure, Yeltsin granted US and other Western oil majors generous exploration rights to two large oil projects, Sakhalin I and Sakhalin II. Under a production sharing agreement (PSA), ExxonMobil, lead partner of the Sakhalin I oil project, got tax-free Russian concessions.
Under the terms of the these agreements, which are typical between major Anglo-American oil majors and weak Third World countries, Russia's government would get paid for the oil and gas rights by receiving a share of eventual oil or gas produced. But the first drops of oil to Russia would flow only after all project production costs had first been covered.
PSAs were originally developed by Washington and Big Oil to facilitate favorable control by the oil companies of large oil projects in third countries. The major US oil giants, working with the James Baker Institute, which drafted Dick Cheney's 2001 Energy Task Force Review, used the PSA form to regain control over Iraq's oil production, hidden behind the facade of an Iraqi state-owned oil company.
Shortly before the Russian government told ExxonMobil it had problems with its terminal on Sakhalin, ExxonMobil had announced yet another cost increase in the project. ExxonMobil, whose lawyer is James Baker III, and which is a close partner to the Cheney-Bush White House, announced a 30% cost increase, something that would put off even further any Russian oil-flow share from the PSA.
The news came on the eve of ExxonMobil plans to open an oil terminal at De Kastri on Sakhalin. The Russian Environment Ministry and the Agency for Subsoil Use suddenly announced that the terminal did "not meet environmental requirements" and is reportedly considering halting production by ExxonMobil as well.
Britain's Royal Dutch Shell under another PSA holds rights to develop the oil and gas resources in the Sakhalin II region, and build Russia's first LNG project. The $20 billion project, employing more than 17,000 people, is 80% complete. It's the world's largest integrated oil-and-gas project, and includes Russia's first offshore oil production, as well as Russia's first offshore integrated gas platform.
The clear Russian government moves against ExxonMobil and Shell have been interpreted in the industry as an attempt by the Putin government to regain control of oil and gas resources Russia gave away during the Yeltsin era. It would dovetail neatly with Putin's emerging energy strategy.
Russia-Turkey Blue Stream gas project
Last November, Russia's Gazprom completed the final stage of its 1,213km, $3.2 billion Blue Stream gas pipeline. The project brings gas from its fields in Krasnodar, then by underwater pipelines across the Black Sea to the Durusu Terminal near Samsun on the Turkish Black Sea coast. From there the pipeline supplies Russian gas to Ankara. When it reaches full capacity in 2010, it will carry an estimated 16 billion cubic meters gas a year.
Gazprom is now discussing transit of Russian gas to the countries of southern Europe and the eastern Mediterranean, based on new contracts and new volumes. Greece, southern Italy and Israel all are in some form of negotiation with Gazprom to tap gas from the Blue Stream pipeline across the territory of Turkey.
A new route for the gas supply is being developed now - the one via the countries of East and Central Europe. The interim title of the project is the South European Gas Pipeline. The main issue here is to establish a new gas-transmission system, both from Russian origin and from the third countries.
In sum, not including the emerging potentials of Gazprom's entry into the fast-developing LNG markets globally, energy, oil and gas and nuclear, is firmly at the heart of Russian attempts to build new economic-alliance partners across Eurasia in the coming showdown with the United States.
US plans for 'nuclear primacy'
The key to the ability of Putin's Russia to succeed is its ability to defend its Eurasian energy strategy with a credible military deterrent, to counter now-obvious Washington military plans for what the Pentagon terms "full-spectrum dominance". In a revealing article titled "The rise of US nuclear primacy" in the March/April Foreign Affairs, the magazine of the New York Council on Foreign Relations, authors Kier Lieber and Daryl Press made the following claim:
Today, for the first time in almost 50 years, the United States stands on the verge of attaining nuclear primacy. It will probably soon be possible for the United States to destroy the long-range nuclear arsenals of Russia or China with a first strike. This dramatic shift in the nuclear balance of power stems from a series of improvements in the United States' nuclear systems, the precipitous decline of Russia's arsenal, and the glacial pace of modernization of China's nuclear forces. Unless Washington's policies change or Moscow and Beijing take steps to increase the size and readiness of their forces, Russia and China - and the rest of the world - will live in the shadow of US nuclear primacy for many years to come.
The US authors claim, accurately, that since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russia's strategic nuclear arsenal has "sharply deteriorated". They also conclude that the United States is, and has been for some time, intentionally pursuing global nuclear primacy. The September 2002 Bush administration National Security Strategy explicitly stated that it was official US policy to establish global military primacy, an unsettling thought for many nations today given the recent actions of Washington since the events of September 2001.
One of Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's priority projects has been the multibillion-dollar construction of a US missile defense. It has been sold to US voters as a defense against possible terror attacks. In reality, as has been openly recognized in Moscow and Beijing, it is aimed at the only two real nuclear powers, Russia and China.
The Foreign Affairs article points out, "The sort of missile defenses that the United States might plausibly deploy would be valuable primarily in an offensive context, not a defensive one - as an adjunct to a US first-strike capability, not as a stand-alone shield. If the United States launched a nuclear attack against Russia (or China), the targeted country would be left with a tiny surviving arsenal - if any at all. At that point, even a relatively modest or inefficient missile-defense system might well be enough to protect against any retaliatory strikes, because the devastated enemy would have so few warheads and decoys left."
In the context of a United States that has actively moved the troops of its NATO partners into Afghanistan and now Lebanon, and which is clearly backing the former Soviet member-state Georgia, today a critical factor in the Caspian Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline, to join NATO and push Russian troops away, it is little surprise that Moscow might be just a bit uncomfortable with the US president's promises of spreading democracy through a US-defined Greater Middle East.
The term "Greater Middle East" is the invention of various Washington think-tanks close to Cheney, including his Project for the New American Century, to refer to the non-Arabic countries Turkey, Iran, Israel, Pakistan, Afghanistan, the Central Asian countries, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia. At the Group of Eight summit in the summer of 2004, Bush first officially used the term to refer to the region included in Washington's project to spread democracy in the region.
On October 3 this year, the Russian Foreign Ministry warned that Moscow would "take appropriate measures" should Poland deploy elements of the new US missile defense system. Poland is now a NATO member. Its defense minister, Radek Sikorski, was a former Resident in Washington at the hawkish American Enterprise Institute think-tank. He was also executive director of the New Atlantic Initiative, a project designed to bring the former Warsaw Pact countries of eastern Europe into NATO under the guise of spreading democracy. The United States is also building, via NATO, a European missile defense system.
The only conceivable target of such a system would be Russia, in the sense of enabling a US first-strike success. Completion of the European missile defense system, the militarization of the entire Middle East, the encirclement of Russia and of China from a connected web of new US military bases, many put up in the name of the "war on terror", all now appear to the Kremlin as part of a deliberate US strategy of "full-spectrum dominance". The Pentagon refers to it also as "escalation dominance", the ability to win a war at any level of violence, including a nuclear war.
Integral to this strategy is a new US policy of militarization of space, part of the Pentagon's total-spectrum dominance policy. Bush authorized a new US National Space Policy on August 31 that establishes that the conduct of US space programs and activities shall be a top priority. It is part and parcel of the Bush administration's defense strategy.
The new policy document declares that the US will "take those actions necessary to protect its space capabilities; respond to interference; and deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to US national interests". It will not let any international body or treaty hinder its militarization of space: "The United States will oppose the development of new legal regimes or other restrictions that seek to prohibit or limit US access to or use of space. Proposed arms-control agreements or restrictions must not impair the rights of the United States to conduct research, development, testing, and operations or other activities in space for US."
That all would be a little more comforting were it not for the bizarre way in which people in Washington these days define "national interest", in contrast to the interest of the world community in peace and freedom.
Moscow's military status
Moscow has not been entirely passive in the face of this growing reality. In his May 2003 State of the Nation address, Vladimir Putin spoke of strengthening and modernizing Russia's nuclear deterrent by creating new types of weapons, including some for Russia's strategic forces, which will "ensure the defense capability of Russia and its allies in the long term". Russia stopped withdrawing and destroying its SS-18 MIRVed (multiple independent re-entry vehicle) missiles once the Bush administration unilaterally declared an end to the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty, and its de facto annulling of START II (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty).
Russia never stopped being a powerful entity that produced state-of-the-art military technologies - a trend that continued from its inception as a modern state. While its army, navy and air force are in derelict condition, the elements for Russia's resurgence as a military powerhouse are still in place. Russia has been consistently fielding top-notch military technology at various international trade shows, and has been effective in demonstrating its capabilities.
In spite of financial and economic difficulties, Russia still produces state-of-the-art military technologies, according to a 2004 analysis by the Washington-based think-tank Power and Interest News Report. One of its best achievements after the dissolution of the Soviet Union has been its armored fighting vehicle BMP-3, which has been chosen over Western vehicles in contracts for the United Arab Emirates and Oman.
Russia's surface-to-air missile systems, the S-300 and its more powerful successor the S-400, are reported to be more potent than US-made Patriot systems. The once-anticipated military exercise between the Patriot and the S-300 never materialized, leaving the Russian complex with an undisputed, yet unproven, claim of superiority over the US system. Continuing this list is the Kamov-50 family of military helicopters that incorporate the latest cutting-edge technologies and tactics, making them an equal force to the best Washington has. European helicopter-industry sources confirm this.
In recent joint Indo-American air force exercises, where the Indian Air Force was equipped with modern Russian-made Su-30 fighters, the IAF outmaneuvered US-made F-15 planes in a majority of their engagements, prompting US Air Force General Hal Homburg to admit that Russian technology in Indian hands has given the USAF a "wake-up call". The Russian military establishment is continuing to design other helicopters, tanks and armored vehicles that are on par with the best that the West has to offer.
Weapons exports, in addition to oil and gas, have been one of the best ways for Russia to earn much-needed hard currency. Already Russia is the second-largest worldwide exporter of military technology after the United States. As reported in various magazines, journals and periodicals, at present, Russia's modern military technology is more likely to be exported than supplied to its own armies because of the existing financial constraints and limitations of Russia's armed forces.
This has implications for America's future combat operations, since practically all insurgent, guerrilla, breakaway or terrorist armed formations across the globe - the very formations that the United States will most likely face in its future wars - are fielded with Russian weapons or its derivatives.
The Russian nuclear arsenal has played an important political role since the end of the Soviet Union, providing fundamental security for the Russian state.
After a bitter intra-services fight within the that lasted from 1998 to 2003, the Russian General Staff realized along with the Defense Ministry that a further policy of neglect of nuclear forces in favor of funding the rebuilding of conventional forces in the face of tight budget constraints was not tolerable. In 2003 Russia had to buy from Ukraine strategic bombers and intercontinental ballistic missiles warehoused there.
Since then, strategic nuclear forces have been a priority. Today the finances of the Russian state, thanks largely to high prices of oil and gas exports, are on a strong footing. The Russian central bank has become one of the five largest dollar holders, with reserves of more than $270 billion. The material foundation of the Russian military is its defense industry. After 1991 the Russian Federation inherited the bulk of the Soviet defense industrial complex.
Today, with little fanfare, the US is building up its influence and military presence in the Middle East despite a general draw-down in its military commitments and expenditures. It is putting huge resources into the periphery countries of the Russian heartland of Eurasia. Why? Oil is a large part of the answer - but oil seen in geopolitical terms. The ultimate game, where the stakes are the highest, is to render permanently impotent the Eurasian land power, Russia, to control its access to the seas and to China - just as Halford Mackinder, "the father of geopolitics", argued.
The push for a US nuclear primacy over Russia is the factor in world politics today that has the most potential for bringing the world into a World War III, a nuclear conflagration by miscalculation.
The SCO, founded several years ago by Russia and China to bring together select Eurasian countries for common dialogue. Its stated goal initially was to facilitate "cooperation in political affairs, economy and trade, scientific-technical, cultural, and educational spheres as well as in energy". Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad was invited as an honored observer last June, and Iran is being encouraged by Russia and China to join the SCO.
Today the SCO remains on the surface a rather amorphous discussion forum. Given a bit more provocation from Washington and NATO, that could change rapidly into the core of a broader Eurasian military and energy alliance to counter-weigh US nuclear primacy. The nightmare of Halford Mackinder would be fulfilled, ironically, largely because of the unilateral and aggressive foreign policy of an overconfident United States.
The basic argument of Mackinder's geopolitics is still relevant: "The great geographical realities remain: land power versus sea power, heartland versus rimland, center versus periphery ..." This Russia understands every bit as much as Washington.
This is the conclusion of a two-part report.
F William Engdahl is author of the book A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, Pluto Press Ltd. He has completed a soon-to-be published book on genetically modified organisms titled Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Political Agenda Behind GMO. He may be contacted through his website, www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net.
(Copyright 2006 F William Engdahl. Used by permission.)
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HJ26Ag01.html
THE NEW WORLD OIL ORDER, Part 1
Russia attacks the West's Achilles' heel
By W Joseph Stroupe
November 17, 2006
Russia has found the Achilles' heel of the US colossus. In concert with its oil-producing partners and the rising powerhouse economies of the East, Russia is altering the foundations of the current US-led liberal global oil-market order, insidiously working to undermine its US-centric nature and slanting it toward serving first and foremost the energy-security needs and the geopolitical aspirations of the rising East.
All this is at the impending incalculable expense of the West. What is increasingly at stake is secure US access to global energy resources - strategic US energy security - because the West's traditional control respecting those global resources is seriously faltering in the face of the compelling strategies undertaken by Russia and its global partners.
The US giant is increasingly at risk as it faces what is gradually but now more widely being recognized as Russia's clever exploitation of US foreign energy dependency and the hemorrhaging of its all-important economic-geopolitical capital: its traditional global energy leadership and dominance via its onetime virtually all-pervasive oil majors.
US Senator Richard Lugar, who recently labeled Russia an "adversarial regime" that increasingly uses its growing energy dominance as a powerful geopolitical weapon, has warned of economic "catastrophe" for the United States, notwithstanding its status as a superpower. Consequently, informed and reasoned leaders such as Lugar increasingly see the US in energy-based jeopardy.
Such leaders clearly do not put blind trust in the conventional wisdom that keeps insisting the US giant has no Achilles' heel and is virtually immune to the efforts on the part of comparatively smaller powers such as Russia and its partners to undermine the current US global position of supremacy.
Backing up the mounting concerns of such leaders as Lugar, as reported on October 1 by The Guardian Unlimited, widely respected energy economist Professor Peter Odell, who was an adviser to Tony Benn, the British energy minister in the late 1970s, and who has since worked for a host of different foreign governments, said he was not being alarmist or controversial when he recently warned that the West was at imminent risk of losing access to global energy resources as a result of Russia's global oil grab.
Odell warned that at any time Russian and Chinese state-owned oil companies, backed by certain rich members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries who are closely aligned with the two, could make hostile takeover bids for key Western oil majors such as BP-Shell, ExxonMobil and/or Chevron, thereby gutting what little remains of the Western oil majors' control over the global markets and thereby further threatening US access to strategic resources.
Odell warned that the Western oil majors were already losing their leadership of the global oil system, had now been reduced to controlling a mere 9% or 10% of the world's reserves, and were unable to win new production rights or even hold on to those granted by current PSAs (production-sharing agreements). Recent developments regarding Russia's Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 projects, in which the position of the Western oil majors is being threatened, illustrate the ominous trend that is accelerating worldwide.
To rock the US colossus forcefully out of its position of global dominance and credibly threaten to inflict economic and geopolitical "catastrophe" on the West, Russia and its strategic partners need not exceed, nor individually even remotely match, US economic, political or military strength in a conventional head-to-head contest of might.
Instead, they need only to exert effectively their mounting energy-based strengths against US vulnerabilities in that same sphere, not in a conventional head-on confrontation but instead by going after the Achilles' heel by employing a clever asymmetrical end-run strategy around the US. This targets the foundations of the current US-dominated liberal global oil-market order, a strategy that leaves the US giant with significantly reduced secure access to, and control over, global strategic resources.
Once that goal is accomplished, without ever a conventional confrontation with the US giant, then the US economy can be effectively and powerfully held hostage to the political and economic aspirations of Russia and the rising East.
Conventional wisdom holds that neither the West in general nor the US in particular can be effectively targeted with the energy weapon any time soon. This is because the structure of the global oil market prevents targeted oil embargoes from being effective. Once oil is sold on the global market, no producer can control where it does or does not go, the argument says. Additionally, the argument continues, producers attempting an embargo cannot afford to withhold their products for long enough to damage the targeted economy lest their own economies, which are inordinately dependent on oil and gas exports, themselves collapse.
The clear insinuation is that any talk of an energy-based economic checkmate of the West is merely hyperbole and sensationalism.
But these arguments are already in the process of collapsing under their own weight in the face of an entirely new array of mounting trends and developments that constitute an impending and grave threat to the strategic energy security of the West.
In its recent report "National Security Consequences of US Oil Dependency", the US Council on Foreign Relations disagrees with such reassuring conventional wisdom and the myths and assumptions associated with it. It warns that the US faces increasingly potent, negative political, economic and geopolitical consequences arising from its dependence on foreign energy resources. The report laments that the US is "insufficiently aware of its vulnerability" because its leaders and people have come to rely on reassuring myths and assumptions that do not square with the facts.
To understand why the conventional wisdom on this issue has become severely faulted and how Russia and its partners are already ominously succeeding in altering the fundamentals of the current US-dominated global oil-market order, it is first necessary to understand how the current oil markets work and how they have evolved over the past three decades since the Arab oil embargo of 1973-74.
Changing the world's oil markets
In the era leading up to the embargo of 1973-74, crude-oil pricing and delivery were handled quite differently than now. That era featured the rigid, bilateral long-term supply contract resulting in considerably less global oil-market supply liquidity than now. It was an era when exporting states tended to conclude agreements individually with consumer states (usually through their national and multinational oil companies) over the price and delivery of crude oil.
Such contracts could be concluded for terms of one or two decades or even more. In that era of rigid bilateral oil contracts, the oil market was much less open and dynamic, and far less able to adjust to supply disruptions, than it is now. Oil tended to be "locked up" within the long-term supply contracts, thus significantly limiting supply liquidity, or fungibility, of oil.
The structure of the global oil market was neither designed nor implemented with a focus on the key requirement of high liquidity because, prior to the 1973-74 Arab embargo, no one envisaged the now-obvious key requirement for the market to adjust rapidly and naturally to a cutoff of oil to one or more importing nations resulting from a targeted embargo or a supply disruption.
Naturally, in that era it was in the interest of any individual exporting state to conclude a sufficient number of rigid bilateral long-term contracts with importing states so as to have most or all of its exportable oil accounted for and sold virtually at the time it was pumped out of the ground.
That being the usual case, if an exporting state or group of states for some reason either failed or refused to honor their commitment of deliveries to a particular consumer state, then that embargoed state found it necessary to meet the emergency by trying to acquire replacement crude-oil supplies from elsewhere, usually from third-party traders and/or by arranging with other buyers for their tankers to be diverted from their original destinations.
That ad hoc process involved many additional, intolerable risks, time delays, and much more complicated logistics and higher costs, all of which were entirely unacceptable over a period of anything more than the very short term. The old oil-market order did not naturally facilitate a compensating for such a supply disruption, and the effort to make it compensate was cumbersome and its risks were unacceptable.
Additionally, the psychological effects of an embargo greatly magnified its literal effects, leading to panic buying by consumers, resulting shortages, higher prices and ripple effects throughout the economy. That helps explain why the US could be effectively targeted in 1973-74 by the Arabs. Though that targeting was not nearly perfect, it was sufficient to inflict much of the intended pain.
As the months wore on, the US could not afford to continue to rely on the intolerable and significantly less secure ad hoc logistics it was forced to resort to in its effort to replace the oil that the Arab nations were refusing to ship. Recently declassified British government documents from that time reveal that both the US and Britain were actively planning for a seizure of Middle East oilfields, illustrating how intolerable the combined physical and psychological effects of the embargo were.
Of note is the ominous fact that at that time the US imported only about 36% of its oil, whereas now it imports nearly 60%, making it far more vulnerable to the energy weapon if Russia and its partners only partially succeed in changing the current liberal global oil order so as to revive even a partial level of effectiveness of a targeted embargo.
US and Britain create a liberalized market
In the aftermath of the 1973-74 crisis, events and the markets themselves gradually evolved to alter radically the nature of the global oil market, thereby dramatically increasing crude oil's former comparatively low degree of fungibility.
This means that as long as the current US-backed liberal oil market is globally adhered to, if a group of exporting nations attempts another targeted embargo, oil from other exporters could be rapidly and naturally exchanged or substituted to replace the lost oil. The global market has evolved from rigidity to dynamism, and from low to very high liquidity.
Over time, the US had come up with an ingenious idea that impacted directly on the issue. Through deregulation and the creation of oil-futures contracts and spot oil markets in New York and London, the old foundations and the market dominance of the rigid, bilateral long-term supply contracts was undermined in favor of much shorter-term contracts.
Extremely liquid oil-futures contracts ("paper oil") that looked forward only a few months to a few years at most and that could be freely and openly bought and sold on a daily basis on the new exchanges replaced the traditional, rigid, discrete long-term supply contracts negotiated directly between exporting and importing states. The global oil-market order was becoming tremendously liberalized, open and highly liquid under US leadership and control.
The new oil exchanges created in the early 1980s provided a way for speculators to profit from the buying and selling of "paper oil" as well as for exporters and importers to sell, buy and arrange for physical delivery of oil. The spot exchanges also facilitated the factoring in of a much wider range of market forces in real time in determining the daily global price of oil. Oil-export startups, those attempting to establish themselves as oil exporters, favored the spot markets as opposed to the rigid long-term supply contracts because, with their limited track record and credibility, they had a hard time successfully negotiating long-term contracts.
However, they could sell on the spot markets by undercutting the price of the more established exporters and get a foothold. Thus the new arrangement encouraged a flourishing of new exporters and a global supply that very comfortably outpaced global demand.
By the mid- to late 1980s, the new oil-market arrangements in New York (and later in London) had been firmly established and were enjoying phenomenal success. While some exporters refused to drop entirely the traditional rigid bilateral long-term supply contracts in favor of the spot markets, up until today most oil is marketed on the exchanges. Oil-futures contracts are freely bought and sold on the exchanges and oil for physical delivery is bought comparatively "at the last hour" on the spot market, where delivery to the importing nation is then arranged.
Global effects of the new order
Under the new market arrangement, nearly all oil became highly visible and instantly accessible because the traditional long-term supply contracts became the minor factor while the spot markets and highly liquid oil-futures contracts became the major factors.
In effect, this radically raised the visibility, accessibility and fungibility of global oil supplies to unheard-of heights and made it possible for oil lost for some reason in one part of the market to be easily, naturally and almost instantly replaced by oil from another part of the market.
In effect, the new exchanges facilitated the creation of one virtual global pool of oil denominated in US dollars into which nearly all exporters sell their oil and out of which nearly all importers purchase oil, all on a daily basis.
A discrete global pool of oil does not physically exist anywhere on the planet, of course. But it does exist in a virtual sense, powerfully mimicking a literal global pool of oil, because the structure and presence of the new exchanges and the global adherence and devotion to them ensures that oil is bought, sold and delivered largely as if such a pool literally exists. And the global dominance of the West's oil majors, whose task it has been to capture global oil supplies for full incorporation into the new US-led liberal global oil-market order, has been the key factor perpetuating the global dominance of that order.
As long as the Western oil majors hold global sway and the US-backed liberal order is globally adhered to, therefore, any attempt to target the US with an oil embargo, as by the efforts of an exporter or group of exporters refusing to sell to the US, would fail miserably because the US would merely draw oil elsewhere from the global pool to suffice its needs.
Importantly, the US and Britain accomplished two goals of profound importance and value with the creation of their new liberalized global oil-market order. First, they prevented the enacting of any targeted oil embargo, and they greatly enhanced the leverage of the West's oil majors, their de facto state sponsors and the West's financial institutions in the new market arrangement while simultaneously fundamentally undermining the leverage of producers, thus powerfully bolstering the strategic energy security of the West.
Second, they consolidated and powerfully solidified the role of the US dollar as the unquestioned international currency, since the one virtual global pool of oil created and maintained by the new liberalized market order is denominated in US dollars alone.
But it is crucial to understand that the West's immunity from a targeted embargo is assured only as long as the current liberal, highly liquid US-led global oil market is unwaveringly adhered to. Once the movers and shakers (now Russia and its producing and consuming partners) begin again to revert to the rigid bilateral long-term supply contracts conducted privately between producers and consumers, thereby incrementally altering the foundations of the global oil-market order by decreasing its level of liquidity, then the real potential for a revoking of a significant measure of oil's fungibility exists.
This means that the ability to enact an effective targeted embargo is once again incrementally revived. A meaningful loss of fungibility of oil would spell potential economic-geopolitical doom for the West. This is the Achilles' heel of the West.
As we shall see, it is that very Achilles' heel Russia and its partners have found and are already energetically exploiting in a bid to shift the US colossus out of its current position of global dominance.
Swiftly mounting anxiety on the part of increasing numbers of the globe's key energy-hungry economies in the East as respects energy security is already fueling incremental abandonment and circumvention of the US-dominated liberal global oil market.
This is in favor of a proliferation of private, state-to-state long-term supply contracts and agreements awarding equity stakes in production acreage to the consumer states. As a consequence, the US-led order is already beginning to suffer a wavering of international adherence and support. Russia continues to lead the global race to establish a new energy order that fundamentally threatens the current US-led one.
The same factor of mounting anxiety over energy security is also fueling the accelerating global trend toward the establishment of new oil and gas exchanges in the Middle East and the East as de facto rivals to the New York and London exchanges.
These new exchanges have two very prominent and significant features. First, they are bringing together primarily the globe's producers and the rising economies in the East to facilitate new Asia-centric (rather than US-centric) energy pricing and security arrangements. Second, they are denominated in currencies other than US dollars or are being structured with the autonomy and sophistication to switch from dollars to other currencies.
The reign of the US-backed current oil market has been a frighteningly short one, barely two decades. It could turn out to be more of a stint than a reign as its fundamentals could be altered to revive the possibility of an effective targeted embargo. And it is already being altered along those lines.
Part 2: Russia fueling a new oil order
W Joseph Stroupe is author of the new book Russian Rubicon: Impending Checkmate of the West and editor of Global Events Magazine, online at www.GeoStrategyMap.com.
(Copyright 2006 W Joseph Stroupe.)
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HK22Ag01.html
IMPORTANT READ ON COMMODITIES
http://www.financialsense.com/captain/log.html
QIS Capital Feature Company Profile Alert - Bulldog Resources Inc.
http://www.qiscapital.com/showpage.php?article_id=63
Another 100,000 TEI for Tristone
Winstar Resources Ltd.
WIX: TSX-V
November 15, 2006
Winstar Resources Ltd. Reports Record Cash Flow from Operations of $3.1 Million in Q3 2006 and Record $38 Million Capital Budget for 2007
CALGARY - Winstar Resources Ltd. today released its financial and operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006. Winstar significantly increased its production, cash flow from operations and sales revenue during the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 compared with the same periods of 2005.
Winstar's year-over-year growth, in the third quarter of 2006 compared with 2005, is primarily a result of the Company's merger with Athanor B.V. in August 2005 and Athanor's acquisition of Hungarian assets in June 2005. The positive impact of these transactions is illustrated by increases in all key parameters compared with the equivalent period of 2005.
Compared with the second quarter of 2006, Winstar maintained its production at 1,319 boepd, sales revenue at $6.7 million, working capital at $15.4 million and unused bank lines despite unexpected field repairs, corresponding high operating costs and one-time general and administrative expenses.
Winstar's drilling activity in Canada, Hungary and Tunisia puts the Company on track for an anticipated exit 2006 production rate of more than 2,500 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boepd).
On November 14, 2006, Winstar's Board of Directors approved a 2007 capital budget of $38 million. The budget, subject to quarterly adjustments, is designed to aggressively exploit Winstar's Tunisian assets, maintain and grow its Canadian production base and continue to explore for high-impact prospects in Hungary.
Highlights for the three months ended September 30, 2006
· Production sales up 217% to 1,319 boepd (416 boepd Q3 2005)
· Petroleum and natural gas sales up 231% to $6.7 million ($2.0 million Q3 2005)
· Cash flow from operations up 827% to $3.1 million, or $0.11 per share ($0.3 million or $0.02 per share Q3 2005)
· Cash flow netback per boe up 113% to $25.45 ($11.93 Q3 2005)
· Working capital maintained at $15.4 million ($15.6 million Q3 2005)
Highlights for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
· Production sales up 250% to 1,531 boepd (437 boepd first nine months 2005)
· Petroleum and natural gas sales up 241% to $22.2 million ($6.5 million first nine months 2005)
· Cash flow from operations up 535% to $12.1 million, or $0.43 per share ($1.9 million or $0.14 per share first nine months 2005)
· Cash flow netback per boe up 66% to $28.81 ($17.33 first nine months 2005)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Highlights Nine Months Ended Three months Ended
September 30 September 30
-------------------- % -------------------- %
2006 2005 Chg 2006 2005 Chg
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales and Prices
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Natural gas
sales (Mcf/d) 5,400 1,088 396 3,824 1,858 106
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oil and NGL
sales (boepd) 631 256 147 681 106 542
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average daily
sales 6:1
(boepd) 1,531 437 250 1,319 416 217
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average natural
gas price
($/Mcf) 6.99 7.21 (3) 6.67 8.59 (22)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average oil
and NGL price
($/bbl) 69.23 62.66 10 69.45 56.90 22
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial ($)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oil and gas
revenue 22,228,436 6,513,408 241 6,700,218 2,022,037 231
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flow
from
operations 12,141,314 1,910,846 535 3,094,782 333,824 827
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per share,
basic and
diluted 0.43 0.14 210 0.11 0.02 527
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income/
(loss) 1,858,921 (1,414,356) - (402,650) (1,845,776) -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per share,
basic and
diluted 0.07 (0.10) - (0.01) (0.10) -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Working
capital at
period end 15,371,663 15,602,585 (1) 15,371,663 15,602,585 (1)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-term
debt at
period end - - - - - -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Shares
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
average during
the period -
Basic and
diluted 28,563,606 14,053,828 103 28,563,606 19,313,334 48
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding
at period
end 28,563,606 28,336,351 1 28,563,606 28,336,351 1
Discussion thread on oil and gas producers and explorers based in Canada.
PERTINENT LINKS
Oil Patch Updates
http://www.oilpatchupdates.com/
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM PRODUCERS
http://www.capp.ca/
Small Explorers and Producers Association of Canada (SEPAC)
http://www.sepac.ca/
THE CANADIAN OIL SANDS
http://www.thecanadianoilsands.info/
PEAK OIL. COM
http://peakoil.com/
WEEKLY PETROLEUM DATA
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/ngs/ngshistory.xls
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |