Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Much more to come. Dave is pushing this along now !
Keep up the great work.
The USGS testing results should be out very soon !
Hawk
Nice. This is huge…company continuing to make solid progress.
Another -250 mil reduced from OS. This time on unrestricted.
Lol I'm not even going to read your response. Some day this will be in silver and you'll be forever crying you didn't buy any. But that's your choice.
That's terrible advice. Tickers like BYRG run by guys like Bryant should be avoided. If you're going to take a gamble on it though, hoping that he can put out some nonsense will move the stock, you should sell and take profits as quickly as possible. Look at the long term chart of BYRG to see why.
"Investment grade stocks". That's hilarious.
As to the share structure manipulations that Bryant is trying to push as incentives for traders to buy stock, that's exactly what it is, manipulation. The same thing you claim MMs do without any proof. Bryant can issue shares at will. To anyone, for any reason. Right now, the market cap is $21M. Even if he were to give back all the restricted stock out there, it would still carry a market cap of $7M. Fow what? A bunch of mined out claims that haven't proven to have reserves worth going after?
Set and forget. Long hold. Investment grade stocks take a long time because they aren't filing BS mergers. Their investor deck states 2025-2026 is when things will get hot. We should be near or above a penny this year at some time. They just have to follow through with the continued share reduction. 3.332b shares should be up next.
Spring and summer is when we get more info.
Is BYRG done, or is this shaking the tree out?
I should put my trust into a iHub barnacle
More trustworthy than PRs issued by a non-filing, non-disclosing, POS fake wannabe mining company, one of a fleet of similar Sunnyland P&D companies. But hey, good luck! You'll need it.
You're right, I should put my trust into a iHub barnacle working on a lifetime achievement award of 5,000 AABB posts. That's so... Sad 🤣. So many words and can't engage a question in dialogue here, except to switch topic to "well what about ___." 🤣.
You would be on better logical footing if you stuck to admonishing the company for past failures instead of future ones.
As long as we are arguing this minor detail, the conversation departs from being about the company and the value they are working on creating as we speak. That's the point. Hard Rock Consulting has reporting covered and one look at their track record should quash all disbelief, not to mention the clear misinterpretation of MISM's mishap from 11 years ago before the overhaul of resource reporting standards in US.
Well articulated? I don't know about that.... but I do know it was wrong.
You get a well articulated response, ignore it, and move on to yet another whataboutism. It should be clear to all that your intentions are to spread negative outlook rather than have discussion, and so you are worthy to be at best ignored.
Sitting here on 8SMA Daily. Good LT adds and Hold on. SS clean up going on, and will continue.
Hawk
Let's see her name on a few PRs. Like legit companies do.
You might be the only person who doesn't understand the words I am saying 🤣.
I look forward to writing more PR's about how BYRG will be JORC complaint and SEC compliant by proxy. Thanks for all the great material everyone and the tidbits from 2013 were a screamer!
Until the overhaul in 2018, which took effect in 2021, SEC disclosure requirements on resources weren't reliable. This is why the US adopted standards based on the Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards (CRIRSCO) like a 43-101 does, so everyone preferred 43-101 standards for a long time. Now the SEC rules are much more similar to a 43-101. 43-101 is easier to say than Industry Guide 7 subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K or whatever it’s called and everyone knows what is meant by 43-101 standards. So BYRG could execute to Canadian standards and simultaneously satisfy SEC standards, they could file in SEC fashion using slightly different terminology and still say it’s up to 43-101 standards, it’s about being able to talk about what’s in the ground by using 3rd parties and qualified persons and all that…
Hard Rock Consulting's PG.
JJ Brown is a licensed Professional Geologist in the states of Idaho and Wyoming and is recognized as a Qualified Person (QP) with regard to geology and mineral resources according to United States, Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101), Australian (JORC), and South African (SAMREC) standards. She has conducted site inspections, geologic held reconnaissance, and data verification as an independent QP for a variety of gold, silver, and multiple commodity projects throughout the western U.S., Mexico, and South America. She has contributed to more than 30 NI 43-101 Technical Reports on geology, exploration, mineral resources and reserves, economic assessment, and pre-feasibility and feasibility level studies over the past 10 years. Ms. Brown's professional specialties are field exploration, including exploration program design and oversight, and technical writing.
You might be the only person impressed with the words you are saying 🤣.
SDRC doing the same crap. Both Dan Halley and the CEO guy mentioned 43-101 reports? Why? Shouldn't they try to comply with US standards first?
True, never filed, yet they claimed it was a "43-101" report. No wonder the BCSC got irritated. And they'll get irritated with BYRG if they try the same thing.
Nope, MISM issued a report entitled "43-101", never filed it with the Canadians at all. So not a matter of timing, as you are suggesting.
Hard Rock Consulting gonna label their report that way too? Are they that stupid/incompetent?
Nowhere are people more forgiving than on iHub when they are trying to make money on the latest story being put forth by a serial failure.
Well, let's see how this one unfolds in 2024.
Unlike you crusty iHub barnacles, not everything is frozen in the past.
Thank you Slowjab. Correct.
It used to be a scam. Dave was scammed and everyone was scammed by Dave. The market accepted it as a scam and now its priced for death.
Place your bets now whether you think it's even possible if it can get cleaned up because that's what they are attempting to do. That may or may not be a disproportionately placed opportunity.
Bryant has been with BYRG for at least 16 years that I'm aware of. In all those years, he's accomplished nothing. When I first started to follow him in 2011 it was because of a bit of mining nonsense centered around a guy named Frank Ekija of the NVC Fund claiming there were $128.3B of proven mineral reserves in the ground and they were going to raise money for exploration at $3 a share. And that BYRG had $500M in the bank since they had a %age of the fund.
It was all a bunch of nonsense, of course, and a year later, Bryant did a 1:50,000 R/S that wiped everyone out. Those were interesting times. Ah, the things people try and make you believe in order to run a ticker.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=59707558
BYRG will sure as hell file a NI43-101 compliant report as they are being advised to by their mining contractor Hard Rock Consulting, and (get this) they will do it the correct way.
Gitreal is confused! MISM investors were issued a warning because the company DIDNT properly file a NI 43-101 when it said it did. Complete falsehood being spread like butter over too much bread. Oh great scholar of OTC mining scams pulling 2013 articles out of someones ass ... give me a break.
According to the article you proudly quoted from, MISM never filed NI 43-101:
“The BCSC is warning the public that Mission Mining has not filed a NI 43-101 report with the BCSC.”
Isn’t that interesting.
However, the NI 43-101 is relevant for mineral projects anywhere in the world. Nobody will receive a cease and desist letter for being outside of Canada and not listed on TSX while acquiring the NI 43-101.
MISM did.
However, the NI 43-101 is relevant for mineral projects anywhere in the world. Nobody will receive a cease and desist letter for being outside of Canada and not listed on TSX while acquiring the NI 43-101.
MISM did.
And like anyone is going to listen to a grown man who has spent over a decade on a single ticker on iHub, that is downright embarrassing. Go look at the boards this man has posted on and ask yourself why someone would post thousands upon thousands of posts 🤣. In short, do your job better or take your meds.
Gitreal just makes stuff up lmao. His efforts on SDRCs board failed so he's onto BYRG, boss probably told him to not mess this one up 🤣
That is very interesting about MISM being flagged for not having a NI 43-101 report. I suppose they never went through the process if true.
Your statement of: "US-filer claiming to have a 43-101 compliant report on their mining project....nope, they will get a cease and desist letter from the Canadians (if brought to their attention). They cannot be compliant because the Canadians will not review and approve it. That is what makes it "compliant", is incorrect.
It is true that a Canadian or foreign mining company trading on the TSX is required to file NI 43-101. However, the NI 43-101 is relevant for mineral projects anywhere in the world. Nobody will receive a cease and desist letter for being outside of Canada and not listed on TSX while acquiring the NI 43-101. Do some more research. See below:
https://www.rangefront.com/blog/what-is-a-ni-43-101-amp-what-is-it-used-for#:~:text=The%20purpose%20of%20an%20NI,%2C%20development%2C%20or%20production%20project.
An NI 43-101 report is a summary for potential investors of scientific and technical information for a mineral exploration, development, or production project. This report is required for listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and TSXV.
Intended for the investing public and their advisors, who in most cases, are not mining experts, the NI 43-101 technical report is meant to be complete and fair in nature while also being able to be understood by a non-scientific audience. Therefore, the challenge for the qualified person preparing the report is to present relevant information as well as the nature, importance, and limitations of the reporting, within the guidelines of disclosure and while keeping the reports simplified and understandable to a potential investor.
WHAT IS A NI 43-101 REPORT?
A NI 43-101 report, otherwise known as a National Instrument 43-101 Technical report, is a report used to provide a concise and accurate summary of a mineral project, whether in the exploration, development, or production stage. Its purpose is to provide relevant and accurate information that potential investors or their advisors can use to inform investing decisions.
While the NI 43-101 report is required for stock exchanges in Toronto, it is relevant for mineral projects anywhere in the world. Regardless of location, if the mining project intends to list on the TSX or TSXV, it is almost always required to have this report to list on the exchange.
WHAT IS A NI 43-101 REPORT USED FOR?
The purpose of an NI 43-101 report is to summarize the important and relevant technical information to potential investors or advisors for a mineral exploration, development, or production project. Most investors will not have the technical knowledge to understand the more detailed and scientific technical reports; this report is meant to be presented in a way that it can be understood by the applicable audience.
The NI 43-101 report is required for most listings on the TSX and TSXV. Around 43% of the world’s public mining companies are listed on the TSX (Toronto Stock Exchange) and TSXV (TSX Venture Exchange). 42% of all global mining financings in the past 5 years were completed by companies listed on these exchanges, and 35% of all global mining equity capital in the past 5 years were raised by these same companies. Therefore, for most public mining and exploration projects, the NI 43-101 report is a critical part of their financing strategy.
KEY INFORMATION WITHIN AN NI 43-101 REPORT
There are 26 headers in a NI 43-101 report. However, the level of detail under each header is up to the qualified person. However, it is advised that they keep in mind that the intended audience does not have a scientific background and that the report is meant to be a summary. This also means a filing of comprehensive appendixes is not typically necessary.
DISCLOSURE OF MINERAL RESOURCES OR MINERAL RESERVES
One of the key aspects of the NI 43-101 report is the disclosure of mineral resources or mineral reserves. This is basically the part of the report that summarizes the mineral assets available in the project. However, there are important rules about what can and cannot be disclosed—and how—which can be found here. This disclosure within the NI 43-101 report may include the date of estimated resources and reserves, the quantity and grade or quality of each category, key assumptions, parameters, and methods used to estimate the resources and reserves. Later in the report, there will also be a disclosure of any known legal, political, environmental, or other risks that could affect potential development of these resources or reserves.
NAME OF QUALIFIED PERSON
The report must be prepared, supervised, or approved by a qualified person. The name of this person as well as their relationship to the issuer of the report must be disclosed in the NI 43-101 report. This disclosure will also include their title, qualifications, a summary of relevant experience, the name of professional associations to which the qualified person belongs, as well as information about the qualified person’s relationship to the project and responsibilities within the technical report.
DATA VERIFICATION
If the report includes scientific or technical information about a mineral project, then it must disclose whether a qualified person has verified the data disclosed, a description of how the data was verified and any limitations in the verification process, and an explanation of any failure to verify the data.
EXPLORATION INFORMATION
This may include details about any surveys or investigations regarding the property as well as the interpretation of the exploration information. The exploration information disclosure should include QA/QC measures applied, as well as sample, analytical, or testing results.
Simply, why BYRG will issue Canadian compliant reporting:
Canada's National Instrument 43-101 is a standard used for fairness and accountability in commercial grade mining properties world wide; not just companies in Canada. This is because Canada has been the largest investment hub for mining companies in the world for many years now. With the goal in mind that BYRG is preparing its properties for sale, BYRG will be evaluated for investment by large, institutional, or otherwise established in mining industry entities (or for acquisition altogether) and these entities will pressure BYRG to develop the properties and report according to the standards that THEY use. THESE companies are very likely to be Canadian-traded or dual-listed public companies, but it will still be useful and welcome if not.
Oh and BTW, you think I run IR? For not just this company but a whole slew of others? I'll take that as a compliment... I guess.
You might want to inform your buddies that run the various Sunnyland-related mining scam companies that are claiming to be working on a 43-101 compliant report is something they need to be careful with. It would be a shame if the BCSC were to get a letter from a concerned person asking about the use of 43-101 reports to promote US-traded companies.....wouldn't it?
BTW, shouldn't you have a disclaimer as required by Ihub about acting as company IR? You seem to be taking that role with several Sunnyland scam companies.
Nothings stopping any company from hiring a geologist or professional qualified to do so (besides expense) to write a Canadian compliant report.
Sorry, but you are half right, half wrong. Yes, the company can hire whoever they want to write a technical report. Since they are a non-filer, they can probably get away with hiring someone's nephew who collects geodes and pretty pebbles to write the report.
But, as far as a US-filer claiming to have a 43-101 compliant report on their mining project....nope, they will get a cease and desist letter from the Canadians (if brought to their attention). They cannot be compliant because the Canadians will not review and approve it. That is what makes it "compliant".
Do you want to see an example of a cease and desist letter that was issued to a US OTC company? I'll see if I can dredge one up.
Here's the report that got an OTC company (Mission Mining or MISM) in trouble and prompted the BCSC to issue their nasty letter:
NI 43-101:
Exploration Potential of the Gold Star Mining
Claims
Location: Esmeralda County, Nevada
Prepared for:
Western Gold Company, LLC
? Mission Mining Company
1725 South Rainbow Boulevard
Suite 16-100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Prepared by:
Vladimir B. Zivkovic, Ph.D., CPG.
Zivkovic Geophysical Investigations, LLC
2005 9th Street
Suite 6
Greeley, CO 80631
303-219-3238
www.zivkovicgeophysical.com
Effective Date: November 11, 2013
I'll see if I kept a copy of the BCSC letter, maybe that will help you understand.
I wasn't going to say anything about this.....
But you, gitreal, are clearly and desperately spreading falsehood here. Nothings stopping any company from hiring a geologist or professional qualified to do so (besides expense) to write a Canadian compliant report. Now if you're implying that the guy to write it under that heading won't be qualified to do so... that's another story.. but you didn't say that.
I've never heard anything more nonsensical in my life... and to see the peanut gallery rally behind you about some article from microcapdaily... which happened to be decently written in my opinion. It cited a broad amount of previously released material information that investors need to evaluate the stock. Now I'm seeing that BYRG is coming off a clear major bottom, share lots from the 2021 debacle are being cancelled, and its becoming so clear that progress is being made to clean up the filth this stock has been for so many years.
It's clear something's up and the overlords must have sent out a memo given the crows have flocked around it. BYRG is in play.
MicroCRAPdaily Figured your spelling needed to be highlighted!
Looking back at the chart, looks like it was heavily front-loaded in early 2021, and selling off ever since. Maybe a new batch of shares came off restrictions, and someone felt they needed help to unload them? Microcrapdaily claims they are never paid for the articles (in shares or in cash) but they don't just write these articles for fun.
Microcapdaily article. BYRG should be heading south now.
They always pump a crap ticker after it's showed some gains. Never before.
Incredible Article on BYRG??? So "incredible" that Microcrapdaily says this in their own disclaimer:
DO NOT BELEIVE anything you read in the articles, many of them are way out of date or just plain wrong.
https://microcapdaily.com/sec-disclosure/
Based on what catalyst?
Big Things Coming on BYRG 0.02+ by May
Pacific Capital? Is this a joke?
BYRG big things coming from Pacific Capital in Southern California. This is a .02+ stock in 2024
Followers
|
121
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
7228
|
Created
|
04/24/08
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |