Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You said it had nothing to do with LBSV. Therefore it's irrelevant on this board.
How can it be irrelevant when I did not state exactyly what it was?
lol
But I do know what is irrelevant..........
Then it's irrelevant on this board. It's probably irrelevant on any board.
My info has nothing to do with LBSV.........lol, GLTU
You appear not to have any "info" at all.
NO need...........I have all the info........we know. :)
You really are paranoid. There're some interesting articles posted on the board. You ought to read them.
LOLOLOLOLISSIMO!! Since when is an SEC suspension "opinion"??
Means Nothing.............show me some real DD, not opinion .
Where does it say that?
"LBSV to resume trading on the OTCBB"
\
The PR headline is:
Liberty Silver Shares to Resume Trading on TSX
It says almost the opposite:
"For the present, the Company''s stock will not immediately be listed, traded or quoted on any of the OTC Markets. The Company is taking steps to meet requirements necessary to permit its stock to resume trading on the OTCBB. The Company''s stock may be traded in the US on the "grey market" or through US broker dealers who have access to the TSX. "
What is says is, "we're stuck on the greys"
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/liberty-silver-shares-to-resume-trading-on-tsx-tsx-lsl-1716029.htm
LBSV to resume trading on the OTCBB
TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - Oct 22, 2012) - Liberty Silver Corp. (LSL.TO) ("Liberty Silver" or the "Company") announced today that the cease trade orders imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Ontario Securities Commission have expired. Trading in its shares on the TSX in Canada will resume today, Monday, October 22, 2012. For the present, the Company''s stock will not immediately be listed, traded or quoted on any of the OTC Markets. The Company is taking steps to meet requirements necessary to permit its stock to resume trading on the OTCBB. The Company''s stock may be traded in the US on the "grey market" or through US broker dealers who have access to the TSX.
The Company advises the investment community that it has never provided any form of compensation to a newsletter writer or anyone else for investment research or to recommend investment in the Company''s shares. The Company also advises that it has no contractual or other relationship with Mr. Robert Genovese, BG Capital Group or any other company owned or controlled by Mr. Genovese (the "Genovese Companies") other than a subscription to a private placement in November 2011 by a company controlled by Mr. Genovese. The Company has engaged Spinnaker Capital Markets Inc. and Navigator Ltd. to provide investor relations services for the Company. The Company also confirms that Spinnaker Capital Markets Inc. and Navigator Ltd. do not have, and have never had, a contractual or other relationship with any of Mr. Genovese and the Genovese Companies. In addition, the Company confirms that Mr. Genovese has never had the right to nominate, and has not nominated, an appointee to the Board of Directors of the Company, and the officers and directors of the Company have not had, and have never had, a business relationship with Mr. Genovese concerning the Company.
The Company wishes to advise the investment community that all official information regarding the Company must be derived solely from disclosure documents filed on www.sedar.com, www.sec.gov and the Company''s website (www.libertysilvercorp.com).
"Liberty is pleased to have the trading suspension concluded promptly. Without exception, the Board and management of Liberty take their regulatory responsibilities very seriously and will continue their commitment to full cooperation and transparency with regulators and the market", said Geoff Browne, Chairman and CEO of Liberty Silver.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/liberty-silver-shares-resume-trading-122812133.html
Same scam yellow cake mining used,same guys,same silver mine yellow cake bought before they went to zero. Then the guys appeared with liberty silver, got the same old hole back and re-pumped the junk.......folks this one will get halted soon enough....imo....rareF
What are you talking about? The SEC does not suspend exchange-listed stocks. When there's something seriously wrong, the exchange delists the stock, and then the SEC suspends.
It is a foreign issuer, and was (and is) fully reporting. It traded on the OTCBB. It does not, however, have any 12(g) or 12(b) registered stock.
YOu cannot prove it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!lol
Nice try.............but WRONG again.
Liberty Silver (LBSV) (LSL.to) (LBSV.ob): The PDF report on Bobby Genovese
10/19/12
On the day that Liberty Silver (LBSV) (LBSV.ob) (LSL.to) is due to have its trading halt lifted by the SEC (though its shares are now moved to the difficult-to-trade gray sheets), the authors of the recent PDF report into the scams run by Liberty Silver's backer, Bobby Genovese, have allowed your author to share the report, previously distributed to a restricted list of regulators, journalists and financial commentators, with the general public. You can find it on this link right here ( http://tinyurl.com/9gctd42 ), a 1.2Mb, 16 page report that goes deeply into the background of Genovese the stock promoter, shows his history and track record of conducting scams and looks at the way in which Liberty Silver has been set up for his benefit, too. Here's how the report starts:
On Friday October 5th, 2012 it came to our attention that the Division of Enforcement decided to halt trading in the shares of Liberty Silver Corp. (LBSV.ob) for a period of nearly two weeks resulting in the issuer being downgraded to the Grey Market pursuant to rule 15c2-11. We would like to thank you for rising to the occasion and being pro-active just when we were beginning to complain about the lack of oversight on the OTCBB market. With this trading halt it appears to us that the SEC may be turning a new page in how it treats pump and dumps something that will prevent billions of dollars of retail investor losses.
Following your trading halt we decided to dig into Liberty Silver Corp. and see if there were any red flags we could identify. The following is a compilation of what we believe to be the relevant facts investors, associates, bankers, lawyers, and accountants should be exposed to before investing, trading, or associating with Robert Donald Bruce Genovese AKA Bobby Genovese and his most recent OTCBB Promo Liberty Silver Corp. (LBSV.ob).
It is what I consider an important report, one that strips away Genovese's facade and shows him for what he is. Here's a little of how it continues:
Our investigation of Mr. Genovese has uncovered a different story one of a Vancouver Investor Relations man turned stock promoter whose name shows up repeatedly as being associated with OTCBB pennystocks, unscrupulous promotions, and offshore companies. It is important to note that while some of the information we are providing has been previously reported on this is the first time an all-encompassing account of Mr. Genovese’s business dealings has been put together stringing together what is in our view a more plausible explanation of his fortune but most importantly providing a template for how he has architected his current OTCBB promotion: Liberty Silver (LBSV).
Here's the link again, go have a read for yourself.
http://tinyurl.com/9gctd42
http://incakolanews.blogspot.com/2012/10/liberty-silver-lbsv-lslto-lbsvob-pdf.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+IncaKolaNews+%28inca+kola+news%29
Wasn't it a bigger drop? What was the last price before the suspension?
You'd think that a 90.32% drop since the day before suspension, would be of interest to holders?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=80717834
The IHub quote server starts fresh when a suspended stock resumes trading. It's annoying. Seems to have been someone who just wanted out and sold at market.
seems strange that that was the only trade just seconds after the open and that the ihub feed showed no dollar or percentage lost.
It isn't, really. It reopened on the Greys. There was only one trade, and it was a lowball. By a LOT.
any idea what happened here today. seems strange.
Whats the deal with this stock? Is it officially done?
halted in canada.
IIROC Trading Halt - LSL (all issues)
TORONTO, Oct. 19, 2012, 2012 (Canada NewsWire via COMTEX) -- The following issues have been halted by IIROC:
Company: Liberty Silver Corp.
TSX Symbol: LSL (all issues)
Reason: Pending News
Halt Time (ET): 10:56 AM ET
The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) can make a decision to impose a temporary suspension of trading in a security of a publicly listed company, usually in anticipation of a material news announcement by the company. Trading halts are issued based on the principle that all investors should have the same timely access to important company information. IIROC is the national self-regulatory organization which oversees all investment dealers and trading activity on debt and equity marketplaces in Canada.
SOURCE: Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
To view this news release in HTML formatting, please use the following URL: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/October2012/19/c8538.html
SOURCE: Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
SOURCE: Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) - Halts/Resumptions
CONTACT: IIROC Inquiries 1-877-442-4322 (Option 3) - Please note that IIROC is not able to
provide any additional information regarding a specific trading halt. Information is
limited to general enquiries only. For more information on IIROC's halts and
resumptions policy clickhere.
Copyright (C) 2012 CNW Group. All rights reserved.
-0-
KEYWORD: Ontario
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: FIN
SUBJECT CODE: STH
Does anybody know if LBSV is trading on Greys or is it still suspended. I can not place an order, even thru my broker.
Importantly and as previously stated, investors are reminded that they should only rely on official statements and releases issued by the Company for information regarding its activities."
lol. who are they trying to fool? are they really trying to say u.s. and canadian securities regulators don't matter?
That's what I mean... Good buying opp coming IMO.
or not. when this resumes trading on the grey sheets, watch for at least an 80% price drop.
This could be a great play when the suspension is lifted!!!
Junior miner Liberty Silver under double scrutiny
10/13/12
We highly recommend this Peter Koven report in today's Financial Post for more information on the growing hoo-hah around Liberty Silver (LSL.to) (LBSV.ob), the promo pumped junior that was halted by the SEC a week (and a bit) ago and is now under official halt status in Canada, too. Koven does a particularly good job on the Canadian people angle of LSL and although doesn't say it out loud, there's clearly a connection to be drawn between the high profile people on the LSL board and the way in which LSL managed to by-pass Venture Exchange listing to get quoted immediately on the TSX. Anyway, go read Koven's story for yourself and get more informed without me blathering in your ear. http://tinyurl.com/9fe29jh
Junior miner Liberty Silver under double scrutiny
Peter Koven
Oct 12, 2012 7:09 PM ET
Thanks for posting this article -
Kiwi
1 word. nonsense.
Too Often Regulators Play the Role of Police, Judge and Executioner: Witness Liberty Silver Corp.
by Anthony Wile
Thursday, October 11, 2012 –
Anthony Wile
To say that regulatory democracy is out of control and doing more damage than good ... well, that may be an understatement.
In this editorial I will examine a very disturbing recent situation in which the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has once again arrested, found guilty and executed a publicly traded opportunity – all without laying a single charge or any court appearances. And I ask you to think a bit about how this might feel. Personally speaking, I am all too aware of what this "process" is like and the destructive damage it causes ... financially, maritally and socially.
I would like to discuss the SEC and its decision to impose a trading halt (essentially a death sentence) on Liberty Silver Corp. (TSX: LSL, OTCBB: LBSV). This from the LibertySilverCorp.com website sums up what just took place:
Liberty Silver was named in an Order of Suspension of Trading (the "Order") dated October 5, 2012 from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Pursuant to the Order, trading in the Company's securities is suspended from October 5, 2012 through October 18, 2012. According to the Order, the SEC states that, "It appears to the SEC that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Liberty Silver because of questions concerning publicly available information about Liberty Silver, the control of its stock, its market price, and trading in the stock."
The Company believes it is in compliance with applicable disclosure and regulatory requirements. The Company is currently reviewing and working to resolve this matter. The Company will work closely and cooperatively with the SEC to resolve this matter for the benefit of our shareholders.
So there you have it. The shares of the company were halted from trading for ten business days. Additionally, IIROC, Canada's regulatory counterpart to the SEC, imposed a trading halt – an action that provides us with further insight into the ever-centralizing power and control of US regulators.
How can any person with even a basic understanding of the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" endorse this kind of execution? No warrants. No court appearance. Nada! With a simple phone call an entire company and its shareholders lose all. Just like that.
Does that sound like justice or, perhaps, more like a totalitarian system? Guilty until proven innocent. The same thing just happened to Kim Dotcom in New Zealand where authorities shut down his billion dollar company and threw him in jail ... all without a trial. In this case, shareholders should sue the regulatory authorities; doubtless there are regulations against that, too.
Now, I have heard firsthand from the regulators' own mouths that the SEC has to act fast to protect NEW investors from being harmed. This haste overwhelms every other consideration. Of course, the SEC was not so hasty with Bernie Madoff, who ran a series of misidentified (and empty) funds under their collective noses for 20 years.
The SEC had plenty of reason to know what Madoff was doing but he was one of their own, a "top man" who was also supportive of the regulatory regime via his involvement with the NASD hierarchy. But it didn't make any difference. Much of what the regulatory and criminal authorities do in this day and age is fairly indefensible.
Say you are a car mechanic. Isn't it your professional responsibility to find out everything you can about cars, to be the best mechanic you can be? But if you are an investment advisor and find out news about a company in advance of others, you may not be able to act on that news for fear it would be perceived as "insider trading."
The idea is that you will have an advantage over others but, in fact, this is why you are in business – to gain a competitive advantage. Goldman Sachs has plenty of advantages ... from top minds to the computer power that engages them.
Of course, just as we've been predicting for years, the SEC is indeed beginning to crack down on computer power. Just a few days ago in an article entitled "To Regulate Rapid Traders, S.E.C. Turns to One of Them," the New York Times reported the SEC had initiated something called "Midas" ... "part of a broader effort at the agency to monitor the proliferation of new technologies and to crack down on practices that have given sophisticated traders an advantage over ordinary investors."
You see? Soon the SEC will be regulating not just computers but computer power! People who have access to high-powered trading programs will end up licensed and supervised. If you trade with unauthorized or super-powered software or systems in an unlicensed environment you may end up in jail.
Kurt Vonnegut predicted the same sort of thing in his short story "Harrison Bergeron" way back in 1961. From Wikipedia: "The film takes place in a dystopian future in which the US government mandates total egalitarianism in all things, by having everyone attach wearable mind 'handicapping' devices to their heads and showing only mind numbing shows on TV."
The SEC's actions in this case – and many others like it – are similarly flawed. The SEC stated in its suspension order, "It appears to the SEC that there is a lack of current and accurate information ...," yet without sufficient evidence to actually lay charges they nonetheless go ahead and destroy the company and its shareholders.
"Appearance" justifies this sort of action? Or the end justifies the means ...
Witness the rapidity with which the Canadian regulator followed suit in suspending the company ... It mattered not whether the company had assets of potential merit – the regulators executed it in Canada as well as in the US.
Canada may fly a separate flag but as one watches the unification of tax departments, financial regulators, central bankers (money fixers), etc. it becomes increasingly clear that nationalist pride is just an illusion. Money Power is firmly in charge. It's called globalism and ain't it grand! Civil liberties flourish under such a structure, no?
In fact, the gentleman involved in promoting this company is now being publicly scourged by a bunch of yellow journalists and anonymous bloggers – all who claim to have caught a "real bad stock scammer." They use terms such as "scumbag" and other such niceties in their descriptions of the "criminals."
They rant on and on about all the past companies in which this person, in this case a Canadian named Bobby Genovese, supposedly had some involvement. Perhaps he did and perhaps he didn't. But regardless, the fact that a stock price rises and falls doesn't make it a scam or a fraud.
People buy speculative securities because they want to SPECULATE. They (us), being a generally oppressed group of over-taxed humans striving for a better tomorrow, place "bets" on emerging companies looking for that big "payday." It happens rarely but when it does, especially in natural resource stocks, the reward for the risk taken (losing it all) can be enormous.
It harkens me back to the days of Robert Friedland's Diamond Fields exploration deal in eastern Canada. They were looking for diamonds and found the world's biggest nickel discovery. Was the fact that Herr Friedland had been on the hunt for diamonds but discovered nickel deposits instead a fraudulent misrepresentation – despite the fact that he ended up building a multi-billion dollar company in the process? Did the speculators complain about their newfound wealth? NO! Why would they? That's why speculators speculate.
The Friedland Diamond Fields example is exactly what can happen in the natural resource business – and in speculating in natural resource companies in particular. Was Liberty Silver Corp. on the cusp of similar success? We'll likely never know now, thanks to the SEC and their diligent policing efforts.
(On another note: I wonder who was responsible for the "information frenzy" that likely bombarded the front doors of the SEC's electronic hallways? Short sellers? Disgruntled former relationships of Mr. Genovese? Dorothy because she was envious of the amount of exploration capital focusing on Nevada instead of Kansas?)
The bottom line is this: Promoters (entrepreneurs) go out and do their best to assemble a team of competent geological types, raise the necessary speculative capital – from speculators – and give it their best shot. If it works, it can repay handsomely for the initial outlay. If it fails one can lose it all. That is the nature of the beast.
But neither here nor there, the government runs ridiculous odds campaigns called "lotteries" every day of the week. These "fools' games" are chased by millions of people – speculators – who invest after-tax dollars, knowing full well they may lose, to chance winning that all-elusive jackpot, only to pay tax on that risk/reward scenario that only the most desperate of society would waste ten cents on. But back to the overall "investing and financial system" at hand.
How do people think the system works? First an IPO is rolled out and then after the price falls big firms buy back shares via their brokerage forces. And then weeks or months later they begin recommending it and roll it out again! They do this over and over. Is all of Wall Street a scam? If so, why doesn't the SEC shut it down? I think we know the answer to that one.
Did the SEC suspend trading in Facebook when the stock was rolled out and promptly lost half its value? Perhaps part of the problem here is that the stock in question is a silver stock and the SEC is especially hard on precious metals that compete with fiat money. Just a thought ...
It takes an enormous effort to wake up every day with the energy and enthusiasm required to give one's project a fighting chance. And in any successful company I have ever seen there is always an "engine under the hood." (Think Bill Gates, Paul Allen, Larry Ellison, etc.)
But the wolves pounce on the promoter, in this case Bobby Genovese, as if he has committed egregious crimes and is responsible for the carnage now facing the Liberty Silver shareholders. They claim all the risks he took in accepting the challenge of building, creating and trying to make something happen in this world make him a criminal if the stock falls after rising.
How ridiculous is this? He may have done things inappropriate or "illegal." I do not know. BUT neither do those who are willing to jump in alongside the regulators and slam a guy who has created enormous wealth for many people over the years.
Ask yourself this: What happens when all the doers give up and say, "I'm going on strike"?
The parasites starve in the dark.
http://www.thedailybell.com/28143/Anthony-Wile-Too-Often-Regulators-Play-the-Role-of-Police-Judge-and-Executioner-Witness-Liberty-Silver-Corp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SEC suspends trading in Liberty Silver
TIM KILADZE
The Globe and Mail
Friday, Oct. 05 2012, 7:29 PM EDT
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/sec-suspends-trading-in-liberty-silver/article4593415/
LBSV OFFICIALLY ON GREY SHEETS.
there you go.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/LBSV/quote
The SEC does suspensions not trading halts. Only Exchanges do trading halts.
Big difference.
You might want to read up some more.
The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of Liberty Silver because of a lack of current and accurate information about the company concerning, among other things, the control of its stock, its market price, and trading in the stock.]
nonsense.
As of September 21, 2012: From January 2010 until today there have been a total of 1116 SEC Suspensions where ALL 1116 stocks were reinstated on the Grey Sheets after the ten day SEC Suspension ended.
Of the 1116 SEC Suspended stocks since January 2010 645 Registrations have been revoked.
The remaining 471 stocks are on the Grey Sheets (or still in the ten day SEC Suspension within the last ten days) and not one has made it off the Grey Sheets back to quotation by any Market Maker.
Of the 471 stocks that are on the Grey Sheets most are awaiting revocation on DEFAULT for failure to file Financials, wherein there were no other allegations that would require subsequent SEC Litigation(s).
Stocks that were Suspended for any allegations are awaiting SEC Litigation or are being litigated and those stocks will remain on the Grey Sheets and will NOT be revoked until all SEC Litigation has been adjudicated by an SEC Administrative Law Judge.
For additional research the links below comprise all SEC Actions back to 1995.
SEC Suspensions:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions.shtml
SEC Administrative Proceedings:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin.shtml
SEC Litigations:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases.shtml
Administrative Law Judge Orders:
http://www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders.shtml
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79825542
You better do some research. Seriously, every single stock this happened to has crashed and burned and every single message board said not us during the suspension.
ya they do...especially popular in Canada...lot of orders come in suddenly without a release...they halt them all the time...for a what's up looks see...don't get be wrong...there may be something that needs to be disclosed bit Im not really worried about this one but as I say we will see everything in 11 days
The SEC does not impose this harsh action against a stock just "to see what's up...".
My guess is, they know what's up.
yes, that's true but again those are all 211 based issues....this is a market and trading issue...those are all largely companies who do not file their audited financials...this is entirely separate issue. This is actually a trading halt to see what's up....The main difference is these are companies that basically have minimum information out. With LBSV they are looking at why the street is accumulating such size. ie is there something that needs to be released. For example, some mining results that are none public etc. Again, could be wrong but that's how I see it
Read this, I said over 1000, not thousands:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79825542
Well it's not 1000's but more like 50's...I don't think its a 211 issue...I think its a market trading issue. I think it will also open on the TSE as well. I don't think is a finra issue but an SEC information disclosure issue. When the slap company's down to the grey's its basically the deal has no legs..Start again
Maybe your right...I just don't think you are...It really doesn't matter because there is no stock to buy or sell till the lift is released anyway...So there argument can't be decided till such time. We shall see..
Where do you read that any stock was suspended by the SEC for a "dated 211", whatever that is?
So then, it is your contention that LBSV is different than the over 1000 other stocks put on the greys?
Most of the stuff your referring to are in all basically grey's to begin with.
No, they are not. They're OTC stocks--Pink or OTCBB--suspended by the SEC. A "dated" 211 is as good as any other.
The moment a stock is suspended, it is no longer in compliance with Rule 15c2-11. Just read the suspension notice.
Most of the stuff your referring to are in all basically grey's to begin with. No real business, dated 211, just doppey business'es that began to suddenly trade. This deal has some real legs on it. So, I don't really see the basis of going to the grey's because the SEC is looking for more disclosure info given lat months big run. Additionally, I think there have been some real market makers take in real positions so that would be a huge slap in giving another market maker an exclusive by being grey.
Just my opinion but I view this company as a little more established than your typical BB deal but we shall see soon enough
Followers
|
15
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
287
|
Created
|
10/27/08
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Total Shares Outstanding: | 33,013,715 |
Restricted/Board of Directors Shares: | 6,729,720 |
Fully Diluted | 39,743,435 |
Toronto, Ontario, March 7, 2018 EPA Signs Agreement With Bunker Hill Mining Corp. Which Provides Full Rights Of Operatorship Of The Bunker Hill Zinc, Lead, Silver Mine
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CSE-BNKR) (“Bunker Hill” or the “Company”) is pleased to report that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), and the United States Department of Justice, have signed an agreement with Bunker Hill, allowing the Company or any subsidiary entities to operate the Bunker Hill Zinc, Lead, and Silver Mine without incurring liability for hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants that migrated from the Mine in the past.
Specifically, Bunker Hill’s agreement with the United States, titled “Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Response Action”, in part, provides for the following:
Major obligations of Bunker Hill
Major obligations of the United States
The Settlement Agreement is subject to a 14 day public comment period, after which it will become effective.
Stated Bruce Reid, President & CEO of Bunker Hill: “This agreement with the United States EPA and Department of Justice provides Bunker Hill or a subsidiary with the ability to operate the Bunker Hill Mine. We can now accelerate the work required to re-open the mine. We will work together with the EPA to operate the mine in a way that will provide economic benefits for the local community in an environmentally prudent fashion.”
About Bunker Hill Mining Corp.
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. has an option to acquire 100% of the Bunker Hill Mine. The Bunker Hill Mine was the largest producing mine in the Coeur D'Alene zinc, lead and silver mining district in northern Idaho. Historically, the mine produced over 35M tons of ore grading on average 8.76% lead, 3.67% zinc, and 155 g/t silver (Bunker Hill Mines Annual Report 1980).
Information about the Company is available on its website, www.bunkerhillmining.com, or in the SEDAR and EDGAR databases.
For additional information contact:
Bruce Reid Chief Executive Officer | Nicholas Konkin Marketing and Communications |
(647) 500-4495 br@bunkerhillmining.com | (416) 567-9087 nk@bunkerhillmining.com |
Cautionary Statements
Certain statements in this news release are forward-looking and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as well as within the meaning of the phrase ‘forward-looking information’ in the Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations. The forward looking statements made herein are based on information currently available to the Company and the Company provides no assurance that actual results will meet management's expectations or assumptions with respect to, among other things, the ability of the Company to successfully complete the acquisition of the Bunker Hill Mine Complex on the terms as announced or other satisfactory terms or at all, and fund the initial payments for which the Company does not have funds at this time, the Company’s present and future financial condition, the Company’s ability to secure financing, and the state of financial markets. Forward-looking statements include estimates and statements that describe the Company’s future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur. Forward-looking statements may be identified by such terms as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “estimates”, “may”, “could”, “would”, “will”, or “plan”, and may include statements regarding, among other things, the terms of the Bunker Hill Mine Complex acquisition and funding of the acquisition. Since forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results relating to, among other things, results of exploration, project development, and the Company’s financial condition and prospects, could differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements for many reasons such as: the inability of the Company to successfully acquire the Bunker Hill Mine Complex on the terms as announced or other satisfactory terms or at all, and fund the payments for which the Company does not have funds at this time; the inability of the Company to budget and manage its liquidity in light of the failure to obtain additional financing; the inability of the Company to develop or sustain an active public market for its securities; development of changes in general economic conditions and conditions in the financial markets; changes in demand and prices for precious metals; litigation, legislative, environmental and other judicial, regulatory, political and competitive developments; operational difficulties encountered in connection with the activities of the Company; and other matters discussed in this news release. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. These and other factors made in public disclosures and filings by the Company should be considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by the Company or on its behalf, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |