Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
My portfolio has taken a mega ass whoopin'. The Bursting of the internet bubble can't hold a candle to this nasty beat down.
I am beginning to think that nothing is safe.........
What about tobacky stocks? MO&VGR. 8+ and 11+ Think their divvies are safe?
Brookfield Asset Management
Occasionally compared to Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A), Brookfield Asset Management manages various asset classes worldwide through multiple subsidiaries. Thanks to healthy liquidity that fueled opportunistic asset purchases, Brookfield reported a 48% increase in cash flow from operations in the fourth quarter, and strong cash flow for the full year.
Many CAPS members like Brookfield's solid track record of managing long-term assets, growing cash flow, and maximizing returns through cheap financing. Another plus: It maintains a 40% stake in Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. The spinoff reported a 141% increase in fourth-quarter adjusted net operating income, and global governments' increasing focus on infrastructure should bode well for its future opportunities. Overall, 97% of the 1,245 CAPS members rating Brookfield Asset Management are bullish.
Brookfield Asset Mgmt beats by $0.11, beats on revs (BAM) 15.08 : Reports Q4 (Dec) earnings of $0.27 per share, $0.11 better than the First Call consensus of $0.16; revenues fell 4.8% year/year to $3.01 bln vs the $2.37 bln consensus. Co says, "Our renewable power and office property businesses both produced strong operating cash flows during the quarter, which led to the overall improvement in operating cash flows. The stable revenue profiles of these businesses should provide us with a strong earnings base for 2009 and beyond. In addition, we continue to bolster our capitalization and liquidity which, at over $3 bln of core liquidity, remains at historically high levels."
I think if we make it through 2009 we will be in good shape. An upturn may start as soon as this fall.
This is my new fear.....
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=35040120
No problem on the homefront..... Unless I have to supplement the business to keep it's doors open...
Do the math
Prices are down. Yields are up. Rates are low. Look, it doesn't take a market guru to see the opportunity here. For the long-run investor, the stock market is stupid cheap right now. Former highfliers Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) and PotashCorp (NYSE: POT), both of which sport meaningful competitive advantages, have been beaten down to the point that even this curmudgeonly investor is kicking their tires. Meanwhile, staid dividend payers from Yum! Brands (NYSE: YUM) to Chevron (NYSE: CVX) sit like fish in a barrel for the long-term investor.
Indeed, these beaten-down dividend dealers have caught my interest for two reasons. First, because you're currently able to gobble up blue-ribbon stocks at flea market prices. And second, because dividend-paying stocks offer the best of both worlds: Not only are they less volatile, but according to Dr. Jeremy Siegel, portfolios invested in the highest-yielding S&P 500 stocks outperformed portfolios in the lowest-yielding by almost five percentage points a year from 1957 through 2003.
Indie Research
Markel Intrigues Investors Looking for a New Berkshire
Thursday January 29, 9:24 am ET
By the tickerspy.com Staff
Market pundits love to speculate on companies that might be "the next Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A - News, BRK-B - News)," but only a few are legitimate contenders. One such firm is Markel (NYSE: MKL - News), which shares with Warren Buffett's firm a focus on specialty insurance and a track record of generating solid investment income.
While Markel's investment business, which focuses on writing specialty insurance for unique situations involving nonstandard and hard-to-place risks, is what primarily drives the stock, Chief Investment Officer Thomas Gayner has also proved to be a shrewd stockpicker.
Unfortunately, it's been tough being a stockpicker lately.
Looking at Markel's top-15, U.S.-listed, equity holdings from the end of Q3, one can see that only a couple of the firm's picks held up during Q4, among them energy giant Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM - News) and insurance firms Fairfax Financial Holdings (NYSE: FFH - News) and RLI (NYSE: RLI - News).
There were several laggards among Markel's end-of-Q3 holdings, including General Electric (NYSE: GE - News), White Mountains Insurance (NYSE: WTM - News), Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE: BAM - News), used-car retailer CarMax (NYSE: KMX - News), and hotel company Marriott International (NNYSE: MAR).
In a challenging quarter for many of Markel's individual holdings, tickerspy.com's graph shows that, in the aggregate, these top holdings have kept pace with the volatile market. Based on Gayner's reputation as a shrewd investor, investors will be wondering where he was putting his money during Q4.
However, investors won't be sure of where Markel stands now until next month, when the deadline for Q4 filings hits. At tickerspy.com, members can track Markel's latest holdings, see a graph of their combined performance, and be notified when new holdings are made public.
Is Warren selling? I'm buying more - lol
The GMAC Home Services' business units that are part of this acquisition include: GMAC Global Relocation Services, GMAC Real Estate and GMAC Home Services Mortgage.
BAM isn't going to make the loans. Remember that BAM's primary business is real estate investment.
What's that? lol! My broker called earlier and suggested I sell half my GE on the Moody's news.
I said WHAT!?!?!?!?!
Ain't I in this Global catastrophy for the long haul!?!?!
I'll buy more!!!!
Are you going into the panic mode?
Would have seen it 4 months ago if this was an investment site. I-Hub has to be the absolute worst source for company news. Totally SUX!
September 23,2008 Brookfield Residential Property Services Acquires GMAC Home Services LLC
TORONTO, ONTARIO - (Marketwire - Sept. 23, 2008) - Brookfield Residential Property Services ("BRPS"), a division of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. ("Brookfield"), announced today that it has entered into an agreement to purchase GMAC Home Services LLC, a recognized leader in global relocation, real estate franchising and brokerage and home financing services, from GMAC Residential Holding Company LLC and Residential Capital LLC. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter 2008.
"Brookfield is a leading provider of residential property services in Canada," stated Chairman George Myhal. "Notwithstanding the recent market turmoil, this acquisition represents an important opportunity for us to expand in the U.S. market for residential property services and we believe we are well-positioned to grow our market share once this difficult period of adjustment is behind us."
In Canada, Brookfield provides executive relocation services, home appraisals and property brokerage services under the Royal LePage, La Capitale, Johnston & Daniel and Centract brand names.
The GMAC Home Services' business units that are part of this acquisition include: GMAC Global Relocation Services, GMAC Real Estate and GMAC Home Services Mortgage.
"This transaction will combine GMAC Home Services' global operations with our businesses, to create a platform for long-term North American and international growth," said Graham Badun, Managing Partner and CEO of BRPS. "GMAC Home Services offers its award winning services through locations in forty seven states, Europe and Asia. This acquisition is evidence of our belief in the long-term opportunities for growth in the U.S. residential property services market."
Following the acquisition, BRPS will have one of the largest relocation companies in the world and its REALTOR(R) network will be almost 30,000 strong, based out of 1,500 locations across North America.
"The purchase of GMAC Home Services by Brookfield allows us to join a globally recognized and respected real estate and relocation services organization," said John Bearden, President and CEO, GMAC Home Services. "This move will enhance the ability of two world-class organizations to pursue opportunities on a global scale. Given that both organizations have similar industry expertise and strong commitments to client service, we expect to quickly achieve the full potential represented by this transaction."
Gloria Nilson GMAC Real Estate Sold to Investment Group Led by Real Estate Veteran Dick Schlott
Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:15am EST
The Former 16 Company-Owned Offices Will Now Become Franchised Offices of GMAC Real Estate
RED BANK, N.J.--(Business Wire)--
Gloria Nilson GMAC Real Estate, one of New Jersey`s largest and best-known real estate firms with 16 offices and more than 700 sales associates, has been purchased by SCS Realty Investment Group LLC, a firm led by 40-year real estate veteran Dick Schlott.
As part of the agreement, Gloria Nilson GMAC Real Estate will continue to operate under that name and will become a franchisee of GMAC Real Estate, owned by Brookfield Residential Property Services. The Schlott-led Gloria Nilson GMAC Real Estate firm will now be the largest GMAC Real Estate franchise in the Northeast.
"The Schlott name is synonymous with New Jersey real estate and we are absolutely thrilled Dick has chosen to purchase these offices and in turn, become a franchisee of our company," said John Bearden, president and CEO of GMAC Real Estate. "We look forward to seeing this tremendous company grow under his leadership, backed by the resources of our new parent company, Brookfield Residential Property Services," Bearden said.
Schlott founded Schlott Realtors in 1971 and grew the firm to one of the nation`s preeminent real estate brokerages with 140 offices in five states, thousands of sales associates and annual sales of more than $7 billion, before selling the company in 1991. He has also led a major global real estate franchise system, and served as president and CEO of GMAC Home Services. During his career, Schlott has held key positions within industry associations including Director of the National Association of Realtors, Vice President of the New Jersey Association of Realtors and President of the Northwest Bergen Board of Realtors.
"This is truly a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for me to re-enter the real estate industry in a huge way and become part of an organization whose philosophy and vision for the business are so closely aligned with my own," said Dick Schlott.
Brookfield Residential Property Services, which less than 60 days ago purchased GMAC Real Estate, is already making significant headlines. The company was recently named in the 2009 Swanepoel TRENDS Report as the number one trendsetter
in 2008.
"With the backing of Brookfield Residential Property Services and as a franchisee of GMAC Real Estate, I`m very confident we`re positioned with the right team to deliver tremendous success," said Schlott.
Terms of the purchase were not announced.
Home services? GMAC? October? GMAC is in deep chit too.... Aren't they?
Hope they didn't purchase their trash.
Maybe we'll get some bailout money too. lol!
One has to imagine that with the next administration's intended plans to ramp up infrastructure projects in the country, Brookfield Asset Management will be one company to benefit, given that it owns and operates many infrastructure-related assets through a subsidiary. Moreover, because it has substantial liquidity available, Brookfield has been able to make opportunistic purchases, including its purchase of the home services unit of GMAC in October. In September, CAPS member ValueArbitrage called Brookfield a top-tier management company.
---Brookfield Asset Management is a best-in-breed asset management company focused exclusively on delivering value to shareholders by producing increasing, recurring high quality free cash flow. ... BAM's basic strategy is to opportunistically [acquire] and manage long-lived assets, at reasonable prices, that generate sustainable and growing free cash flow, and finance them with cheap debt and equity financing, and manage them actively to maximize total returns. ... BAM offers investors a truly compelling opportunity for patient, long term investors.
Brookfield Cash Flows Freely - Desjardins
by: FP Trading Desk November 21, 2008
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) reported third quarter results earlier this month, but analysts have been poring over the company’s more detailed quarterly report, released earlier this week. Michael Goldberg at Desjardins Securities was particularly interested in determining funds from operations (FFO) excluding gains and other unpredictable factors, and segmented FFO excluding those items.
He noted that total reported FFO per share for the third quarter was US58¢, up from US51¢ in same quarter of the previous year. Excluding net gains and unpredictable items, Mr. Goldberg determined Brookfield’s adjusted FFO available for common stockholders at US50¢ per share, up from US45¢ a year earlier. Adjusted FFO is funds from operations after the payment of all interest and expenses. Mr. Goldberg says “it is not quite the equivalent of free cash flow, but a good indicator that Brookfield is a prolific generator of cash.”
Mr. Goldberg’s takeaway from his number crunching is that Brookfield’s cash flows “remain solid,” while it’s financial position “is strong an it is cash rich at a time when others face forced liquidations and cash is king.”
He adds “this should be the time for Brookfield to thrive,” even though the credit crunch and market crash has cut Brookfield’s stock price in half. It now trades in the C$15 range on the TSX and at about US$12 on the New York exchange.
While the company's prospects remain solid, Mr. Goldberg has reduced his price target on Brookfield shares to US$24 from US$39, given the current market.
“We believe that Brookfield shares represent deep value at current levels,” he said, noting it has lost US$9-billion in market capitalization since Lehman Brothers went bankrupt Sept.12. "We have a hard time believing that Brookfield is worth US$9-billion less than it was on Sept.12."
BIP Is No Mere Blip
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/11/06/bip-is-no-mere-blip.aspx
Christopher Barker
November 6, 2008
Short-term traders sprint like hares, often hopping between speculative hunches and under-researched bandwagons. Fools, on the other hand, are content to sit on the tortoise's shell, armed with a mantra as relevant today as it is during bull markets: slow and steady wins the race.
In a market environment like this, tortoises are admittedly no less susceptible to short-term setbacks than their hippity-hoppity counterparts, and long-term investment specialist Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE: BAM) has not been immune to the turmoil. Seeking a balanced portfolio of infrastructure assets, including utilities, transportation, and timber operations, BAM spinoff Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (NYSE: BIP) is looking to win the race for stable income and capital appreciation.
Brookfield Infrastructure posted adjusted operating cash flow of $13.1 million for the third quarter, representing a 25% decrease from the prior year. Net income reversed course from a $5.3 million gain in 2007 to a $1.4 million loss for the latest quarter. Despite solid returns from the company's Chilean electric transmission lines, thanks to a retroactive rate hike and favorable currency exchange rates, the third quarter was broadsided by severe weakness from the timberlands segment.
Brookfield offered a decidedly negative outlook for the timber industry -- echoed by recent results from Weyerhaeuser (NYSE: WY) and Louisiana-Pacific (NYSE: LPX) -- and is adapting by conserving its inventory of secondary-growth Douglas fir until returns are more favorable. Meanwhile, BIP perceives an historic opportunity to acquire additional assets at distressed valuations, thanks to the panic of 2008.
BIP will divest a minority stake in non-core transmission line assets in Brazil for anticipated proceeds of $270 million. Combined with a sizable credit facility, the company now expects to have $600 million in its coffers with which to capitalize on the bargains available to grow its asset portfolio. For starters, Brookfield Infrastructure will invest $103 million to maintain a 30% interest in Longview Timber Holdings, as that company issues shares to purchase nearly 68,000 acres of timberland in Washington.
With a 7% dividend yield exceeding those of even REIT-structured timberland plays like Rayonier (NYSE: RYN) and Plum Creek Timber (NYSE: PCL), Brookfield Infrastructure is not without its rewards. With timberlands looking like a potential long-term drag on earnings, though, I would like to see Brookfield Infrastructure place greater emphasis upon acquiring transportation and utility assets before I re-affix my Foolish seal of approval.
Maybe Fannie Mae is trying to unload a lot of those bad loans on someone else. A little golf, a lot of drinks.... and presto - a billion of bad loans gone.
Paid for 20 rounds. Must have needed 14 Fannie Mae executives to advise 6 customers.
Lame excuse...
What is a "customer advisory board meeting?"
Mango towel service is provided free at most golf courses in Scottsdale. Not sure why Mango..... I would prefer Kiwi myself - lol
Bailout money hard at work....... Until you get caught.....
GRAPEVINE, Texas (AP) - Taxpayers paid $6,279.26 for a golf outing that included at least 14 executives from the troubled mortgage giant Fannie Mae, according to a television report.
The Sept. 29 event came just 22 days after the government bailed out Fannie Mae.
A spokeswoman for Fannie Mae says the golf outing was part of a customer advisory board meeting that had been scheduled in January and all activities such as this have since been canceled.
The 14 listed on the tee sheet included three Fannie Mae executives from Dallas, two from Chicago and one from Washington, D.C. The cost for the golfing alone at the Cowboys Golf Course in Grapevine was $3,316, Dallas-Fort Worth television station KTVT reported Monday night.
Fannie paid for 20 golfers, according to documents obtained by the station. The outing included mango towel service and more than $1,700 worth of buffet food and a $555 bar tab.
"While this event was planned since January, obviously circumstances with our company and the market overall have changed significantly since then," Fannie Mae spokeswoman Amy Bonitatibus said. "We have ceased all similar activities as those associated with this event, and we regret having not done so in this case."
May have to get some more of this too.
In late June, safevalue noted that Brookfield is "involved in high quality long life assets, that produce free cash flows ... the company has a great CEO who is value and investor conscience ( Bruce Flatt)."
An earlier pitch from TMFMattyA in March shares that bullish sentiment, highlighting the stock's cheapish valuation (which, like everything else, is even cheaper today):
Finally, BAM is on sale. You just don't get too many opportunities to invest in a management team like this at a reasonable price. This company controls a vast portfolio of quality, stable, cash-producing assets, and features a management team that really knows how to allocate capital prudently. Like [Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A) (NYSE: BRK-B)] and [Markel (NYSE: MKL)], I think this is one of those few companies that you can hold onto forever.
The experts disagree over how long it takes to recover from a bear market.
The financial firm T. Rowe Price found that in the past five bear markets going back to 1976, the longest it took for stocks to recover from their peak and then provide a 10 percent annual compound return was eight years. The shortest was five months.
Of course this assumes that you bought all of your stock at the peak which is unlikely.
In one respect it is imaginary. Arbitrary value isn't real money unless it is converted to such..... and if everyone decides to sell at the same time without enough buyers then it doesn't exist.
Much like my saying I will give you $100 for an hour of your time and then when you tell me you will be here Monday morning at 8:00am I tell you I can only give you $50. You haven't lost $50 because you never really had it except as a future promise.
Just looked up derivatives...... Imaginary value used as currency?
Anyway to explain it in laymans terms for the mentally challenged?
The problem as I see it, is that nobody seems to know really how many (in dollars) crappy derivitives are floating around out there. It is hard to fix a problem when you don't know how big it is or even what the problem is.
I can't help but feel that something will get done to turn this nightmare around. How quickly.... I don't know...
If nothing else, which I wouldn't mind, is to stabilize the markets so I have more time to pick and choose the incredible deals out there. lol!
More announcements and financial repair plans expected Monday.
A worldwide effort.
My personal fund is doing better than the two mentioned. :~)
October 12, 2008
Those With Sense of History May Find It’s Time to Invest
By ALEX BERENSON
The four most dangerous words for investors are: This time is different.
In 1999, technology companies with no earnings or sales were valued at billions of dollars. But this time was different, investors told themselves. The Internet could not be missed at any price.
They were wrong. In 2000 and 2001 technology stocks plunged, erasing trillions of dollars in wealth.
Now investors have again convinced themselves that this time is different, that the credit crisis will push economies worldwide into the deepest recession since the Depression. Fear runs even deeper today than greed did a decade ago.
But in their panic, investors are ignoring 60 years of history. Since the Depression, governments have become far more aggressive about intervening when credit markets seize up or economies struggle. And those interventions have generally succeeded. The recessions since World War II, while hardly easy, have been far less painful than the Depression.
Now some veteran investors, including G. Kenneth Heebner, a mutual fund manager who has one of the best long-term track records on Wall Street, say that the sell-off has gone much too far and stocks are poised to rally powerfully if the downturn is less severe than investors fear.
“The fact is, there are a lot of tremendous bargains out there,” said Mr. Heebner, who manages about $10 billion in several mutual funds. Indeed, by many measures stocks are as cheap as they have been in the last 25 years.
He pointed to Chesapeake Energy, a natural gas producer that he owns in his CGM Focus mutual fund. In July, Chesapeake traded for $63 a share. On Friday, it fell as low as $11.99.
He says that investors with a stomach for risk and a long time horizon should consider following Warren E. Buffett, who in the last three weeks has invested $8 billion in Goldman Sachs and General Electric.
Mr. Heebner expects world economies to contract over the next year. But he said the market plunge in the last week was no longer being driven by rational analysis. Stocks are probably falling because of a combination of panic and forced selling by hedge funds that must meet margin calls from their lenders, he said.
Mr. Heebner’s funds have not avoided the carnage this year. The CGM Focus fund is down about 42 percent so far in 2008. But his long-term track record is impressive. In the decade that ended Dec. 31, 2007, CGM Focus rose 26 percent a year, including reinvested dividends, making it among the best-performing mutual funds.
Mr. Heebner is not alone in his optimism.
“I think in years to come — I wouldn’t say months to come — we will perceive this as being a great value-buying opportunity,” said David P. Stowell, a finance professor at Northwestern and a former managing director at JPMorgan Chase. “Two and three years from now, it will seem very smart.”
Even before their jaw-dropping plunge of the last month, stocks were not expensive by historical standards, based on fundamentals like earnings and cash flow. Now, after falling 30 percent or more since early September, stocks in stalwart, profitable corporations like Nokia, Exxon Mobil and Boeing are trading at nine times their annual profits per share or less. Many smaller companies are even cheaper. Some of those stocks are trading at five times earnings or less.
Those ratios are historically low. Over all, the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index is trading at about 13 times its expected profits for 2009, its lowest level in decades. In contrast, at the height of the technology bubble in early 2000, the stocks in the S.& P. traded at about 30 times earnings, the highest level ever. At the same time, the 10-year Treasury bond paid about 6 percent interest, compared with less than 4 percent today.
Investors have fled stocks in favor of government bonds, insured bank deposits and other low-risk investments because they are deeply afraid of the worldwide economic crisis, said Stephen Haber, an economic historian and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. But he said he believed that fear might have gone too far.
“If there is good and wise policy, and government moves effectively, this need not play itself out in ways like the Great Depression, which is the image that is playing itself out in people’s mind,” Mr. Haber said. Government action typically does not work immediately, and banking crises around the world often require multiple interventions, he said.
Still, optimists remain in the minority on Wall Street. Most investors seem to believe that the credit crisis will do substantial damage to stocks and overall economic activity.
“We have never before seen for such sustained periods of time such a sustained turn away from risk taking,” said Steven Wieting, the chief United States economist for Citigroup. “This has broken out of the boundaries we’ve seen.” Economic activity appears to have slowed sharply in September, Mr. Wieting said.
The panic last week took the biggest toll on financial companies, as well as companies that are highly leveraged. But stocks fell 10 to 30 percent even for companies typically thought to be resistant to economic downturns, like the manufacturers of consumer staples.
For example, Newell Rubbermaid fell to $12.82 on Friday from $17.34 on Oct. 1, a 26 percent decline in 10 days. Newell Rubbermaid now trades at its lowest levels since 1990, and just eight times its expected earnings for next year.
Yet Newell Rubbermaid, whose brands include Calphalon, is profitable and insulated from the credit crisis, said William G. Schmitz Jr., who follows household products companies for Deutsche Bank. “There’s really no balance sheet risk,” Mr. Schmitz said. The company also pays a 6 percent dividend.
Newell Rubbermaid said in July that it would earn $1.40 to $1.60 a share for 2008, excluding restructuring charges. For 2009, stock analysts predict it will make $1.53 a share. And while a slowing economy may mean that people will be buying fewer products from Newell Rubbermaid, the recent plunge in oil prices will reduce its costs, Mr. Schmitz said.
“The way the stock’s reacted, you’d think they were going out of business,” he said.
Martin J. Whitman, a professional investor for more than 50 years, said that as long as economies worldwide could avoid an outright depression, stocks were amazingly cheap. Mr. Whitman manages the $6 billion Third Avenue Value fund, which returned 10.2 percent annually for the 15 years that ended Sept. 30, almost two percentage points a year better than the S.& P. 500 index. The fund is down 46 percent this year.
“This is the opportunity of a lifetime,” Mr. Whitman said. “The most important securities are being given away.”
I think you are right. It is going to take a while for things to recover.
I'm bracing for a long, cold, winter, spring, summer, fall, winter, spring, and summer. lol!
Bailout Could Deepen Crisis, CBO Chief Says
Asset Sales May Lead to Write-Downs, Insolvencies, Orszag Tells Congress
By Frank Ahrens
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 25, 2008; D04
The director of the Congressional Budget Office said yesterday that the proposed Wall Street bailout could actually worsen the current financial crisis.
During testimony before the House Budget Committee, Peter R. Orszag -- Congress's top bookkeeper -- said the bailout could expose the way companies are stowing toxic assets on their books, leading to greater problems.
"Ironically, the intervention could even trigger additional failures of large institutions, because some institutions may be carrying troubled assets on their books at inflated values," Orszag said in his testimony. "Establishing clearer prices might reveal those institutions to be insolvent."
In an interview later yesterday, Orszag explained using the following example: Suppose a company has Asset X, whose value is recorded on the books as $100. Because of the current economic decline, Asset X's real value has dropped to $50. If the company takes part in the government bailout and sells Asset X for $50, the company has to report a $50 loss on its books. On a scale of millions of dollars, such write-downs could ruin a company.
Such companies "look solvent today only because it's kind of hidden," Orszag said. "They actually are insolvent" already, he said.
In hearings on Capitol Hill so far this week, criticism of the bailout plan put forward by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke has largely been restricted to the shape of the $700 billion proposal, how the money will be spent and what sort of oversight Treasury should have.
But Orszag yesterday questioned the wisdom of the plan itself, testifying that "it therefore remains uncertain whether the program will be sufficient to restore trust."
In yesterday's interview, Orszag said, "The key question is: What are we buying and what are we paying for it?"
Orszag offered alternatives, such as equity injections into particularly troubled companies, but allowed that those could lead to further problems, as well. In the end, he said, Congress must pass some sort of relief, if only because Wall Street is expecting it.
"If we did nothing, there is a significant risk of another collapse of confidence in the financial markets," he said.
Then, there is the paperwork cost of the bailout.
The budget office "expects that the administrative costs of operating the program could amount to a few billion dollars per year, as long as the government held all or most of the purchased assets," he testified, without defining what he meant by "a few."
Even as the financial markets rallied Thursday and Friday, Orszag said, the credit situation was so dire that "short-term lending was virtually shut down."
He said that the Treasury was acting as a go-between in short-term lending between banks. Instead of Bank A lending directly to Bank B, as is customary, Bank A no longer had confidence that Bank B could repay the loan.
So Bank A would give the money to the Treasury, which issued a security that was put into the Federal Reserve, which then issued the cash to Bank B.
If the government is forced to intermediate such ordinary transactions, commerce slows, credit confidence remains low, and operational strain is placed on the Treasury and the Fed.
"You don't want them in the middle of every short-term financial transaction," Orszag said.
During questioning before the Joint Economic Committee earlier yesterday, Bernanke acknowledged concerns about the bailout's effect on the budget.
"I think those concerns are very serious," he said. "But it's really a question of alternatives."
Brookfield owns high-quality office properties in tight-supply markets like New York City and the District of Columbia. It also owns hydroelectric generating facilities.
The company has strong cash flow, a lot of cash on its balance sheet and low debt.
"That means they can take advantage of the turmoil in the financial markets to buy assets others are forced to sell," Blankenhagen said.
Legendary Value Investor Sees Opportunities in Volatile Market
Monday September 8, 9:17 am ET
By the tickerspy.com Staff
Despite what is set to be a huge open today, this has been a challenging market the last few months. Some of the world's most highly regarded value investors have been seeing opportunity, though. Among them is the legendary Marty Whitman, whose Third Avenue Value Management has taken stock of the landscape and decided the time is ripe to raise $3 billion for a private-equity fund to focus on investing in distressed companies. According to The Wall Street Journal, a number of other firms are launching similar funds, including Cerberus Capital Management, Carlyle Group, and BlackRock (NYSE: BLK - News).
Meanwhile, Third Avenue earlier this year reopened its Third Avenue Small-Cap Value Fund (Nasdaq: TASCX - News). Since inception, the fund has returned an annualized 10.75% through the end of July.
New York-based Third Avenue is a long-term, value-focused manager of mutual funds and hedge funds. Its largest mutual fund is the Third Avenue Value Fund (Nasdaq: TAVFX - News). This year, Whitman has taken a contrarian line, continuing to add to stakes in embattled bond insurers MBIA (NYSE: MBI - News) and Ambac Financial (NYSE: ABK - News). Given that Third Avenue's launching of the new distressed fund is a clear signal that it is seeing value in the market, investors will be curious to see where the firm was putting its money during Q2.
Looking at Third Avenue's top-15, U.S.-listed, equity holdings, which are aggregated across all its funds, one can see that its largest stakes are in Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE: BAM - News) and real estate outfit Forest City Enterprises (NYSE: FCE-A - News). Third Avenue was trimming shares in Brookfield and adding to its Forest City stakes during Q2.
Other top holdings included stakes in Korean steelmaker Posco (NYSE: PKX - News), drilling contractor Nabors Industries (NYSE: NBR - News), real estate development company The St. Joe Company (NYSE: JOE - News), The Bank of New York Mellon (NYSE: BK - News), and independent oil and gas exploration and production company Cimarex Energy (NYSE: XEC - News).
This is what I've been thinking should be my next batch of purchases..........
"Taking advantage of such downward-trending situations is easier with the explosion of exchange-traded funds that reward investors when the market is lower."
Maybe that Irish bank too....
A Bad Summer for Stocks? This Fall Could Be Worse
By Jeff Cox, Special to CNBC.com
| 01 Sep 2008 | 05:32 PM ET
After a rough summer, Wall Street is gearing up for an even rougher fall as the financial crisis, housing slump and economic pressures show no signs of abating.
September is already the stock market's worst month historically, posting an average 1.2 percent decline. And despite a mild rally since mid-July, stocks are still trading at near bear-market levels. Year to date, the major averages are down as much as 12 percent.
"This is just the last gasp," says Kathy Boyle, president of Chapin Hill Advisors in New York. "From a technical point of view the rally actually did not look great. Pharmaceuticals aren't participating, none of the drug companies, none of the biotechs are participating, and tech is actually lagging."
"So this is really being driven by the financials," she adds. "Nothing systematically changed from last week other than they kind of got oversold. ... I'm still very worried."
Stocks May Stage Gustav Relief Rally
Some think that while stocks could realize gains later in the year, the early part of autumn doesn't offer much optimism.
"It would not be unnatural for the market to test the bottom," says Quincy Krosby, chief investment strategist at The Hartford. "This is a bear market, and that would fit in with the process of a bear market."
Playing the Downturn
Taking advantage of such downward-trending situations is easier with the explosion of exchange-traded funds that reward investors when the market is lower.
It's a move that Boyle is employing with gusto. "The credit crisis is still here," she says.
Among the array of short ETFs, which gain 2 percent for every 1 percent the index they track falls, are ProShares funds: Ultra Short Financials, Ultra Short Russell 2000, and Ultra Short Real Estate. She also holds or is buying ETFs that are short the Dow, S&P 500 and the Nasdaq, as well as semiconductors and industrials.
Boyle has been consistent in predicting sharp stock downturns this year, and says that by October the Dow will slip below 10,000 and the S&P will tumble to 1,100 or lower, and the Nasdaq tech barometer is on its way to between 1,500 and 1,600.
Yet it's not all doom and gloom for Boyle. A rapid, steep fall could send the market to its long-awaited bottom, and the presidential election or another significant event could signal at least a steadying for the market, she says.
Stocks will slide "through October and November, then we're looking for a potential rally through the end of the year," Boyle says.
"We're looking at a 15 to 25 percent drop in the indexes over the next two months," she adds. "If that happens that could create a bottom and that may coincide with the election."
Market pros are looking at several key factors to determine the market's behavior through the balance of 2008, but none seems to be more prominent than the consumer.
"I think it will be predicated on how money managers think this is unwinding," Krosby says. "They want to see a stabilization in the financials, they want to see credit spreads come lower, they want to get a better sense of the election dynamics and you want to get a better sense of the global backdrop."
"Again, everything is predicated on the consumer and the consumer's sense of his job security. There are many moving parts."
Krosby believes that if back-to-school sales look strong it could inject some confidence into the market. Wall Street also will be watching the performance of some of its bellwethers to gauge the economic health not only of the US economy but the rest of the world as well.
Some expect the news in that regard may not be so great.
"I think that we're going to get negative growth in consumer spending for the first time since 1991 in the third quarter," says David Ressler, chief economist at Nomura Securities in New York. "Consumers at least are certainly in a very weakened state and that's going to be evident in the data going forward."
That likely would be bad news for the stock market, though Ressler also is among those who think the downturn might not devolve into a worst-case scenario.
"The stock market is not for nothing considered a leading economic indicator," he says. "Stock prices are going to soon reflect a belief that the second half of 2009 is going to look a lot better than at least the last few quarters have been, but it's still a year down the road before we get a meaningful bounce in the overall economy's activity."
The Case for the Bulls
Not everyone thinks the market is in freefall, or is even headed for a significant rough patch.
Michael Cohn, of Atlantis Asset Management, says the recent steadying in financials and the slight uptick in some housing data has him encouraged for the first time in more than a year about the market.
"The bad news is decelerating," Cohn says. "We've gone through almost three quarters of this quote unquote credit crunch where you could have gotten some really bad numbers out of the economy and it's just not happening."
Even amid his optimism Cohn says there likely won't be any significant bounce until after the election, yet he does not see a downturn before then either.
"We had a nice commodities selloff," he says. "We're going to get nice numbers for inflation next month becausae of the way oil has done down at the gas station. Soft commodities have also pulled back. They see there's going to be potentially good news coming in September and October in terms of reversing the bad news that's had a cloud over this market."
Gordon Charlop of Rosenblatt Securities thinks stocks may have found some stability. See his comments in video at left.
Cohn is avoiding housing stocks but is advising Atlantis's traders to start picking up market stalwarts. Among those he is watching are Boeing and CNBC parent General Electric , along with infrastrcuture plays including McDermott International and Jacobs Engineering .
As for financials, he's cherry-picking at this point and advises against plays on ETFs that go long on the whole sector.
On the overall picture, he thinks the market only needs a strong dose of positive thinking to set it back on the path higher.
"There's a tremendous amount of cash on the sidelines just waiting to see this deceleration in the bad news," Cohn says. "Conventional wisdom says the market looks six to nine months ahead. Conventional wisdom is a self-fulfilling prophecy when everyone believes it."
© 2008 CNBC.com
I'll have to read that a bunch of times.... Maybe 7 or 8. I may begin to understand it around 6. When I have more time of course. :~)
Understanding Brookfield's Malaise
by: David Daly posted on: August 18, 2008
Brookfield Asset management (BAM) is a very fine firm. I hold it as one of the main positions in my UpDown account and in my real accounts. I believe that the market is currently holding down BAM's share price for several reasons. The firm faces formidable competition in the execution of its asset management strategy but, on balance, I'm optimistic that they will emerge as a leader in the field.
The stock is probably worth about U.S. $35 today (about five dollars more than its current price), and should trade significantly higher in the 2009-10 time frame as the housing inventory overhang clears, commercial real estate finds its legs, and as the market wakes up to the many other positive attributes of Brookfield. Details follow.
First, through Brookfield Properties (BPO), BAM is a major owner of commercial real estate in North America, the UK and Australia. The market believes that commercial real estate will follow residential real estate down. That may indeed be the case and BPO does has some new construction in my neck of the woods (Washington, DC) which is sitting vacant.
An important point here, however, is that that BPO's, and by extension BAM's, real estate holdings are exclusively in high-grade, major urban centers. Indeed one might say that their exposure to Canary Wharf in London is about as far afield as their property portfolio gets relative to the various central business districts of the world (and, with Docklands Light Rail, even Canary Wharf isn't so far afield now-a-days). My experience is that buildings of this kind, while expensive and usually offering modest initial cap rates, are the last to fall when prices soften and the first to recover when the market firms. We all intuitively know this to be the case in the residential market, and it's the same really in the commercial property market.
For an example of what a company looks like when they hold a real estate portfolio which is not concentrated in high quality, central business districts, as is the case with BPO's portfolio, take a look at First Potomac Realty (FPO). The father and son team there bought a bunch of low grade properties in middling markets around Washington, DC and now they can barely make their REIT dividend. I think they have now stabilized their financial situation with some property sales, but my point is not to criticize FPO, which is mostly a decent operator, but, rather to illustrate the contrast with an operator like Brookfield Properties. The name of the game is buying quality at a fair price, not building an "empire" of mediocre properties. Brookfield has spent years acquiring good quality at reasonable (not cheap) prices and with conservative financing arrangements. They will eventually fill their vacancies and they will certainly survive --which is not something one can say about all commercial real estate players.
Second, turning away from commercial real estate, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) also has exposure to the residential market both through BPO's residential operations in the U.S. and Canada and through separately traded Brookfield Homes (BHS), the latter of which has now begun to actually lose money. Morningstar and Barron's, citing various publicly available data sets and a bit of market rumor, have recently talked about the possibility that a housing bottom may be near, or, at least, the free fall is slowing.
By contrast, BHS management says we will not bottom until 2009. Whatever the case, and bearing in mind that they may all be right, housing stocks are again putting in a bottom, and a strong upward movement in BHS's share price could be one possible impetus for a movement in BAM's price.
Third, and related to point number two above, BAM's timber operations, most of which are based on the former Longview Fibre, and some of which are held via Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIP), are also being weighed down by the weak housing market. Timber prices react to many factors but U.S. housing starts data are a key variable. Even if the inventories of homes for sale begin to go down, it will be a while before we get enough new housing starts to lift timber prices.
Still, in the very long term, timber has attractive qualities because of climate change, overall population growth, and the fact that timber is a rare example of an item of inventory which quite literally grows in value irrespective of trading conditions. (Even the oil majors cannot say that about their crude oil reserves, which might go up in value because of price rises or new, adjacent discoveries but does not actually reproduce/grow on its own. Timber is unique in some ways for that reason. Although wine makers or scotch makers --like Diageo with their Johnnie Walker brand-- experience a similar phenomena in that their inventory usual goes up in value as it ages.) Thus, timber is a good buiness, but it's a tough time in the market.
Fourth, BAM's partly owned Crystal River Capital (NYSE: CRZ) has also had a tough time of late. That's a tiny part of their business, but it's indicative of the overall level of anxiety in the capital markets, especially in regards to real estate.
I believe these foregoing factors are on the market's mind and masking a number of very promising recent developments at BAM. These include the continued growth of the great hydropower portfolio, a generally good track record at Hyperion Brookfield in the midst of the current mortgage market mess (they won the mandate to take over management of the Regions Bank Morgan Keegan mortgage security funds), the K.G. Redding bolt-on acquisition, and the very sensible Multiplex acquisition. The latter was almost transformational in size and scope and I generally hate it when my companies make big acquisitions but when reflected on 10 years hence, Multiplex will probably be viewed in a positive light.
Lastly, in terms of recent developments, they have continued to build-up a truly unique set of assets in Brazil. As the saying goes, Brookfield was in Brazil (well) before Brazil became fashionable (BAM was previously called Brascan). These assets include hydro-power, retail real estate, and residential real estate through separately traded Brascan Residential. The latter has not done so well post-IPO, but it will likely do well over time as the Brazilian retail mortgage market develops.
Furthermore, at both the corporate level and the operational level, BAM has a number of attributes and promising initiatives in place.
At the corporate level, these include a good dividend history (with the recent spin off of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners being an integral part of this record), and good corporate governance, to include a solid slug of insider ownership.
At the operational level, and looking beyond the aforementioned recent developments, the Brookfield "story", so to speak, is two-fold.
First, many of their assets, including much of their real estate is either under valued on their books or it does not generate cash flow that is readily apparent on the income statement. Thus, I've always thought of BAM as one of those firms/stocks whose accounting makes a mockery of investors who use exclusively quantitative screening tools.
In any event, the second key element to the overall Brookfield story is their effort to use their rich portfolio of assets, be it real estate or hydro power or equity in a restructuring deal, and whether it be in Canada or Chile or where have you, to seed investment funds for institutional investors. Many institutional investors, especially pension funds with long-lived liabilities, would like to have stakes in these kinds of largely illiquid assets, usually classified under the rubric of infrastructure investment.
In as much as infrastructure is increasingly being viewed as an attractive asset class with "steady as she goes" bond-like returns that have inflation adjustment features, this is a good strategy. There is demand for this kind of product in large part because the worldwide market for inflation adjusted bonds is not big enough to fund all of the pension assets out there which need to be invested safely while staying ahead of inflation. It's tough to stay ahead of inflation without investing in stocks but infrastructure, whether it be electricity transmission lines, hydro-power, or commercial property, offers a reasonable alternative to stocks with more consistency in the cash flows.
With respect to this initiative to transform itself from being an operator of assets into an asset manager of infrastructure-focused investment funds, BAM faces tough competition from Babcock & Brown, Goldman Sachs (GS), Merrill Lynch (MER), and Macquarie (MIC) among others. Plus, many pension funds are big enough that they have the scale to directly invest in real estate or timber, etc.
All the same, I think BAM will be able to continue to grow its assets under management [AUM] because the demand for these types of investable assets is growing fast and BAM brings a lot to the table in terms of it's long history of successful on-the-ground operations of things like hydo power and electric transmission lines. Even if she or he were a Wharton graduate, I would not want the average Goldman Sachs employee to be doing maintenance on any hydro-power plants on which I rely for electricity. Brookfield, by contrast, actually has employees on staff who get greasy. Thus, in a sense, they have "street credibility" as an owner/operator of the assets they are seeding into their funds.
I would also venture to say that the recent problems faced by Merrill and Babcock & Brown as well as the overall tightness in the credit markets may lessen the degree of competition faced by BAM in bidding on new assets.
In sum, BAM is being weighed down by the market, and not unreasonably so, but the drum beat of the underlying positive story will grow louder as the U.S. residential and commercial real estate markets stabilize.
At the present time, I would guess that BAM is undervalued by the market by about U.S. $5. Over the longer term, it should do very well so the current price may present an attractive entry point.
One option for the faint-hearted is to split your capital 50-50 between shares of BAM itself and shares of the sister company, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIP). The latter has less long-term upside potential but it currently trades with a very nice yield near 6% as of this writing. By my calculation BIP is also currently trading at less than 80% of its $22.60 book value per share. The price it probably depressed because of BIP's exposure to the soft timber market; the fact that it was only recently spun-off from BAM and so many holders are deeming it a non-core holding and purging it from their portfolios; and because Morgan Stanley seems to have recently accidentally bought too big of a stake so they are now having to quickly liquidate some of their position (there was an SEC filing on this).
Brookfield Asset Management Announces Strong 2008 Second Quarter Results
Friday August 8, 8:19 am ET
TORONTO, ONTARIO--(MARKET WIRE)--Aug 8, 2008 -- Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (Toronto:BAM.TO - News)(BAM - News)(AEX: BAMA) -
Investors, analysts and other interested parties can access Brookfield Asset Management's 2008 Q2 Results as well as the Shareholders' Letter and Supplemental Financial Information on Brookfield's web site under the Investor Centre/Financial Reports section at www.brookfield.com.
The 2008 Q2 Results conference call can be accessed via webcast on August 8, 2008 at 11 a.m. Eastern Time at www.brookfield.com or via teleconference at 1-800-319-4610 toll free in North America. For overseas calls please dial 1-604-638-5340, at approximately 10:50 a.m. Eastern Time. The teleconference taped rebroadcast can be accessed at 1-800-319-6413 or 604-638-9010 (Password 2811).
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (Toronto:BAM.TO - News)(BAM - News)(AEX: BAMA) today announced its results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Cash Flow From Operations
Cash flow from operations for the second quarter totalled $378 million ($0.62 per share). Operating cash flow in the same quarter in 2007 was $340 million ($0.55 per share) on a comparable basis, which excludes a security disposition gain of $100 million, or $440 million ($0.72 per share) including the gain. On a comparable basis, operating cash flow per share increased by 13% quarter-over-quarter due to improved water levels and pricing in the company's renewable power business and stable growth within our commercial office business.
Called 'em about an hour or so ago...... They're looking for them.
Sounds like you're capitalizing on other peoples misfortune/stupidity.
In the right place at the right time!
Hey! That has a familiar ring to it! lol!
There must be a record of them somewhere.
I have been pretty busy with my housing rehabs also. Since I can buy them really cheap from the banks, I haven't been having any problems selling them.
I've still got to go through my pile to see if I can figure out where my shares are before I fire my other advisor. :~)
Been EXTREMELY busy! I keep hearing all the doom and gloom about the economy and housing, but, we are, and have been, just swamped!
They may have taken cash in lieu of a small odd lot of shares.
No one asked me first though.
An Infrastructure Play to Help Diversify
Roger Nusbaum
06/16/08 - 09:56 AM EDT
In the never-ending quest for quirky holdings that might be able to deliver equitylike returns with little or no correlation to the U.S. stock market, as well as a decent dividend, here's a look at Brookfield Infrastructure Partners(BIP).
BIP, which was spun off from Brookfield Asset ManagementBAM on Feb. 1, owns infrastructure assets that it describes as high quality "with high barriers to entry and low maintenance capital requirements that generate stable and growing cash flows." It plans to invest in other projects it believes has similar attributes.
The management hopes to find these attributes with toll roads, airports, ports, more timber and more electrical transmission.
The current mix is comprised of complete ownership of Ontario Transmission, partial stakes in electricity transmission in Brazil and Chile and partial stakes in timber companies in Vancouver, Oregon and Washington State.
BIP thus far has delivered on the potential for low correlation, with only a 0.27 correlation to the S&P 500SPX, but it has been more volatile than the market so far, and BIP has lagged SPX since inception by 3%. I believe the lag and the volatility are mostly attributable to the timing of the initial listing, as the financial crisis has been unkind to just about every sort of high-yielding-but-complicated investment product out there.
The focus on cash flow as part of the objective reveals the intention to pay steady dividends, which for now are pegged at $0.265 quarterly per share. That targets a 60-70% payout ratio of adjusted net operating income (ANOI), which for BIP's management will be the bottom line measurement of profitability.
The payout may stray from 60-70% as new acquisitions are made and digested, to which I would add, it makes sense to expect the occasional writedown, depreciation or other form of impairment as well.
The reason to mention this is that these sorts of investment products are often complex businesses that do a lot of transactions that can make analyzing them a little more difficult than regular stocks. Similar products are quite active in this regard, and the Brookfield Web site tells prospective investors this will be the case with BIP.
This does not make BIP a poor investment, but it does underscore that BIP might require a little more work to follow it.
There's also a leap of faith that not only can management successfully run the current operation, but that they will buy "the right" assets in the future and be able to successfully run those new assets as well.
One other possible factor contributing to the volatility may have been the issue with brownouts in Chile due to a lack of hydroelectric generation, and a few other factors that could lead to more serious problems. This is an ongoing issue, and while President Bachelet is working diligently to avert a crisis, anyone buying BIP needs to follow this issue.
One possible catalyst for price appreciation over the next couple of years could be the timberland. In the most recent quarterly report, the company reported that the electricity generation was profitable but that the timber asset results were weak and generated a loss. This has not been the best of times for most timber companies, but that market will turn. Assuming BIP still owns timberland when it does turn, it could pick up a nice tailwind.
I think BIP would ideally be a "purpose" holding as opposed to a hot stock that might double in a year. The company aims to deliver a 10% to 15% total return, including the dividend, which at current prices is 5.5%. That would be a fantastic result, but expectations should probably be a little lower.
Consistent 15% total returns are few and far between, but that does not invalidate the thesis for BIP's attributes, and its place in the infrastructure theme and a diversified portfolio.
I am FREE!!!!!
And of course you get what you pay for - lol.
Hmmmmm? Can't find 'em in my stack.
My "other" financial advisor is really beginning to piss me off. They almost sent my simple IRA contribution to an ex employee a couple months ago. Among many other things that's irritating the heII out of me.
Funny thing, got a call from E. Jones headquarters to do a survey/questionaire about my "other" advisor just a couple hours after these shares came up missing...... Uh..... Safe to say.... I didn't give him very high marks. lol! VERY bad timing! lol!
What were your rates again? :~)
Yes. They trade under the symbol BIP. Got them about two months ago.
Did you ever receive your spinoff shares? Should have got them long ago. Shows how much I pay attention, eh? lol!
Followers
|
13
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
257
|
Created
|
03/13/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |