Bryan Glass was active between 2005 - 2009. During that time, Glass used Bryan Clark's firm for the following custodianship petitions:
12/28/2005 - Case #05A515039 - Bryan Glass vs Centrocom Corp
04/04/2007 - Case #07A538870 - Bryan Glass vs Global Resources Technologies Inc
10/22/2007 - Case #07A550368 - Bryan Glass vs Zamage Digital Art Imaging Inc
10/22/2007 - Case #07A550369 - Bryan Glass vs Security First International Holdings
11/29/2007 - Case #07A552608 - Bryan Glass vs Greenzap Inc
11/29/2007 - Case #07A552609 - Bryan Glass vs MB Tech Inc
11/29/2007 - Case #07A552610 - Bryan Glass vs Telpac Industries Inc
6/20/2008 - Case #08A565875 - Bryan Glass vs Global Teledata Corp
8/13/2008 - Case #08A569542 - Bryan Glass vs CES International Inc
08/13/2008 - Case #08A569543 - Bryan Glass vs Amarium Technologies Inc
12/05/2008 - Case #08A577213 - Bryan Glass vs Asia Broadband Inc
12/05/2008 - Case #08A577214 - Bryan Glass vs Vertx Corp
5/15/2009 - Case #A-09-590476-P - Bryan S Glass vs Gold Coast Resources Inc
Probably the most well known of those was the Amarium Technologies Inc (AMMG) hijacking because that one got sold to a group of well connected offshore money launders who used some bogus debt Notes to create a bunch of insider owned super cheap free trading stock then ran a high profile promotion on the stock using Stock Tips as the promoter. The secret insiders hiding behind a ghost CEO later changed the shell to Calissio Resources Group Inc (CRGP) and used it for a bogus special stock dividend which eventually led to the stock being suspended by the SEC and lots of lawsuits being filed by the clearing firms that got burned through the special stock dividend debacle.
In 2015 and especially 2016, Glass showed back up with a bunch of custodianship petitions once again using his old attorney friend from the past - Bryan Clark:
01/13/2015 - Case #A-15-712259-B - Bryan Glass vs Secure TV Channel Inc
03/02/2016 - Case #A-16-732780-B - Bryan Glass vs China Grand Resorts Inc
03/02/2016 - Case #A-16-732788-B - Bryan Glass vs CVF Technologies Corporation
03/14/2016 - Case #A-16-733341-B - Bryan Glass vs GFR Pharmaceuticals Inc
03/14/2016 - Case #A-16-733343-B - Bryan Glass vs Xemex Group Inc
03/15/2016 - Case #A-16-733458-B - Bryan Glass vs American Rare Earths and Materials Corp
03/16/2016 - Case #A-16-733484-B - Bryan Glass vs AIVTech International Group Co
03/17/2016 - Case #A-16-733602-B - Bryan Glass vs Asiarim Corporation
03/22/2016 - Case #A-16-733813-B - Bryan Glass vs China Travel Resort Holdings Inc
03/22/2016 - Case #A-16-733814-B - Bryan Glass vs ACS Global Inc
03/28/2016 - Case #A-16-734143-B - Bryan Glass vs ATWEC Technologies, Inc
03/28/2016 - Case #A-16-734148-B - Bryan Glass vs Environmental Control Corp
03/28/2006 - Case #A-16-734149-B - Bryan Glass vs American Environmental Energy, Inc
03/29/2016 - Case #A-16-734218-B - Bryan Glass vs ATC Venture Group Inc
04/14/2016 - Case #A-16-735075-B - Bryan Glass vs Beesfree Inc
Bryan Glass hasn't done any more custodianship petitions since 2016.
As far as Bryan Clark goes:
Up until 2005 all shell hijackers took place via corporate identity theft which isn't legal. It wasn't until 2005 that the whole idea of filing for custodianship of the shells through the court system started and it originated in Nevada through attorney Bryan Clark.
Bryan Clark was the go to attorney for Nevada Custodianship petitions from 2005 - 2010. Clark already had lots of experience with receivership cases through bankruptcy and restitution/fraud deals so I guess that's what led him into the receivership deals for abandoned shells.
Other attorneys working in Bryan Clark's law firm during this time assisting with custodianship petitions included: Kyleen Cane, Scott Doney, and John Laxague.
Prolific shell hijackers that used Bryan Clark's services during the 2000s included: Peter Berney, Eugene Koppenhaver, Mark Taggatz, Michael Manion, Bryan Glass, Michael Anthony, Bradley Swahn, David Clark, and David Stocker.
Custodianship petitions being used to hijack abandoned shells spread into other states during the later half of the 2000s including Colorado, Florida, California, Minnesota, Wyoming, and Utah.
Not everybody goes the custodianshp route, even in this day in age there is still a lot of people that just make new entities by the same name as the old entities as a way of attempting to steal the abandoned shells without paying any fees (court filings fees, back taxes, reinstatement fees, etc).
AI
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
