American Picture House Corp. (APHP)

[zatafour]

LDSI.... So you are just encouraging others to sell in order to drive the price down so you can get in lower... Got it... Thank you

[Brown castle]

Not at a manipulated price. I’ll buy when it sells for a realistic value.

[zatafour]

LDSI... You don't have to buy???

[Brown castle]

The value of this stock, is based on the assets of THIS company. It has nothing to do with speculation in other companies. And this lawsuit isn’t some strategic conspiracy. It’s been brought about by an investor claiming that this stock is worthless. That contention is based on the actual value of this company, not speculation. Someday this might become a real corporation with actual revenues, contracts, and property. But at this point, it’s just a stack of paper.

[seven77]

There are plenty of otc stocks that are trading at way higher pps and have more shares outstanding and have no assets or any type of business. The complaint was strategic to slow us us down , to interrupt the business plan. once the complaint is dropped we will have all kinds of companies looking at us for possible mergers. EV technology is hot. Just look at all those companies at Billion dollars market caps with no product yet.

[Brown castle]

How is a million and a half market cap on an inactive company a bargain? And Vastech had those patents for years without any success. And if they lose this lawsuit it’s over. Even without that lawsuit hanging over the company, no way an inactive shell is worth more than a couple hundred thousand. That would put the price back where it was before all this obvious manipulation, .0001.

[seven77]

If I remember correctly there were some big hits at .0008, .0009 and .0010. and prices down here are a bargain. we still own the patent to the inverse magnetic motor technology.

[Brown castle]

You’re a fool if you’re buying at this price. That was a 90 cent purchase that pushed the price to .0009. The last real price was .0001. It’s been daily manipulation with these two dollar and less purchases. There is nothing happening here. The company hasn’t conducted business in like 7 years. There are no revenues, no properties, no contracts, nothing. Just a big ol’ Lawsuit hanging over it threatening to erase this inactive company. And even at .0001 it was overvalued with over 2 billion shares of stock. If people really believe it’s gonna do something, why do they keep manipulating the price?

[zatafour]

Added a few

[seven77]

Just a reminder that just before the complaint was filed against LDSI we had a patent application pending for Inverse Magnetic Motors. The patent was assigned on 05/23/2019, a few months after the complaint. This leads me to believe that LDSI was working on something major and someone knew and tried to stop it or slow it down. The timing of the complaint is suspect. What it did is put everything on hold. Imagine where the stock would be if the complaint had not happened with all the the hype with Electric Vehicles, and EV stocks skyrocketing lately.

https://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2019/0157955.html

[Law of Averages]

I seen that too i hope this has a big run.

[gumzsa]

.001

[Law of Averages]

Wise choice this should see .0025 shortly.

[zatafour]

Grabbed a starter here today

[gumzsa]

It broke .01 on last big run then came tumbling back down

[Law of Averages]

I would love to see this get past .002+ the Share Structure is good enough for that to happen.

[gumzsa]

showing life today would love to see this wake up again

[seven77]

Could the action today have anything to do with this right here?

We represent MacGregor and LDSI, Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs in the abovereferenced action, and write, pursuant to Rule 24 of the Rules of the Commercial Division of the
Supreme Court (Advance Notice of Motions), to advise Your Honor – on notice to counsel for
Sprung, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant in the above-referenced action – of MacGregor’s
and LDSI’s intention to bring a joint motion to disqualify Sprung’s counsel. This letter also
outlines some of the issues related to the anticipated motion.1
With this case still at an early stage (e.g., discovery has only just begun), MacGregor and LDSI
intend to move jointly to disqualify Plaintiff’s counsel because:
(i) Plaintiff’s counsel had prior attorney-client relationships with each of MacGregor
and LDSI, including in connection with a highly sensitive criminal matter;
(ii) Those prior representations are substantially related to Plaintiff’s counsel’s
representation in this action; and
(iii) Plaintiff’s interests and those of MacGregor and LDSI are materially adverse.

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=LhrN3L56ZuHtzLdNWUvg5A==

[Due Diligence Virtuoso]

I had a lotto in this, but grabbed some more today. Been noticing bids building out of no where. Pure speculation but perhaps a filings will be submitted. Company usually has to get access codes to the OTCM and you will usually see MM's come online w bids when that happens before the retail market is aware.

[seven77]

Information leaked? its setting up very nicely..

[seven77]

Case might be dropped because:Dear Justice Ruchelsman:

We represent MacGregor and LDSI, Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs in the abovereferenced action, and write, pursuant to Rule 24 of the Rules of the Commercial Division of the
Supreme Court (Advance Notice of Motions), to advise Your Honor – on notice to counsel for
Sprung, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant in the above-referenced action – of MacGregor’s
and LDSI’s intention to bring a joint motion to disqualify Sprung’s counsel. This letter also
outlines some of the issues related to the anticipated motion.1
With this case still at an early stage (e.g., discovery has only just begun), MacGregor and LDSI
intend to move jointly to disqualify Plaintiff’s counsel because:
(i) Plaintiff’s counsel had prior attorney-client relationships with each of MacGregor
and LDSI, including in connection with a highly sensitive criminal matter;
(ii) Those prior representations are substantially related to Plaintiff’s counsel’s
representation in this action; and
(iii) Plaintiff’s interests and those of MacGregor and LDSI are materially adverse.

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=LhrN3L56ZuHtzLdNWUvg5A==

[Brown castle]

Only 3 dollars worth today but it pushed the price up 25% to .0005. Insanely obvious price manipulation.

[Brown castle]

Yep, 4 bucks worth sold today. There is definitely something big happening here.

[Law of Averages]

Something definitely going on here. I hope LDSI makes a big run the float is small enough for big run.

[seven77]

3 million bought at .0004 and another 3 million on the bid ...

[Brown castle]

And again, another two dollars worth to push the price back up to .0004. Nothing subtle about this manipulator.

[Brown castle]

There he is again, buying 2 dollars worth of stock to push the price back up to .0004.
What a stupid reason to commit a felony. And it’s all documented in his trade record.

[Brown castle]

I knew someone would buy a couple bucks worth at.0004 this morning. What do you hope to gain with such obvious manipulation? Until something actually happens with this stock, there won’t be any volume. And for an inactive, shell of a company, it’s still way over priced. Why place yourself in the crosshairs of Regulators just to temporarily pump up the price? There is a record of every transaction and how will you explain your trade record when you get audited?

[Brown castle]

Congratulations stock up 50 percent on that 1 dollar buy!

[Brown castle]

3 cents worth sold today!!! This could be the start of something big! Oh yeah, It’s a run up for sure this time!!!

[Brown castle]

That’s literally 20 cents worth sold today. No exaggeration, that’s how easy it was for someone to push the price. And it was the only trade of the day. Yep, 20 cents.

[Brown castle]

Back up to .0004 on a 20 cent purchase. Nothing suspicious here, huh?

[Brown castle]

Nice try, but those buys were chump change. The price hit .0004 yesterday on a 4 dollar buy. The million shares today is just a sad attempt at a smokescreen. At this price that’s only 400 dollars worth of stock. Not exactly a run up when there’s over 2 billion shares.

[seven77]

New documents submitted today based on that 1 million buy at .0004 I say it's something good.

[Brown castle]

Nothing is happening here. When the price hit .0001 the other day I knew the manipulators would buy it back up. This stock has been heavily manipulated ever since it went back on the market. And now with the ridiculously low volume and price, it’s just too easy. But it means nothing, it’s still a company with no assets, no revenues, and a lawsuit pending. There is no reason for this price increase except for desperation as it circles the drain. And considering the nature of the lawsuit, and history of this company, this kind of manipulation is foolish. Regulators are definitely watching.

[tsuami]

What's happening here? A few decent buys yesterday and today after months of inactivity. Someone knows something is coming? Also float must be very low, under 1M buys push pps up 100+%.

[MoreThanWealth]

Looks like someone or someone's believe it will! Accumulation thru roof, look for a spike in pps here!

[seven77]

This case has taken a strange turn. Sprung may not be able to collect on the default judgement on Jeffrey Katz.
PER JHO/REFERRAL ORDER DATED OCTOBER 30, 2019 AND SIGNED BY HON. KNIPEL, THIS
MATTER IS SET FOR AN INQUEST ON FEBRUARY 20, 2020 @9:45AM ROOM 482, SPECIAL
REFEREE PART 82. IF YOU NEED AN INTERPRETER, YOU MUST CALL THE CLERK IN PART 82
BEFORE THE SCHEDULED DATE. FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN A DEFAULT.
INQUEST=An inquest is a judicial inquiry in common law jurisdictions, particularly one held to determine the cause of a person's death. Conducted by a judge, jury, or government official, an inquest may or may not require an autopsy carried out by a coroner or medical examiner

I have a feeling Jeffrey Katz as pictured on this website may not be Jeffrey Katz at all
https://www.google.com/search?q=jeffrey+katz&sa=X&rlz=1C1GCEU_enUS868US868&biw=1920&bih=969&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=wY4nciX-2qUYpM%253A%252CpIVWE-2UFNEK0M%252C%252Fm%252F0k3g5y&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kTHw_e4lHj91sS8Ceu5Wiyl3m-6qg&ved=2ahUKEwiLwKasmMzmAhUCt54KHbzFAXAQ_B0wCnoECAsQAw#imgrc=wY4nciX-2qUYpM:

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/imagebuzz/terminal01/2009/6/25/14/if-internet-commenters-had-a-magazine-20365-1245955858-8.jpg%3Fdownsize%3D700%253A%252A%26output-quality%3Dauto%26output-format%3Dauto%26output-quality%3Dauto%26output-format%3Dauto%26downsize%3D360:*&imgrefurl=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peggy/if-internet-commenters-had-a-magazine&h=670&w=500&tbnid=Q9tZP3ex9L2Y6M&tbnh=260&tbnw=194&usg=K_f4XlxVIAQs1NbTl6RK-jeJbFdVg=&docid=NWkyAUDPFT9TmM

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=ETkmrwSpe2j5rrf98VO92Q==

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=xAnppvyWWAJg14CG3aDI5w==

[sharp tool]

$200 brings you 100% return

WOW WOW

[sharp tool]

$6 and 20%

$30 and 100%????????

[sharp tool]

Dumpster?

Took it from one dumpster and put it back in to a different dumpster and you made some money on the way.

How nice

[Brown castle]

As we wait patiently for the outcome of this lawsuit, I would like to thank our CEO, Bannor Macgregor for bringing this shell of a company back to life. Regardless of how this all plays out, he literally pulled this company out of the dumpster. He gave all those previous LDSI stockholders a chance to recoup some of their losses. I’m sure there are a lot of old Backstage Vibe investors that would like to shake Mr Macgregor’s hand and tell him thanks!
And this has been an interesting board. All of the speculation, all the rumors, manipulation, and hype, this stock had a market cap exceeding 20 million! I got to stick around to see what happens next! So thank you Mr Macgregor! And best of luck in court. Hopefully this will end well, and the board can get back to making a real company out of this shell.

[seven77]

This complaint reminds of Cirtran vs Playboy. Cirtran failed to make milestones set forth by the contract. Here too Sprung failed to make final contributions therefore contract should be void.
"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/playboy-enterprises-wins-appeal-court-affirms-award-of-19-million-and-injunction-against-play-beveragescirtran-beverage-300727965.html

[seven77]

"8. Because Sprung expressed that he did not want his investment utilized by Vastech
UK for research and development of the technology, Moskowitz directed Sprung to MacGregor
and LDSI (d/b/a Vastech Auto America in the United States) to pursue investing in Vastech Auto
America, because LDSI had been granted a Master License for the American Territory to sub-
license, co-manufacture, and/or sole-manufacture electronic motors based upon the Vastech UK
technology."

[seven77]

From the response submitted by MacGregor's lawyers... interesting
"AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
(Unjust Enrichment Against All Defendants)
85. Defendants MacGregor and LDSI repeat and reallege their responses to
Paragraphs 1 through 84, supra, as if set forth herein.
86. In a Decision and Order on Motion, entered by the Clerk of the Supreme Court of
the State of New York, Kings County, on October 8, 2019, in the above-captioned action (the
“Order”), the Court dismissed, in its entirety, Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action for Unjust
Enrichment Against All Defendants. As a result, no response to Paragraph 86 is required.
87. In its Order, the Court dismissed, in its entirety, Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action
for Unjust Enrichment Against All Defendants. As a result, no response to Paragraph 87 is
required.
88. In its Order, the Court dismissed, in its entirety, Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action
for Unjust Enrichment Against All Defendants. As a result, no response to Paragraph 88 is
required.
INDEX NO. 504677/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2019"
8 of 26
"AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Money Had and Received Against All Defendants)
89. Defendants MacGregor and LDSI repeat and reallege their responses to
Paragraphs 1 through 88, supra, as if set forth herein.
90. In its Order, the Court dismissed, in its entirety, Plaintiff’s Fourth Cause of Action
for Money Had and Received Against All Defendants. As a result, no response to Paragraph 90
is required.
91. In its Order, the Court dismissed, in its entirety, Plaintiff’s Fourth Cause of Action
for Money Had and Received Against All Defendants. As a result, no response to Paragraph 91
is required.
AS AND FOR A FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Rescission Against All Defendants)
92. Defendants MacGregor and LDSI repeat and reallege their responses to
Paragraphs 1 through 91, supra, as if set forth herein.
93. State that Paragraph 93 of the Complaint contains statements of law and/or legal
conclusions for which no response is required and otherwise deny the allegations of Paragraph
93 of the Complaint.
94. State that Paragraph 94 of the Complaint contains statements of law and/or legal
conclusions for which no response is required and otherwise deny the allegations of Paragraph
94 of the Complaint.
AS AND FOR A SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Constructive Trust Against All Defendants)
95. Defendants MacGregor and LDSI repeat and reallege their responses to
96. In its Order, the Court dismissed, in its entirety, Plaintiff’s Sixth Cause of Action
for Constructive Trust Against All Defendants. As a result, no response to Paragraph 96 is
required."

[sharp tool]

LOST ANY HOPE??

WHAT'S GOING ON?

[sharp tool]

NOBODY HOME??

[sharp tool]

Let's not forget his past

Helped the FEDS "Wooden Nickle" and got out of a jail sentence.

He's in the PROGRAM and this is a clear violation of the MOU

[sharp tool]

Let's not forget his past

Helped the FEDS "Wooden Nickle" and got out of a jail sentence.

He's in the PROGRAM and this is a clear violation of the MOU

[sharp tool]

Let's not forget his past

Helped the FEDS "Wooden Nickle" and got out of a jail sentence.

He's in the PROGRAM and this is a clear violation of the MOU