Alaska Oil & Gas Ltd (fka AKOL)

[Witchhouse]

Boy would I like to see this stock recover. They are not PR ing too much kope they are waiting for something real to report.

[excel]

Wrong guy to ask. Needham has the personality of a ROCK!
All I ever have got back from him and seen from him is one sentence replies.
He has his head up his ass if he thinks that's how you treat shareholders with one line replies.
He thinks he's running a private company.
Wait until Mancini back and ask him.

[nanuk]

Sir,

Please check our web site which will provide specific information.

R. Needham





I saw your announcement on Yahoo and wonder exactly where the Fowler prospect is. From the message board on Inverstorhub I have gathered that you have some people all spun up on this 80 acres of land/water? somewhere in the existing Cook Inlet oilfield. I have queried people on the message board as to the actual location of this prospect, and in very hostile terms I have been informed that they don't know. They tell me to ask you, so I am asking; where is the Fowler prospect?

[excel]

So it took you 4 requests to provide a copy and now you say you don't know how to cut and paste? Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

Myself being the wonderful nice guy you know that I am I'll help you out!

Left click mouse over the words you want to copy.
Hold it down as you slide it over the text.

Lift the left click position up.

You have now highlighted the text you want to copy.

Right click. Click copy.


Take your mouse to a post page here and right click.

Click paste!

You are done!

You will enjoy using this the rest of your life!

BTW. I sent email Monday and still no reply.
I heard he was going to be out of town this week.
Hopefully get something back in a bit.

Or.........Maybe he won't like the tone of my email?
Like the moderator here did with the link you'll find in the ibox to his questions I asked some tough questions to him also. LOL!

So for you to assume he clammed up because you told him you worked up there will that can be an assumtion now can't it since I didn't get a reply either. Hmmmmmmmm.

One more thing. The company FOGL is planning on using.
Revenues for doing this would be hard to come by already if you read these news releases.
You will see in second one they will have revenues shortly.

Have any other complaints?

Are the days just a tad to long for you up there?

I suggest taking up a hobby or something.




Nevada Holding Enters into Licensing Agreement with the Institute of GeoInformational Analysis of the Earth
By Staff

NEW YORK, Sep 20, 2004 (PRIMEZONE via COMTEX) --
Nevada Holding Group, Inc. (Pink Sheets:NVHG) announced today that it has entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with the Institute of GeoInformational Analysis of the Earth. The Company shall market the Institute's proprietary Remote Earth Sensing (RES) technology. The license covers North and South America and Australia. NVHG may market RES applications non-exclusively in the rest of the world. Total purchase price for the license is $15 million U.S. dollars plus working capital. Both parties plan to finalize this transaction within 90 days. The Geoinformational Analysis technology would enable NVHG to locate for their clients underground mineral deposits or water by processing space images data combining with geological data of the land surface, taken from the satellites, and using proprietary software and specially devised analytical algorithms.

NVHG, soon to be called GeoScanex ( www.geoscanex.com ), shall market this RES technology to oil, gas, mining, and oceanographic customers throughout North, South America and Australia. A typical service contract, including a full scan of a small to medium size field including all the analysis, will cost the client $500,000-$800,000. Several companies have already expressed interest and approximately 10 jobs are anticipated for 2005. NVHG shall also offer its services to auditing firms, for proof of reserves documentation. NVHG is Exus Global (EXGL) Portfolio Company.

Dr. Ivan Raylyan, Chairman of Institute of Geoinformational Analysis of the Earth and soon to be Chairman of NVHG stated, "Our expansion to North, South American and Australian Markets through our agreement with NVHG symbolizes our technologies strength and enables us to respond to the large number of inquiries we receive on a daily basis. We are looking forward to working with the U.S. based management team. Our partners and staff are prepared to cooperate with them to develop these new markets."

About the Institute of GeoInformational Analysis of the Earth and Scanex

Over the past several years, the Institute, in cooperation with Scanex ( www.scanex.ru ), has used the RES technology in a number of practical projects according to its customers' requests. The projects were implemented in various regions of the world, such as Africa, the Middle East, the Far East, North America and Russia, and made it possible to predict and localize commercially viable deposits of hydrocarbons, gold and diamonds. The approximate total volumes of the petroleum deposits alone (in localized traps) amounted to some 70 million tons (including some 40 million tons in Sakhalin and 20 to 25 million tons in the Penza area). Gas-related projects included the localization of drilling sites for Burgaz Company (a subsidiary of Gazprom). In gold mining, joint ventures have been set up and have started operating in South Korea. On the whole, the economic effect of adopting the technology varied between 10 million and 15 million tons practically in every project. ScanEx provides full integrated solutions for satellite remote sensing applications and offers cost-effective innovative technologies for Earth imagery collection, dissemination and problem-solving use. For more information on the institute see their web site www.geoscanex.com .

The preceding includes forward-looking statements which involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause the Company's actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. Forward-looking statements above are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation, competition, intellectual property rights, litigation, needs of liquidity, and other risks detailed from time to time in the company's reports filed with the SEC.

SOURCE: Nevada Holding Group Inc

Nevada Holding Group, Inc.
Henry Val, CEO
[phone], Ext. 204


Exus Global Announces Portfolio Company, Nevada Holding, Enters into Licensing Agreement to Market Remote Earth Scanning to Natural Resource Companies; NVHG Yields over a 100% return to Exus in 5 Months

NEW YORK, Sep 27, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) --
Nevada Holding Group, Inc (OTCBB:NVHG), an Exus Global, Inc. (OTCBB:EXGO) portfolio Company, announced today that the company has entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with the Institute of Geoinformational Analysis of the Earth to market exclusively their proprietary Remote Earth Sensing (RES) technology in North and South America. The technology enables companies to locate underground mineral deposits by processing space images of the land surface with proprietary software and special algorithms.

NVHG soon to be called GeoScanex will market this RES technology to oil, gas, mining, and oceanographic customers throughout North and South America. An average job which will include a full scan of a small to medium size field with all the analysis will cost $500,000-$800,000. Several companies have already expressed interest and for 2005 - 10 jobs are anticipated.

Dr. Ivan Raylyan - Chairman of Institute of Geoinformational Analysis of the Earth and soon to be Chairman of NVHG stated, "Our expansion to North and South American Markets through our agreement with NVHG marks our technologies strength and enable us to service the high demand of inquiries we receive on a daily basis. We are looking forward in working with the US based management team as we here in Switzerland and Russia are prepared to cooperate with them to develop the market."

Ike Sutton, CEO of Exus Global, Inc. commented, "NVHG's License with Geoinformational provides an increased value for the 3,000,000 shares of NVHG which we own. Recent market activity of NVHG closed at .30 per share. We are looking forward to continued returns in our investment as the business progresses."

[nanuk]

I'm no internet guru. I'm not a chat post person. I help make oil and gas. I have no idea how to show you Needham's e-mail. Cut and paste? I can't forward it to this site. I have sent Mancini 2 more requests with no reply. Once I told him I'm actually working in Cook Inlet he clammed up. Perhaps you should verify this on your own. He'll know who I am. By the way, check out who this Nevada company representing GeoScanex really is. No assets, no income since formation in 1999. Another penny stock gone to .20 on a press release. Venture capital, indeed. Their venture at obtaining your capital. Looking at the historic prices of Frontier stock, you're probably in the hole pretty far and have no hope but for Frontier's line to be real. We'll be looking for their rigs any time now.

[excel]

So you don't have the copy of an email reply you said you had from SATURDAY which means you LIED about it.

What a surprise!

[nanuk]

You can't produce a cogent thought. Still pounding the table. You and Spark should get together. See you on the tundra.

[Witchhouse]

Heading north I see!!!!!!

[excel]

Who says miracles don't occur? LOL!

[anthraxshield]

FINALLY!!! We closed green! That's the first up day in a long time, but we got a lot of ground to make up to get back to a realistic market value IMO.

[excel]

LOL! Yes. Many people had vacations planned in that split second. LOL!

[curmudgeonsvengali]

I almost had a heart attack!
I was on E-Trade, looking at my portfolio, which is >$800 in the red, when all of a sudden, in a split second, I had made a 527% profit! WHAT!!!

It was FOGL. Somebody must have bought some at .19 instead of .019!

Then, in less than a minute, it was back down again.

Should have sold.

Oh well, easy come, easy go.

"There's no such thing as a sure thing. That's why they call it gambling." - Oscar Madison

[anthraxshield]

This is the first time that it has bounced back like this after its decline each day. I think a close in the green today would signify a reversal.

[excel]

FOGL Let's see if today is finally reversal.
It's bled so much it's going to need a transfusion! LOL!

[DRCAL]

Thanks for facts and not hype.

[excel]

Just what I thought. You can't produce copy of email you tried to tell us you got an answer to on a Saturday.

Am I suppose to spoon feed you info that isn't available?

Find your brain.
God gave everyone a brain.

Use it.

You don't like the fact all weekend long I gave you same answer.

Don't try the spin job with me.

[anthraxshield]

Nanuk, FOGL is a startup venture that is putting more time and money into creating revenues by producing marketable gas and oil than spending money they don't have on building a fancy website.

I don't understand why you are still here. The public information readily available says that the Fowler property is in the Tertiary Tyonek Formation of the Cook Inlet Basin. Go look it up on the map or do a search for it on the Alaska department of natural resources.

http://www.dog.dnr.state.ak.us/

[AKvetch]

Try this:

http://quotes.freerealtime.com/dl/frt/C?SA=quotes%7CNews&IM=quotes&symbol=FOGL&type=News...

And if you check out their website, you'll find additional info about the Fowler Project:

http://www.frontieroilandgas.com/

[SPARK]

Do you wear a dress?? ROTFLOLOL!!!

[nanuk]

Can you understand this; I live here and depend on Cook Inlet Oil and gas operations for my living. You have presented nothing but old information concerning exploration in this region via Frontier's website. Mancini/Needham still hasn't replied to my reply asking for more info than is available on Frontier's laughable website. Don't shoot the messemger because you don't like the message.

[nanuk]

Go to Google and search for Frontier Oil & Gas. You will find everything they have made public.

[excel]

My research? LOL!
Listen up. I gave you all the info I had.
I gave you contact info to find out for yourself.
If that info doesn't satisfy you that's TOUGH!

Your ego is out of control along with your logic.

Now show us this copy of the email you sent on a Saturday and received a reply from.

Waiting.............

[anthraxshield]

Nanuk, will you please provide the link to the article on Yahoo that you saw about FOGL?

[nanuk]

Sorry I was not more specific. Mancini/Needham, whoever it was, replied by e-mail. I contacted him by e-mail. You are deteriorating rapidly. I thought you were better than Spark, but now I have my doubts. Do you understand that if the Fowler prospect is within 300 feet of existing feeder lines that narrows down the location to the existing Cook Inlet oilfield? Get a map and get a clue. Your "research" is either pitifully incomplete or you have an agenda.

[excel]

I came to this forum with a simple question no one could answer.

There is no answer from the website.
Or anywhere else that I know of.
Exactly how many times do you need to be told that?

Here is part of first reply below.
That wasn't good enough for you though.
You go on and on and on and on.
Bla, Bla, Bla.

Still waiting for your answer was it email or phone contact?
If email, still waiting for copy of reply.
You want everything from everyone else even after you are told it doesn't currently exist yet.

That's quite a HUGE area of land.
I suggest you email or call for direct location of the property. Contact info below.

I have seen a document with the properties name listed before.
I'll see if that person has the link handy again.

Phone: (281) 854 – 2374
Fax: (360) 937 – 5727
E-mail: [e-mail]

[nanuk]

Please tell me who I am. I'm dying to know. I'll tell you what I do for a living. I am a contractor who works for Unocal and Conoco-Phillips in the Cook Inlet oilfield. I talk to the people who run this place fairly regularly. Who am I?

[nanuk]

I came to this forum with a simple question no one could answer. I have been abused by idiots for doing so. I am truly sorry I ruffled your feathers. Anyone familiar with the Cook Inlet oilfield knows this proposal by Cable Advertising sounds preposterous; not impossible, but preposterous. It would take some serious new information to change this picture. You apparently have none. From his response to my inquiries, I take it Mancini/Needham have none either.

Spark, you are particularly pathetic. I mentioned the Spark platform in Cook Inlet. I called it dead, but it does produce a little gas, as you do. This gas has been used to power turbine generators to keep marker lights running on the platform, but it is unmanned; lights on, no one home. Perfect.

[excel]

That comes to 4 wells.


From website............
Well spacing for the owned property will be one(1) well for every twenty(20) acres with the possibility of approval for a one(1) well per ten(10) acres.



Who knows at this point what they will have?
I believe they need to get those 70k acres leased as they stated they hope to do.

Can the area be drilled? Are the permits in place? Of the 2 billion barrel potential for the area, how many estimated reserves are on the Fowler and adjacent properties.

These two links should give you some of the information you are seeking.

http://www.knobias.com/individual/public/news.htm?eid=3.1.ee0c870611b96894edc851588c7cc660229619c108....

http://www.knobias.com/individual/public/news.htm?eid=3.1.04aa1b2a670ffd2bca8424e34ce165f75bf9a8b17b....

[SPARK]

Yep..you're a girl alright..LOL

[DRCAL]

That comes to 4 wells. The other areas can be leased, but are not as yet. The next question is, Can the area be drilled? Are the permits in place? Of the 2 billion barrel potential for the area, how many estimated reserves are on the Fowler and adjacent properties.
Some areas are against drilling. There seem to be some postings that reflect this mindset.

[nanuk]

Very clever. There is a dead production platform in Cook Inlet with the same name as your alias. Appropriate.

[excel]

You have no argument, so you are pounding the table.

What argument?

I've told you from post ONE the exact location is NOT listed on the website.

Do I need to type that reaaaaaaaaaaaaaal sloooooooooooooooow for you?

BTW..................

You must have a short memory from post to post.

You don't want to show us copy of email?

When Mike gets back from the property next week I'll ask him if he got a call from you or he emailed you back.

I want people to come here and question what is going on.

Heck all ya got to do is read my prior posts and you'll see I'm not happy at all here with company actions and have been questioning them.

I think I got a good idea who you are by the way.

You should really find another hobby.

[excel]

What Fowler family is it? Twenty acres is not much.

http://www.frontieroilandgas.com/project.html

Frontier Oil and gas brings excellent partners to the table in Fowlers oil and gas. The company is looking to develop both oil and natural gas reserves located in the Cook Inlet oil basin in Alaska. Ownership of the 80 acres property located in the cook inlet is owned free and clear by the fowler family for the last 45 years, with an additional 7,000 adjacent acres to be leased. Well spacing for the owned property will be one(1) well for every twenty(20) acres with the possibility of approval for a one(1) well per ten(10) acres. Current Oil Reserve is an unproven reserve with an estimated 2 billion barrels. Current Gas Reserve is a fully documented reserve with an estimated 1.9 trillion cubic feet. The development property in question is within 300 feet of main natural gas feeder pipelines.

[DRCAL]

What Fowler family is it? Twenty acres is not much.

[SPARK]

Your posting history suggests you have no experience trading stocks...you come on this board like a puber with an inflamed pimple...hey if you hate da company go email em..ya sound like a girl..LOL

[nanuk]

You are flailing, excel. You have no argument, so you are pounding the table. You can't spell or create an english sentence. I'm satisfied you know nothing of substance. I'll go about my business and watch what actually happens in Cook Inlet while you watch FOGL.PK. Time will tell. Hope you get rich.

[excel]

Nanuk. You contacted Mr Mancini on a Saturday.
Interesting.

You contacted him by phone or email?

If email, please provide us here a copy of that reply from him. As you'll find here replies have been posted here.

Answer this before you go on to my next point.

Mr Mancini directed me to their website as though this would answer my question. I have gone through every link on Frontier's site and it is weak; no real info as to where Fowler is located.

We had ALREADY discussed exact location of property wasn't on website.
In fact we discussed your disatisfaction with the website.
In fact I have told you at least 2 times I did NOT have exact location so your bottom remark you made in post is baseless ALSO!

With these factors in mind why would you if contacting him by email, go back to a website that you stated earliar you found nothing there about location?

Why wouldn't you immediatly email him back saying you had already looked at website and info isn't there I'm enquiring about?

If contact by phone, on a SATURDAY, inform Mr Mancini why would you direct me to a site that doesn't contain that info?

You really need to be more careful when you post in the way you do.

You give yourself away so fast.

If you want to go toe to toe with me in a debate make sure your story at least adds up.

Otherwise you lose ALL credibility and look rather silly in the process.

[nanuk]

At your suggestion, I contacted FOGL directly. Mr Mancini directed me to their website as though this would answer my question. I have gone through every link on Frontier's site and it is weak; no real info as to where Fowler is located. Either you are willfully ignorant or you know as much yourself. Bring some real information to the table. Once again, where is the Fowler prospect? Smart money says you don't know or care.

[SPARK]

If this dude is a basher..then he sucks at it..LOL

[excel]

Nanuk. By the way, you still haven't answered my one simple question; where is the Fowler prospect? Thank you for questioning my maturity. You made my day.

I answered your question.
I do know you have reading abilities so it was not a question of you not understanding my response to you.

You didn't like my answer though.

That's where the question of maturity comes into play.

I gave you the email, phone numbers, for you to call yourself expressing your concerns as I don't have exact answer for you and completely expressed that point to you, thus the CONTACT info.

Valid concerns indeed.
All of us here have concerns.
I posted that in my original post to you.
Pick up a phone or email, but don't blame others for lack of info.

[nanuk]

You don't seem to understand my point. I am not an investor. I have no dog in this fight. I simply saw an article on Yahoo touting this prospect and wondered what they were talking about. I have worked with the people who run the Cook Inlet oilfield for 15 years, and I showed this article to them. They suggest that you have no idea what it takes to drill to 40,000 feet in Cook Inlet and the incredible expense involved. The promos on Frontier's site seem to mix shallow coal bed methane exploration with this extreme deep oil exploration.

Frontier also claims their proven gas reserves are within 300 feet of existing gas feeder lines. This places their 80 acres within the existing and very mature Cook Inlet infrastructure. We are desperate for natural gas to keep our industries, namely Agrium Fertilizer and Conoco-Phillips LNG, running and employing our populus. Unocal is the main supplier of gas for Agrium. These are huge international concerns who are suing one another over the gas supplies in Cook Inlet. Conoco-Phillips almost certainly will not be able to renew their export license in 2009, and Agrium is not working anywhere near capacity due to shortages in Unocal's gas production. Unocal is drilling furiously onshore to try to meet its obligations.

So please excuse me if I have doubts about Cable Advertising launching an exploration project based on 80 acres somewhere in the middle of the existing Cook Inlet oilfield. The articles they trot out on their website are very old news to people who live here. By the way, you still haven't answered my one simple question; where is the Fowler prospect? Thank you for questioning my maturity. You made my day.

[excel]

Nanuk. I took a lot of my time to explain things to you.
Gave you contact numbers for your own verification.
My post to you wasn't no pump post.
I gave both sides of the coin well.

That's how you respond?
I was hoping your response would have been more mature.
Good luck to you.
You'll need it.

[anthraxshield]

Nanuk, the CEO is heading up to the property next week. Why don't you give him a call and ask him yourself 281-854-2374. Maybe you guys can meet up for lunch.

I can see you joined iHub on the same day you posted on this board so I question your motives. We have seen enough evidence from 3rd party verifying documents that the existence of the Fowler property is not even worth discussing on this board. Excel provided you with an example. Get out and do your own DD if you are still not convinced.

[nanuk]

So you don't know what you're talking about. I suspected as much. You are a trader. I live with the results of oil companies' decisions. Who has more to gain? I would love to see a new big oil prospect in Cook Inlet. Where is it? Pinnacle Reef? Do you know anything? I doubt it.

[excel]

From September 29th article in the Rigzone.com oil and gas industry newsletter.

http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=16790

Part of article...........

Cook Inlet basin, located in south-central Alaska where the Fowler property is located, is approximately 250 miles from north to south and 70 miles wide.



That's quite a HUGE area of land.
I suggest you email or call for direct location of the property. Contact info below.

I have seen a document with the properties name listed before.
I'll see if that person has the link handy again.

Phone: (281) 854 – 2374
Fax: (360) 937 – 5727
E-mail: [e-mail]



Few observations though about your postings though that I find interesting.

Maybe you are as frustrated as I am about the current price?
I know I am very frustrated at management because anyone watching L2 along with T&S knows something not right here.

Yet, first you want info you can get by emailing, or calling company.

No problem asking here first at all.
Don't get me wrong about that.

Yet, one would think as you stated being in industry 25 years and have heard nothing about location even though I would think one would need to account for the huge amount of country there in that thought process would you then trust some poster for that info?

Since drilling hasn't started.
Since drilling timeline, or expected projectings of drilling results haven't been brought to the publics knowledge, would you still expect to hear anything up there?

You don't get any info after trading hours on a FRIDAY afternoon so two hours ten minutes later the company is a scam, bla, bla, bla.

You been in the business up there 25 years but new to the hub a few days ago?
Only posts are on this board.
Curious how then you found out about FOGL up there?

You believe the website is a joke.
Not fancy
I agree.
Do we need a fancy website?

All I care about is they deliver, but you are going to base the company on it's website?

Look, this is a pink stock for a reason.
I don't blame you for having concerns one bit.
In fact I think you and EVERYONE else should.
If they don't they shouldn't be investing. LOL!

That all being said your two posts together on a Friday afternoon after trading hours when most leave yet within 2:10 of each post after a huge frustrating week price wise I think there is a better way to ask for info.

As you can see if you go back 25 posts not many that post here either.

Next time you might try different approach imo.
This isn't a cult stock with people following blindly.
There are concerns here.

[nanuk]

So I take it no one knows Cook Inlet geography, much less geology. I've been here 25 years and work on contract to Unocal. This would be big news if there were any substance here. No one here has ever heard of it. I've seen Frontier's site; what a joke. I doubt this company exists in any substantive form. I'll certainly need a lot more solid evidence before I believe one word of this.

[nanuk]

Sitting on the bluff overlooking the Cook Inlet oilfield wondering where the Fowler prospect is. Can anyone enlighten me?

[excel]

We shall see. Start praying! LOL!

[sainte-beuve]

please...! I can't take another down day!

[anthraxshield]

Yep, looking good. Uptick .026.