Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I couldn't care less what MOST "professional investors" think... and neither should most individual investors.
Because those guys aren't focused on what most matters to ME... rather than focused on selling to the clueless what I will sell to them...
The OTCBB is where their product comes from. Guys who sort the good from the trash on the OTCBB, and buy shares at wholesale for pennies from those who can't tell what they are worth, and then sell them for dollars at retail to "professionals" who can see the value only when the price proves it... they ARE the authority... not the "professionals" who can't see value, and don't care about it anyway, since they really only focus on flogging some "product"... whatever it is... as salesmen.
"Professionals" in the sense you are talking about... are used car salesmen pushing product... not investors.
Their niche isn't HERE... so, why would you ever care what they think about that isn't HERE... given this board is about what is HERE.
ATNY is an obvious winner...
This is an ATNY board... so... NOT about any others.
I bought ATNY low... because I saw the value...
Good luck to you, buying the crap the "professionals" want to sell to you only after they vet it ... that makes them money at your expense.
I've STILL not seen a post of a single bit of DD actually relevant to this company...
Just a continual stream of generalities about the market... that have nothing to do with this company...
The "story" won't really change a whit if they get listed on NASDAQ... It will still be the same company, the same management, the same potential... only, you will have missed out on the opportunity for recognizing the SAME value that was obviously there way back when it was trading at $0.25 a shares... when you could have bought that same value for a lot less.
Buy low... is the necessary first element in "buy low, sell high".
I just read it: another reverse stock split!!!
Now that's what they are good at!!!!!!!!!
And tons of people are under water because of all the stock dilution.
You need to look at the whole picture, that is, what has happen to the majority of the SH's, not just a few.
The long term picture is a stinking pile of garbage for the SH's who have endured tons of dilution while management uses the OTCBB as a piggy bank to fund their company.
Ask MOST any professional investor what he thinks about the OTCBB & see what he/she tells you!
I will go where the big money goes, not the small fry.
Most pros won't EVER LOOK AT THE JUNK here because they know what they are dealing with.
"Gambler's pocket" or nobody would buy this junk.
If they get approved for NASDAQ, then the story has changed.
So, now that it looks like they're moving up to the NASDAQ... what will you end up paying me for those shares that I bought for $0.25 each when your mantra re the risks in the OTCBB won't fly ?
Frankly, I don't see a reason to bother with agreeing to disagree... given, particularly with the news here, how OBVIOUS and how patently WRONG the generic market blather is in relation to this specific company. The error in logic is the basic "hasty generalization"... "some OTCBB stocks are scams... therefore, this stock must be a scam" ?
The claim that the number of those that are scams is 95% or greater is also patently bogus, but, even IF that were true, the point of bothering with doing your homework is to find those few that ARE lumped in with that crowd... that don't belong there.
As I pointed out way back when this was trading for $0.25, the whole POINT of bothering with doing the DD is to find those that are NOT scams, that are selling at discounted prices because some fools will assume they are... only because of the exchange where they trade, etc.
Scams happen on EVERY exchange... the primary difference being one in how fully "legal" the efforts to part investors from value will tend to be when practiced on the larger exchanges...
Your DD products should be "informed by" but not "driven by" rational concern re risks in generalities... and should, instead, be driven in largest part by the FACTS in specifics that relate to specific situations.
THIS is one obvious instance in which making the effort shows, as I've had the DD right on this one from the start...
Score one for solid DD...
Generalist fear mongering blather... zero.
I do understand the point you are making over and over again in your posts, I just don't share it. Lets just agree to disagree.GLTY, sagedono
95% of the companies on the OTCBB are here to print stock & dilute the common to run their company.
Ever wonder why almost no Tutes invest in them except for death financing ect?..............
Because almost ALL OF THEM ARE JUNK!!!!!!!!
The smart money goes to the exchanges.
Don't you just hate it when these useless, defunct little companies... win awards from their customers ?
I have been following since 2006 and they are now just buying defunct companies. Lets see what happens. If there not defunct they are making them defunct just for the money.
Yes, I know, to me most of the companies on OTCBB are just stock printing machines.
It's just that I've been following this company since 2003 & want to see what happens.
Can't you see they are just pumping and dumping. They can't manage their way out of a paperbag, they're just full of pluff. That's the only thing they are really good at, all of them. That's their way of making money. They don't know a **** thing.
I still remember the P & D flyer I got in snail mail:
Flyer from the mail says: "Target price $25.00 to 40.00 in the next 12 months"
That's quite a lofty target from 3.10. Split adjusted: 3.10 divided by 40, = .07
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=18984359
All the way to the bank...
I don't think that any of us chattering here now... are current shareholders ?
Looks to me like their finances are pretty interesting...
A fairly wide gap between the largish gross profit they report and the taxable number ?
Why is that ? What does that difference mean... ???
Yup!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good company?
Profitability
Profit Margin (ttm): -13.15%
Operating Margin (ttm): 0.66%
Management Effectiveness
Return on Assets (ttm): 0.55%
Return on Equity (ttm): -17.58%
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=ATNY.OB+Key+Statistics
Ask any pro about the typical OTCBB stock & he will laugh.
Still Laughing!! Glad you guys are having fun, but look who's laughing back, THEM.
It sounds like what "investing" is to you is what you do, and what gambling is... is anything anyone else does ?
There is no rationale, no reason, in what you're claiming, which makes a distinction without a difference.
Investing, TO ME, is finding value on sale... buying it at a low price, and selling it again to someone else at a better price. A change of listing is only one of MANY things that might make a difference in the pricing of shares. The companies that uplist... are not really made any less risky because they've made that move, rather, they've made that move because they are less risky ???
Finding the "gems" before others have is the task... and making your money available to good managers to enable them in growing a business is what investing is... everything else is just "holding stocks"... for a longer or shorter period, at particular times.
There is risk in ALL stocks, although the risks are not equal... and the risk is minimized by being smart about determining what the risks are before investing, and then managing YOUR OWN exposure to them... ie, choosing good stocks, and using skill in timing buying and selling.
JMHO
Another quarter, more losses, same old story, year after year:
Financial Highlights for the Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2010
* Revenue was $68.6 million, an increase of 169% from $25.5 million in the same period in 2009;
* Gross profit of $17.4 million versus $5.9 million in the same period last year;
* Gross margin of 25.3% as compared to 23.0% for the twelve months of 2009; and
* Net loss of $9.0 million as compared to a net loss of $6.4 million in the previous year. The net loss in 2010 includes a $5.7 million loss related to discontinued operations and a $3.7 million charge related to restructuring and acquisition expenses
But that's not investing to me, it's gambling & yes this will happen where you make a lot of money while averaging down on a stock such as here. But you are taking an enormous amount of risk & many times you will lose many times doing this.
You or somebody got in "the gamblers pocket" where you made money but you were lucky.
Delphi went from .25 to 2.00 while It was bankruptcy. There are a whole group of people that play the bankruptcy stocks.
OF COURSE you can make money on these stocks but odds are against you. Go ask any professional investor & see what he says about the OTCBB, there is good reasons why they are not quoted on the major ticker tapes.
What API keeps doing is what most OTCBB do, issue stock to run the company, lose money year after year, reverse split, start the cycle again. They are happy to stay here on the OTCBB.
Go read on YHOO MB all the bag holders.
I wonder how many people made money here opposed to the people that lost money.
This company went from under $0.30 to well over $1.50 in five months last year...
You were here and watched it happen... while I was here chatting about it with you... telling you what I saw in the charts ?
So...
Timing matters ?
The point of doing the DD and working on your timing and trading skills... is to avoid being "most people" ??
Most of the risks you address are NOT modified by the exchange where a stock trades. The benefit of a higher exchange is the listing CAN generate greater liquidity... and that thin veneer of "safety" provided by the exchange is a fiction, that mostly means there are many more less sophisticated investors buying those shares...
The "value" isn't modified by the exchange... but, the listing often enables selling for a better price... to others who aren't able to identify good stocks before they trade on that exchange... or after.
Not a quibble from me on the utility of owning good companies that are successful in up-listing... but, trying to avoid buying them before they up-list makes no sense (and the listing doesn't change them) when the whole point is buying a VALUE which you are more likely to find a better deal on when you find good companies that happen to be pink or OTCBB.
It is worth the effort it takes to find them...
Recent examples of "buying low" include: QCOR in 2007/2008 and again this year. QCOR this year was not made more satisfying because of the uplisting history. MILL this year... not about the listing buy about the value... and, you know, riding ATNY from under $0.30 wasn't that bad an idea, either... no matter what exchange it traded on ?
Man up and post your calls on IHub when you make them... which makes it not an exercise in looking at charts after the fact and seeing "where you COULD OF made money IF"... rather than an exercise in holding yourself accountable for your calls ???
Anyway...
JMHO
Well I was up 122% last year & up around 40% this years & I doubt that I would get those kind of of returns on the OTCBB or Pink sheets.
OF COURSE you can always show in these stocks where you COULD OF made money IF you bought at the low & sold at the high, but it's not going to happen that way for most people & a lot of these stock will dilute you to death.
The stocks I follow that uplisted were FPP, HSQM, JGBO & shortly GHII.OB.
Few professional investors take these type of stocks seriously until they get off the OTCBB.
That makes zero sense... at all... still.
Why would you ever bother with following them at all ? It isn't rational. If that were the case, you'd be better off just looking at those that announced they were uplisting... and not waste your time with all the others ?
Anyway, I think the truth re markets is still much closer to the opposite of what you claim than it is as you claim.
"There are some gems" ? It doesn't MATTER if you can't figure out how to find them, or won't act on it when you find one... ???
This one moved from $0.25 to $2 last year... and they are posting numbers that beat the pants off others you're considering by a wide margin ???
Whatever...
I follow these stocks only to see if they will get off the OTCBB because there is little or none tute money in these stocks.
Professional investors know that this is a Mickey Mouse exchange full of Mickey Mouse companies where there are mostly novice & day traders, lots of dilution, death financing ect. But yes once in a while there are some gems that make it to the exchanges where the real money is.
The market doesn't really respond very well to the news.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=ATNY.OB+Basic+Chart&t=6m
Here it is:
API Technologies Enters Into Agreement with United States Department of Defense to Focus on Market for Classified and Secure Contracts
API Technologies Corp. ("the Company") (OTC Bulletin Board: ATNY), a provider of highly engineered products and services to the global defense sector, and the United States Department of Defense ("DoD") have established a corporate structure through a proxy agreement that enables the Company, through its direct subsidiary, API Defense USA, to compete for classified programs and contracts from the DoD. This agreement opens doors for API Defense USA to participate in the fastest growing segment of DoD contracting.
According to Defense Department budget-watcher Bill Sweetman of Aviation Week, the R&D, procurement and operations budgets for 2010 is just over $50 billion for classified programs.
Two Former US Navy Admirals and a Retired Marine Corps General Join New Proxy Board Bringing API Defense USA Access to Classified Markets
Under the proxy agreement, all of API Technologies' current operating subsidiaries will become direct subsidiaries of the Company's Secret cleared subsidiary, API Defense USA, which will be governed by a Proxy Board with the required security clearances. Vice Admiral Robert T. Conway, Jr. (US Navy, retired), Rear Admiral Kenneth L. Fisher (US Navy, retired), and General Richard D. Hearney (US Marine Corps, retired) will become directors of API Defense USA. Under the new structure, Mr. Stephen Pudles, has become the CEO of API Defense USA, responsible for all of the Company's global operations, and Mr. Phillip DeZwirek, currently Chairman of API Technologies, has become its CEO.
"This structural change immediately adds significant strategic impact to our business and is the culmination of several months of joint effort between API and the Department of Defense," said Stephen Pudles, CEO of API Defense USA. "We have unlocked the classified-projects procurement market by bringing in three experienced retired military personnel, with the necessary security clearances, to fill these critical board positions. API Defense USA can now compete for new and growing contracts that were previously off-limits."
Mr. Pudles continued, "Admirals Conway and Fisher as well as General Hearney, signal that API Technologies and API Defense USA are even better positioned to compete at the highest level of defense contracting where security is of paramount concern. I am confident that our Proxy Board members will enable API Defense USA to increase its business and thus benefit API's shareholders as we continue to increase revenues, profits and overall value."
"We are all very confident that we have now organized and positioned API Technologies and all of our subsidiaries to better compete for these important new sources of revenue for our company," said Mr. DeZwirek, API Technologies Chairman and CEO.
Vice Admiral Robert T. Conway, Jr., USN, is a career Surface Warfare Officer whose last assignment was as the Commander, Navy Installations Command, Washington, D.C., where he served as the Navy technical authority for Shore Installation Management. He has extensive major staff experience within the DoD and is familiar with government contracting requirements and regulations. He received his master's degree from Providence University, Providence, R.I. and is a graduate of the Industrial College of the Armed Forces at the National Defense University, Washington, D.C. In 2009, he founded R.T. Conway & Associates, a consulting business to assist corporate executives on matters involving Infrastructure, Facilities, Security, Technology and Renewable Energy.
Rear Admiral Kenneth L. Fisher, USN, is an experienced naval aviator with extensive operational and major staff experience. His last assignment prior to retirement was as Deputy and Chief of Staff, Commander in Chief, US Pacific Fleet. He too is very familiar with government contracts having spent five years as a senior leader for Booz Allen Hamilton and two years in Business Development for a major DoD Contractor in addition to consulting for other major defense contractors.
General Richard D. Hearney, USMC, culminated his military career as the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps. As such, he was involved with major acquisitions for the Marine Corps at the highest level of the DoD. After retirement, he founded RDM Strategies to help innovative companies apply their technologies to protecting our homeland. Prior to that, he served as president and chief executive officer of Business Executives for National Security (BENS), a national, nonpartisan organization of business leaders. Additionally, General Hearney was vice president of Military Aircraft and Missile Systems Group for the Boeing Company and was the regional vice president of Business Development - Western Europe for the McDonnell Douglas Corporation.
Fortunately, it seems a WHOLE lot less like gambling if you actually bother with making an effort in doing the due diligence.
That seems to have worked out pretty well for me here, so far...
Say... Did you actually READ their latest PR ???
This pretty typical for these OTCBB stocks.
I think the whole thing is pretty funny. They can't manage or hold on to their management for they are all idiots running the show. The investors are just pouring money into a hole and keep pumping and dumping. What a shame its such a sham.
Revenues up almost 400% in the quarter year over year...
Gross profit growing...
And the news just out seems it isn't exactly a bad thing...
Maybe will have to rethink my expectations re this one pretty soon ?
Yes, of course these little dinky stocks will move occasionally. Nobody would buy them if they didn't.
Sort of like the lottery showing that one big winner or nobody would the tickets.
The odds are not in your favor. The big money that moves the stocks isn't here. Too me OTCBB stocks are pretty much a pure gamble.
It ran 7X between Feb and Nov last year... from $0.25 to over $1.75.
I don't look for it to do that again this year...
And the losses continue
ATNY: Q3 Adj EPS (8c) vs (2c) EPS -300% Y/Y
http://www.knobias.com/story.htm?eid=3.1.f3a2eb116203a366f296c24abd71e8a43d44aa044b898bf60f025889d5ad6d51
"ATNY News" API Technologies Receives $2.3 Million in New Orders from Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems El Segundo
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/api-technologies-receives-23-million-in-new-orders-from-raytheon-space-and-airborne-systems-el-segundo-93671324.html
RONKONKOMA, N.Y., May 13 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- API Technologies Corp. (OTC Bulletin Board: ATNY) ("API" or the "Company"), a prime contractor in engineered systems, components and secure communications to the global defense and aerospace industries, has been awarded two separate contracts from Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems, located in El Segundo, California, totaling approximately $2.3 million, to supply electro-mechanical enclosures, including electronic circuit cards for mission-critical laser targeting and imaging systems. Both orders will be manufactured at the Company's Pennsylvania facility.
Stephen B. Pudles, Chief Executive Officer of API Technologies Corp., stated, "We are very pleased that Raytheon has once again selected API to be a key supplier on these two programs. With our recent acquisitions, we are now able to provide our global clients with a more diverse product offering that we expect will continue to improve our relationships and increase revenues."
No, I only watch most OTCBB stocks. The OTCBB in general, is in bad condition as liquidity & interest has been waining since the credit crisis.
Too low quality here. You can always find a OTCBB or pink stock that had terrific gains, otherwise no one would play them.
You can make money here buy it's much more difficult then NASDAQ or listed, at least for me.
It's so Mickey Mouse because there is no tute support.
You can always look back after the fact & say did you load up at the bottom & sell for massive gains, but this seldom happens.
So, you didn't load up at $0.25 a share back in February ?
Symbol changed to ATNY
It would be a miracle to me if APIA ever could make money for just one quarter:
GAAP net loss for the twelve months ended May 31, 2009 was $6.4 million or -$0.19 per share, compared to a net loss of $6.6 million or -$0.26 per share for the twelve months ended May 31, 2008. The loss includes non-cash charges related to stock-based compensation and depreciation totaling $2.2 million. Excluding these non-cash charges and total R&D expenses of $4.2 million, non-GAAP net income was breakeven versus a loss of $1.0 million in the previous year(1);
Just like last year.
API Nanotronics Announces Expanded Partnership With Sital Technology Ltd.
API's National Hybrid Subsidiary to Represent Sital's industry Leading Mil-Std-1553 IP Cores and Products in the United States and Parts of Europe and Will Collaborate on Next Generation Products
May 11, 2009 8:30:00 AM
Email Story Discuss on ZenoBank
View Additional ProfilesNEW YORK, NY -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 05/11/09 -- API Nanotronics Corp. (OTCBB: APIA) ("API" or the "Company"), a leading supplier of electronic components, systems and sub-systems, nano-optics and nanotechnology products to the aerospace, defense and communications sectors, today announced that its National Hybrid division(NHi) has expanded its sales and product development relationship with Israel based Sital Technology, the world leader in Mil-Std-1553 IP cores and products.
API's NHi subsidiary, located in Ronkonkoma, New York, is a leader in the avionics industry in key MIL STD 1553 technologies and provides system engineers with new opportunities through Sital's advanced Data Bus products. Customers in the U.S. can now purchase Sital's products directly from NHi including IP Cores, Bus Testers, and DDC terminal drop-in replacements. These new products significantly broaden NHi's product offerings, positioning the Company to provide customers complete solutions for their 1553 Data Bus needs. The companies also intend to co-develop next generation 1553 interface products, combining Sital's industry leading IP core with NHi's industry leading terminals, transceivers and transformers to develop the world's most compact and powerful 1553 interface solutions.
Stephen B. Pudles, Chief Executive Officer of API Nanotronics Inc., said, "This partnership expands on our successful existing collaboration with Sital that resulted in our ARIES® product line. We are proud to represent Sital's industry leading products in key markets and look forward to working together on future product offerings. This is a great opportunity for both companies."
API's National Hybrid division will be exhibiting at the coming Avionics show in San Diego on June 1 and 2.
About API Nanotronics Corp. (OTCBB: APIA)
API Nanotronics Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries API Electronics Inc., National Hybrid Inc., Filtran Group, TM Systems, Keytronics and API Nanofabrication Corporation, is engaged in the manufacture of electronic components and systems for the defense and communications industries. API is also developing a leadership position in the R&D and manufacture of nanotechnology and MEMS products. With a growing list of blue chip customers, including Honeywell/Allied Signal, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, and numerous other top technology-based firms around the world, API regularly ships products to clients in more than 34 countries. API owns state-of-the-art manufacturing and technology centers in New York, New Jersey and Ontario, Canada and has manufacturing capabilities in China and a distribution center in Britain. API Nanotronics trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol APIA. For further information, please visit the company website at www.apinanotronics.com.
About Sital Technology
Headquartered in Kfar-Saba, Israel, Sital Technology is an industry expert in MIL-STD-1553 design. The company develops intellectual property, components and testers for Mil-Std-1553 and other avionics applications and provides design and integration services. The principal staff are veterans of Israeli Air Force with in-depth understanding of avionics systems and its requirements. For more information about Sital visit www.sitaltech.com.
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements:
Except for statements of historical fact, the information presented herein constitutes forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, which are more fully described in the Company's Annual and Quarterly Reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, include but are not limited to, general economic and business conditions, the ability to acquire and develop specific projects, the ability to fund operations and changes in consumer and business consumption habits, our ability to protect our intellectual property, our ability to integrate and consolidate our operations, our ability to expand our operations in both new and existing markets, the effect of growth on our infrastructure and the effect of competition in the electronic components, nano-optics and nanotechnology industries. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material aspects from those currently anticipated. All information in this release is as of the date hereof. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statement to conform the statement to actual results or changes in the Company's expectations.
Add to Digg Bookmark with del.icio.us Add to Newsvine
For more information contact:
Sital:
Duli Yariv
Email Contact
NHI:
Harry Perry
Email Contact
Steve Bulwa
Director of Corporate Communications
API Nanotronics Corp.
1-877-API-O-API (274-0274)
Email Contact: Email Contact
That pretty describes the entire market... the larger markets only the more, with more than half the $$$ that was in the market last year on the sidelines now... and it looks like more $$$ is moving to the sidelines, still, as the new administration seems more intent on killing capitalism that the voters who put them in power expected they would be.
None of which, still, has anything much to do with the performance of individual companies. If you've followed mine, I'm not thinking this is the bottom of the market... and still expect that companies that are buried in debt now are going to have a long slog of it... and growing survival risks.
The future isn't going to be defined by the dinosaur companies in mature businesses at the end of their life cycles... and I wouldn't look there rather than looking at smaller companies when looking for future growth stocks.
What I'm thinking is happening here is that there is still no real buying interest. The company is probably buying stock as they said they would.
Once they use up their money I wonder where it will go.
The OTCBB is dead and in a mega depression market, from most of the OTC's I follow.
There are only 35 million shares out... and a good number are closely held...
Yahoo shows this:
Shares Outstanding5: 32.47M
Float: 29.07M
% Held by Insiders1: 25.99%
That math doesn't seem to add up... so their announced effort in buying back 10% might be working against what is a much smaller real float than what the numbers on Yahoo show. They have the cash in hand to fund the effort. They likely have turned a corner on performance, with re-structuring costs behind them now... so, I'll likely change my perspective on the utility in trading these shares as we see the market begin to sustain the recent trend.
That is often why managements will institute buybacks in the shares... to take advantage of disconnects between the market price of the stock and the intrinsic value of the shares.
Otherwise, yours stick to a theme, I'll grant you, but I don't think there is any rational connection between the market that shares trade in and company creditworthiness, which is far more a function of business focus and acumen, and market functions that apply to the markets the companies address, rather than the markets in which their shares trade. I've been deliberate for a long time in pointing out that for the most part, the portion of your holdings that isn't in cash, should be focused on companies that aren't ticking time bombs based on unservicable debt.
Beyond that, you'd do well, still, to focus on future markets and future growth, rather than concentrate any holdings in companies that address mature or dying markets. The life cycle of markets and companies ought to be a primary element of your awareness and focus. Growth stocks will likely lead the next real bull market... when it comes... it just isn't clear to most people yet what the markets will choose to focus on as the next trend in growth that can buck the decay of the dinosaurs of the previous market cycle. It should be a clue that they WILL appear already poised to buck the trends in the business cycle, even if not the pricing issues in the stock market...
You posture disconnects between stock prices and company reality as if that IS the problem... rather than the only real source of opportunity that exists in the markets... the only thing that allows you to buy value low and sell froth high ?
APIA is up today!
Looks like it's doing it's yearly, around tax time, double, only to fall to new lows later in the year.
I don't like it for trading because there too much of a spread.
If you want to make money in this market, learn to trade or get out. Buy and hold isn't working any more.
OTCBB are especially risky, because of the lack of credit.
I've been doing well trading. I'm up from last year witch I consider great considering the horrible market last year.
I consider APIA interesting to watch but don't take the stock seriously.
They MAY has good management and other good thing (if this is true), but the stock price is a disconnect from the company, .
What. No comment to make ?
There is no shortage of opportunity in the current market... which doesn't mean the opportunities won't get larger rather than smaller later this week...
Agree APIA isn't a short term play... you might trade it, but I've many more compelling short term trade candidates. Otherwise, I don't see any benefit in choosing investments that have already been recognized for their accomplishments and the nature of their opportunities, rather than buying those with accomplishments and opportunities that others haven't recognized yet. The risks are what they are... and they really aren't that different from one exchange to another... for the same reasons gun control doesn't work. So, your advocacy for that boils down to telling us we should put more trust in the same analysts who thought CDS and auction rate securities were as good as cash... than we do in our own DD abilities. Not buying that...
The exchange on which shares trade doesn't do anything to improve management decision making or limit management focus to shareholders best interest... so you are better off doing the DD and qualifying the quality, focus, experience and track record of management yourself... than convincing yourself that anything else matters as much.
Followers
|
13
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
424
|
Created
|
02/10/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
General Company Information
Company website
http://www.apinanotronics.com/
About APIO
API Nanotronics and its subsidiaries provide systems and electronics for advanced military, industrial, commercial, automotive, and medical applications. Current products include; naval aircraft launching and landing equipment, flight control and signaling systems, aircraft ground support equipment, hybrid circuits, oscillators, inductors, power conversion, transistors, microcircuits, diodes, and reactors.
The Company invests in new technology, uses ready-made manufacturing capabilities, and leverages existing sales and distribution channels towards becoming an industry leader in delivering customized nanotechnology products to current and emerging markets.
Investor Relations Contact
Bakerview Investor Relations, Inc.
1-800-961-7228
investors@apinanotronics.com
Other Contacts
Phillip Dezwirek, Chairman and CEO
Thomas Mills, Director, COO and President
Dr. Martin Moskovits, Chief Technology Officer
Claudio Mannarino, CFO
Arnold Markowitz, VP, Sales
Robert Alini, Director of Operations
Board of Directors
Jason Dezwirek
Donald Wright
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Why APIO?
http://www.apinanotronics.com/Investors/why_api.asp#why
...................... - PR's and News
SEC Fillings from
http://pro.edgar-online.com/profile.aspx?ticker=apio
Latest Press Releases
THIS LINK WILL DIRECT YOU TO APIO's RECENT AND ARCHIVED PR's PAGE ON THEIR WEBSITE...
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/index.asp
API's National Hybrid Announces Product Design Win for New Commercial Airliner
Wednesday, May 02, 2007
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=213
API's National Hybrid Announces Size Breakthrough for Military Standard-1553 Communications Interface
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=212
API Nanotronics Reports Third Quarter Financial Results
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=211
API Nanotronics Announces 1.2 Million Dollars in New Orders
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=210
API Nanotronics Announces $1.2 Million in New Orders
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=209
API Nanotronics Appoints Leading Nanotechnology Expert Dr. Martin Moskovits as Chief Technology Officer
Monday, March 05, 2007
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=208
API Nanotronics Announces $2 Million in New Orders
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=207
API Nanotronics Announces Over $2 Million in New Orders
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=206
API Nanotronics Closes Acquisition of National Hybrid Inc. -- Revenues Expected to Increase 100%
Monday, January 29, 2007
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=205
API Nanotronics Awarded Contracts Exceeding $1.4 Million
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=203
API Nanotronics Achieves 2006 Milestones -- Looks Forward to 2007
Thursday, December 28, 2006
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=201
RUBINCON VENTURES AND API ELECTRONICS GROUP ANNOUNCE CLOSING OF MERGER AND COMMENCEMENT OF TRADING AS API NANOTRONICS
Monday, November 06, 2006
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=200
Rubincon Ventures and API Electronics Group Announce Shareholder Approval of Merger
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
http://www.apinanotronics.com/news/release.asp?numb=199
....
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |