Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
i was under the impression that NBSE acquired AECS or AECS R/Med into NBSE.
I think this play is dead.
but good luck anyways.
NBSE was reverse acquired by AECS, which basically constitutes what we all call RM.
I saw that you are out and thanks for the kind words.
The timing of that buyin is interesting in light of the deal being concluded on the Friday prior to the big volume the following Tuesday.
I am holding out to see what happens as I view today's PR as an intro which leaves a lot of detail out with promise of more to come.
Best, R.
thats purely speculation
i was lookng for a R/M, didnt get it, im out.
good luck.
"The acquisition, which was consummated on January 25, 2008" That was Friday January 28th. Note from the chart below how the volume spike came two trading sessions later as somebody clearly in the know thought it looked cheap up to .065. Monday to shift the cash and Tuesday to start loading? Looks that way IMO.
patience it looks good here.
Any idea why HDSN would attack a run on this? This is the second time they have put the stops on this one. I don't recall them being so aggressive in the past.
what ever u want to call it it adds more value to our holdings for sure
I thought this was a reverse merger?
lot of volume at da ask. maybe those mms will move soon
sweet pr buying more here
PLACENTIA, CA -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 02/20/08 -- AEC Holdings Corp. (PINKSHEETS: AECS) ("AECS") and Not By Sight Entertainment ("NBSE" or the "Company") announced today that AECS has acquired NBSE. The acquisition, which was consummated on January 25, 2008, results in NBSE becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of AECS. The parties believe that this acquisition now positions AECS to join the entertainment industry where its focus will be on developing and producing family-friendly feature films and musical artists.
"Our joint vision," says NBSE President Brent Martz, "is to take the lucrative genre of family-friendly entertainment to a new level and in doing so, move away from the senseless violence, inappropriate language and sexual innuendo that drives today's so called 'family-friendly' film, television, music and stage productions."
"Together, we will strive to reintroduce to modern audiences the definition of the words 'family-friendly' that our parents and even grandparents would recall from years past," says NBSE Secretary Jon Van Dyke. Van Dyke continued, "With an emphasis on the way a product is designed, produced and marketed, we will make every effort to be unique and exciting in order to fill the void of high-quality, entertaining and dynamic family-friendly entertainment that has diverse and moral family appeal. Our products will be marketed throughout the world through conventional and web-based distribution, with a specific focus on families of all ages."
The Company anticipates that it will announce its first feature film projects as well as its first music artists in the upcoming weeks.
Forward-Looking Statements
Some paragraphs of this news release, particularly those describing strategies and business plans, contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1993, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. While the Company is working to achieve those goals, actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including difficulties in marketing its products and services, need for capital, competition from other companies and other factors, any of which could have an adverse effect on the business plans of the Company, its reputation in the entertainment industry or its expected financial return from operations. Factors such as these could have an adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. In light of significant uncertainties inherent in forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation of the Company or any other person that the objectives and plans of the Company will be achieved.
Contact:
Darla Rodriguez
Tel: 310.880.2675
Email: darla@notbysightentertainment.com
Hope so. I have emailed a few suggestions that have worked for other companies before in terms of shareholder communication and what to say. I am now waiting to see what they release and when.
Do you think he gets it?
That's what I said to him in my email the other day.
thanks.
we really need the PR, otherwise we wont get the run-up, which is what we're all here for.
Email from AECS consultant below: From: "Dwayne" <dwaynebigelow@bellsouth.net> Add to Address BookAdd to Address Book
To: "robert heddle" <robert@m>
Subject: Re: Not By Sight Entertainment / AECS.
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:14:04 -0500
Robert,
Thank you for your email. I am not sure why you are contacting me but I can assure you we have the same goals. I too am a shareholder of AECS, and will soon be a consultant to walk them through the shark infested waters.
I think that this company is exciting and Brent and his team are good people with values , something we don't see much in this business.
Anyway I have always been a believer that many heads are better than one, so any suggestions are always excepted.
Again thank you and I'm looking forward to seeing Not By Sight grow into a great family value company which will equal shareholder value.
Warm Regards,
Dwayne
Thanks for the note...just popped a window open to have a look, perhaps a good sign of more to come.....
SEAB is closed now and not even showing on L2. Whatever the nature of his work, he's done for now by the looks of it.
AECS Upticking on low volume again now. A few 5k partials and it upticks on air again.
Horrible day yesterday, but I hope my hunch that it is all to do with the RM and a big loader coming on board is correct.
Was yesterday the last big shake before the run? I guess we'll find out.
I'll start cheering when we get above .035 again.... or if we start seeing some serious MOMO.
I'm away all next week, so enjoy if she roars !
That's what I think too, but yesterday made the numbers suck that's for sure.
Ouch...sorry to hear that Rheddle.
Being cautiously optimistic, I think something is going on behind the door...good chance you'll be in the money in the near term.
Todays' play could not have been for naught!!
Good luck - your average is probably far better than mine then. I'm down over 70% at the moment, so I need the upswing to be big.
That's what I mean by "tactical bidwhacking". Whoever bought all those shares up to .065 (we will have accounted for a very small portion of those IMO) was using SEAB to buy.
Why would SEAB push the bid all the way to .065 to buy a load of shares? It looks like about 300,000 shares at most took this down in hits to the bid before the big orders filled low down. Could the SEAB buyer have sold some shares at a loss in order to fill that big order at .0125. Sure ! IMO. Happens all the time.
Now that SEAB has shut up shop for the day, whoever wanted shares appears to have them and the action is all on NITE and HDSN again with small guys like us buying retail.
If it was insider dumping, then they would have dumped the 1.5 million shares they bought the other day and the bottom would have been far lower than .0125.
Congrats to all those with a better average than me.
I am trying to get a hold of the other lawyer (who is currently on a conference call) to see what info he may have. See bold below that I copied from the site.
"Not By Sight Entertainment, LLC is a limited liability company formed in the state of California, in January, 2006. NBSE is owned by Brent Martz and Jon Van Dyke and is represented by Adam Treiger of Stowell, Zeilenga, Ruth, Vaughn & Treiger LLP and Virginia Sourlis, Esq., MBA of Sourlis Law Group.
Stowell, Zeilenga, Ruth, Vaughn & Treiger LLP
2815 Townsgate Road, Suite 330
Westlake Village, CA 91361
[b/805.446.1496"
I agree that the stream of 5K trades indicates manipulation for loading at a lower price for the chosen few. I joined them a little higher when it began to rebound and added to my small pile of shares - I hope I'll be glad I did! LOL
Another theory, someone with some $$'s and an ear on the inside knows the deal is imminent, so they are manipulating to get a pocket full of shares. They cannot just start buying at the ask, cause folks will know something is up...?
I concur...if the deal was a bust, the shares would simply enter the float, mms' / buyers typically do not step down and then just as quickly step back up...not over and over.
This is one for the "lessons forward" if only we can find out what the play is / was!!
Now he's closed. I am trying to work out why SEAB would push the bid all the way to .065 to load on the way up and then become active again on the day that the shareprice takes a big dive down to .0125.
I can't help but think that it's all part of the action preceding the RM being revealed. With all the 5k hits to the bid on the way down and then a big order fill, it looks like tactical bidwhacking to pick shares up cheaper by trying to shake shares loose from people.
The risk of course, is that it's insiders dumping, because the deal has gone to shit, but I don't see that as particularly likely in light of what I found out over the last couple of weeks.s
I was just going to reply about the big order...that is quite possible, someone / perhaps even the new owner has a buy order in at a set price.
That 450k could be for one buyer (more to come?), however, that evokes the notion that the mm that filled that order will now need to cover those shares...@ a profit.
Considering this stock has not seen these levels...prior to today, you likely have an idea what that might mean, provided it was done to fill an order.
No, not mine. See my last post to you for some thoughts. e
I wasn't following it that close...got like 20 L2 windows open ...LOL. But, I think SEAB may have been in the mix.
Those were not your shares were they? 300k & 150k @ .0125 & .013.
I guess its possible someone/s had stop orders in and got taken out?
But, that typically means mm manipulation so as to get cover shares...which I don't think is relevant.
This is a new play I don't recall seeing before?
I had sold my shares a while back and only track this one EOD for price and volume, picked up a few @ .02 and then kept the L2 window open....
Yes SEAB has been an odd one today. He steps up to the bid at .02, then dropped to .018 with his ask at .032 before I left for meetings late morning.
I thought he was going to push the bid like last time, but to then see that 300k at .0125?
It looks more to me as though somebody that owns a lot of shares started hitting the bid to move the shareprice lower to fill a big order (i.e. the 300,000 shares).
Hard to tell, but SEAB seemed to be controlling that action, just like he controlled the last run. Did anybody see L2 action during the dump and see who was on the ask ??
What a rollercoaster !
Really bizarre action, all the 5ks' tossed at the bid to drop out the buyers and then the big dump of shares.
Then bidders stepping the bid back up and picking up the shares.
Hmm...wonder if the old owners are being required to sell their shares on the open market and the new owner is buying them.
SEAB is acting very odd in their advances and declines on both the b & a.
Couldn't be shorting, covering or otherwise in play...as the liquidity / volume has been miniscule..up until today?!
Who knows? He told me a couple of months back that he was holding on to some of his shares due to the acquisition. Admittedly at that time, it was meant to be a Texan oil co according to him, rather than the entertainment co we now know about, so who knows if he still holds or not.
So oversold at these levels when you think of the OS etc.
I'm holding but can't even add unfortunately as I added more on the last run when we reached .065..
yep.. really high volume too.
hopefully we'll get a PR soon.
I just got home and what a dump session so far today ! Not nice to see my account after that :o( Half of it was 300,000 at 14.59 hours at .0125. Ouch
no kidding last is 0125
I grabbed another 5k; I think some1 got tired of holding... good for me.
At last - SEAB steps on the bid again now. SEAB - .02 x .032. Let's see how far he pushes the bid now.
Agreed I added 5k today...
Chart below showing how we've come down on very low volume from the recent high of .065. Big vol bought it up and low volume on the way down to the lows usually eaquals rapid upticking on the way back up.
Will do - e
k keep us updated rheddle!
*** Another communication below:
Virginia suggested I contact the guy below and I copied the two owners as well. I will post any response.
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:22:48 +0000 (GMT)
From: "robert heddle" <robert@.com> Add to Address BookAdd to Address Book
Subject: Not By Sight Entertainment / AECS.
To: dwaynebigelow@bellsouth.net, bmartz@notbysightentertainment.com, jvandyke@notbysightentertainment.com
Dear Mr Bigelow,
I am a shareholder in AECS and I understand that Not By Sight Entertainment has recently purchased controlling ownership in the stock.
I am writing to you to request that the Nevada SOS website and pinksheets.com be made current as the old directors (the Gomez') are still listed on there, which is confusing to investors. See links below:
http://pinksheets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=Aecs#getCompanyInfo
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=d8Moxy4EH823wGASiNIK4A%253d%253d
The Nevada SOS website can usually be changed in a day just by sending in a simple notification, although I do appreciate that the filings are in default due to the company's resident agent having resigned last year.
It would also be desireable to see a press release issued by the company when you are ready, explaining the following:
1. Announcement of reverse acquisition of AEC Holdings by Not By Sight Entertainment in the form of a press release on one of the wires such as PR Newswire.
2. Clarification of share structure following RM
3. Notice explaining that there will be no reverse split of the stock based on that having been carried out in August 2007
4. Details of the plans for the business and any revenue projections through 2010 as a result of successful implementation of those plans.
5. Details of who the "investors" are that were announced on the company website in November and how much cash they have invested in exchange for how many shares. If those shares are restricted for a set period, that would sit well with shareholders and would be worth mentioning in any press release. The big fear of shareholders in the pinksheets is dilution, so anything that could be released to quell that fear would be advantageous.
If I am sounding rather presumptuous, then please forgive me, but I have been following pinksheet companies for a long time and see the many pitfalls that result in failure of the stock, irrespective of how well the company may be doing behind the scenes.
Clearly you are in it to make money, but if you are able to build shareholder value over time, you will be able to raise more money in the long run than being tempted to make a quick buck and scare away potential investors by diluting the stock excessively.
Please let me know if you would like to bounce any ideas around and I would be glad to help out.
I wish you all every success.
Best wishes, Robert.
great rheddle. yea if we can get a PR announcing the deal and type of merger or acquisition ect, this thing should pop like no tomorrow.
:P good luck
Followers
|
15
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
588
|
Created
|
11/15/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |