Weren't you already told that the answer was that they were not their holdings? So it is not really curious. It is like I am holding someone's money and they want it back.
Would you say I got rid of their money when I paid them back their money?
You might want to read the filings to understand but the shares are sub investors under Epic for years. They apparently wanted their shares two years ago and were given their shares for their portion of their investment that Epicnwas holding. Not really curious but maybe obvious?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
