You missed the point completely.....it wasn't that a device such as the EC-V "violated the laws of physics" in itself (where was that said???), it was the dishonest way the Co presented it that made it seem this way.....nobody (that I know of) said it would not WORK, just not as efficiently as a turbine, with like just one moving piece, and a few bearings.....and the engineering report PROVED that.....the report they quickly removed form their web-site....
If you want a bold-faced lie, and proof of deception, just look at what they said.....or all their PRs that never came to fruition....seems you cherry pick who your liars are, but, then again, you also seem to be a conspiracy theory nut, so I'm not too surprised:
"""Historically, hydroelectric energy has required large turbine engines powered by massive amounts of water. Even the very smallest turbines require 187 tons of water per minute (6000 cu ft/min or 45,000 gal/min). This huge amount of water rushes past metal blades causing them to turn and produce electricity. This method of generation works well when large amounts of water are available but is impractical and inefficient when water flow is reduced. The concept of turbine-generated electricity has thus been limited to large waterfalls and dams."""
(from the old IHDR web site)
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
