InvestorsHub Logo

exwannabe

07/17/17 7:43 PM

#304179 RE: JamesGMS #304177

Bavi did indeed perform exactly as expected - actually better than Opdivo in a very similar trial - which really made our result that much more difficult to understand. Dr. Garnick did his job - Bavi should have been approved last year.


They took almost 600 people. Gave 2/3 Bavi, and they lived no longer than those they did not give Bavi to.

Come on, this is simple. If the drug works, then those taking it should live longer than those not taking it. They did not.

Garnick is (or was) doing nothing more than collecting some bucks for selling his reputation. Every trial PPHM ran since he came here has been a failure. And almost all had design issues.

EDIT: The Garnick scam is one more reason the BOD must be voted out.


InternetForumUser

07/18/17 1:01 AM

#304204 RE: JamesGMS #304177

Shoulda, woulda, coulda don't mean jack. If Peregrine believed that Bavi was going to be approved after the second look-in, well, they were completely and utterly wrong. Maybe there wasn't an issue with Bavi but with the over all P3 design and PPHM's confidence because the P3 as everyone knows failed at the first look-in due to futility.

Peregrine Managements P3 assumptions were WRONG. They were also wrong about the P2 data. Oops it was sabotaged..what a joke.

Is imminent gonna happen soon?