I am sorry but I don't see it that way. I am sure that it contributed to the issue, but to single that out as the one and only reason the price has not risen higher than it has in the past is closed minded. I tend to look at everything and see it differently.
No problem giving credit where credit is due: he certainly has pointed that topic out in the past (ad nauseam). I just don't tend to think it has as much affect on the stock as he does. Just my two cents.