I will tell you this I was contacted by a person who deals and in shells and asked if I would cooperate and drop my law suites and complaints if he were to merge a new business into HLXH. I told him that I need some guarantees and information on the company. That was in early March I have not heard back from him.
I also ask a Federal Court to make the SEC answer these questions for me:
1. Why when a company agrees to maintain the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for ever as part of a share exchange agreement and willfully violates that commitment within 2 years by filing a Form 15 with the Commission way is it that the Commission has not charge that company and its management with securities fraud?
2. Way does a law firm include a clause in a share exchange agreement to file a Form S-8 within 30 days of the signing of the agreement to pay themselves in common stock when it’s illegal? Way does that same law firm not hold the Company to the obligations it agreed to under the share exchange agreement and if the Company refuse not report such events to the Commission as is required by Part 205 of 17 CFR? Why does the said law firm continue to sell stock when they are aware the Company has violated its commitments under the share exchange agreement? Was the law firms plan part of a plan to defraud the public? The law firm sold 55,000 shares at an average price of $2 per share and high price of $2.50 per share, through Michael Pellman of Morgan Stanley. Yet the law firm never said one word to the Commission as the Company violated ever agreement they ever made to investors. Why has the Commission not held the law firm liable under Part 205 of 17 CFR and the Exchange Acts anti-fraud provision of Section 10B and Rule 10b-5(1)? This is truly trading on inside information.
3. Way does a law firm advise its client to alter the 302 certification statements when it is forbidden by Item 601(b) (31) of the Exchange Act Rules? And event after catching the Company and the Law Firm way does the Commission do nothing, not event Red Flag the Companies filing for special review?
4. Way does an accounting firm with 20+ years of experiences not provided complete discloser as required by Articles 11-01 and 11-02 of Regulation S-X in form 8-K? Way after the Commission cought this accounting firm and prosecuted this accounting firm for other violation of the anti-fraud provision in November of 2013 not Red Flagged the Company? Again way has this not cause a senses of urgency for the Commission after the invoker and others have continually complained about this Company and its accounting firms since April of 2008?
5. Way does a Company claim for 2 years that it is going to conduct a roll-up of its subcontracts, acquire other companies by the end of a current year, and open in 12 new markets by a certain time period all the time their attorney is selling stock, and turning down opportunities to complete such transaction, and admit all of the above was a lie in a filing to Federal Court for the Eastern District of NY and an email to the evoker way has the Commission taken no action?
6. Way when a Company claims to the public that a project they are part owner of has receive renew interest and investor have taken the statement as truthful and purchased stock, but the statement is totally false and known to the Company and its management does the Commission take no action? A five minute Google search and information provided by the invoker reveals the project has defaulted on its mortgage, the mortgage granter (Agape World & Nick Cosmos) was arrested and is currently serving a 25 years prison term for running a $450 million Ponzi scheme, and the property was auction off by the United States Bankruptcy Trusty.
7. Way does the same law firm that represents the Company and who also represents the foremention project in Federal Bankruptcy Court provide a legal opinion that the statements made to the public about the project are true? Why with this knowledge has the Commission taken no action?
8. Way does a management team create a credit line from a company controlled by them for a public Company controlled by them, secure the credit line with all of the assets of the public Company and then stop reporting any information about the Company’s activities to the public and the Commission take no action when they have been informed by the invoker and others?
9. Way did 2 Long Island Based Law Firm’s representing this Company have access to all of the information above and never meet their obligation to the issuer and the shareholders under The Attorney Conduct Rule of Sarbanes Oxley Section 307 (Part 205 of 17 CFR) and the Commission take no actions?
10. Way has the Commission received all of this information from the invoker and others, and have access to this information through EDGAR and taken no action?
