InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 184
Posts 33135
Boards Moderated 8
Alias Born 04/14/2010

Re: tdbowieknife post# 75555

Sunday, 03/16/2014 1:29:07 PM

Sunday, March 16, 2014 1:29:07 PM

Post# of 116862
More Trouble for Bo Ritz, a bankruptcy case... And he's a liar.



This Court acknowledges that the Debtor drained substantial funds out of Chrysalis's
[459 B.R. 636]

operating account and funneled these funds to other entities controlled by the Debtor. Moreover, this Court has found that the Debtor is not a credible witness. So—this Court shares Husky's view that the Debtor is not an upstanding businessman who can be trusted. The Court is therefore sympathetic to Husky's request for relief. Nevertheless, the Texas Legislature, for better or worse, has set a high bar for plaintiffs seeking to pierce the corporate veil in order to impose individual liability. Indeed, just a few years ago, Husky may have prevailed in his action against the Debtor. But, the Texas Legislature has changed the statute, and now Husky, like any plaintiff, must prove actual fraud. Actual fraud, however, is difficult to prove, and the Legislature has made clear that actions to pierce the corporate veil will be few and far between.

A judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered on the docket simultaneously with the entry on the docket of this opinion



http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20BCO%2020110804938


..






Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.