InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 95
Posts 14888
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/20/2011

Re: Rbb1822 post# 20276

Monday, 02/24/2014 11:51:35 AM

Monday, February 24, 2014 11:51:35 AM

Post# of 20441

the patents appear not to have been re-assigned.


That fits with my speculation that there was no money up front in whatever deal Sanchez was trying to make with 4J's... i recall that we determined 4J's was moving away from the product anyway, and so it only would make sense for them to try to salvage some value from it by letting Sanchez try to bring it back to life... anyway, Sanchez has clearly bailed from ANTs - as Dr. Kautzmann did before him, and as Kozak did before him... it all gives one the sense that the layers of the onion go even deeper than any of us lowly shareholders can even guess.

I'm watching the controversy on the GTSM board unfold.


Since this isnt the proper forum to discuss a different company, all i'll say about that here on this board is that it is a complicated, unclear situation there... made more complicated by the revocation and lack of public information available to investors... much similar to the situation here... but it all amounts to a tempest in a teapot unless and until something starts trading again.

The patent, which is assigned to Kozak has not yet been granted, and the exchange note holders will probably be first in line for any assets of the company.


Unfortunately I don't see any evidence to suggest that there are any assets to get in line for in the first place... and regarding the patent that you say is assigned in Kozak's name - Im no expert but I think that if the USPTO were going to issue a patent it wouldn't have taken them 6 years to do it....

all my posts are my opinion only.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.