Wonder what's going on here ... It's now more than a year since JF was convicted and almost a year since he was convicted, and the judge still hasn't completed his memo setting out his reasoning for various motion dispositions, including dismissal of the ID-theft charge.
The DoJ and JF appeals are waiting on this; and the SE case can't proceed until everything is disposed of in the criminal case. The last info rom the court docket is the judge's order from last year, reiterating his concerns about the possibility of taint:
It has come to my attention that the United States Attorneys
Office has publicly announced findings and conclusions by the
United States Department of Justice Office of Professional
Responsibility that suggestions of misconduct by Assistant United States Attorney Victor Wild related to this case “lack[] factual support and were without merit.”
This case remains under consideration in this court in
connection with the preparation of a full written explanation
sought by the parties in connection with their noticed cross
appeals concerning the grounds for disposing of post trial
motions. The action and reasoning of the Office of Professional
Responsibility are relevant and perhaps material to the
Memorandum and Order I now have in draft.
Moreover, I have indicated that to the degree the suggestions of misconduct are directed to a sentencing proceeding in a case before Judge Wolf [ie Dan O'Riordan's case],it is my intention to forward to Judge Wolf my Memorandum and Order thereby directing his attention to the relevant filings bythe parties before me. The Office of Professional Responsibility report would be relevant and perhaps material to that referral as well.
Is there some investigation of eg Wild in process?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
