InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 20304
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/14/2003

Re: None

Monday, 02/03/2014 10:56:13 AM

Monday, February 03, 2014 10:56:13 AM

Post# of 432788
Here are a couple of interesting rulings in IDCC's favor in the 337-868 case.




337-868 Confidential

01/30/2014 03:41 PM Theodore R. Essex USITC
Administrative Law Judge
Inv Title: Certain Wireless Devices with 3G and/or 4G Capabilities and Components Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-868

Doc Title: Denying Respondents' Motion for Summary Determination that Complainants Have Failed to Meet the Technical Prong of Domestic Industry with Respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,941,151


Inv Title:

Certain Wireless Devices with 3G and/or 4G Capabilities and Components Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-868

Doc Title: Denying Samsung Respondents' Second Motion for Partial Summary Determination that Claims of the Power Ramp-Up Patents Are Invalid for Lack of Written Description Support







Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News