InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 203
Posts 13654
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 10/26/2008

Re: rockie101 post# 392319

Friday, 12/13/2013 6:13:38 PM

Friday, December 13, 2013 6:13:38 PM

Post# of 727451
rockie, yes, IMHO they have always been, otherwise there would have been absolutely no reason for them to take the extreme measures they did with ensuring no trading, bartering, selling of escrow shares. In fact, the only thing one can do is will them.

Quite frankly, this also explains why the former WAHUQ holders who were wanting the Newco so bad for. I always knew there was another reason they wanted it so bad and it was not just tax attributes that would have taken so long to see a return, rather assets that are more immediate such as cash.

Keep in mind, they were almost ready to go to prison for insider trading in order to get this bounty and I have NEVER believed it was just for NEWCO and tax attributes. All we did at the very end and approval for the POR was to exchange shoes with the WAHUS who were capped at ten plus dollars a share and COULD NOT receive escrow shares. They were penalized in other words and now we get what they fought so hard for. All of the good stuff is sealed.

All of the bogus, amended and allowed claims past the bar date explains all Walrath is doing is letting her criminal bosses at JPM/FDIC keep the money longer before paying. Unfortunately, for us, several years longer. Courts just do not allow claims past the bar date and bogus claims to boot. Think about this.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News