InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 404
Posts 2400
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 09/05/2013

Re: geeker post# 148932

Friday, 11/22/2013 11:29:19 AM

Friday, November 22, 2013 11:29:19 AM

Post# of 238556
I don't think there is anything clever about analyzing canv's q3 release and evaluating its impact on mjna as they are tied to each other whether you like it or not. To point at someone that is evaluating these figures and impacts for you as they come out is foolish, especially when if you read the releases and had a grasp of financials you would see the same thing.

Also an article on SA at best, AT best maybe! could represent 5% of the people trading mjna (and that is way over estimated) so I doubt any article on SA could have an impact as we have seen in last two weeks. So how do you account for the other percentage of the drop off genius????

Here's a hint, the fragile veneer of mjna's prowess in the MMJ sector has been lifted amongst the investors giving it the benefit of the doubt, hoping its name recognition and correction of mgmt would prevail. It hasn't and the market is reacting to the #'s with arithmetic, not hear say.

If people want to blame someone for losing money they should blame themselves as they push the buy/sell button on the trade. It's funny because everyone pats themselves on the back when it goes up talking about their investing prowess, but as soon as it goes the other way it must have been due to an article or series of releases and not a lack of judgement and simple math.... Word