InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 162
Posts 5310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2009

Re: tzebedee post# 389191

Monday, 09/09/2013 1:48:10 PM

Monday, September 09, 2013 1:48:10 PM

Post# of 730428
tz -- I suggest you read the motion. It was a motion to produce, and if GS had refused or not complied to the satisfaction of the WMILT, we certainly would have seen the WMILT push forward for the 'court' to compel GS to comply.

Keep in mind, the court would prefer the parties to 'not fight things in the court room' -- that is, the court is used when there is an impasse, not agreement.

So it is reasonable to assume (and more) that the WMILT is satisified with what they received from GS. And obtained it, so far, without having to push forward with the 'motion'.


.... Please, just call me Catz ;) - - - - - {and the requisite, all IMHO, do your own due diligence, and make your own investments}

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News