Many questions on payout amounts! Especially, when comparing 2008 settlement to 2013 remission. Specifics: 2008...22% payout of recognized loss, $4.11 million pool, 7,646 valid claims. Details on how recognized loss was determined was mailed to each claimant. Specifics: 2013...3.05% payout of recognized loss and $4.2 million pool...little information on methodology. Questions: 1) How was recognized loss determined (same as 2008...if not, why the change and how was the loss determined?) 2) How many valid claims (same as 2008...if not, why the change and how did the valid claims amount change?) 3) Public records show admin/attorney fees for 2008...what are those amounts for 2013? Personally, my recognized loss increased 3x fold, and my payout decreased 3x fold (doesn't make any sense!) Alledgedly, DOJ went with Analytics/BMC because they had the database and the administrative costs would be less therefore providing an increased payout to claimants...something is very wrong here!
